RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,353
Posts: 5,445,820
Members: 24,968
Currently online: 455
Newest member: TrekkieKimber

TrekToday headlines

Kruge Bobble Head
By: T'Bonz on Oct 30

Two Trek Actors In Green Room
By: T'Bonz on Oct 30

Trek UglyDolls First Look
By: T'Bonz on Oct 29

New Star Trek Select Action Figure
By: T'Bonz on Oct 29

Trek Actors In Elsa & Fred
By: T'Bonz on Oct 29

The Red Shirt Diaries #9
By: T'Bonz on Oct 28

Greenwood Cast In Truth
By: T'Bonz on Oct 28

Cumberbatch In Talks For Strange
By: T'Bonz on Oct 28

Two New Trek Bobble Heads
By: T'Bonz on Oct 27

Meaney On Playing Historical Figure Durant
By: T'Bonz on Oct 27


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek TV Series > Star Trek - Original Series

Star Trek - Original Series The one that started it all...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old April 8 2013, 09:42 AM   #121
Maurice
Vice Admiral
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Location: Maurice in San Francisco
View Maurice's Twitter Profile
Re: Does TOS Still Look Futuristic to You?

^^^Did Richard Taylor say this was his inspiration?
__________________
* * *
"The road to hell is paved with works-in-progress."
—Philip Roth
Maurice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 8 2013, 12:48 PM   #122
ZapBrannigan
Fleet Captain
 
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
 
Location: New York State
Re: Does TOS Still Look Futuristic to You?

Maurice wrote: View Post
^^^Did Richard Taylor say this was his inspiration?
I always thought Andrew Probert designed the refit. Anyway, the nacelles look nearly identical to the locomotive, and I hardly think it's a coincidence. I don't know if it was ever acknowledged in print.
ZapBrannigan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 8 2013, 01:22 PM   #123
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Does TOS Still Look Futuristic to You?

I always heard that the front end of the nacelles were inspired by a 30's or 40's Ford pick-up truck...
__________________
"If I hadn't tried, the cost would have been my soul." - Admiral James T. Kirk, Star Trek III: The Search for Spock
BillJ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old April 8 2013, 01:41 PM   #124
aridas sofia
Rear Admiral
 
Re: Does TOS Still Look Futuristic to You?

It's funny, because on the Ottens website Taylor is quoted as saying the front of the nacelles was based on a 1940 Ford grille. That locomotive looks a lot closer to the final result to me.

http://ottens.co.uk/forgottentrek/de...re-enterprise/
aridas sofia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 8 2013, 01:49 PM   #125
ZapBrannigan
Fleet Captain
 
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
 
Location: New York State
Re: Does TOS Still Look Futuristic to You?

Maybe he didn't want to admit how closely he had copied something old, so he gave the fans a red herring to talk about. Eh, I don't know.
ZapBrannigan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 8 2013, 01:56 PM   #126
Robert Comsol
Commodore
 
Robert Comsol's Avatar
 
Location: USS Berlin
Re: Does TOS Still Look Futuristic to You?

ZapBrannigan wrote: View Post
I always thought Andrew Probert designed the refit. Anyway, the nacelles look nearly identical to the locomotive, and I hardly think it's a coincidence. I don't know if it was ever acknowledged in print.
If I recall correctly, Matt Jefferies had already done some preliminary work for a new Enterprise back in the mid-1970's before he embarked on another project (as Paramount couldn't decide whether to greenlight a new Star Trek television series or not).

It started something like this and this. If there's enough evidence of an evolution in designing the new nacelles, it could be a coincidence. Of course, Matt Jefferies might have seen this locomotive and subconsciously remembered the design when he started on the new nacelles (it's called cryptomnesia).

Indeed, the locomotive looks a lot like the new nacelles, great find!

Bob
__________________
"The first duty of every Starfleet officer is to the truth" Jean-Luc Picard
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
Albert Einstein
Robert Comsol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 8 2013, 09:47 PM   #127
Jon1701
Rear Admiral
 
Jon1701's Avatar
 
Location: Manchester, UK
Re: Does TOS Still Look Futuristic to You?

xortex wrote: View Post
Jon1701 wrote: View Post
Each Star Trek bridge has looked pretty futuristic to me at the time it was produced with the exception of STAR TREK (2009). That's the only bridge that felt over designed and focused on aesthetics over function.

Its the only bridge that seemed dated straight away and I'm not talking about the spotlights.

In fact I liked everything about that movie apart from the production design. To me, it didn't create a believable universe, which tended to pull me out of the movie.
Tough titties,

That movie was sour dreck or a satre wreck. Take you're pick.
Each to their own.

Satre?
__________________
www.moviebreadbin.com
Movie reviews sponsored by that toupee that Patrick Stewart had sent over from London that time.
Jon1701 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 8 2013, 10:45 PM   #128
Gary7
Rear Admiral
 
Gary7's Avatar
 
Location: Near Manhattan ··· in an alternate reality
Re: Does TOS Still Look Futuristic to You?

