RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,604
Posts: 5,425,204
Members: 24,805
Currently online: 546
Newest member: David Ellerman

TrekToday headlines

September Loot Crate Features Trek Surprise
By: T'Bonz on Sep 16

USS Enterprise Miniature Out For Refit
By: T'Bonz on Sep 16

Star Trek/Planet of the Apes Comic Crossover
By: T'Bonz on Sep 16

Trek 3 Shooting Next Spring?
By: T'Bonz on Sep 16

Star Trek: Alien Domain Game Announced
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Red Shirt Diaries Episode Three
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Made Out Of Mudd Photonovel
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Takei Has Growth Removed
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Retro Review: Tears of the Prophets
By: Michelle on Sep 12

New Wizkids Attack Wing Ships
By: T'Bonz on Sep 12


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Welcome to the Trek BBS! > General Trek Discussion

General Trek Discussion Trek TV and cinema subjects not related to any specific series or movie.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 25 2013, 10:12 PM   #31
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Star Trek: TNG film era reboot?

CaptainMurdock wrote: View Post
TNG shouldn't be rebooted. It's characters were too old for the "Action Movie" Camp.
I thought they were all fairly young outside Picard and Mama Crusher?
__________________
"I tell you what you all need, you need to take a thirteenth step, down off your high horse." - Hank Hill, King of the Hill
BillJ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 25 2013, 10:19 PM   #32
marsomthing
Lieutenant Junior Grade
 
Re: Star Trek: TNG film era reboot?

CoveTom wrote: View Post
TNG was an excellent TV series. It stunk as a film series. And it would stink on ice if they attempted to "reimagine" it as a modern Hollywood summer blockbuster film. All IMHO, of course.
What was bad about TNG films? they made enough of them that they had to be in demand from somebody. I am not a TNG nut but I enjoy the show and the movies occasionally, never remember thinking to myself .... Wow this is awful
marsomthing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25 2013, 10:22 PM   #33
Dream
Admiral
 
Dream's Avatar
 
Re: Star Trek: TNG film era reboot?

CaptainMurdock wrote: View Post
TNG shouldn't be rebooted. It's characters were too old for the "Action Movie" Camp.
So were the original TOS cast in movies 1-6.
Dream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26 2013, 07:07 AM   #34
CaptainMurdock
Lieutenant Commander
 
CaptainMurdock's Avatar
 
Location: Ohio
Re: Star Trek: TNG film era reboot?

Dream wrote: View Post
CaptainMurdock wrote: View Post
TNG shouldn't be rebooted. It's characters were too old for the "Action Movie" Camp.
So were the original TOS cast in movies 1-6.
Yes but we got to see them when they were at the action hero age. Plus I give them a pass because I love TOS more than TNG.
__________________
Kirk...if you do this, you'll never sit in the Captain's chair again.
CaptainMurdock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26 2013, 09:33 PM   #35
publiusr
Commodore
 
Re: Star Trek: TNG film era reboot?

Well you already have ST II redone with STiD after all, but in what would be the TOS era in the Prime timeline--so you are already getting that.

I might like to see another ship--a send up to McQuarrie fall back in time a la Planet of the Titans, the billion year voyage--other unused stories given new life.
publiusr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 28 2013, 10:04 PM   #36
CoveTom
Rear Admiral
 
Location: CoveTom
Re: Star Trek: TNG film era reboot?

marsomthing wrote: View Post
CoveTom wrote: View Post
TNG was an excellent TV series. It stunk as a film series. And it would stink on ice if they attempted to "reimagine" it as a modern Hollywood summer blockbuster film. All IMHO, of course.
What was bad about TNG films? they made enough of them that they had to be in demand from somebody. I am not a TNG nut but I enjoy the show and the movies occasionally, never remember thinking to myself .... Wow this is awful
I'm not saying that the TNG movies did not draw an audience. Well, all except Nemesis anyway, which lost money and did not justify a sequel in Paramount's eyes. But I'm speaking of the more subjective and difficult to quantify matter of quality. I did not think the TNG movies were all that good.

That's not to say that I thought they were crap. I don't decry every moment of Insurrection as some do around here, for example. But I thought there were too many things done to make TNG attempt to appeal to that ever-elusive "mass market" moviegoing public that took it away from what made the TV series good. Action hero Picard. All the stores having to be action/adventure. A Data B-story in every movie. The loss of the ensemble feel from the show. Etc.

But, then again, I've always thought that Star Trek works best as a TV series, not a movie series. Even the best of the Trek movies, IMHO, does not compare to Trek's best work on television. Unfortunately, I think that's an inherent limitation of today's moviemaking environment. When you're releasing a movie once every 2-3 years, and spending a bagillion dollars on it, you can't take risks. On a TV series, with 26 episodes per year and a much lower audience threshold for success, you can.
CoveTom is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.