RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,384
Posts: 5,505,134
Members: 25,127
Currently online: 457
Newest member: punch

TrekToday headlines

Star Trek Opera
By: T'Bonz on Dec 19

New Abrams Project
By: T'Bonz on Dec 18

IDW Publishing March 2015 Comics
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Paramount Star Trek 3 Expectations
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Star Trek #39 Sneak Peek
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Star Trek 3 Potential Director Shortlist
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Official Starships Collection Update
By: T'Bonz on Dec 15

Retro Review: Prodigal Daughter
By: Michelle on Dec 13

Sindicate Lager To Debut In The US Next Week
By: T'Bonz on Dec 12

Rumor Mill: Saldana Gives Birth
By: T'Bonz on Dec 12


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

View Poll Results: Grade the movie...
A+ 144 19.20%
A 161 21.47%
A- 101 13.47%
B+ 83 11.07%
B 59 7.87%
B- 27 3.60%
C+ 40 5.33%
C 38 5.07%
C- 25 3.33%
D+ 11 1.47%
D 13 1.73%
D- 10 1.33%
F 38 5.07%
Voters: 750. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 18 2013, 04:19 AM   #2746
mattman8907
Lieutenant Commander
 
mattman8907's Avatar
 
Location: California
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Tai wrote: View Post
I'm wondering about the motives of Section 31 and how it relates to the third film. On reflection it seems that the Klingons would be the obvious choice of villians in the next film. They have every justification to declare war on the Federation given that Starfleet agents violated their space, landed on their homeworld, murdered dozens of their men and destroyed 3 ships.

Could you imagine if a Klingon raiding party just beamed down to Australia and killed a bunch of people in retaliation and just left?

Kirk's actions in this movie alone seems like provocation enough for the Klingons.
i wonder if they will give Khan to the klingons if Benedict comes back.
mattman8907 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 04:22 AM   #2747
Tai
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Washington, D.C
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Well, the Klingons obviously did not do anything right away as the dedication of the repaired Enterprise took place one full year after the... Harrison incident?

Still, I'd imagine, given all the intrigue at the High Council that we saw in TNG and DS9, that the leadership in Qo'nos must be chomping at the bit to get back at the Federation for this insult to their honor and sovereignty.
__________________
Forgive you?! I ought to knock you on your God-damn ass! -Captain Kirk
Shatner... I'd fight William Shatner. -Tyler Durden
Tai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 04:24 AM   #2748
teacake
Fleet Admiral
 
teacake's Avatar
 
Location: Google's ass cave full of the lush, lush asses they have stolen.
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Tai wrote: View Post
Qo'nos
I do wish they'd spelled it that way.
__________________

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 04:52 AM   #2749
Dream
Admiral
 
Dream's Avatar
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Did anyone else think the Klingon scene felt unnecessary? They were only there because Trek needs its aliens, and maybe because there needed to be another action scene. On that last point we could have figured out Khan was badass later on without it.

Have Kirk show up with a phaser pointed at the back of Khan's head and it would have changed nothing.
Dream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 05:03 AM   #2750
dub
Fleet Captain
 
dub's Avatar
 
Location: Location? What is this?
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

teacake wrote: View Post
Seriously, I have seen this movie three times AND I like a nice woman's body as much as the next person. I do not recall any gratuitous ass scenes and if you are saying that you could see her ass because she was walking away from the camera.. SO? You can see everyone's asses in that position. What was gratuitous about it?
Her booty was in the upper right corner as she was walking and the camera followed her with it perfectly staying in that portion of the frame. In my case, I'm not complaining! I was very impressed...with the camera work!

But overall, I felt the same way about this film that I did about Avatar. I loved, loved, loved the first half. But then it just went into typical action flick mode. And that's about when they went overboard lifting dialogue from TWOK, I suppose as an homage, but I just couldn't take it. Too corny. And Spock yelling "Khan..." maybe others thought that was clever, but it didn't work for me. My wife and my buddy who watched it with me were not annoyed because they have the benefit of not having TWOK committed to memory. And what is it with Khan's skull-crushing obsession? Plus, prime Spock's appearance was so random. So I really don't know how to judge this movie since I really liked the first half but was let down by the rest...
dub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 05:15 AM   #2751
Phily B
Fleet Captain
 
Phily B's Avatar
 
Location: United Kingdom
View Phily B's Twitter Profile
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Dream wrote: View Post
Did anyone else think the Klingon scene felt unnecessary? They were only there because Trek needs its aliens, and maybe because there needed to be another action scene. On that last point we could have figured out Khan was badass later on without it.

Have Kirk show up with a phaser pointed at the back of Khan's head and it would have changed nothing.
Kind of, but I enjoyed it a lot nonetheless and it was awesome seeing the Klingons again, this time actually appearing tough and competent.

