RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,846
Posts: 5,474,197
Members: 25,040
Currently online: 485
Newest member: Space Tennis

TrekToday headlines

Retro Review: Covenant
By: Michelle on Nov 22

Two Official Starships Collection Previews
By: T'Bonz on Nov 21

Saldana: Women Issues In Hollywood
By: T'Bonz on Nov 21

Shatner Book Kickstarter
By: T'Bonz on Nov 20

Trek Original Series Slippers
By: T'Bonz on Nov 19

Hemsworth Is Sexiest Man Alive
By: T'Bonz on Nov 19

Trek Business Card Cases
By: T'Bonz on Nov 17

February IDW Publishing Trek Comics
By: T'Bonz on Nov 17

Retro Review: The Siege of AR-558
By: Michelle on Nov 15

Trevco Full Bleed Uniform T-Shirts
By: T'Bonz on Nov 14


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Gaming

Gaming Non-Star Trek Gaming

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 10 2013, 01:54 PM   #2221
Angel4576
Rear Admiral
 
Angel4576's Avatar
 
Location: United Kingdom
Re: Mass Effect 3

I never really had a problem with the genocide side of the destroy ending. TBH I don't really see it as genocide at all, it's a sacrifice that you make. Both EDI and the Geth knew the score when they allied themselves to you. EDI even states in-game that she'd die to stop the Reapers if necessary. Consequently, although I'd have preferred not to have had to sacrifice them, I still felt that it was the lesser evil of the proposed choices.

Synthesis speaks for itself. Control - is just too much of a risk. It's made clear that although the Shepalyst would retain the memories and experiences of Shepard, it would NOT be Shepard. I'd be worried about what else went into the Shepalyst's makeup. Equally I'd be concerned about the Shepalyst changing its mind at some point in the future and effectively becoming Catalyst Mk II. Anything that leaves the Reaper fleet intact was unacceptable to me. Destruction was the only realistic way of removing the Reaper threat for good. Yeah, we're left with future potential clashes between Organics and Synthetics, but we've just beaten the Reapers. Is it really very realistic to believe that any synthetic race would get to being as advanced and as powerful as the Reapers without something having to be done about them beforehand? This is assuming that the Catalyst's logic was even sound to begin with......
__________________
I am a Ranger. We walk in the dark places no others will enter. We stand on the bridge and no one may pass. We live for the One, we die for the One.
Angel4576 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10 2013, 04:59 PM   #2222
Kestrel
Vice Admiral
 
Kestrel's Avatar
 
Location: East Tennessee
Re: Mass Effect 3

Of course on the other hand if you let the Geth (especially) live - assuming you worked it so they made peace with the Quarians - you have a proper example of organics and synthetics not wiping each other out, thus clearly doing an end-run on the Catalyst's whole logic.
__________________
"If Romeo had just masturbated a couple of times a week he would have saved both those nice families a heap of trouble."
Kestrel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10 2013, 05:43 PM   #2223
Angel4576
Rear Admiral
 
Angel4576's Avatar
 
Location: United Kingdom
Re: Mass Effect 3

Kestrel wrote: View Post
Of course on the other hand if you let the Geth (especially) live - assuming you worked it so they made peace with the Quarians - you have a proper example of organics and synthetics not wiping each other out, thus clearly doing an end-run on the Catalyst's whole logic.
The Catalyst would undoubtedly qualify that with a "for now".

Irrespective of your ending choice though, if you broker peace on Rannoch then it shows that there's no reason that synthetics can't actually take their place as positive contributors to galactic society, just like the organic races. Even moreso than some.
__________________
I am a Ranger. We walk in the dark places no others will enter. We stand on the bridge and no one may pass. We live for the One, we die for the One.
Angel4576 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 11 2013, 09:41 PM   #2224
RyuRoots
Fleet Captain
 
RyuRoots's Avatar
 
Location: Ul'Dah
View RyuRoots's Twitter Profile Send a message via AIM to RyuRoots
Re: Mass Effect 3

The destroy ending can be summed up by paraphrasing Fallout 3 a bit. "[The galaxy], with all its flaws, was deemed worthy of preservation."