ZapBrannigan wrote: View Post
What I'm not too crazy about is that the front end of each warp nacelle bears a cross that looks like "the" Cross, which is way out of place unless the ship was launched by United Federation of Presbyterians or something.
I never thought about that until you mentioned it and... you're right. Damned... and now I'll never stop seeing it that way.
__________________
Remembering Ensign Mallory.
Gary7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 9 2013, 01:05 AM   #129
trevanian
Rear Admiral
 
Re: Does TOS Still Look Futuristic to You?

Robert Comsol wrote: View Post
ZapBrannigan wrote: View Post
I always thought Andrew Probert designed the refit. Anyway, the nacelles look nearly identical to the locomotive, and I hardly think it's a coincidence. I don't know if it was ever acknowledged in print.
If I recall correctly, Matt Jefferies had already done some preliminary work for a new Enterprise back in the mid-1970's before he embarked on another project (as Paramount couldn't decide whether to greenlight a new Star Trek television series or not).

It started something like this and this. If there's enough evidence of an evolution in designing the new nacelles, it could be a coincidence. Of course, Matt Jefferies might have seen this locomotive and subconsciously remembered the design when he started on the new nacelles (it's called cryptomnesia).

Indeed, the locomotive looks a lot like the new nacelles, great find!

Bob
After PLANET OF THE TITANS was cancelled and they went with PHASE 2 for a couple of months, Jeffries did some moonlighting for TREK while on LITTLE HOUSE, his regular gig. He drew the new Ent with the flat nacelles, which I guess was one of his alternates originally, so the general lines are his.

Then, when Abel took on the effects, Richard Taylor was the art director. He tweaked the Jeffries as mentioned, and had Andy Probert doing the majority of the ship, like variations in windows and rec rooms and torpedo launchers. ST THE MAG has a TMP issue in which there's a Taylor interview where he discusses this.

THE GOD THING had correspondence with Taylor at one point (that's where he got all the storyboards and concept art that I still so dearly covet and dream about getting to see!), too.

I think Taylor retconned some of his thinking ... there's no indication from Magicam or anybody else that the Ent was supposed to be pearlescent or sport the checkerboarding, not until Trumbull came on.

In fact Magicam mentions in STARLOG 27 that the ship was supposed to be almost entirely smooth, and that made it tough on them, but that they ultimately were disappointed with all the surface detail added for TMP, for aesthetic reasons. (then again the same Magicam guys also claim in the AMERICAN CINEMATOGRAPHER issue on TMP that they were provided with NO storyboards, which sounds like utter bullshit to me, since there was Minor and later on Zuberano and lots of other guys drawing all sorts of stuff ... why wouldn't it have gotten to Magicam? Sorry for diversion.)

But Taylor does make this shiny hull idea claim in the ST THE MAG interview, I'm pretty sure of that.

I should check his website (and Trumbull's) to see if there are any additons about TMP. The TMP stuff on Trumbull's has some good images in HQ, not all of which are common.
trevanian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 9 2013, 01:37 AM   #130
ZapBrannigan
Fleet Captain
 
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
 
Location: New York State
Re: Does TOS Still Look Futuristic to You?

Robert Comsol wrote: View Post
If I recall correctly, Matt Jefferies had already done some preliminary work for a new Enterprise back in the mid-1970's before he embarked on another project (as Paramount couldn't decide whether to greenlight a new Star Trek television series or not).

It started something like this and this. If there's enough evidence of an evolution in designing the new nacelles, it could be a coincidence. Of course, Matt Jefferies might have seen this locomotive and subconsciously remembered the design when he started on the new nacelles (it's called cryptomnesia).

Indeed, the locomotive looks a lot like the new nacelles, great find!

Bob
Thanks. Based on "this" and "this," I now think Matt Jeffries designed the refit and TMP's subsequent artists just tweaked it.
ZapBrannigan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 9 2013, 04:58 AM   #131
Geoff Peterson
Fleet Admiral
 
Geoff Peterson's Avatar
 
Location: 20 feet from an outlet
Re: Does TOS Still Look Futuristic to You?

I always assumed they took the look from the original Klingon battle cruiser's nacelles.
__________________
Nerys Myk
Geoff Peterson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 9 2013, 05:31 AM   #132
Maurice
Vice Admiral
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Location: Maurice in San Francisco
View Maurice's Twitter Profile
Re: Does TOS Still Look Futuristic to You?

