RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 138,318
Posts: 5,352,426
Members: 24,622
Currently online: 581
Newest member: groucho900

TrekToday headlines

Drexler TV Alert
By: T'Bonz on Jul 26

Retro Review: His Way
By: Michelle on Jul 26

MicroWarriors Releases Next Week
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25

Ships Of The Line Design Contest
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25

Next Weekend: Shore Leave 36!
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25

True Trek History To Be Penned
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25

Insight Editions Announces Three Trek Books For 2015
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24

To Be Takei Review by Spencer Blohm
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24

Mulgrew: Playing Red
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24

Hallmark 2015 Trek Ornaments
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies I-X

Star Trek Movies I-X Discuss the first ten big screen outings in this forum!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old April 10 2013, 06:24 PM   #226
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: In the 23rd Century...
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: What sunk the TNG movie franchise: Insurrection or Nemesis?

Never did like the Enterprise-E, felt like the took the Connie-refit, the Excelsior and Voyager put them all in a bag and stomped on it. And the color scheme of the interiors are downright depressing.
__________________
"I had no idea you were so... formidable. " - Anan 7 to James T. Kirk, A Taste of Armageddon
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 10 2013, 07:19 PM   #227
sonak
Vice Admiral
 
Location: in a figment of a mediocre mind's imagination
Re: What sunk the TNG movie franchise: Insurrection or Nemesis?

Lord Garth wrote: View Post
"The Way of the Warrior", the fourth season premiere of DS9 when Worf joins the series. Specifically, it's the scene where he and O'Brien are talking in the Promenade.

ah, thanks. That's a good episode and a good quote, I can't believe I can't remember it.
__________________
"why oh why didn't I take the blue pill?"
sonak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 10 2013, 08:13 PM   #228
Jon1701
Rear Admiral
 
Jon1701's Avatar
 
Location: Manchester, UK
Re: What sunk the TNG movie franchise: Insurrection or Nemesis?

BillJ wrote: View Post
Never did like the Enterprise-E, felt like the took the Connie-refit, the Excelsior and Voyager put them all in a bag and stomped on it. And the color scheme of the interiors are downright depressing.
Totally.

The bridge is so angular and uninviting. Its almost as if they went "lets do the exact opposite of the Enterprise D"

Really, the only good thing Stuart Baird did in NEMESIS was change the graphical colour scheme on the bridge. That improved things. Slightly.
__________________
www.moviebreadbin.com
Movie reviews sponsored by that toupee that Patrick Stewart had sent over from London that time.
Jon1701 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 11 2013, 01:35 AM   #229
TREK_GOD_1
Fleet Captain
 
TREK_GOD_1's Avatar
 
Location: Escaped from Delta Vega
Re: What sunk the TNG movie franchise: Insurrection or Nemesis?

BillJ wrote: View Post
Never did like the Enterprise-E, felt like the took the Connie-refit, the Excelsior and Voyager put them all in a bag and stomped on it. And the color scheme of the interiors are downright depressing.
They ran out of ideas. The TNG era designers' natural tendency was to believe "thinner! sleek! better!" so after D (a so-so design, IMO), here comes E, which was a horrible mashup of the Excelsior and who knows what else, with all of the off surface stripes and angles.

They never appeared to be functional, powerful ships, but glorified model kits.
__________________
"...to be like God, you have the power to make the world anything you want it to be."
TREK_GOD_1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 11 2013, 02:51 AM   #230
Random_Spock
Fleet Captain
 
Random_Spock's Avatar
 
Location: Random_Spock
View Random_Spock's Twitter Profile
Re: What sunk the TNG movie franchise: Insurrection or Nemesis?

sayonara maru wrote: View Post
The Overlord wrote: View Post
What sunk the TNG movie franchise: Insurrection or Nemesis?
Neither.. the TNG franchise literally had no where else to go. The Insurrection and Nemesis movies were great on their own...But they just didnt add anything to the franchise that couldnt be seen on one of the hour episodes. ..

Still wouldnt have missed either for the world though. Data wigging out, Commander William Babyface, Will and Deanna finally hooking up (on screen!), Picard driving a Subaru, Data making the ultimate sacrifce...and sweet sweet Anij..
Agreed. Liked the marriage of Will and Deanna . Wasn't a fan of Data's singing though . On a side note, got to see a part of Star Trek V recently and the scene where Kirk, Spock and company were singing around the camp fire had me . Felt so sorry for poor Spock (row, row, row your boat -- seriously Kirk --> ).

My biggest disappointment in the last film was with the makeup and the way it was shot. Both of those seemed really cheap. Especially during any of the outdoor scenes (yes Picard in a jeep I'm looking at you ) -- I was almost blinded by how bright that scene appeared O_O. And the makeup, heck some of the stuff that was in TNG, series wise looked better. The Klingons and the Romulans looked downright fake.

