RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,581
Posts: 5,403,350
Members: 24,864
Currently online: 557
Newest member: Griznuq

TrekToday headlines

October-November 2014 Trek Conventions And Appearances
By: T'Bonz on Sep 30

Cho Selfie TV Alert
By: T'Bonz on Sep 30

TPTB To Shatner: Shhh!
By: T'Bonz on Sep 30

Mystery Mini Vinyl Figure Display Box
By: T'Bonz on Sep 29

The Red Shirt Diaries Episode Five
By: T'Bonz on Sep 29

Shatner In Trek 3? Well Maybe
By: T'Bonz on Sep 28

Retro Review: Shadows and Symbols
By: Michelle on Sep 27

Meyer: Revitalizing Star Trek
By: T'Bonz on Sep 26

Trek Costumes To Be Auctioned
By: T'Bonz on Sep 25

Hulu Snaps up Abrams-Produced Drama
By: T'Bonz on Sep 25


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 26 2013, 04:27 AM   #166
Mountie1988
Lieutenant Junior Grade
 
Re: Klingons in STID--why do they look like a burned Kryten?

DavidLeeRoth wrote: View Post
He looks more like Darth Maul than a Klingon. The head has a cube-like shape, that thing running down the head doesn't resemble a ridge, the whole head looks like it was dunked in BBQ sauce and put on the grill and he doesn't have any hair.

http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__...7/Worf2379.jpg

[Converted to link. Images posted inline should be hosted on your own space. - M']

That's what a Klingon should look like.

No, doesn't look like Darth Maul at all.
Mountie1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26 2013, 04:28 AM   #167
Ghouleddie74
Fleet Admiral
 
Ghouleddie74's Avatar
 
Location: The Halloween System in the Warped Sector of the Demented Quadrant
View Ghouleddie74's Twitter Profile
Re: Klingons in STID--why do they look like [SPOILERS]?

I'm still trying to figure out how Darth Maul has a cube-shaped head that looks like it was dunked in barbecue sauce. And where are the pointy yellow Klingon horns and black and red facial tattoos?
__________________
"On Halloween night the Great Temporal Pumpkin rises out of the Chroniton patch and flies through space to bring new timelines to all the good little children of the galaxy." -cooleddie74
Ghouleddie74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26 2013, 04:33 AM   #168
Geoff Peterson
Fleet Admiral
 
Geoff Peterson's Avatar
 
Location: 20 feet from an outlet
Re: Klingons in STID--why do they look like [SPOILERS]?

Set Harth wrote: View Post
cooleddie74 wrote:
That way J.J. honors continuity but doesn't step in a huge nerd minefield by changing some detail about Khan's age, the wars or his ship.
Just his race.
What race would that be?
__________________
Nerys Myk
Geoff Peterson is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 26 2013, 04:43 AM   #169
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: Klingons in STID--why do they look like [SPOILERS]?

Hard to say. He was played by a Mexican actor before. Maybe he was supposed to be Mexican?
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26 2013, 06:04 AM   #170
Ghouleddie74
Fleet Admiral
 
Ghouleddie74's Avatar
 
Location: The Halloween System in the Warped Sector of the Demented Quadrant
View Ghouleddie74's Twitter Profile
Re: Klingons in STID--why do they look like [SPOILERS]?

If we had to go based on television from the seventies and eighties I'd say Khan was a Corinthian.
__________________
"On Halloween night the Great Temporal Pumpkin rises out of the Chroniton patch and flies through space to bring new timelines to all the good little children of the galaxy." -cooleddie74
Ghouleddie74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26 2013, 06:10 PM   #171
Set Harth
Rear Admiral
 
Set Harth's Avatar
 
Location: Police State
Re: Klingons in STID--why do they look like [SPOILERS]?

Nerys Myk wrote: View Post
Set Harth wrote: View Post
cooleddie74 wrote:
That way J.J. honors continuity but doesn't step in a huge nerd minefield by changing some detail about Khan's age, the wars or his ship.
Just his race.
What race would that be?
Indian.
__________________
Thank you very much for your concern, sir, but he does not need your religion, he has science and socialism and birthdays.
Set Harth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26 2013, 06:42 PM   #172
Robert_T_April
Captain
 
Robert_T_April's Avatar
 
Location: Yesterday's Enterprise
Re: Klingons in STID--why do they look like [SPOILERS]?

Only one Klingon took off his helmet if I'm not mistaken, and although he looked slightly different, I thought he had ridges...
Robert_T_April is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26 2013, 07:23 PM   #173
Greg Cox
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Oxford, PA
Re: Klingons in STID--why do they look like [SPOILERS]?

To be fair, the bit about Khan "possibly" being a Sikh was mentioned once in "Space Seed," forty-six years ago. It wasn't mentioned at all in The Wrath of Khan. Granted, I got two books out of that line, but I'm inclined to cut them some slack here. Khan's Sikh roots are not essential to the character; heck, Khan never mentions them onscreen. He identifies as a genetically-engineered superman, not a Sikh.

The way I see it, one line of dialogue from forty-six years ago is no big deal. As the saying goes, sometimes an ounce of inaccuracy saves a ton of explanation.

Or, even more profoundly, why sweat the small stuff?
__________________
www.gregcox-author.com
Greg Cox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26 2013, 07:30 PM   #174
Mach5
Rear Admiral
 
Mach5's Avatar
 
Re: Klingons in STID--why do they look like [SPOILERS]?