Not saying he mightn't have seen that locomotive at some point, but here's what Taylor said about the nacelles:
My approach was to kind of "art-deco-size-it" in a way. I spent weeks drawing and re-drawing and designing the nacelles. I mean the front-end of the nacelles was almost a 40 Ford grille. But I tried to make it have a very art-deco feel; for example I added the parallel lines along the edge of the saucer.
Richard Taylor
March 09, 2001
Interview on Cinepixel
P.S. The locomotive in question is a C & O Chesapeake & Ohio M-1 Steam Turbine Locomotive.
__________________
* * *
"The road to hell is paved with works-in-progress."
—Philip Roth

Last edited by Maurice; April 9 2013 at 06:04 AM.
Maurice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 9 2013, 05:42 AM   #133
Screamy
LORD SHIT SUPREME
 
Screamy's Avatar
 
Location: Not on your life, my Hindu friend.
View Screamy's Twitter Profile Send a message via ICQ to Screamy
Re: Does TOS Still Look Futuristic to You?

TREK_GOD_1 wrote: View Post
ZapBrannigan wrote: View Post
Much as I love the bridge as a visual experience, it has some problems.

- To get from the captain's chair to the elevator, Kirk had to take two steps down, turn 180 degrees, and then take two steps right back up again, and squeeze between the chair and the red railing. (The gap varies between episodes as the captain's chair was moved forward or back to accomodate a scene.) Or he could go the long way to the port-side bridge steps and double back for the whole distance to the elevator.
It is not any easier to get to the main turbolift on TNG's Enterprise. First, the entire rear of the command chairs are blocked by the cresent-shaped, elevated security station. This means Riker, Picard and Troi had to--as seen dozens of times--get up, walk forward, turn to walk up a ramp outside of the security section just to get to the turbolift. Not exactly a functional layout.
There was also the forward turbolift.
__________________
ENOUGH OF THIS TURGID BASH WANKERY!
Screamy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 9 2013, 07:18 AM   #134
ZapBrannigan
Fleet Captain
 
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
 
Location: New York State
Re: Does TOS Still Look Futuristic to You?

Maurice wrote: View Post
Not saying he mightn't have seen that locomotive at some point, but here's what Taylor said about the nacelles:
My approach was to kind of "art-deco-size-it" in a way. I spent weeks drawing and re-drawing and designing the nacelles. I mean the front-end of the nacelles was almost a 40 Ford grille. But I tried to make it have a very art-deco feel; for example I added the parallel lines along the edge of the saucer.
Richard Taylor
March 09, 2001
Interview on Cinepixel
P.S. The locomotive in question is a C & O Chesapeake & Ohio M-1 Steam Turbine Locomotive.
Thank you for all that useful info. I was absolutely wondering about the train's identity.

It's odd that this Taylor guy gets such a modest credit for TMP at imdb.com, given that he played such a crucial role. I was expecting him to be the art director or production designer, but he's lost in a very long alphabetical list of people under Visual Effects. He designed the Refit and at imdb he's practically a name in the phone book!

Last edited by ZapBrannigan; April 9 2013 at 07:41 AM.
ZapBrannigan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 10 2013, 01:18 AM   #135
trevanian
Rear Admiral
 
Re: Does TOS Still Look Futuristic to You?

Most of what Taylor intended (as Abel's art director for VFX) was dropped or abandoned. His concept of vger -- inside or out -- was nothing like what we got, and the space walk was completely different. I think Taylor and Abel wanted Epsilon 9 set on a planet, too (since the live-action for that wasn't even shot till early 79, that concept may have lasted all the way through the primary Abel involvement.)

Except for the interior wormhole, which was completed at Abel but overseen by Trumbull's animation guy Bob Swarthe, most folks think there is nada in terms of on-screen stuff from Abel. But in addition to the refit tweaks -- which did NOT include the self-lit stuff that Trumbull put in along with the awesome paint job -- Abel/Taylor's Andy Probert designed the drydock (though Magicam claimed they only got one general sketch, Probert made available a lot of drydock artwork in STARLOG and ENTERPRISE INCIDENTS) and travel pods and work bees.

The Abel/Taylor bridge probe was supposed to be something much different than we got too. Con Pederson, one of the main supes on 2001 (the unsung quiet one), was working on a kind of light sculpture. About 10 years ago, I talked with a guy who, like Probert, managed to survive working at both Abel's and Trumbull's, and he mentioned he liked hanging out with Pederson because the guy was all about the work, whereas a lot of Abel folks at the main facility were more about the drugs (I kind of make a hobby of trying to interview as many TMP folk as I can, and since I write about tech stuff in filmmaking, it actually happens pretty often. Haven't gotten too much in the way of revelations, but you never can tell when somebody is going to peel back a new layer.)

There is a guy named Joe who worked on the show and wrote a letter to STARLOG saying the NEW WEST article about Abel (look that up, it is something else!) was in large part malarkey, and it supported a lot of Abel views that the problems were all over, not just on their end. Brick Price has also gone on record about Abel producing a lot of footage, whereas the official story is that they produced nothing but an unsuccessful film test, which was when Wise started getting rid of them.

We really need that Preston Neal Jones 1600 page making of TMP, now more than ever!
trevanian is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
aesthetic, color tv, design, futuristic, uniforms

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.