RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 135,754
Posts: 5,216,170
Members: 24,215
Currently online: 1007
Newest member: SF Junkie

TrekToday headlines

Q Meets NuTrek Crew
By: T'Bonz on Apr 18

Pine In Talks For Drama
By: T'Bonz on Apr 18

New X-Men: Days of Future Past Trailer
By: T'Bonz on Apr 17

Nimoy to Receive Award
By: T'Bonz on Apr 17

Star Trek Special: Flesh and Stone Comic
By: T'Bonz on Apr 16

These Are The Voyages TOS Season Two Book Review
By: T'Bonz on Apr 16

Kirk’s Well Wishes To Kirk
By: T'Bonz on Apr 15

Quinto In New Starz Series
By: T'Bonz on Apr 15

Star Trek: Horizon Film
By: T'Bonz on Apr 14

Star Trek: Fleet Captains Game Expansion
By: T'Bonz on Apr 14


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek TV Series > Deep Space Nine

Deep Space Nine What We Left Behind, we will always have here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old April 24 2013, 06:19 PM   #91
BillJ
Admiral
 
Location: In the 23rd Century...
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Anyone here who HATES "in the pale moonlight"

indolover wrote: View Post
I personally don't give a crap if any art work has to be realistic. The Roddenberry vision can be seen as it is, as a hope and dream.
Unrealistic TV shows are fine. But don't be surprised when a long-running franchise like Star Trek that depicts an unrealistic humanity eventually examines the flip-side. Don't be surprised when they eventually examine the cost such a society would have, the the things people would be willing to do to protect it.

When they present an "unrealistic" humanity, they open up other storytelling options in the process.
__________________
I'm not popular enough to be different! - Homer Simpson
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 24 2013, 06:31 PM   #92
indolover
Fleet Captain
 
Re: Anyone here who HATES "in the pale moonlight"

BillJ wrote: View Post
indolover wrote: View Post
I personally don't give a crap if any art work has to be realistic. The Roddenberry vision can be seen as it is, as a hope and dream.
Unrealistic TV shows are fine. But don't be surprised when a long-running franchise like Star Trek that depicts an unrealistic humanity eventually examines the flip-side. Don't be surprised when they eventually examine the cost such a society would have, the the things people would be willing to do to protect it.

When they present an "unrealistic" humanity, they open up other storytelling options in the process.
I don't care. Since I see works for what they are in their context. Nobody in this thread has frankly mentioned why all artistic works need to be realistic.
indolover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 24 2013, 06:31 PM   #93
indolover
Fleet Captain
 
Re: Anyone here who HATES "in the pale moonlight"

Carcazoid wrote: View Post
indolover wrote: View Post
Only fools and losers believe in "morality".


First good laugh of the day. Thanks.
then you're weak if you endorse the contrary.
indolover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 24 2013, 06:42 PM   #94
marksound
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Planet Carcazed
Re: Anyone here who HATES "in the pale moonlight"

indolover wrote: View Post
Carcazoid wrote: View Post
indolover wrote: View Post
Only fools and losers believe in "morality".


First good laugh of the day. Thanks.
then you're weak if you endorse the contrary.

Stop it! You're killing me!
marksound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 24 2013, 06:45 PM   #95
indolover
Fleet Captain
 
Re: Anyone here who HATES "in the pale moonlight"

Yeah, it's good I made a psychologically imbalanced person laugh.
indolover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 24 2013, 07:06 PM   #96
sonak
Vice Admiral
 
Location: in a figment of a mediocre mind's imagination
Re: Anyone here who HATES "in the pale moonlight"

indolover wrote: View Post
Yeah, it's good I made a psychologically imbalanced person laugh.

indeed-laughter is the best medicine
__________________
"why oh why didn't I take the blue pill?"
sonak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 25 2013, 04:30 AM   #97
indolover
Fleet Captain
 
Re: Anyone here who HATES "in the pale moonlight"

Laughter? You all endorse "morality". That in itself requires laughter.
indolover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 26 2013, 01:18 AM   #98
wingsabre
Lieutenant Junior Grade
 
Re: Anyone here who HATES "in the pale moonlight"

indolover wrote: View Post
wingsabre wrote: View Post
I though it was one of, if not the best episode in the season/series. Gene Roddenberry had an ideal universe, where humanity eventually evolved to the point of avoiding conflict. However, humans will always be humans. We can built great things such as the pyramids, or reach for the stars, but we can still be capable of doing horrible things to each others a well.
Yeah, so all unrealistic artistic works have to be canned....

