RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 137,910
Posts: 5,330,938
Members: 24,558
Currently online: 662
Newest member: laurah2215

TrekToday headlines

Retro Review: Inquisition
By: Michelle on Jul 12

Cubify Star Trek 3DMe Mini Figurines
By: T'Bonz on Jul 11

Latest Official Starships Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Jul 10

Seven of Nine Bobble Head
By: T'Bonz on Jul 9

Pegg The Prankster
By: T'Bonz on Jul 9

More Trek Stars Join Unbelievable!!!!!
By: T'Bonz on Jul 8

Star Trek #35 Preview
By: T'Bonz on Jul 8

New ThinkGeek Trek Apparel
By: T'Bonz on Jul 7

Star Trek Movie Prop Auction
By: T'Bonz on Jul 7

Drexler: NX Engineering Room Construction
By: T'Bonz on Jul 7


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

View Poll Results: Grade the movie...
A+ 141 19.13%
A 159 21.57%
A- 99 13.43%
B+ 82 11.13%
B 58 7.87%
B- 27 3.66%
C+ 40 5.43%
C 38 5.16%
C- 24 3.26%
D+ 11 1.49%
D 13 1.76%
D- 10 1.36%
F 35 4.75%
Voters: 737. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 12 2013, 10:56 PM   #1726
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: England again
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

I loved the magic glass in the brig! The resizable/repositionable hole was very cool.

The endless levels corridors below the dome was either at the top of the neck or the dome on top of the saucer. it was cool. As were the new displays along the corridors.

The new warp core was nice. It looked like real machinery and not a blue lava lamp. And so big you could climb up inside it! Nice to see some big important-looking control panels outside.

The enormous shuttlebay got a slightly new look and a giant crane to move the parked shuttles between levels (and some idiots still blindly insist this Enterprise is no bigger than the old!)

It looked great.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 12 2013, 11:08 PM   #1727
Classic Fan
Rear Admiral
 
Classic Fan's Avatar
 
Location: Tardis library
View Classic Fan's Twitter Profile Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Classic Fan
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Phily B wrote: View Post
I said it before, but I love the new warp core.
New warp core was amazing. Looked so deliberately NASA esque. Just looked, awesome. And the reactor chamber was even more awesome. Just looked 'real' compared to previous iterations.

Also, I still have no problem with a brewery doubling for a collosal engineering department. May even be starting to like it better.
__________________
"Course your not,your not scared of anything. Box falls out the sky, man falls out of box, man eats fish custard. Look at you, just sittin' there,you know what i think? Must be helluva scary crack in your wall" - The Doctor
Classic Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 12 2013, 11:12 PM   #1728
M
Vice Admiral
 
M's Avatar
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

StarMan wrote: View Post
Ok, so help me out here. For those of you who loved it, where did it hook you? Thinking back, I was engaged from the get go. The Niribu scene with The Enterprise rising out of the ocean was frelling awesome. Then we went through to Kirk's demotion - great. Then IIRC the bar scene... okay ... then, the scene with Kirk and Spock and the quibbling over how to address Kirk (before the big meeting and Harrison's assault). I reckon it's about there that I started to drift out. There was a bit of a lag, but I thought they were taking the foot off the pedal briefly before we got to the real meat of the story. Alas, it never got there for me.
That's interesting, as I had more or less the same experience. I loved the first 15 minutes with the mission on Nibiru, the volcano, the Enterprise rising out of the water, then BOOM!!! the title card! Brilliant stuff there!

Most of what came after that was fine with me. I didn't buy that Kirk was being demoted from Captain of the ship to First Officer back to Captain in what seemed like five minutes, but I could live with that. Harrison beaming from Earth to frickin' Kronos was harder to swallow, but I thought, come on, don't get hung up on such technical shit. Seeing the uber-secret Vengeance from the trailer in Marcus' office? Okay, doesn't make a whole lot of sense, but I can swallow that. The Enterprise zapping from one part of the galaxy to another? Well, okay, this new universe seems to be pretty small, I thought. Spock and Uhura – two high-ranking, supposedly professional officers of the Federation flagship – quarreling like teenagers on their most important mission yet in front of their captain? I'm beginning to wonder if this is the kind of Star Trek I really want to see. If these are really the characters I love and care about.