As much as I love DS9, if Kirk was beating up Klingons left right and center like Sisko regularly seemed to do then there would be hell to pay on these boards
Phily B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 05:22 AM   #2752
hiddenderek
Ensign
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Dream wrote: View Post
Did anyone else think the Klingon scene felt unnecessary? They were only there because Trek needs its aliens, and maybe because there needed to be another action scene. On that last point we could have figured out Khan was badass later on without it.

Have Kirk show up with a phaser pointed at the back of Khan's head and it would have changed nothing.
I think they added a Klingon scene to set up a potential conflict for a third film, if there is going to be one.
hiddenderek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 05:22 AM   #2753
mattman8907
Lieutenant Commander
 
mattman8907's Avatar
 
Location: California
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

a little off topic but why do you think Nurse Chapel apparently written out of this movie series? There were a few Sickbay scenes where it would have been easy to give her a cameo, instead of being said to have left the ship.
mattman8907 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 05:23 AM   #2754
Brent
Admiral
 
Brent's Avatar
 
Location: TARDIS
Send a message via ICQ to Brent Send a message via AIM to Brent Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Brent
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Dream wrote: View Post
Did anyone else think the Klingon scene felt unnecessary? They were only there because Trek needs its aliens, and maybe because there needed to be another action scene. On that last point we could have figured out Khan was badass later on without it.

Have Kirk show up with a phaser pointed at the back of Khan's head and it would have changed nothing.
Nope, the more of the Trek universe they show in movie land, the better... no series to do this in, so they gotta squeeze as much as they can in movie land, I'm all for it.
__________________
"Would you mind not standing on my chest? My hat's on fire." - The Doctor

My Let's Play Series of STO - http://www.youtube.com/user/JustGaming4Us
Brent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 05:26 AM   #2755
flemm
Fleet Captain
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Dream wrote: View Post
Did anyone else think the Klingon scene felt unnecessary? They were only there because Trek needs its aliens, and maybe because there needed to be another action scene.
I dunno, I think it depends on how you look at it. Their appearance in the film *feels* unnecessary, I agree, but actually they are important because the primary motivation of Admiral Evil is starting a war with them.

I thought the Klingons probably should have felt more involved in the proceedings. But at least they did appear.

Phily B wrote: View Post
As much as I love DS9, if Kirk was beating up Klingons left right and center like Sisko regularly seemed to do then there would be hell to pay on these boards
The Sisko is Klingon Kryptonite. It is known
flemm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 05:35 AM   #2756
hiddenderek
Ensign
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Is it just me or did they say that Khan's people want to destroy all inferior life? That's not what they want to do. They wanted to conquer it. I'm pretty sure they said "destroy" in the movie, which is stupid.
hiddenderek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 05:35 AM   #2757
Santa Claus
Believe
 
Santa Claus's Avatar
 
Location: J. Allen's Rooftop
Send a message via ICQ to Santa Claus Send a message via AIM to Santa Claus Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Santa Claus Send a message via Yahoo to Santa Claus
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

I didn't find it at all unnecessary. It established several things:

1] The Klingon presence in this universe [Kronos, Birds of Prey, et al].
2] The look and behavior of the Klingons in this universe [Forehead ridges, Klingon language, Warrior castes]
3] Uhura develops further character growth involving how she communicated and dealt with the Klingons.

And it sets up what may be a large storyline for the next movie.
__________________
---------
"I believe... I believe... It's silly, but I believe." - Susan Walker
---------
❄ A Joyful Holiday Season to You All! ❄

Santa Claus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 05:40 AM   #2758
teacake
Fleet Admiral
 
teacake's Avatar
 
Location: Google's ass cave full of the lush, lush asses they have stolen.
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

hiddenderek wrote: View Post
Is it just me or did they say that Khan's people want to destroy all inferior life? That's not what they want to do. They wanted to conquer it. I'm pretty sure they said "destroy" in the movie, which is stupid.
Destroy, detonated (the fleet!), challenged, torn apart, one man weapon of mass destruction. It's the movies.
__________________

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 05:45 AM   #2759
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Yeah, not a piece of dialogue that I'm concerned by. I'm sure that three hundred years later there are varying characterizations of an historical figure. I've even seen people argue about just how nuts Caligula was or wasn't.

Saw it again this evening and enjoyed it even more the second time. The characters, speaking of, are all great. Pegg and Cumberbatch are the standouts. Urban really isn't given much material, really, that would give him a chance to break out of that gritted-teeth-damn-I'm-irritated faux-Kelley delivery; it does get a little monotonous.
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 05:47 AM   #2760
teacake
Fleet Admiral
 
teacake's Avatar
 
Location: Google's ass cave full of the lush, lush asses they have stolen.
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Kirk even ordered him to get out of that delivery!
__________________

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacake is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
benedict cumberbatch, grading & discussion, jj abrams

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.