RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,940
Posts: 5,479,071
Members: 25,056
Currently online: 468
Newest member: JeremiahJT

TrekToday headlines

Trek Shirt And Hoodie
By: T'Bonz on Nov 27

A Klingon Christmas Carol’s Last Season
By: T'Bonz on Nov 27

Attack Wing Wave 10 Expansion Pack
By: T'Bonz on Nov 27

New Star Trek Funko Pop! Vinyl Figures
By: T'Bonz on Nov 26

QMx Mini Phaser Ornament
By: T'Bonz on Nov 26

Stewart as Neo-Nazi Skinhead
By: T'Bonz on Nov 26

Klingon Bloodwine To Debut
By: T'Bonz on Nov 25

Trek Actors In War Of The Worlds Fundraiser
By: T'Bonz on Nov 25

Star Trek: The Next Generation Gag Reel Tease
By: T'Bonz on Nov 24

Shatner In Haven
By: T'Bonz on Nov 24


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek TV Series > Voyager

Voyager There's coffee in this forum!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old April 13 2013, 11:22 PM   #46
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: King Daniel Into Darkness
Re: Can USS VOYAGER separate from saucer section?

T'Girl wrote: View Post
If you can in deed endlessly hover, why devote any internal space to those four legs?

Technically, if you're hovering (regardless if the legs are touching the ground) you haven't actually "landed."

Hovering does look more dignified than landing on those tiny feet.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 14 2013, 03:24 AM   #47
T'Girl
Vice Admiral
 
T'Girl's Avatar
 
Location: comfortably residing in the meat packing district
Re: Can USS VOYAGER separate from saucer section?

SonicRanger wrote: View Post
Of course it separates
Love it SonicRanger, and makes it pretty obvious where the saucer's impulse engine is. It's in between those two "booms."




__________________
.
TOS, TNG and VGR never mentioned a "Federation President."
T'Girl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 16 2013, 06:12 PM   #48
secretreeve
Lieutenant Junior Grade
 
Re: Can USS VOYAGER separate from saucer section?

considering how awkward it can be assembling that model (i know, i built it and lit the entire thing so had cables traversing both sections) all i can say is i hope to god revell never get into the star ship building industry or we're all screwed
__________________
Modelling build logs, lighting kit shop, but mostly model kit building of all kinds of sci fi secretsmodelling.webs.com

youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/user/MrReeve1987?feature=mhee
secretreeve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 16 2013, 07:46 PM   #49
C.E. Evans
Vice Admiral
 
C.E. Evans's Avatar
 
Location: Ferguson, Missouri, USA
Re: Can USS VOYAGER separate from saucer section?

I always saw the Intrepid-class as being a single-hulled design and with Starfleet going more and more in that direction in the future.
__________________
"Don't sweat the small stuff--it makes you small-minded..."
C.E. Evans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 16 2013, 07:49 PM   #50
R. Star
Rear Admiral
 
R. Star's Avatar
 
Location: Shangri-La
Re: Can USS VOYAGER separate from saucer section?

Even if the two components are assembled separately then joined, doesn't necessarily argue that they can separate at will and function independently. The whole point of the separation bit was to keep the families out of harm's way, but they seemed to have dropped the whole families on starships bit after Wolf 359 and definitely after the Dominion war. Rightly so.

Voyager never had any civilians on it when they launched. If they could separate the whole time, why was it not even mentioned once as an alternative at some point when Janeway was ready to blow up the ship on any number of occasions?
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams
R. Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 16 2013, 08:11 PM   #51
T'Girl
Vice Admiral
 
T'Girl's Avatar
 
Location: comfortably residing in the meat packing district
Re: Can USS VOYAGER separate from saucer section?

R. Star wrote: View Post
The whole point of the separation bit was to keep the families out of harm's way
No, that's just a benefical extra. As I understand the original concept the ship can separate to relieve the lower section of the bulk of the saucer. Making the lower section faster and more malnuverable, therefor a better combatant in battle situations.

Battle section.

")
__________________
.
TOS, TNG and VGR never mentioned a "Federation President."
T'Girl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.