RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,918
Posts: 5,478,241
Members: 25,052
Currently online: 469
Newest member: johnclever25

TrekToday headlines

New Star Trek Funko Pop! Vinyl Figures
By: T'Bonz on Nov 26

QMx Mini Phaser Ornament
By: T'Bonz on Nov 26

Stewart as Neo-Nazi Skinhead
By: T'Bonz on Nov 26

Klingon Bloodwine To Debut
By: T'Bonz on Nov 25

Trek Actors In War Of The Worlds Fundraiser
By: T'Bonz on Nov 25

Star Trek: The Next Generation Gag Reel Tease
By: T'Bonz on Nov 24

Shatner In Haven
By: T'Bonz on Nov 24

Retro Review: Covenant
By: Michelle on Nov 22

Two Official Starships Collection Previews
By: T'Bonz on Nov 21

Saldana: Women Issues In Hollywood
By: T'Bonz on Nov 21


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek TV Series > The Next Generation

The Next Generation All Good Things come to an end...but not here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old April 8 2013, 09:32 PM   #1
The Overlord
Captain
 
Worf's actions during Birthright Part II

What do you think of Worf's actions during Birthright Part II? Was Worf teaching people who lost their way to be proud of their heritage or was Worf being a racist trouble maker who disrupted a peaceful situation between a group of Klingons and Romulans?
The Overlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 8 2013, 09:52 PM   #2
R. Star
Rear Admiral
 
R. Star's Avatar
 
Location: Shangri-La
Re: Worf's actions during Birthright Part II

Both are fairly accurate descriptions. Though it's a bit ironic he ascribes behavior as to how "all Klingons" should behave when he's such an atypical Klingon himself. He did do as he thought right in teaching them of their heritage, but he also was blatantly racist against Romulans and probably did take a certain joy out of screwing with Tokath's utopia.
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams
R. Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 8 2013, 10:30 PM   #3
indolover
Fleet Captain
 
Re: Worf's actions during Birthright Part II

I think a reasonable conclusion was met at the end. the youngsters left to live in the Empire, whilst the elders remained and were free to live in their community. Worf himself technically lied to Picard when he said that nobody survived Khitomer, but it was an "honour" lie, and not as bad lol..
indolover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 9 2013, 09:45 PM   #4
jimbotron
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Bay Area, CA
Re: Worf's actions during Birthright Part II

Worf has a serious chip on his shoulder whenever it comes to Klingons not living the Klingon way. After all, he didn't have the benefit of a Klingon upbringing, he was mostly raised by humans, and has been overcompensating ever since. That especially showed when it came to raising his son. Though he's a hypocrite because he first shipped him to his human parents before raising him himself. Then it was Klingon warrior this, Klingon warrior that.

Then Worf sees Alexander years later actually trying to be a Klingon warrior, and he gets annoyed all over again. Worf's an 'interesting' character.
jimbotron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 10 2013, 04:37 AM   #5
JirinPanthosa
Rear Admiral
 
Re: Worf's actions during Birthright Part II

The Overlord wrote: View Post
What do you think of Worf's actions during Birthright Part II? Was Worf teaching people who lost their way to be proud of their heritage or was Worf being a racist trouble maker who disrupted a peaceful situation between a group of Klingons and Romulans?
Let's remember that those children were born prisoners, and that situation is not acceptable no matter how peaceful they were living. They had to be given the choice whether or not they wanted to live there, no different from Masterpiece Society.

Worf's behavior was certainly racist, but the targets of his racism were his captors. He got over the fact the girl was half-Romulan and loved her anyway.
JirinPanthosa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 10 2013, 05:39 AM   #6
R. Star
Rear Admiral
 
R. Star's Avatar
 
Location: Shangri-La
Re: Worf's actions during Birthright Part II

JirinPanthosa wrote: View Post
The Overlord wrote: View Post
What do you think of Worf's actions during Birthright Part II? Was Worf teaching people who lost their way to be proud of their heritage or was Worf being a racist trouble maker who disrupted a peaceful situation between a group of Klingons and Romulans?
Let's remember that those children were born prisoners, and that situation is not acceptable no matter how peaceful they were living. They had to be given the choice whether or not they wanted to live there, no different from Masterpiece Society.

Worf's behavior was certainly racist, but the targets of his racism were his captors. He got over the fact the girl was half-Romulan and loved her anyway.

Really everyone was wrong in a measure. Tokath and the older Klingons pretty much forced their views on their children and did everything censure any opposing viewpoints. Worf was clearly well intentioned, but it never occurred to him that they could be happy there instead of fitting his racial profiles of how people should be. Really the victims of the whole episode where the Klingon children who never had a choice.
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams
R. Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 10 2013, 02:16 PM   #7
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: Worf's actions during Birthright Part II

The wider context should also be noted here: any group of people condemned to live their lives on a single planet, without contact to the interstellar community, can be considered to be unduly suffering (as prisoners, castaways or other sidelined people today are) unless they specifically demonstrate they are hermits-by-choice. In Trek terms, staying on one planet is quite analogous to fortifying at one's ranch and never stepping outside.

Of course, with a ranch the size of a planet, the concept of fortifying loses some of the "deprivation" aspects that are so central to crazy cult fortresses today, even if the social context is the very same. But while Carraya apparently was a vast, lush planet, and the former prison camp walls did not hinder the movement of the inhabitants, the group of cultists there was still the same size as its terrestrial equivalents from today, so the social deprivation element is still very much there.

Our heroes frequently encounter people who want nothing to do with society-at-large. Kirk was in the habit of punching such people in the face until they agreed to become more sociable; Picard had no such inborn wish to alter status quo, but always encountered these hermits in situations where change was already dictated by outside forces, so the end result was the same. Was Worf going against some sort of a Starfleet directive by letting the Carraya camp stand even when it amounted to inhuman deprivation? Or was he simply reenacting "The Masterpiece Society" without the outside pressure of a stellar core fragment impact?

As for the children never having a choice, how is this different from the societal norms of the rest of the Klingon Empire, or the Romulan Star Empire? Rebelling against one's native society is considered ill form in general (everybody despises Worf for defecting to the Federation); the elders on Carraya don't appear to be in a special position in this respect.

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 10 2013, 07:15 PM   #8
sonak
Vice Admiral
 
Location: in a figment of a mediocre mind's imagination
Re: Worf's actions during Birthright Part II

I think the intention of the writers was to have it be Worf trying to get these Klingons to re-connect and be informed of their heritage to make their own choices. Unfortunately, in its execution, the episode made Worf seem like an intolerant troublemaker.
sonak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 21 2013, 06:00 AM   #9
Worf'sParmach
Commander
 
Worf'sParmach's Avatar
 
Location: Plano, TX
Re: Worf's actions during Birthright Part II

jimbotron wrote: View Post
Worf has a serious chip on his shoulder whenever it comes to Klingons not living the Klingon way. After all, he didn't have the benefit of a Klingon upbringing, he was mostly raised by humans, and has been overcompensating ever since.
This. I bet Worf was so excited to have some klingons looking up to him that he just couldn't help himself. That said, this is one of my favorite Worf episodes because it is so "gray." Worf and Tokath are both being intollerant with Ba'el being the commonality that helps them see that.
__________________
Obsessing over every detail in the Star Trek Universe since the 1990s
Check out my fanfic (pretty please ): http://www.fanfiction.net/~ginomo
Worf'sParmach is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.