Look, even Roddenberry created situations where humans did despicable things out of greed, fear, etc... He may have a utopian future in his mind, but even he relented to human nature. Roddenberry created Harry Mudd after all. He created a world where Kirk was a womanizer and was weak to control his lust. He created a future where his heroes allowed a good woman die so the world will be a better place. He created a world where his heroes too had to acquiesced to thievery and treachery in order to steal the Romulan Cloaking device, just so they can protect their precious Federation. Look at any piece of art out there and you'll see that there's no absolute black or white, but there are also shades of grey. Sometimes there are no good decisions, just the least bad decision and Roddenberry understood that. Sisko's least bad decisions brought the Romulans into the war, and prevent an epoc of genocide and tyrannical rule from the Dominion.

Just because you hate certain aspects of the episode does not give you the right to force others to think the same way. If that's your goal, you should give up now because I know what I like and no one can convince me otherwise.

Last edited by wingsabre; April 26 2013 at 08:57 PM.
wingsabre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 29 2013, 05:11 PM   #99
Crazyewok
Commander
 
Re: Anyone here who HATES "in the pale moonlight"

wingsabre wrote: View Post


Look, even Roddenberry created situations where humans did despicable things out of greed, fear, etc... He may have a utopian future in his mind, but even he relented to human nature. Roddenberry created Harry Mudd after all. He created a world where Kirk was a womanizer and was weak to control his lust. He created a future where his heroes allowed a good woman die so the world will be a better place. He created a world where his heroes too had to acquiesced to thievery and treachery in order to steal the Romulan Cloaking device, just so they can protect their precious Federation. Look at any piece of art out there and you'll see that there's no absolute black or white, but there are also shades of grey. Sometimes there are no good decisions, just the least bad decision and Roddenberry understood that. Sisko's least bad decisions brought the Romulans into the war, and prevent an epoc of genocide and tyrannical rule from the Dominion.

Just because you hate certain aspects of the episode does not give you the right to force others to think the same way. If that's your goal, you should give up now because I know what I like and no one can convince me otherwise.
That why I gte confused when certain people cry about Rodenberry "vision" I mean look at the TOS you had crew bullying (ok that may be abit extrme), a man slut who liked to bend the rules and a universe full of theives and criminals.


By the time TNG is created Rodenberry seems to have become retarded. HE hippie lala land trek is boring. It may be Art but it sucks, which is why TNG first 2 series sucked and nearly killed it. Art all well and good but when you are makeing a TV show you have to be consistant and make something people want to watch.
Crazyewok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 29 2013, 05:40 PM   #100
RXTT
Lieutenant
 
RXTT's Avatar
 
Location: Gamma Quadrant
Re: Anyone here who HATES "in the pale moonlight"

NO! I LOVE IT! DS9 4EVER!!!! Love that episode. It got to the real heart of war. Makes TOS and TNG look like VOY!!!!!!
__________________
Niner 4 Life!

RXTT.NET
RXTT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 30 2013, 07:35 AM   #101
Nightdiamond
Fleet Captain
 
Nightdiamond's Avatar
 
Location: California
Re: Anyone here who HATES "in the pale moonlight"

Hate it? That ending with Sisko telling the computer to erase the entire confession was one of the best Trek endings ever.

Garak's speech to Sisko at the end was one of the best Trek speeches ever.

re: cloaking....I gather that the Dominion sometimes can see through a cloaking device, like if they set up their scanners in a special way.

I've seen a number of times when it did appear to work against them.

Morality...maybe it doesn't exist "naturally" in the universe but it's all the more reason to create it and enforce it. Otherwise we're back to the stone ages.

Depending on what definition of morality we're talking about.
Nightdiamond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 31 2013, 08:49 AM   #102
Vulcan Logician
Lieutenant Commander
 
Vulcan Logician's Avatar
 
Location: In the realm of pure logic
Re: Anyone here who HATES "in the pale moonlight"

Carcazoid wrote: View Post
indolover wrote: View Post
Carcazoid wrote: View Post


First good laugh of the day. Thanks.
then you're weak if you endorse the contrary.

Stop it! You're killing me!
Weak to endorse the contrary? Morality requires great strength. Sure, sitting around and judging people is easy. But acting in a moral manner is very difficult. Sticking to principles is difficult. Acting in accordance with societal norms is weak, yes. But acting against those norms because you posses a greater moral truth is very difficult and requires tremendous strength. How is morality weak, then?
Vulcan Logician is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 31 2013, 09:27 PM   #103
doctorfoto
Commodore
 
Re: Anyone here who HATES "in the pale moonlight"

My only issue with this episode is that people are always talking about it. I thought the record was deleted.

Seriously though, I know it's silly, but fanfic and legitimate fiction "follow-ups" to this episode do kind of irk me for the same reason. The whole weight of the episode lies in Sisko's last line and action. "I *can* live with it."

>BOOM!< .. Huh?! What episode? What are you talking about?
doctorfoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.