RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,940
Posts: 5,479,034
Members: 25,057
Currently online: 421
Newest member: JeremiahJT

TrekToday headlines

Trek Shirt And Hoodie
By: T'Bonz on Nov 27

A Klingon Christmas Carol’s Last Season
By: T'Bonz on Nov 27

Attack Wing Wave 10 Expansion Pack
By: T'Bonz on Nov 27

New Star Trek Funko Pop! Vinyl Figures
By: T'Bonz on Nov 26

QMx Mini Phaser Ornament
By: T'Bonz on Nov 26

Stewart as Neo-Nazi Skinhead
By: T'Bonz on Nov 26

Klingon Bloodwine To Debut
By: T'Bonz on Nov 25

Trek Actors In War Of The Worlds Fundraiser
By: T'Bonz on Nov 25

Star Trek: The Next Generation Gag Reel Tease
By: T'Bonz on Nov 24

Shatner In Haven
By: T'Bonz on Nov 24


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Misc. Star Trek > Future of Trek

Future of Trek Discussion of future Trek projects.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old April 24 2013, 01:56 PM   #106
horatio83
Commodore
 
Re: why is there no more talk of a new star trek tv series?

I have only seen the one Twilight episode with Shatner and the creature in the plane and considered it to be fairly bad. About The Outer Limits, I actually liked the 90s series quite a lot as a teenager and without having seen the original series I guess they are of roughly equal quality. But all these series are fairly rooted in their time. TOS is a total 60s and the new The Outer Limits is a total 90s show which prevents them from becoming timeless classics.

My point was rather that cinema seems to be in decline nowadays. Of course there are still good moviemakers and in indie cinema you can find many gems but there isn't another Hitchcock or Kurosawa on the horizon.
But on the other hand a lot of creative energy seems to flow into television. Game of Thrones has been mentioned and the best TV show ever, The Wire, is also an HBO product. Television is no more the little brother of cinema, they are on equal footing nowadays. No idea whether this shift from cinema to TV will continue though.
__________________
The illegal we do immediately; the unconstitutional takes a little longer. - former US Secretary of State and unconvicted war criminal Henry Kissinger
horatio83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 24 2013, 02:04 PM   #107
Dream
Admiral
 
Dream's Avatar
 
Re: why is there no more talk of a new star trek tv series?

horatio83 wrote: View Post
I have only seen the one Twilight episode with Shatner and the creature in the plane and considered it to be fairly bad. About The Outer Limits, I actually liked the 90s series quite a lot as a teenager and without having seen the original series I guess they are of roughly equal quality. But all these series are fairly rooted in their time. TOS is a total 60s and the new The Outer Limits is a total 90s show which prevents them from becoming timeless classics.

My point was rather that cinema seems to be in decline nowadays. Of course there are still good moviemakers and in indy cinema you can find many gems but there isn't another Hitchcock or Kurosawa on the horizon.
But on the other hand a lot of creative energy seems to flow into television. Game of Thrones has been mentioned and the best TV show ever, The Wire, ia also an HBO product. No idea whether this shift from cinema to TV will continue though.
I don't consider the original Outer Limits to be a classic. There were many excellent episodes, but many garbage episodes too. I call shows good when nearly all of it is good.

The new 90s Outer Limits was decent enough, but not really popular. I know they canceled the dvd releases in America because the first season didn't sell well enough.

The thing about "Game of Thrones" is that the best place for it is on cable, it is impossible to do as movies considering the length of the books. It is based on excellent written material. The fact that the production values, acting, writing, and effects are all excellent are an added bonus.
Dream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 24 2013, 02:09 PM   #108
horatio83
Commodore
 
Re: why is there no more talk of a new star trek tv series?

Well, I actually wanted to deny TOS the status of classical. I think a piece of art has become classical when you totally don't mind its rootedness in its time anymore. Shakespeare, Hitchock, you name it. But at least for me TOS is too 60s.