And then the pivotal moment; at least for me: Harrison reveals himself to be Khan. I remember thinking, that I have no problem whatsoever with them reinterpreting Khan. But at the same time I felt, that this had no punch, no gravitas, no meaning. At all. I kept asking myself, why it had to be Khan. I kept wondering if people in the audience weren't asking themselves right now, what the significance of his backstory – being a genetically engineered man from 300 years ago – was.

This was the moment when I seemed to give up on the movie. The rest – the whole "homage" to TWOK and the horrible KHAAAAAAN!!!11!!1 – felt just like the confirmation of what I had already formed in my mind at that time: I wasn't going to like this movie.

Sadly.
__________________
Bashir: »Out of all the stories you told me, which ones were true and which ones weren't?«
Garak: »My dear doctor, they're all true.«
Bashir: »Even the lies?«
Garak: »Especially the lies.«
M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 12 2013, 11:14 PM   #1729
Classic Fan
Rear Admiral
 
Classic Fan's Avatar
 
Location: Tardis library
View Classic Fan's Twitter Profile Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Classic Fan
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

King Daniel wrote: View Post
I loved the magic glass in the brig! The resizable/repositionable hole was very cool.

The endless levels corridors below the dome was either at the top of the neck or the dome on top of the saucer. it was cool. As were the new displays along the corridors.

The new warp core was nice. It looked like real machinery and not a blue lava lamp. And so big you could climb up inside it! Nice to see some big important-looking control panels outside.

The enormous shuttlebay got a slightly new look and a giant crane to move the parked shuttles between levels (and some idiots still blindly insist this Enterprise is no bigger than the old!)

It looked great.
Liked the shuttle bay changes. The support girders got moved a bit, maybe due to fanboy 'disgruntlement' or just to 'shut them the fuck up'

Can't figure out how far down and up the column intersection goes. Doesn't bother me, i liked it. Made the ship interior more spacious and an interesting addition. Gave a sense of scale inside.

And if I'm honest, I prefer the new warp core over the 'lava lamp' trek staple.

Also have to mention the awesome title card, Nibiru sand image fading into real Enterprise was so classic looking. Loved it. And the new warp contrails were so cool, almost reminiscent of TOS movie warp effect.
__________________
"Course your not,your not scared of anything. Box falls out the sky, man falls out of box, man eats fish custard. Look at you, just sittin' there,you know what i think? Must be helluva scary crack in your wall" - The Doctor
Classic Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13 2013, 12:00 AM   #1730
Xavier_Storma
Lieutenant Commander
 
Xavier_Storma's Avatar
 
Location: Duesseldorf, Germany
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

I am so angry with them. First I did not want to go at all... but my dad forced me. We went to see TREK since I was a kid in 1991. I was visiting them and he got the tickets already.

Well, I had no expectations... and surprise... when the film started, and continued I really kind of... well liked it. I was about to forgive that nonsense with the ship under water, or the stupidity of Starfleet officers in this reality after the really well acted and directed London part, and especially after Pike's lesson to Kirk... until half way through I thought... well, seems everyone deserves a second chance. The nods to DS9 and ENT... awesome... I was starting to like what I saw. Good music, a great improve in camera and cinematography over 09 (seems they cured the cameramans Parkinson for this film). Superb sets, and set design. I liked the locations on Earth, Nimburu looked awesome, Heck... Kronos looked great. Cool Klingon design... and that was where the film went downhill for me completely... and lost me there. I guess if I rewatch the film, I will simply eject the Blu Ray right at the scene, where they fight the Klingons... the rest was a really poor copy of TWOK and "Paradise lost". Damn... I hated it.

I hope they get new authors for the next part. I got used to the new crew, I got used to the new styles, hell... even uglyprise grew on me... JJ direction is okay with me... you get used to it... but now... please... get writers who work creativly...

Such a lost opportunity.
__________________
Star Trek - A Final Unity
http://www.st-afu.com
Xavier_Storma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13 2013, 12:03 AM   #1731
saddestmoon
Lieutenant Commander
 
saddestmoon's Avatar
 
Location: New Zealand
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

I loved that moment when (as the ships gravity was failing) we get a glimpse of some shuttles, lined up in the bay, lurching forward and falling off towards the bottom left of the camera shot... that looked awesome!

