RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 138,207
Posts: 5,346,508
Members: 24,605
Currently online: 523
Newest member: Disco

TrekToday headlines

Funko Mini Spock
By: T'Bonz on Jul 23

IDW Publishing Comic Preview
By: T'Bonz on Jul 23

A Baby For Saldana
By: T'Bonz on Jul 23

Klingon Beer Arrives In The US
By: T'Bonz on Jul 22

Star Trek: Prelude To Axanar
By: T'Bonz on Jul 22

Abrams Announces Star Wars: Force For Change Sweepstakes
By: T'Bonz on Jul 22

New Funko Trek Figure
By: T'Bonz on Jul 21

Saldana As A Role Model
By: T'Bonz on Jul 21

San Diego Comic-Con Trek Fan Guide
By: T'Bonz on Jul 21

Cumberbatch As Turing
By: T'Bonz on Jul 21


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek TV Series > Star Trek - Original Series

Star Trek - Original Series The one that started it all...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old April 4 2013, 03:48 AM   #1
Masao
Fleet Captain
 
Masao's Avatar
 
Location: Tokyo
What kind of fan are you?

(To the mods: I'm posting this in the TOS forum, because that's where I usually post. Move to a more appropriate forum if you see fit.)


Whenever I witness one of these doctrinal conflicts within Star Trek (Thread: "Do you believe in the official Chronology" http://www.trekbbs.com/showthread.php?t=207400), I’m kind of amused (but also a bit saddened) by how much it resembles conflicts in other “faiths” and belief systems, like religion, science, sports, hobbies, politics, or other entertainment franchises.

Like other faiths, Trek had a core of events, narratives, and values that were later declared canon or apocryphal, celebrated and denounced, and expanded and elaborated upon.

All of us assume familiar roles in this faith which include:

The Priesthood - who have been anointed to have authority over others

The Faithful Flock - who happily accept, without question, whatever the priesthood tells them

The True Believers – who show complete devotion to the faith and allow it to enter all aspects of their lives

Conservatives, who include:
The Fundamentalists - who claim adherence to the faith, as they believe it was in the beginning
and
The Traditionalists - who prefer the old ways but tolerate the new

The Prophets and Mystics - who claim a direct communication with forces beyond our ken

The Defenders of the Faith - who seek to maintain doctrinal purity and protect the faith from within and without

The Crusaders - who fight other faiths

The Cannibals/Fratricidials - who fight most with those of their own faith

The Scripturists - who pride themselves on their superior knowledge of the faith and canon and use it to lord over other believers

The Archivists – who make detailed records of the people, places, and events of the faith.

The Conspicuous Believers – who make a show of how deeply they believe

The Quietly Observant - who believe (perhaps deeply) but make no professions of faith

The Casual Believers - who pay attention only to the big events

The Grazers - who pick and choose from along the various tenets of this and other faiths

The Intellectuals - who ponder and discuss deeper issues and meanings of the faith and belief

The Artists - who depict and celebrate characters and events of our faith, out of devotion, patronage, or self-expression

The Elitists – who look down upon others for “believing in the wrong way”

Progressive, who include:
The Reformers - who say that problems with the faith or with believers need to be fixed
and
The Evolutionists - who say the faith is a living, breathing entity that should change with time and the environment.

The Iconoclasts - who attack the faith but provide no solutions

The Provocateurs - who like to stir things up, just for the hell of it

The Apocalyptics - who believe the things are so f*cked up that the end is near

The Splittists – who say that one aspect of the faith should be followed and others abandoned

The Ecumenicals - who try to reach out to other believers and faiths

The Relic Hunters - who search for and collect physical articles pertaining to their faith

The Pilgrims - who travel to sacred places and meet with other believers

The Closeted – who are ashamed of their belief and will denigrate or downplay it, especially before nonbelievers

The Deniers (I couldn’t think of a better term) – who say the faith is not important while always talking about it

The Apostates/Heretics/Blasphemers - who denounce the faith in part or in whole

The Lapsed - who once believed but have since left the faith

The Big-Tenters/Universalist - who believe that all are believers are welcome

TrINO – “Trekkie in name only.” A possibly mythical type who only claims to be a fan for the supposed social cachet (!)

NuTrINO - What fundamentalists call people who like the 2009 movie (I just thought it sounded funny)

It’s a fun parlor game to step back and think about what role or roles you and other fans play. I know that I play several of these roles. While I find some Trek fans annoying on a personal level (OK, I’m an elitist), I think we need all types of fan.