OK, seriously, those who actually care about this shit should just assume that a quick aesthetic surgery was a part of Section 31 fake identity package.

In the 23rd century, changing one's appearance shouldn't be much more difficult than changing a name. Heck, they can probably do it in a matter of minutes.
__________________
"Religion is something left over from the infancy of our intelligence, it will fade away as we adopt reason and science as our guidelines."
― Bertrand Russell
Mach5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26 2013, 07:41 PM   #175
Greg Cox
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Oxford, PA
Re: Klingons in STID--why do they look like [SPOILERS]?

Mach5 wrote: View Post
OK, seriously, those who actually care about this shit should just assume that a quick aesthetic surgery was a part of Section 31 fake identity package.

In the 23rd century, changing one's appearance shouldn't be much more difficult than changing a name. Heck, they can probably do it in a matter of minutes.
Heck, Kirk had himself surgically disguised as a Romulan in "The Enterprise Incident," an Orion was surgically transformed into an Andorian in "Journey to Babel," and a Klingon was surgically disguised as a human in "The Trouble with Tribbles."

So it's canon!
__________________
www.gregcox-author.com
Greg Cox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26 2013, 08:16 PM   #176
marksound
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Planet Carcazed
Re: Klingons in STID--why do they look like [SPOILERS]?

According to Article I of the "Rehat Maryada" (the Sikh code of conduct and conventions), a Sikh is defined as "any human being who faithfully believes in One Immortal Being; ten Gurus, from Guru Nanak to Guru Gobind Singh; Guru Granth Sahib; the teachings of the ten Gurus and the baptism bequeathed by the tenth Guru; and who does not owe allegiance to any other religion".[31] Sikhs believe in the equality of humankind, the concept of universal brotherhood and One Supreme transcendent and immanent God (Ik Onkar)
If that's the case, ethnicity doesn't enter into it. Anyone can be Sikh.

I'm thinking that Khan might be Sikh in name only.
marksound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26 2013, 08:46 PM   #177
JarodRussell
Vice Admiral
 
JarodRussell's Avatar
 
Re: Klingons in STID--why do they look like [SPOILERS]?

Greg Cox wrote: View Post
The way I see it, one line of dialogue from forty-six years ago is no big deal. As the saying goes, sometimes an ounce of inaccuracy saves a ton of explanation.
Why do the audiences today need "a ton of explanation" what a Sikh is, but the audiences in the 60s didn't?
Khan was a genetically engineered tyrant over all eurasia hundreds of years ago, got overthrown and escaped/exiled into space. One line of monologue.
JarodRussell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26 2013, 09:11 PM   #178
marksound
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Planet Carcazed
Re: Klingons in STID--why do they look like [SPOILERS]?

JarodRussell wrote: View Post
Greg Cox wrote: View Post
The way I see it, one line of dialogue from forty-six years ago is no big deal. As the saying goes, sometimes an ounce of inaccuracy saves a ton of explanation.
Why do the audiences today need "a ton of explanation" what a Sikh is, but the audiences in the 60s didn't?
Khan was a genetically engineered tyrant over all eurasia hundreds of years ago, got overthrown and escaped/exiled into space. One line of monologue.
I think audiences in general couldn't give a rat's ass. It's just the Treknoids that need everything spelled out, with 27 color glossy pictures with circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one.

And that cracks me up.
marksound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26 2013, 09:13 PM   #179
JarodRussell
Vice Admiral
 
JarodRussell's Avatar
 
Re: Klingons in STID--why do they look like [SPOILERS]?

Carcazoid wrote: View Post
JarodRussell wrote: View Post
Greg Cox wrote: View Post
The way I see it, one line of dialogue from forty-six years ago is no big deal. As the saying goes, sometimes an ounce of inaccuracy saves a ton of explanation.
Why do the audiences today need "a ton of explanation" what a Sikh is, but the audiences in the 60s didn't?
Khan was a genetically engineered tyrant over all eurasia hundreds of years ago, got overthrown and escaped/exiled into space. One line of monologue.
I think audiences in general couldn't give a rat's ass. It's just the Treknoids that need everything spelled out, with 27 color glossy pictures with circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one.

And that cracks me up.
There's this notion that I will never understand: the audience is stupid. Apparently EVERYTHING that was already mentioned somewhere confuses the people in theaters and needs to be done differently.
JarodRussell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26 2013, 09:18 PM   #180
marksound
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Planet Carcazed
Re: Klingons in STID--why do they look like [SPOILERS]?

JarodRussell wrote: View Post
Carcazoid wrote: View Post
JarodRussell wrote: View Post

Why do the audiences today need "a ton of explanation" what a Sikh is, but the audiences in the 60s didn't?
Khan was a genetically engineered tyrant over all eurasia hundreds of years ago, got overthrown and escaped/exiled into space. One line of monologue.
I think audiences in general couldn't give a rat's ass. It's just the Treknoids that need everything spelled out, with 27 color glossy pictures with circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one.

And that cracks me up.
There's this notion that I will never understand: the audience is stupid. Apparently EVERYTHING that was already mentioned somewhere confuses the people in theaters and needs to be done differently.
Audiences aren't stupid. They don't need minor details explained. It's just the fanatical Treknicators that need "two minutes of onscreen explanation."

I like to think that my imagination can fill in any blanks, real or perceived.

The fans that need the slow paced, talk it to death in every scene, blahblahblah, are the reason Trek nearly died.
marksound is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.