You don't rape every culture in the galaxy with reaper tech on the word of the enemy general or submit Shep's mind to inevitably fall to the Reaper hivemind and start all this over again; because remember, literally no one we've seen that has jumped in to control or co-opt or otherwise partner with the Reapers has been anything but subsumed. Remember how for the entirety of all three games, we've been beaten broadside over and over with the idea that one of the Reapers' biggest and scariest powers is convincing people that LUDICROUSLY BAD ideas are in their best interest?

Also, no one should take starbrat at his word about inevitability. The one being who has personally ensured every cycle says that if you kill him and his forces, the cycle won't stop.

Uh huh.

I also thought it was stupid that destroy hits "all synthetic life". Why not just say it hits everything with Reaper code since EDI, the Geth (if they survive) and...obviously everything on the Reaper side all have it? It sounds a bit less like important-sounding nonsense that way but that's just me.

But that's a side tangent. The point is that even if we DO fuck up with machines later on, that'll be on US. We're given the CHANCE not to, we're given the freedom to have the chaos of life, in whatever form it takes, to go on.


I personally ignore this stupidity altogether and just headcanon in my own ending and have Citadel as an epilogue, though. I suppose it's fun to talk about in a weird way, but when seriously coming down to it, I never will accept "Press button, save (or doom in one of two horrific ways) the galaxy" as a conclusion.
__________________
Star Trek: 1987-Present
RyuRoots is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 12 2013, 04:55 PM   #2225
Angel4576
Rear Admiral
 
Angel4576's Avatar
 
Location: United Kingdom
Re: Mass Effect 3

BW talk about the possibility of a spin-off game from the main trilogy;

Digital Spy

All I can say is, more melee-focused? Kai Leng? I seriously hope they're fcuking joking.
__________________
I am a Ranger. We walk in the dark places no others will enter. We stand on the bridge and no one may pass. We live for the One, we die for the One.
Angel4576 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 12 2013, 07:59 PM   #2226
RyuRoots
Fleet Captain
 
RyuRoots's Avatar
 
Location: Ul'Dah
View RyuRoots's Twitter Profile Send a message via AIM to RyuRoots
Re: Mass Effect 3

Kai Leng? That HAS to be a joke. They can't seriously think his perception is anything but a really, really bad joke in ME3 itself, right? He was the very definition of a cliche'd idiot who survived purely on plot armor.

And honestly, I'm not sure I'd be interested even if it was a Garrus game, and I love him. If I'm going to be interested in ME again, I think it'd have to be something completely divorced from the Reapers or Shepard.
__________________
Star Trek: 1987-Present
RyuRoots is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 12 2013, 09:45 PM   #2227
Skywalker
Admiral
 
Skywalker's Avatar
 
Re: Mass Effect 3

Of course it would be Walters who suggests the spinoff could focus on Kai Leng. The font of bad ideas himself.
Skywalker is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 13 2013, 04:11 AM   #2228
ATimson
Rear Admiral
 
ATimson's Avatar
 
Location: Andrew Timson
Re: Mass Effect 3

RyuRoots wrote: View Post
Kai Leng? That HAS to be a joke. They can't seriously think his perception is anything but a really, really bad joke in ME3 itself, right? He was the very definition of a cliche'd idiot who survived purely on plot armor.
Kai Leng was interesting in the third Karpyshyn novel (where the character first appeared). Just... not so much in the Dietz novel or the game.
__________________
Andrew Timson
===============
"Niceness is the greatest human flaw, except for all the others." - Brendan Moody

"...don't mistake a few fans bitching on the Internet for any kind of trend." - Keith R.A. DeCandido

Last edited by ATimson; May 13 2013 at 03:09 PM. Reason: typo
ATimson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13 2013, 01:10 PM   #2229
Reverend
Rear Admiral
 
Reverend's Avatar
 
Location: UK
Re: Mass Effect 3

Yeah, I really hope that they won't go down the road they're suggesting. I'd rather they do something new, not milk the last dregs of nostalgia people might have for the existing characters. As far as games are concerned that is. Novels, comics and the like are the best place to be telling small side stories, prequels and character pieces as the recent 'Homeworlds' series proved.