Yeah, Star Trek is “just a TV show.” But it’s one that I’ve enjoyed for most of my life. Trek means a lot to me, but I refuse to get into heated arguments with other fans about their beliefs. Think what you want and let others do the same. As a wise man once said, “Don’t be a dick.” Even as Trek grows and evolves, I will always have some part of it to hold on to. That will never change. It’s only the behavior of other fans that could ever push me away from active fandom (and posting about it on Internet message boards).
__________________
"Jesus said the meek would inherit the earth, but so far all we've gotten is Minnesota and North Dakota." -- Garrison Keillor

Last edited by Masao; April 5 2013 at 01:17 AM. Reason: Clarified and added some definitions.
Masao is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 4 2013, 04:58 AM   #2
Nerys Myk
Fleet Admiral
 
Nerys Myk's Avatar
 
Location: House of Kang, now with ridges
Re: What kind of fan are you?

Reformer
__________________
The boring one, the one with Khan, the one where Spock returns, the one with whales, the dumb one, the last one, the one with Kirk, the one with the Borg, the stupid one, the bad one, the new one, the other one with Khan.
Nerys Myk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 4 2013, 05:12 AM   #3
ZapBrannigan
Fleet Captain
 
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
 
Location: New York State
Re: What kind of fan are you?

Over the years, I've been eight or nine of those things. Sometimes a few things simultaneously. Just which ones and when is a little personal. That's between me and my Franchise.
ZapBrannigan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 4 2013, 05:18 AM   #4
aridas sofia
Rear Admiral
 
Re: What kind of fan are you?

You're right, Masao. And your way of avoiding conflict is the better way. I plead guilty to jumping the gun to attack points of view with which I disagree. And yet, like I said in the Chronology thread, in the end, it's all a matter of taste. Which says something about religion that many would find profoundly disturbing.

There is a website (whose name escapes me at the moment) where members contribute to the creation of a community-edited sci-fi future history. It's carefully wrought and hews close to what is scientifically plausible. Their scenario has the entertainment phenomenon that is Star Trek splitting into various "mythologies" that eventually evolve into literal faiths. It's fascinating and makes the point that what is like a religion might in fact be a religion in the making.
aridas sofia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 4 2013, 05:20 AM   #5
Nerys Myk
Fleet Admiral
 
Nerys Myk's Avatar
 
Location: House of Kang, now with ridges
Re: What kind of fan are you?

Yeah, I've been a few myself.

The Faithful Flock

The Scripturists

The Archivists

The Intellectuals

What a long strange trek its been.
__________________
The boring one, the one with Khan, the one where Spock returns, the one with whales, the dumb one, the last one, the one with Kirk, the one with the Borg, the stupid one, the bad one, the new one, the other one with Khan.
Nerys Myk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 4 2013, 06:24 AM   #6
Masao
Fleet Captain
 
Masao's Avatar
 
Location: Tokyo
Re: What kind of fan are you?

aridas sofia wrote: View Post
You're right, Masao. And your way of avoiding conflict is the better way.
I'm starting a religion. Send me some money right f*cking now (large denominations, nonsequential serial numbers, unmarked) and get in on the ground floor! I'll make you a priest. No celibacy required.
__________________
"Jesus said the meek would inherit the earth, but so far all we've gotten is Minnesota and North Dakota." -- Garrison Keillor
Masao is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 4 2013, 06:38 AM   #7
Gov Kodos
Vice Admiral
 
Gov Kodos's Avatar
 
Location: Gov Kodos Regretably far from Boston
Re: What kind of fan are you?

What about Abramaic Separatists?
__________________
We are quicksilver, a fleeting shadow, a distant sound... our home has no boundaries beyond which we cannot pass. We live in music, in a flash of color... we live on the wind and in the sparkle of a star! Endora, Bewitched
Gov Kodos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 4 2013, 06:57 AM   #8
Masao
Fleet Captain
 
Masao's Avatar
 
Location: Tokyo
Re: What kind of fan are you?

Gov Kodos wrote: View Post
What about Abramaic Separatists?
My list was not intended to be exhaustive. If your flavor of belief is not listed, please elaborate!
__________________
"Jesus said the meek would inherit the earth, but so far all we've gotten is Minnesota and North Dakota." -- Garrison Keillor
Masao is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 4 2013, 10:17 AM   #9
Dix
Lieutenant Junior Grade
 
Re: What kind of fan are you?