Loving the Enterprise's shuttles design as well!

Also - I would quite like to see a diecast model of this particular shuttle (looked like it had slightly different stylings, ever so subtle engine stuts angled slightly back...).
saddestmoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13 2013, 12:42 AM   #1732
Pauln6
Commodore
 
Pauln6's Avatar
 
Location: Bristol, United Kingdom
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

M wrote: View Post
StarMan wrote: View Post
Ok, so help me out here. For those of you who loved it, where did it hook you? Thinking back, I was engaged from the get go. The Niribu scene with The Enterprise rising out of the ocean was frelling awesome. Then we went through to Kirk's demotion - great. Then IIRC the bar scene... okay ... then, the scene with Kirk and Spock and the quibbling over how to address Kirk (before the big meeting and Harrison's assault). I reckon it's about there that I started to drift out. There was a bit of a lag, but I thought they were taking the foot off the pedal briefly before we got to the real meat of the story. Alas, it never got there for me.
That's interesting, as I had more or less the same experience. I loved the first 15 minutes with the mission on Nibiru, the volcano, the Enterprise rising out of the water, then BOOM!!! the title card! Brilliant stuff there!

Most of what came after that was fine with me. I didn't buy that Kirk was being demoted from Captain of the ship to First Officer back to Captain in what seemed like five minutes, but I could live with that. Harrison beaming from Earth to frickin' Kronos was harder to swallow, but I thought, come on, don't get hung up on such technical shit. Seeing the uber-secret Vengeance from the trailer in Marcus' office? Okay, doesn't make a whole lot of sense, but I can swallow that. The Enterprise zapping from one part of the galaxy to another? Well, okay, this new universe seems to be pretty small, I thought. Spock and Uhura – two high-ranking, supposedly professional officers of the Federation flagship – quarreling like teenagers on their most important mission yet in front of their captain? I'm beginning to wonder if this is the kind of Star Trek I really want to see. If these are really the characters I love and care about.

And then the pivotal moment; at least for me: Harrison reveals himself to be Khan. I remember thinking, that I have no problem whatsoever with them reinterpreting Khan. But at the same time I felt, that this had no punch, no gravitas, no meaning. At all. I kept asking myself, why it had to be Khan. I kept wondering if people in the audience weren't asking themselves right now, what the significance of his backstory – being a genetically engineered man from 300 years ago – was.

This was the moment when I seemed to give up on the movie. The rest – the whole "homage" to TWOK and the horrible KHAAAAAAN!!!11!!1 – felt just like the confirmation of what I had already formed in my mind at that time: I wasn't going to like this movie.

Sadly.
I agree with everything you say, albeit I still enjoyed the movie.

I think you probably forgot the bit where the ENSIGN with roughly 1 year's experience AS A NAVIGATOR was promoted to CHIEF engineer because he'd been shadowing Mr Scott instead of, perhaps, one of the qualified ASSISTANT CHIEF ENGINEERS that a starship with 400+ crew should have on board. I'm fine with Chekov being transferred since this version appears to be trained as a technician rather than a scientist, I'd be fine with him being the character who liaises with the bridge to give him something to do - but putting him in charge when he's an inexperienced ensign? It makes Kirk look like a terrible administrator who is happy to put the ship at risk on a whim - which in fairness is all true I suppose.

I agree with what you say about the Spock Uhura scene, which comes on top of the transporter scene in the last movie. Uhura criticises Spock for not thinking about her before he takes a risk - er... that's exactly what he's supposed to do sweetie - in fact, if he put your feelings before his duty, he would never qualify as a commander, and logic would dictate that he'd have to resign his commission on a starship to take a desk job. The scene was a text-book scenario about why lovers should not serve on the same ship. A real misfire.