Was very disappointed by it .
__________________
Credit goes to Viacom for the Perry Mason films, no copyright infringement intended.
Random_Spock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 11 2013, 07:38 PM   #231
RAMA
Vice Admiral
 
RAMA's Avatar
 
Location: NJ, USA
Re: What sunk the TNG movie franchise: Insurrection or Nemesis?

I put together a model of the E-E and it really looks impressive as a hand held object. I gained a new appreciation for it, thought it's still not on my top 10 favorite starships list.

The new sleeker, more modern, better protected design ethic has been very popular in fandom, as well as for creators, with ST:Online and the book artists taking it and turning it into the greatest era of starship creativity in Trek since the new design ethic of STNG. We've had the Titan, Aventine (which I like even more than the E-E), etc.

RAMA
__________________
It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. Carl Sagan
RAMA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 11 2013, 07:56 PM   #232
CaptainStoner
Knuckle-dragging TNZ Denizen
 
CaptainStoner's Avatar
 
Location: Hill dweller
Re: What sunk the TNG movie franchise: Insurrection or Nemesis?

^ yeah, I don't mind the Sovereign class. But the Galaxy class was the TNG ship, on millions of TVs, and I think TNG lost some of its 'branding' by switching ships.
This is, I think, aside from preferring the Galaxy design myself. I like a lady with some curves...
CaptainStoner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 11 2013, 08:44 PM   #233
Danger Ace
Commander
 
Danger Ace's Avatar
 
Location: California
Re: What sunk the TNG movie franchise: Insurrection or Nemesis?

Lord Garth wrote: View Post
I'd have to say Insurrection sunk the TNG films. I don't dislike the movie, but it doesn't do anything for me.
Do you realize the power of what you wrote?

That is absolutely the most condemning thing anyone could say. To say that after $60 million and thousands of hours labor they instilled within you a feeling of indifference.

Wow!

People, by our nature, are prone to feel something. It is only an extreme case when something leaves us feeling nothing. There can be no solace or upshot to that from the point-of-view of the cast or crew. That makes it an unqualified failure for all concerned.

And I think people have it wrong to say "there was no place to go." They had an exceptional mix of characters and the univesere literally as their metaphorical oyster. Star Trek (TNG included) could go anywhere and do anything it wanted. It is, by design, uniquely crafted to tell any kind of story imaginable.

As for the aging, again I claim bull-schtick! The TOS folks did it. They did it by simply aknowledging their age and embracing it. That is all TNG had to do.

The Riker-Troi wedding meant nothing because they never really laid the groundwork for it to mean something. Fans tried to make something out of it because they had all this outside information that general audiences didn't. And that kind of symbolises TNG's big screen problems - all their movies (save First Contact) were all about taking short-cuts.

TWoK, for example, culled a villian from TOS run on TV roughly 15 years earlier which organically created a tension and a gravity to the drama. TNG, in Nemesis, tried to manufacture the same relationship between Picard and Shinzon in an instant and it felt painfully contrived. Just as Data's mock sacrifice tried to recreate Mr. Spock's powerful death scene also in TWoK.

No, what killed the TNG films was the total taking for granted the wonderfulness of what they had by all concerned taking shortcuts. The lack of quality which resulted was seen and felt. In short, it was a suicide.
__________________
Yours Truly,
Vic Falcone
Danger Ace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 11 2013, 10:31 PM   #234
Lord Garth
Captain
 
Lord Garth's Avatar
 
Re: What sunk the TNG movie franchise: Insurrection or Nemesis?

Danger Ace wrote: View Post
Lord Garth wrote: View Post
I'd have to say Insurrection sunk the TNG films. I don't dislike the movie, but it doesn't do anything for me.
Do you realize the power of what you wrote?
?

Ummm... ...



... no?

No.

That is absolutely the most condemning thing anyone could say. To say that after $60 million and thousands of hours labor they instilled within you a feeling of indifference.

Wow!
Yes, and I'm involved in an independent film right now. I've put in long, 20 hour days.

If someone says that film does nothing for them when it comes out, then that's what happens. You get praise, you get criticism... you get indifference.

People, by our nature, are prone to feel something. It is only an extreme case when something leaves us feeling nothing. There can be no solace or upshot to that from the point-of-view of the cast or crew. That makes it an unqualified failure for all concerned.
The soundtrack is a bit playful. There... I felt something.

The rest of your post is addressed toward other people so I won't bother to get into that.

No, what killed the TNG films was the total taking for granted the wonderfulness of what they had by all concerned taking shortcuts. The lack of quality which resulted was seen and felt. In short, it was a suicide.
Yes, and if Insurrection weren't tied down to its December 11, 1998 release date no matter what they would've had time to make a better film.

For that reason, while it's too bad it's taking four years for Star Trek Into Darkness to come out, it's better if they took their time to get it done right than done quick.

For the record, the film I'm involved with is I Am Monroe? and my name is Roland Khorshidianzadeh. For those who've known me online for a decade or more, yes, I finally got myself into the industry. It's one of the many reasons I post a lot less than I used to.