Technological changes like larger television screens and streaming makes it likely that this trend of towards television as home cinema / televisions with cinema-like budgets continues.
__________________
The illegal we do immediately; the unconstitutional takes a little longer. - former US Secretary of State and unconvicted war criminal Henry Kissinger
horatio83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 24 2013, 03:34 PM   #109
Greg Cox
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Oxford, PA
Re: why is there no more talk of a new star trek tv series?

horatio83 wrote: View Post
I have only seen the one Twilight episode with Shatner and the creature in the plane and considered it to be fairly bad. About The Outer Limits, I actually liked the 90s series quite a lot as a teenager and without having seen the original series I guess they are of roughly equal quality. But all these series are fairly rooted in their time. TOS is a total 60s and the new The Outer Limits is a total 90s show which prevents them from becoming timeless classics..
And you don't think today's shows won't seem dated or "rooted in their time" fifty years from now? "Ohmigod, Game of Thrones is so early-century . . . ."

It's all a matter of perspective. By coincidence, I was on the phone this morning with a friend who was talking up a classic James Garner comedy from the sixties.

"Sounds like a fun old movie," I replied. "I'll have to check it out the next time it turns up on TCM."

"It's not an old movie!" he protested indignantly. "It's in color."

"It came out over fifty years ago. It's an old movie."

"Oh, god, you're right . . . .")

(The really sad part? He's younger than I am!)
__________________
www.gregcox-author.com
Greg Cox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 24 2013, 03:57 PM   #110
horatio83
Commodore
 
Re: why is there no more talk of a new star trek tv series?

As I wrote in my previous note, when something is extraordinarily good you don't mind all the idiosyncracies of the period anymore.
Let's take Hamlet. Sure, when you produce it you take out part about children actors in Act II, that's too time-specific. But nobody minds the Elizabethian worldview that informs everything about the play, from the view that marrying an in-law is incest to the four temperaments/fluids opinion about melancholy. But the play is fantastic despite of all of this as its greatness is rooted deeper. It's like watching a Hitchcock movie, of course you are aware of all the 50s/60s elements but it feels at the same time as if the guy could have done the same movie in ANY time period, it would basically still be the same piece.
__________________
The illegal we do immediately; the unconstitutional takes a little longer. - former US Secretary of State and unconvicted war criminal Henry Kissinger
horatio83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 24 2013, 03:59 PM   #111
sonak
Vice Admiral
 
Location: in a figment of a mediocre mind's imagination
Re: why is there no more talk of a new star trek tv series?

they'd have to do a Star Trek police procedural to get it on regular network TV. Police procedurals are the thing now.
__________________
"why oh why didn't I take the blue pill?"
sonak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 24 2013, 04:59 PM   #112
DCR
Lieutenant Commander
 
Location: Wentworth Hall, Tellus of Sol
Re: why is there no more talk of a new star trek tv series?

sonak wrote: View Post
they'd have to do a Star Trek police procedural to get it on regular network TV. Police procedurals are the thing now.
CSI: Qonos!
DCR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 24 2013, 05:22 PM   #113
Greg Cox
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Oxford, PA
Re: why is there no more talk of a new star trek tv series?

sonak wrote: View Post
they'd have to do a Star Trek police procedural to get it on regular network TV. Police procedurals are the thing now.
Fortunately, regular network TV is not the only game in town these days. I think most of the series I watch nowadays are on A&E, FX, Syfy, AMC, etc.
__________________
www.gregcox-author.com
Greg Cox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 25 2013, 07:34 PM   #114
xortex
Commodore
 
Location: Staten Island, NY
Re: why is there no more talk of a new star trek tv series?

Greg Cox wrote: View Post
Shaka Zulu wrote: View Post


Both are, but the former is even more annoying than the latter, because at least the latter have the knowledge of great TV of the present and can watch them. The former just wants to stay stuck in the past, because many of them have no idea how to exist in the present or deal with the future, and so hate any new original movie/TV show/comic book while detesting any remakes or continuations of older material and franchises. A lot of them deserve to be sent back in time, to be quite frank, except for the fact that they wouldn't survive one hour before wanting what exists here in the present.
Ah, but the younger ones are sometimes willfully ignorant of the classics of the past--and don't care to learn anything about them, because all that old stuff is dated and corny and cheesy anyway. So they dismiss entire decades of TV history as being beneath their interest--and miss out on lots of great stuff while practically bragging about their ignorance of the past.

