RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 137,914
Posts: 5,331,185
Members: 24,559
Currently online: 509
Newest member: Matt W

TrekToday headlines

Retro Review: Inquisition
By: Michelle on Jul 12

Cubify Star Trek 3DMe Mini Figurines
By: T'Bonz on Jul 11

Latest Official Starships Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Jul 10

Seven of Nine Bobble Head
By: T'Bonz on Jul 9

Pegg The Prankster
By: T'Bonz on Jul 9

More Trek Stars Join Unbelievable!!!!!
By: T'Bonz on Jul 8

Star Trek #35 Preview
By: T'Bonz on Jul 8

New ThinkGeek Trek Apparel
By: T'Bonz on Jul 7

Star Trek Movie Prop Auction
By: T'Bonz on Jul 7

Drexler: NX Engineering Room Construction
By: T'Bonz on Jul 7


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies I-X

Star Trek Movies I-X Discuss the first ten big screen outings in this forum!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 24 2013, 08:31 PM   #61
J.T.B.
Commodore
 
J.T.B.'s Avatar
 
Re: Was there a TMP Enterprise outrage ?

scotpens wrote: View Post
trevanian wrote: View Post
. . . My boss' kid had one of those things [Opel GT], and every time he tried one of those 'high&mighty' acts at work because he could get away with it, I'd tell him somebody stole the back half of his car.
Naaah, I just don't see it.
It's something that doesn't come over as well in photos, but in person they definitely had a more chopped-off feel, which is why I could twig what Trevanian was talking about. A cousin of mine had one and it was a real POS. Buick dealerships sold them. Their hidden headlights were worked by a hand lever on the console, and instead of moving back and forward they rolled over sideways.

Going back to an earlier post, the only negative I remember talking about was the transporter effect. It was so different and kind of dark compared to the original, I remember it being called "ugly" by some friend or another. The flyby, however... There was the star destroyer fly over in Star Wars and then the tour around Enterprise... You just hadn't seen anything so huge, detailed, solid, believable and grand on screen before. It was more than a decade before I ever heard the sequence criticized as too long.
J.T.B. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24 2013, 10:03 PM   #62
starburst
Fleet Captain
 
starburst's Avatar
 
Re: Was there a TMP Enterprise outrage ?

Noname Given wrote: View Post

"The new nacelles look like they where lifted from a Klingon Battle Cruiser."
I always thought that too when I was younger, although didnt think it was a bad thing just noted a similarity.
starburst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24 2013, 11:38 PM   #63
Tau Ceti III
Lieutenant Commander
 
Location: Kalispell, MT, USA
Re: Was there a TMP Enterprise outrage ?

Belz... wrote: View Post
Someone made a fan design for 1701 based on the Planet of the Titans reimagining of the Enterprise by Ken Adam. I wonder how fans would have reacted if the "refit" had looked like this:

http://www.galacticempire.org/2011/0...of-titans.html
To me, that ship would have made a decent Next Generation Enterprise, 1701-D, compared to what we got

As to the refit Enterprise in TMP, it was love at first sight, still my favorite incarnation
Tau Ceti III is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24 2013, 11:41 PM   #64
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: Was there a TMP Enterprise outrage ?

Back in '79 I had mixed feelings about the TMP refit.

I flat out love the original MJ design. I still do. Based on pre-release art and pics (of what was the Phase II version) of the TMP ship I wasn't sure what to expect as I wasn't totally won over by the images we were seeing in magazine articles (like Starlog).

When the movie came out I was blown away. The finalized version up on the screen was sooo much better than the images I'd seen earlier. Everything was well proportioned and well integrated. And the SCALE of it all. The film really brought the Enterprise to life. There was an added layer or two of realism and detail to it all.

Now that said there were elements I had reservations about. To this day I'm still not fond of the Christmas tree effect of spotlights all over the hull. I understand the reasoning behind them, but I still don't care for it. At first the new style nacelles kind of irked me, but mostly in terms that I don't think they had enough width to them---didn't look as visually balanced (in my mind) as the cylindrical nacelles. The pristine white colour overall was also something I wasn't totally sold on.