Last edited by Lord Garth; April 12 2013 at 04:53 AM. Reason: Corrected a few typos.
Lord Garth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 11 2013, 11:06 PM   #235
Danger Ace
Commander
 
Danger Ace's Avatar
 
Location: California
Re: What sunk the TNG movie franchise: Insurrection or Nemesis?

Lord Garth wrote: View Post
For the record, the film I'm involved with is I Am Monroe? and my name is Roland Khorshidianzadeh. For those who've known me online for a decade or more, yes, I'm finally got myself into the industry. It's one of the many reasons I post a lot less than I used to.
I applaud your "making it" and will look for it. In fact, the title "I Am Monroe" sounds familiar to me ... Without getting too far off-topic, how about a quick blurb regarding its release info?

I am a big believer in supporting independent filmmakers - they are the most consistant source of sincere cinema (how's that for a another response to mock? Don't you feel rather insensitive and loutish in the face of my open-hearted support of your artistic endeavor? )

Peace and I truly hope "I Am Monroe?" hits big for you.
__________________
Yours Truly,
Vic Falcone
Danger Ace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 11 2013, 11:09 PM   #236
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: In the 23rd Century...
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: What sunk the TNG movie franchise: Insurrection or Nemesis?

Insurrection is the one that honestly pisses me off the most and turned me off of Star Trek for quite a while. It had a great concept and totally squanders it. Then I read the 'Making of' book and it pisses me off even more because it seemed like they allowed Stewart and Spiner to derail the whole thing behind-the-scenes.
__________________
"I had no idea you were so... formidable. " - Anan 7 to James T. Kirk, A Taste of Armageddon
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 11 2013, 11:30 PM   #237
Danger Ace
Commander
 
Danger Ace's Avatar
 
Location: California
Re: What sunk the TNG movie franchise: Insurrection or Nemesis?

BillJ wrote: View Post
Insurrection is the one that honestly pisses me off the most and turned me off of Star Trek for quite a while. It had a great concept and totally squanders it. Then I read the 'Making of' book and it pisses me off even more because it seemed like they allowed Stewart and Spiner to derail the whole thing behind-the-scenes.
I seem to recall reading the same thing in various articles. It only got worse with Nemesis.

With the TOS era films even the worst one came across as near-miss. I still believe there were a lot of good moments in The Final Frontier and the kernals of potential greatness lay there largely unpopped - All it needed was one more top-to-bottom rewrite of the script before heading into production.

"Generations" was the victim of novices attempting to write for the big-screen, but even that was really just another near-miss. "First Contact" was a homerun. "Insurrection" struck out at the plate, while, "Nemesis" was, for all intents and purpose, a forefeit where, in odd fashion, those inolved attempted to re-enact the highlights from a previous game played by a different lineup.

You couple that with the bush league effort of "Enterprise" on weekly television no wonder attendence went down and fans left in favor of the stadiums of other franchises (both new and old).
__________________
Yours Truly,
Vic Falcone

Last edited by Danger Ace; April 11 2013 at 11:59 PM.
Danger Ace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 11 2013, 11:56 PM   #238
MacLeod
Admiral
 
Location: Great Britain
Re: What sunk the TNG movie franchise: Insurrection or Nemesis?

I would say it was a combination of both. Whilst neither film was bad, they weren't great either. They were just short of average. If NEM had good critical reviews and madea decent sum of money at the box office Paramount would have made another film.

If you look at the TOS movies generally TWOk, TVH and TUC are considered to be the best of films. Whilst TMP, TSFS and TFF are considered the weaker. So you had one weak, followed by one good. Whilst for the TNG films, FC is generally conisered to be the strongest whilst the other three the weaker films.
__________________
On the continent of wild endeavour in the mountains of solace and solitude there stood the citadel of the time lords, the oldest and most mighty race in the universe looking down on the galaxies below sworn never to interfere only to watch.
MacLeod is online now   Reply With Quote
Old April 12 2013, 02:09 AM   #239
Hober Mallow
Commodore
 
Location: The planet Terminus, site of the Encyclopedia Foundation on the periphery of the galaxy
Re: What sunk the TNG movie franchise: Insurrection or Nemesis?

Here's how I always imagined Nemesis being pitched:

"Okay, ready? So Data has... a twin!"

"Uh... okay... but wasn't that already done in the series? Hmmm... maybe that could be the b-story. How about a truly cinematic A-story?"

"Okay, okay, I got. So Picard... get ready for it... Captain Picard has... a twin!
__________________
"Beep... beep!" --Captain Pike
Hober Mallow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 12 2013, 02:34 AM   #240
CaptainStoner
Knuckle-dragging TNZ Denizen
 
CaptainStoner's Avatar
 
Location: Hill dweller
Re: What sunk the TNG movie franchise: Insurrection or Nemesis?

It wasn't a TNG film that killed Star Trek forever, it was a collection of certain scenes. The joystick on the bridge, the dune buggy, "Blue Skies"', Kirk's death, etc. All of these combined to create a warp core breach, and up she went.
CaptainStoner is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
insurrection, nemesis

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.