RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,915
Posts: 5,478,190
Members: 25,053
Currently online: 486
Newest member: johnclever25

TrekToday headlines

New Star Trek Funko Pop! Vinyl Figures
By: T'Bonz on Nov 26

QMx Mini Phaser Ornament
By: T'Bonz on Nov 26

Stewart as Neo-Nazi Skinhead
By: T'Bonz on Nov 26

Klingon Bloodwine To Debut
By: T'Bonz on Nov 25

Trek Actors In War Of The Worlds Fundraiser
By: T'Bonz on Nov 25

Star Trek: The Next Generation Gag Reel Tease
By: T'Bonz on Nov 24

Shatner In Haven
By: T'Bonz on Nov 24

Retro Review: Covenant
By: Michelle on Nov 22

Two Official Starships Collection Previews
By: T'Bonz on Nov 21

Saldana: Women Issues In Hollywood
By: T'Bonz on Nov 21


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

View Poll Results: Grade the movie...
A+ 144 19.20%
A 161 21.47%
A- 101 13.47%
B+ 83 11.07%
B 59 7.87%
B- 27 3.60%
C+ 40 5.33%
C 38 5.07%
C- 25 3.33%
D+ 11 1.47%
D 13 1.73%
D- 10 1.33%
F 38 5.07%
Voters: 750. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 18 2013, 03:12 AM   #2731
Count Zero
Decidedly something
 
Count Zero's Avatar
 
Location: Land of Awesome
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Well, since Enterprise is the only series still existing in this universe I would go with what was established on that show about Section 31 unless it was directly contradicted on screen. Section 31 actually predates the Federation.

ETA: Damn, you're all too fast for me.
__________________
"Now and then we had a hope that if we lived and were good, God would permit us to be pirates." Mark Twain, Life on the Mississippi
Count Zero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 03:12 AM   #2732
teacake
Fleet Admiral
 
teacake's Avatar
 
Location: Google's ass cave full of the lush, lush asses they have stolen.
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Section 31 is around right now.
__________________

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 03:13 AM   #2733
Ovation
Vice Admiral
 
Location: La Belle Province or The Green Mountain State (depends on the day of the week)
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Shh!!! You'll blow our cov…oops. I've said too much already.
Ovation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 03:15 AM   #2734
HaventGotALife
Fleet Captain
 
HaventGotALife's Avatar
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

LOL ^^^^
__________________
"Cogley was old-fashioned, preferring paper books to computers. He had an extensive collection of books, he claimed never to use the computer in his office."
HaventGotALife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 03:19 AM   #2735
mattman8907
Lieutenant Commander
 
mattman8907's Avatar
 
Location: California
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

did anyone find it a little ironic that when Kirk's five year mission ends it will be around the same time in the "Prime" reality, Kirk started his?
mattman8907 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 03:23 AM   #2736
J. Allen
[Snuggling Intensifies]
 
J. Allen's Avatar
 
Location: The Countryside
Send a message via ICQ to J. Allen Send a message via AIM to J. Allen Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to J. Allen Send a message via Yahoo to J. Allen
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

mattman8907 wrote: View Post
did anyone find it a little ironic that when Kirk's five year mission ends it will be around the same time in the "Prime" reality, Kirk started his?
Ironic? No. It wouldn't be irony. It is a nice little tidbit of trivia, though.
__________________
-----------------------
💗 Visit Brony Kingdom 💗
-----------------------
J. Allen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 03:30 AM   #2737
mattman8907
Lieutenant Commander
 
mattman8907's Avatar
 
Location: California
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

J. Allen wrote: View Post
mattman8907 wrote: View Post
did anyone find it a little ironic that when Kirk's five year mission ends it will be around the same time in the "Prime" reality, Kirk started his?
Ironic? No. It wouldn't be irony. It is a nice little tidbit of trivia, though.
yeah it just kinda came to me.
mattman8907 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 03:40 AM   #2738
Lord Garth
Captain
 
Lord Garth's Avatar
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

I saw Star Trek Into Darkness. I thought the 2009 film was better.
Lord Garth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 03:44 AM   #2739
mattman8907
Lieutenant Commander
 
mattman8907's Avatar
 
Location: California
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

i was just online and apparently there is going to a 4-part prequel comic coming out detailing the life of one John Harrison, who we know to be one Khan Noonien Singh. so all those questions you fine folks have been asking will finally be answered. you can read more at:

http://www.thetrekcollective.com/201...ss-august.html
mattman8907 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 03:57 AM   #2740
Finn
Vice Admiral
 
Finn's Avatar
 
Location: Finn
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Admiral Buzzkill wrote: View Post
There's a lot of the voice over in the trailers that doesn't appear in the movie. Either they trimmed a scene or two, or the dialogue was written for the trailer.