Oh and there's no way in hell I'd play any game where Kai Leng in the focus. They may as well make it about Conrad Verner. At least that way you know it's a joke!
Reverend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 14 2013, 03:06 AM   #2230
RyuRoots
Fleet Captain
 
RyuRoots's Avatar
 
Location: Ul'Dah
View RyuRoots's Twitter Profile Send a message via AIM to RyuRoots
Re: Mass Effect 3

Oh no, now a Conrad Verner game I would totally play. That would be *amazing*. The objective could be to complete the shrine to Shepard, which would use your import data for the appearance of the pictures in said shrine.
__________________
Star Trek: 1987-Present
RyuRoots is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 25 2013, 05:22 PM   #2231
TheGodBen
Rear Admiral
 
TheGodBen's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Re: Mass Effect 3

I came across this rumour on reddit, a guy claiming to have attended a private PAX panel hosted by Bioware reveals some info about the next Mass Effect game. People in the know seem to think there's a good chance it's legit.

If true, it looks like the next game will be a sequel, with two new races (possibly indicating it taking place centuries after ME3), a renewed focus on exploration, and multiple types of vehicle. Sounds promising.
__________________
...so many different suns...
TheGodBen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 25 2013, 05:31 PM   #2232
ATimson
Rear Admiral
 
ATimson's Avatar
 
Location: Andrew Timson
Re: Mass Effect 3

TheGodBen wrote: View Post
If true, it looks like the next game will be a sequel, with two new races (possibly indicating it taking place centuries after ME3), a renewed focus on exploration, and multiple types of vehicle. Sounds promising.
Mac Walters is still the lead writer, right? That'll undo any other "promising" information Bioware puts out.
__________________
Andrew Timson
===============
"Niceness is the greatest human flaw, except for all the others." - Brendan Moody

"...don't mistake a few fans bitching on the Internet for any kind of trend." - Keith R.A. DeCandido
ATimson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 26 2013, 12:49 AM   #2233
Reverend
Rear Admiral
 
Reverend's Avatar
 
Location: UK
Re: Mass Effect 3

^ I doubt he was solely responsible for ME3's failing. Mostly I think it was poor planning and a lack of foresight, which actually makes it more (though not exclusively) the fault of the producer or director or whoever's in change of overall development. Basically they should have done the ending first and built everything up to that, but instead from what I gather they did the middle missions first, leaving the beginning and end to last...and it showed. Based on some of the unused files it looks like they have much bigger plans for the London mission than just a lame horde mode mission, but ran out of time.

That said these rumours do sound promising *if* there's any truth to them. In the very least is sounds consistent with those cryptic N7 day tweets the team was putting out earlier this month. Taking place post ME3, refocus on exploration and the implication that the PC could possibly be customized from a choice of several different species.
Reverend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 26 2013, 02:34 AM   #2234
Skywalker
Admiral
 
Skywalker's Avatar
 
Re: Mass Effect 3

Reverend wrote: View Post
^ I doubt he was solely responsible for ME3's failing. Mostly I think it was poor planning and a lack of foresight, which actually makes it more (though not exclusively) the fault of the producer or director or whoever's in change of overall development.
That would be Casey Hudson.
Skywalker is online now   Reply With Quote
Old November 26 2013, 05:08 AM   #2235
RyuRoots
Fleet Captain
 
RyuRoots's Avatar
 
Location: Ul'Dah
View RyuRoots's Twitter Profile Send a message via AIM to RyuRoots
Re: Mass Effect 3

Really, ME3's biggest problem is that it wasn't frigging FINISHED. It was an incomplete game, and it showed badly. If Bioware's evil overlords actually let them complete the game, I think that'll have more of an influence than whether Mac and Casey are around or not.
__________________
Star Trek: 1987-Present
RyuRoots is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
auto dialogue, bioware, mass effect, mass effect 2, mass effect 3

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.