RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 147,654
Posts: 5,838,495
Members: 26,163
Currently online: 404
Newest member: Scrapper

TrekToday headlines

Vulcan Ale – The Genesis Effect
By: T'Bonz on Aug 31

Shatner Writing Book About Friendship With Nimoy
By: T'Bonz on Aug 31

Nimoy Documentary ON COPD In Progress
By: T'Bonz on Aug 31

Three New Star Trek Beyond Set Shots
By: T'Bonz on Aug 31

Retro Review: Elogium
By: Michelle Erica Green on Aug 28

Trek Swype Keyboard
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Meaney In Talks For McGuinness Role
By: T'Bonz on Aug 27

Stewart And Son To Act Together
By: T'Bonz on Aug 27

Quinto: If I Wasn’t An Actor…
By: T'Bonz on Aug 27

Star Trek Beyond Update
By: T'Bonz on Aug 27


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Misc. Star Trek > Future of Trek

Future of Trek Discussion of future Trek projects.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old March 20 2013, 04:32 PM   #16
feek61
Captain
 
feek61's Avatar
 
Location: The Sunshine State
Re: Star Trek: Continues? Wow..very sad..

PhaseIIforever wrote: View Post
I like Continues and Phase II . . .
I agree 100% I think there is plenty of room for many interpretations of Trek and personally I enjoy them all and the different takes that people have on the characters. Mostly I admire the people who devote their time and money into producing them. I really am disappointed when I hear of petty bickering between the different fan films. I wish everyone could just respect and enjoy what each other is doing.
__________________
feek61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 20 2013, 05:32 PM   #17
Tom
Rear Admiral
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Location: In your Mind!
Re: Star Trek: Continues? Wow..very sad..

Thanks Greg. We are going to try to give him a small (yet still undetermined) role in Renegades as well
__________________
Star Trek: Renegades - Starring Walter Koenig & many more - Coming Soon!! www.startrekrenegades.com

Owner & Founder - TrekUnited.com & GalacticaBBS
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 7 2013, 08:01 AM   #18
Shaka Zulu
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Bulawayo Military Krral
Re: Star Trek: Continues? Wow..very sad..

Dream wrote: View Post
Keep in mind that TOS sets are probably the cheapest to make compared to the much more expensive sets of the modern Trek shows. They can get away with being cheesy if it is TOS.

As well, they should be budgeting some money to get LCD monitors so that the bridge screens will looks like they actually work.
Shaka Zulu is online now   Reply With Quote
Old April 7 2013, 02:08 PM   #19
feek61
Captain
 
feek61's Avatar
 
Location: The Sunshine State
Re: Star Trek: Continues? Wow..very sad..

The bridge monitors do actually "work" on the set.
__________________
feek61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 12 2013, 04:18 PM   #20
Shaka Zulu
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Bulawayo Military Krral
Re: Star Trek: Continues? Wow..very sad..

^Thanks for the heads-up.
Shaka Zulu is online now   Reply With Quote
Old April 12 2013, 05:37 PM   #21
feek61
Captain
 
feek61's Avatar
 
Location: The Sunshine State
Re: Star Trek: Continues? Wow..very sad..

The first episode will be out next month. I think it would be better to make a judgement after you get to see it. I think it is going to be good.
__________________
feek61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 12 2013, 06:34 PM   #22
Ronald Held
Rear Admiral
 
Location: On the USS Sovereign
Re: Star Trek: Continues? Wow..very sad..

How does it rate compared to Star Trek Phase II?
Ronald Held is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 16 2013, 08:01 PM   #23
R. Star
Rear Admiral
 
R. Star's Avatar
 
Location: Shangri-La
Re: Star Trek: Continues? Wow..very sad..

Breadfan wrote: View Post
Hi all! (been a long time)

I must say I'm pretty dissapointed someone decided to literally rehash TOS..So now we have exactly the "same" TOS with different actors? To me personally, it feels like cheapening the whole genre. Instead of thinking of new ideas, someone decided to recycle TOS.

I don't think it's the right way to go..How bout you guys?
Isn't all that true for NuTrek?
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams
R. Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 29 2013, 12:09 AM   #24
Mr. Adventure
Admiral
 
Mr. Adventure's Avatar
 
Location: Mr. Adventure
Re: Star Trek: Continues? Wow..very sad..