Just wait until you're older and some kid tells you that "Throne of Games" couldn't possibly have been any good 'cause nobody his age has ever heard of it.

(Trust me, I've been there.)
Yea, like all those show runners of the various star Trek incarnations. Trek started off as a procedural and then gradually became all things to all people. I could see a Trek with one Human Captain with an all alien crew. I think that would be interesting.

Come to think of it Farscape and Buck Rogers were very similar, weren't they? And even Andromeda except he (Kevin Sorbo),Dylan Hunt wasn't the only human.
xortex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 26 2013, 04:44 AM   #115
wingsabre
Lieutenant Junior Grade
 
Re: why is there no more talk of a new star trek tv series?

There has been buzz that Paramount's Brad Grey wants to build a TV studio to help insulate and diversify the studio. It's still part of Viacom, and Viacom has CBS focused on television production and Paramount focused on film production, however such a move may make room for a Star Trek TV series.
wingsabre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 26 2013, 05:24 AM   #116
Shaka Zulu
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Bulawayo Military Krral
Re: why is there no more talk of a new star trek tv series?

^Exactly what I've been saying will and should happen.

R. Star wrote: View Post
So... they're idiots because they like a different type of product than you? Rather shallow reason to insult someone.
I'm insulting them because they refuse to see reason and think that these old shows are still popular enough to be put on home video as pressed complete season boxed set DVD's with all of the trimmings, when they know they aren't that popular (the only old shows that have been are Star Trek: TOS, Mission: Impossible, Bewitched, Hogan's Heroes, Gilligan's Island, I Dream Of Jeannie) and also because of the mentality that says that only old shows are any good. These people are in dire need of a wake-up call to make then live in the present that they are in now, not the past (this blog post by Stephen Bowie sums up what's wrong with people like these better than I could: Well I Heard Mister Young Sing About Her)

Last edited by Shaka Zulu; April 26 2013 at 05:49 AM.
Shaka Zulu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 26 2013, 04:14 PM   #117
CoveTom
Rear Admiral
 
Location: CoveTom
Re: why is there no more talk of a new star trek tv series?

^ How condescending. If I believe that only older TV shows are any good, I am not wrong, I simply have different tastes than you.
CoveTom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 26 2013, 04:19 PM   #118
Shaka Zulu
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Bulawayo Military Krral
Re: why is there no more talk of a new star trek tv series?

^Not at all. Read the article that I posted a link to.
Shaka Zulu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 26 2013, 07:06 PM   #119
R. Star
Rear Admiral
 
R. Star's Avatar
 
Location: Shangri-La
Re: why is there no more talk of a new star trek tv series?

So by refusing to see reason... you just mean think what you think.
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams
R. Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 26 2013, 11:09 PM   #120
C.E. Evans
Vice Admiral
 
C.E. Evans's Avatar
 
Location: Ferguson, Missouri, USA
Re: why is there no more talk of a new star trek tv series?

wingsabre wrote: View Post
There has been buzz that Paramount's Brad Grey wants to build a TV studio to help insulate and diversify the studio. It's still part of Viacom, and Viacom has CBS focused on television production and Paramount focused on film production, however such a move may make room for a Star Trek TV series.
Given that neither Viacom nor Paramount has the rights to make a Star Trek TV series, I wouldn't hold my breath.

Here's the lowdown regarding Trek's ownership. There was a time in which Star Trek was wholly owned by Paramount (which in turn, was owned by Viacom). But that ended in 2006 when Viacom and its sister/rival company, CBS, were separated and Paramount was divided between them. Viacom got Paramount Pictures, while what was formerly Paramount Television (which includes Star Trek in all its various incarnations) eventually became the property of CBS. Paramount continues to make Star Trek movies, but only under license from CBS (Paramount pays CBS for the use of Star Trek). CBS is the ultimate owner of Trek and any new TV series is theirs to say, not Paramount or anyone else.

The current relationship between CBS and Viacom is like a separated couple that underwent a very messy divorce. CBS got full custody of Star Trek and Paramount got visiting rights. They don't really get along that well, otherwise as feuding and infighting was among the reasons why CBS and Viacom were separated.
__________________
"Don't sweat the small stuff--it makes you small-minded..."
C.E. Evans is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.