I definitely am not a JJ Abrams apologist.

I respect and like (some more, some less) all Trek, but I despise AbramzTrek. I don't know exactly in which of your categories that puts me nor do I actually care. I don't see Star Trek as a religion, I see it as a philosophy. It is Star Wars that is much better suited to be branded as a religion. That's one of the reasons why I would oppose Star Trek becoming like Star Wars, which it did with AbramzTrek.
Dix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 4 2013, 10:30 AM   #10
Gov Kodos
Vice Admiral
 
Gov Kodos's Avatar
 
Location: Gov Kodos Regretably far from Boston
Re: What kind of fan are you?

I can't imagine why anyone would despise the new Trek films. But why would you clutter the thread if you don't care. Besides, it's just a fun little thought experiment. As to Star Wars, it's enormously successful, which is reason enough to have taken a look at a franchise that had become moribund years before it ended and reboot it into the dynamic series Abrams has created.
__________________
We are quicksilver, a fleeting shadow, a distant sound... our home has no boundaries beyond which we cannot pass. We live in music, in a flash of color... we live on the wind and in the sparkle of a star! Endora, Bewitched
Gov Kodos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 4 2013, 10:48 AM   #11
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: In the 23rd Century...
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: What kind of fan are you?

Grazer/Reformer.
__________________
"I had no idea you were so... formidable. " - Anan 7 to James T. Kirk, A Taste of Armageddon
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 4 2013, 10:51 AM   #12
Masao
Fleet Captain
 
Masao's Avatar
 
Location: Tokyo
Re: What kind of fan are you?

People who like the 2009 film and think it makes a nice addition to the diversity of Trek would would consider themselves "evolutionists" (who believe Trek is a living, breathing entity that should change with time and the environment). If you don't like it, that's cool too.

All are welcome here, brothers and sisters.
__________________
"Jesus said the meek would inherit the earth, but so far all we've gotten is Minnesota and North Dakota." -- Garrison Keillor
Masao is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 4 2013, 11:45 AM   #13
Ancient Mariner
Rear Admiral
 
Ancient Mariner's Avatar
 
Location: A ship of Samuel Walters' imagination.
View Ancient Mariner's Twitter Profile
Re: What kind of fan are you?

Intellectual / Evolutionist
__________________
I'm starting to worry about this voyage ...
Ancient Mariner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 4 2013, 11:46 AM   #14
teacake
Admiral
 
teacake's Avatar
 
Location: Militant Janeway True Path Devotees Compound. With Sehlats.
Re: What kind of fan are you?

Gov Kodos wrote: View Post
What about Abramaic Separatists?


I put myself firmly in The Artists, though I started out my Trek life pre-internet as an Archivist. Maybe I'd still be an Archivist if it wasn't all seemingly done.

Also, should be in General for more coverage!
__________________

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacake is online now   Reply With Quote
Old April 4 2013, 11:52 AM   #15
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: England again
Re: What kind of fan are you?

Masao wrote:
The Evolutionists - who say the faith is a living, breathing entity that should change with time and the environment.
Maybe this one? While I enjoy seeing TOS on it's own terms and speculating on the original intent of it's creators, I also get a lot of enjoyment from looking at the constantly evolving bigger picture, and how TOS fits into it. All the new information we've had about the Trekverse. They all change our perceptions of the original slightly, and there's a lot of fun in re-examining the old with what we've learned since.

For example, we now know that the USS Enterprise NCC-1701 was the second starship Enterprise, following on from the Enterprise NX-01 a century before. George Kirk was a Starfleet officer (and Jim's inspiration for joining up) and first officer of the USS Kelvin NCC-0514, a ship that was twice the size and had twice the crew of Kirk's TOS Enterprise. Why is that? Did Starfleet shrink their captial ships? Or was the old Enterprise perhaps a 23rd century equivalent of Voyager, smaller and more advanced, while the bigger and older Kelvins, Newtons and Mayflowers lumbered around unseen in the original 79 episodes?

Were the NX-01 and the Kelvin "more advanced" than the TOS ships? Or was TOS' depiction of the 23rd century limited by the budget and technology of a TV show in the 1960's? If the obviously rubber-suited Gorn was "really" a dangerous lizard monster then perhaps some other things, like randomly blinking squares for control panels, are similarly open to interpretation. Perhaps the Romulan ship from "Balance of Terror" really looked like the one from "Minefield" - or perhaps it was a Starfleet knock-off design, as described in deleted scenes? It's fun to speculate about.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.