R. Star wrote: View Post
Breadfan wrote: View Post
Hi all! (been a long time)

I must say I'm pretty dissapointed someone decided to literally rehash TOS..So now we have exactly the "same" TOS with different actors? To me personally, it feels like cheapening the whole genre. Instead of thinking of new ideas, someone decided to recycle TOS.

I don't think it's the right way to go..How bout you guys?
Isn't all that true for NuTrek?
I don't even like nuTrek and still don't feel that's fair.
Mr. Adventure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 26 2015, 02:55 PM   #25
Dude111
Lieutenant
 
Breadfan wrote:
I must say I'm pretty dissapointed someone decided to literally rehash TOS..So now we have exactly the "same" TOS with different actors? To me personally, it feels like cheapening the whole genre. Instead of thinking of new ideas, someone decided to recycle TOS.

I don't think it's the right way to go..How bout you guys?
A PIECE OF UTTER TRASH!!!!!!

Just watched a little bit of episode 2 on youtube (I closed it in disgust after 3 or 4 mins) ... Im sick of the braindead morons of today STEALING SOMEONE ELSES GOLD AND MAKING IT GARBAGE!!!!!! (They have nothing good to make on thier own so they ruin someone elses treasure)

I just read a thread about this on another site and decided to have myself a laugh.... I SURE DID!!!!!!!!
Dude111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 26 2015, 07:05 PM   #26
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: alt.nerd.obsessive.pic
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Star Trek: Continues? Wow..very sad..

Dude111 wrote: View Post
Breadfan wrote:
I must say I'm pretty dissapointed someone decided to literally rehash TOS..So now we have exactly the "same" TOS with different actors? To me personally, it feels like cheapening the whole genre. Instead of thinking of new ideas, someone decided to recycle TOS.

I don't think it's the right way to go..How bout you guys?
A PIECE OF UTTER TRASH!!!!!!

Just watched a little bit of episode 2 on youtube (I closed it in disgust after 3 or 4 mins) ... Im sick of the braindead morons of today STEALING SOMEONE ELSES GOLD AND MAKING IT GARBAGE!!!!!! (They have nothing good to make on thier own so they ruin someone elses treasure)

I just read a thread about this on another site and decided to have myself a laugh.... I SURE DID!!!!!!!!
I don't think you're really being fair to all the fan film folks that work really hard to make these. Do I wish they'd do their own take? Sure. But what a thrill it would be for me to make my own TOS adventure. I'm sure the thrill is the same for them.

So why not lay off? There's no need to criticize people for having fun and sharing that fun.
__________________
"Just give me two seconds, alright, you mad bastard!" - Montgomery Scott, Star Trek Into Darkness
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 26 2015, 07:42 PM   #27
Jeff O'Connor
Commodore
 
Jeff O'Connor's Avatar
 
Location: Tampa, FL
View Jeff O'Connor's Twitter Profile Send a message via AIM to Jeff O'Connor Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Jeff O'Connor
Re: Star Trek: Continues? Wow..very sad..

Bill, that fellow bumped a topic from over two years ago with a post as over-the-top as that one. I've a sneaking suspicion it was in (odd) jest.
__________________
Star Trek
1966-
Jeff O'Connor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 26 2015, 09:10 PM   #28
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: alt.nerd.obsessive.pic
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Star Trek: Continues? Wow..very sad..

Jeff O'Connor wrote: View Post
Bill, that fellow bumped a topic from over two years ago with a post as over-the-top as that one. I've a sneaking suspicion it was in (odd) jest.
Could be. I'm sleepy.
__________________
"Just give me two seconds, alright, you mad bastard!" - Montgomery Scott, Star Trek Into Darkness
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 16 2015, 12:39 AM   #29
Brainsucker
Lieutenant Commander
 
Re: Star Trek: Continues? Wow..very sad..

Star Trek Continue or Phase II? I'm confused. They are the same production or made by different fan group?
The "Kirk" is okay. I like him. He has the face, the acting, and the charm of a starship captain. I think they need a new "Spock". He's simply bad. I won't say about the acting, but he doesn't has the figure / posture of a "Spock". And the way he talk is too feminim. And McCoy, I feel that he's too fat for the doctor. But it still okay, sometime, people can become overweight.
But overall, I enjoy some of their episodes. Specially the episode when the Enterprise fought against a hijacked Constitution class starship. Just change the Spock actor and it will become even better.
Brainsucker is online now   Reply With Quote
Old August 16 2015, 02:55 AM   #30
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: Star Trek: Continues? Wow..very sad..

Star Trek Continues and Phase II are two separate productions.
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991, 2013-?
Warped9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.