So overall I'd say I was about 90% pleased with the refit primarily because even with my reservations it all went together beautifully.

Inside was a mixed bag. A lot of it looked like a credible evolution of the TOS sets, but I also missed the spaciousness of the TOS ship. The original ship allowed me to believe the crew could spend five years within those walls, but the TMP version, particularly the corridors, looked too confining to accept as something you could see yourself spending extended periods in. This was supposed to be a starship on years long mission and not a submarine or naval vessel on patrols lasting a matter of months. On the other hand I thought the main rec-room was oversized.

In many respects the new interiors looked convincing, but I would have liked to see a bit more colour to them. Also some of the interiors could look somewhat unfinished, but then that fit in with the ship being launched ahead of schedule. I found the transporter room to be too dark and claustrophobic so I think that one was a miss along with the transparent partition between the control console and the materialization platform---it just didn't look right.

The Bridge - quite nice overall, but again I'd like to have seen a bit more colour. Not too much, but maybe paint the turbo lift doors and the railings red (a bit darker than the series version).

Main Engineering - okay this I still don't really care for. It struck me as just too divergent from the TOS setup and it looked like it took up a lot of room.

Sickbay - fine as it seemed a logical evolution from what came before.

Transporter Room - no, I think they missed here. It was just too dark and claustrophobic and welcoming. I could easily see why someone like McCoy would feel like they were within an instrument of death in that room. The death of Sonak and Lori Ciana certainly reinforces that anxiety.

Hangar Deck - we really don't see much of it, but it looked okay but maybe a bit too open and oversized. I got the feeling Main Engineering and the Hangar Deck took up most of the secondary hull.

So with the interior overall I was about 60-70% or so happy with it.


I don't really recall any controversy about the TMP design. I recall discussion, but certainly not outrage. In regard to the new look Klingons and the vamped up new Klingon battle cruisers I got the impression they were largely a hit with audiences. That opening scene of the film is still probably the best of all the films.
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991, 2013-?

Last edited by Warped9; May 24 2013 at 11:51 PM.
Warped9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25 2013, 12:01 AM   #65
Belz...
Fleet Captain
 
Belz...'s Avatar
 
Location: In a finely-crafted cosmos... of my own making.
Re: Was there a TMP Enterprise outrage ?

Tau Ceti III wrote: View Post
To me, that ship would have made a decent Next Generation Enterprise, 1701-D, compared to what we got
Well I'm a big fan of 1701-D, but my thought seeing this one was that it's a TMP-era version of the D.
__________________
And that's my opinion.

The Onmyouza Theatre: an unofficial international fanclub dedicated to the Japanese heavy metal band Onmyo-Za.
Belz... is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25 2013, 01:07 AM   #66
C.E. Evans
Vice Admiral
 
C.E. Evans's Avatar
 
Location: Saint Louis (aka Defiance)
Re: Was there a TMP Enterprise outrage ?

Belz... wrote: View Post
Tau Ceti III wrote: View Post
To me, that ship would have made a decent Next Generation Enterprise, 1701-D, compared to what we got
Well I'm a big fan of 1701-D, but my thought seeing this one was that it's a TMP-era version of the D.
To me, it seems this particular render could still be used for a future Enterprise (perhaps 25th-Century).

But I remember the original sketch by Ralph McQuarrie was said to have more a "Star Wars" vibe to it by some.
__________________
"Everybody wants to rule the world..."
C.E. Evans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25 2013, 01:11 AM   #67
Belz...
Fleet Captain
 
Belz...'s Avatar
 
Location: In a finely-crafted cosmos... of my own making.
Re: Was there a TMP Enterprise outrage ?

I'm imagining the TOS movies with this model instead, and I don't dislike the results.
__________________
And that's my opinion.

The Onmyouza Theatre: an unofficial international fanclub dedicated to the Japanese heavy metal band Onmyo-Za.
Belz... is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25 2013, 01:28 AM   #68
R. Star
Rear Admiral
 
R. Star's Avatar
 
Location: Shangri-La
Re: Was there a TMP Enterprise outrage ?