A big plus for taking Uhura on the mission though. She should have gone on the mission in the last move too, since she was fluent in Romulan rather than just rusty in Klingon.
__________________
Star Trek/Babylon 5/Alien crossover www.youtube.com/user/pauln6

Other Worlds Role Playing Game
http://rpg.drivethrustuff.com/produc...ducts_id=97631
Pauln6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13 2013, 12:45 AM   #1733
JarodRussell
Vice Admiral
 
JarodRussell's Avatar
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Pauln6 wrote: View Post
The scene was a text-book scenario about why lovers should not serve on the same ship. A real misfire.
nuUhura is extremely ugly inside. It's all about her, her, her.
__________________
lol
l
/\
JarodRussell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13 2013, 12:49 AM   #1734
Pauln6
Commodore
 
Pauln6's Avatar
 
Location: Bristol, United Kingdom
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

She'd be too busy thinking about Spock to irradiate herself and save the ship. Selfish cow.
__________________
Star Trek/Babylon 5/Alien crossover www.youtube.com/user/pauln6

Other Worlds Role Playing Game
http://rpg.drivethrustuff.com/produc...ducts_id=97631
Pauln6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13 2013, 12:55 AM   #1735
saddestmoon
Lieutenant Commander
 
saddestmoon's Avatar
 
Location: New Zealand
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Hmmm... been thinking about the crashed USS Vengeance.

For me, it wasn't an issue that the dreadnaught didn't disintegrate when it struck San Francisco - it suggests that the starship is indeed an extremely robust new class of ship - and it got me thinking, that we may indeed see it resurface again in the next movie (particularily if a Klingon war erupts, and conflict escalates...)

I love that it represents Starfleet's more insidious, convert, militaristic streak (essentially Admiral Marcus' dirty and not-so-little secret).

Wouldn't mind seeing it in action again, if that ever transpires...
saddestmoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13 2013, 01:04 AM   #1736
StarMan
Vice Admiral
 
StarMan's Avatar
 
Location: ... in another place.
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Pauln6 wrote: View Post
I think you probably forgot the bit where the ENSIGN with roughly 1 year's experience AS A NAVIGATOR was promoted to CHIEF engineer because he'd been shadowing Mr Scott instead of, perhaps, one of the qualified ASSISTANT CHIEF ENGINEERS that a starship with 400+ crew should have on board.
Oh lordie, that's right. Yes, I remember thinking 'Hold on, skeleton crew? No... full crew. Wait. what?'
__________________
Let's rock!

Last edited by M'Sharak; May 13 2013 at 04:49 AM.
StarMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13 2013, 01:08 AM   #1737
JarodRussell
Vice Admiral
 
JarodRussell's Avatar
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

That's the new Starfleet, ladies and gentledudes. Cadets become Captains, and navigator ensigns become chief engineers.
__________________
lol
l
/\
JarodRussell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13 2013, 01:15 AM   #1738
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: In the 23rd Century...
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

I'm waiting for kirk55555 and Mr_Homn to post their reviews since they've both seen it and rated it an 'F'.
__________________
"When I first heard about it (the Enterprise underwater), my inner Trekkie was in a rage. When I saw it, my inner kid beat up my inner Trekkie and made him go sit in the corner." - Bill Jasper
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13 2013, 01:16 AM   #1739
indranee
Vice Admiral
 
indranee's Avatar
 
Location: Warrrrrrrrrshington, DC
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

RAMA wrote: View Post
http://www.thewrap.com/movies/articl...x-office-91006

STID improves greatly over ST09 INT Box office
So that article is basically saying that the non-stop action and the reduction in "Trekkiness" (I haven't seen the movie, so this is hearsay) is because of the studio listening to audience gripes about Trek in global market polls and wanting TDK numbers for this movie?

Seriously, I don't know whether to laugh or cry at that.
indranee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13 2013, 01:18 AM   #1740
indranee
Vice Admiral
 
indranee's Avatar
 
Location: Warrrrrrrrrshington, DC
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

BillJ wrote: View Post
I'm waiting for kirk55555 and Mr_Homn to post their reviews since they've both seen it and rated it an 'F'.
I'm not sweating those... but then again I'm not reading any spoiler reviews... and yes I'm on this thread but I've got one eye squeezed shut while I navigate it

Besides, they already gave the thing an "F". What more do you wanna know from them?
indranee is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
benedict cumberbatch, grading & discussion, jj abrams

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.