Certainly Pike's dialogue in the trailers isn't lifted from his scenes - the gist is the same, but different wording and attitude.
Just saw the movie. I had the impression that a scene or two was deleted from early in the movie.
Finn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 04:02 AM   #2741
Tai
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Washington, D.C
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

teacake wrote: View Post
HaventGotALife wrote: View Post
mattman8907 wrote: View Post

granted the federation is still relatively new (they were what? a hundred years old by the end of Into Darkness?) but still section 31 should have been disbanded. it cause nothing but trouble.
Hopefully, this incident brings them out of the shadows and Starfleet disbands them when people find out they exist.
I expect a very public disbanding may a part of Section 31's plans. Marcus is far too easy with throwing around Section 31's name, even if he did think those he told were never coming back. How does he know they didn't send off an email about it prior to their planned deaths?

But if it disbands there will be speeches full of Roddenberry ideals about not losing what makes us human as we try and preserve humanity blah blah and everyone will pat themselves on the back and Section 31 will continue, more covert than ever.
^This is brilliant.

To layer the conspiracy even further one could picture a Section 31 that saw Marcus getting a little too power hungry and decided to cut Khan loose to expose him and have the problem take care of itself.

If a war with the Klingons ensued as a result of the chaos, then that's what they wanted all along anyway.
__________________
Forgive you?! I ought to knock you on your God-damn ass! -Captain Kirk
Shatner... I'd fight William Shatner. -Tyler Durden
Tai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 04:02 AM   #2742
mattman8907
Lieutenant Commander
 
mattman8907's Avatar
 
Location: California
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Finn wrote: View Post
Admiral Buzzkill wrote: View Post
There's a lot of the voice over in the trailers that doesn't appear in the movie. Either they trimmed a scene or two, or the dialogue was written for the trailer.

Certainly Pike's dialogue in the trailers isn't lifted from his scenes - the gist is the same, but different wording and attitude.
Just saw the movie. I had the impression that a scene or two was deleted from early in the movie.
im going to snatch the novel on tuesday. see what was missing from the movie.
mattman8907 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 04:11 AM   #2743
Tai
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Washington, D.C
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

I'm wondering about the motives of Section 31 and how it relates to the third film. On reflection it seems that the Klingons would be the obvious choice of villians in the next film. They have every justification to declare war on the Federation given that Starfleet agents violated their space, landed on their homeworld, murdered dozens of their men and destroyed 3 ships.

Could you imagine if a Klingon raiding party just beamed down to Australia and killed a bunch of people in retaliation and just left?

Kirk's actions in this movie alone seems like provocation enough for the Klingons.
__________________
Forgive you?! I ought to knock you on your God-damn ass! -Captain Kirk
Shatner... I'd fight William Shatner. -Tyler Durden
Tai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 04:14 AM   #2744
teacake
Fleet Admiral
 
teacake's Avatar
 
Location: Google's ass cave full of the lush, lush asses they have stolen.
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Tai wrote: View Post
I'm wondering about the motives of Section 31 and how it relates to the third film. On reflection it seems that the Klingons would be the obvious choice of villians in the next film. They have every justification to declare war on the Federation given that Starfleet agents violated their space, landed on their homeworld, murdered dozens of their men and destroyed 3 ships.

Could you imagine if a Klingon raiding party just beamed down to Australia and killed a bunch of people in retaliation and just left?
Starting a war because a bunch of people died as a result of a raiding party that was not sanctioned by their own government seems like overkill. But of course that's what we do.
__________________

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 04:16 AM   #2745
HaventGotALife
Fleet Captain
 
HaventGotALife's Avatar
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Tai wrote: View Post
I'm wondering about the motives of Section 31 and how it relates to the third film. On reflection it seems that the Klingons would be the obvious choice of villians in the next film. They have every justification to declare war on the Federation given that Starfleet agents violated their space, landed on their homeworld, murdered dozens of their men and destroyed 3 ships.

Could you imagine if a Klingon raiding party just beamed down to Australia and killed a bunch of people in retaliation and just left?

Kirk's actions in this movie alone seems like provocation enough for the Klingons.
I think it depends on who the people are. A lot more was done in the lead-up to the Dominion War before formal declarations were announced. I think because it's the Klingons and they look for an excuse to go to war, that it is most likely this incident will lead to war. I think that's the set-up for the next film, especially with people connected to this film saying they want "someone to do the Klingons."
__________________
"Cogley was old-fashioned, preferring paper books to computers. He had an extensive collection of books, he claimed never to use the computer in his office."
HaventGotALife is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
benedict cumberbatch, grading & discussion, jj abrams

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.