The refit Enterprise remains my favorite version of the ship. Granted it's more than a little campy to basically take the vessel apart, rebuild it with new parts and call it the same ship though.

Honestly the little spinners on the TOS version annoyed me. They just remind me of those tacky rims people spend a lot of money on but look utterly ridiculous.
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams
R. Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25 2013, 02:26 AM   #69
Therin of Andor
Admiral
 
Therin of Andor's Avatar
 
Location: New Therin Park, Andor (via Australia)
View Therin of Andor's Twitter Profile
Re: Was there a TMP Enterprise outrage ?

Noname Given wrote: View Post
"Why two Turbolifts to the Bridge now?"
'Cos it was added in TAS, due to fan complaints that there was only ever one access point to the bridge.
__________________
Thiptho lapth! Ian (Entire post is personal opinion)
The Andor Files @ http://andorfiles.blogspot.com/
http://therinofandor.blogspot.com/
Therin of Andor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25 2013, 04:41 PM   #70
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: England again
Re: Was there a TMP Enterprise outrage ?

R. Star wrote: View Post
The refit Enterprise remains my favorite version of the ship. Granted it's more than a little campy to basically take the vessel apart, rebuild it with new parts and call it the same ship though.

Honestly the little spinners on the TOS version annoyed me. They just remind me of those tacky rims people spend a lot of money on but look utterly ridiculous.
Unfortunately, a few weeks ago somebody pointed out the crosses on the front of the TMP Enterprise nacelles, and now I can't stop seeing the USS Jesus Christ, flagship of the Space Missionaries.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26 2013, 01:15 AM   #71
trevanian
Rear Admiral
 
trevanian's Avatar
 
Re: Was there a TMP Enterprise outrage ?

King Daniel Into Darkness wrote: View Post
Unfortunately, a few weeks ago somebody pointed out the crosses on the front of the TMP Enterprise nacelles, and now I can't stop seeing the USS Jesus Christ, flagship of the Space Missionaries.
... in the name of the father, the son, & the holy ramscoop ...
trevanian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26 2013, 10:22 AM   #72
TheSubCommander
Captain
 
TheSubCommander's Avatar
 
Re: Was there a TMP Enterprise outrage ?

I was very young when TMP came out, but I do remember its release. I don't remember my parents saying anything negative about the Enterprise's redesign. The one thing I do remember them saying was they didn't like the then "new" uniforms all that much, and complaining that the communicators were replaced with wrist band, though.

And honestly, I don't understand the hate for the TMP Enterprise from some people. It is STILL my favorite incarnation of the Enterprise! I like them all, don't get me wrong (yes, even NX01!), but I have always had a special affinity for the TMP Enterprise. Probably because as a kid, I grew up building models of it. And at the time when the only Star Trek that existed was TOS and Star Trek 1,2, and 3, I used to think how old fashioned it made the TOS Enterprise look to me, with its Saturn 5 rocket-inspired nacelles, and its radar dish-inspired deflector dish.
TheSubCommander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26 2013, 11:44 AM   #73
Belz...
Fleet Captain
 
Belz...'s Avatar
 
Location: In a finely-crafted cosmos... of my own making.
Re: Was there a TMP Enterprise outrage ?

There's hate for the TMP Enterprise ?
__________________
And that's my opinion.

The Onmyouza Theatre: an unofficial international fanclub dedicated to the Japanese heavy metal band Onmyo-Za.
Belz... is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26 2013, 10:30 PM   #74
publiusr
Commodore
 
Re: Was there a TMP Enterprise outrage ?

It was lovely. Star Wars level detail in the aztec but ST swan forms both--the ultimate starship.

Now I remember drawing swept back pylons before the movie came out on loose leaf paper. Mine didn't work out so well...
publiusr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26 2013, 11:22 PM   #75
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: England again
Re: Was there a TMP Enterprise outrage ?

Belz... wrote: View Post
There's hate for the TMP Enterprise ?
There certainly was when the nacelle pylons of my AMT kit snapped off for the dozenth time
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.