RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 135,700
Posts: 5,213,772
Members: 24,208
Currently online: 729
Newest member: meshman63


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek TV Series > Star Trek - Original Series

Star Trek - Original Series The one that started it all...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old April 4 2013, 01:37 AM   #106
J.T.B.
Commodore
 
J.T.B.'s Avatar
 
Re: Why Did Gene drop Christopher Pike?

Danger Ace wrote: View Post
With respect to Maverick, the initial reason for bringing in Bart Maverick was as a hedge on the rising animosity between James Garner (Bret Maverick) and Warner Bros.Television as William T. Orr, executive-producer, was especially known for signing actors to onerous, one-sided contracts that led to many rebellions.
Really? What I always heard was that Maverick's production schedule wasn't up to the demands of being the first weekly full-hour "adult" Western (Cheyenne was the first hour-long, but was only bi-weekly), and when they realized they wouldn't be able to deliver all the episodes in time they came up with the solution of brother Bart and shooting his episodes with a separate crew. Roy Huggins said that the characters were supposed to be interchangeable, since they didn't know in advance which actor would be working on which script. The only times writers were supposed to write Bret or Bart specifically were episodes in which both appeared.

yenny wrote: View Post
Roddenberry wanted Hunter back. But he couldn't get him, cause he became a major movie star when PT.109 came a major hit movie.
Hunter? He wasn't in PT-109.
J.T.B. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 4 2013, 02:02 AM   #107
Danger Ace
Commander
 
Danger Ace's Avatar
 
Location: California
Re: Why Did Gene drop Christopher Pike?

J.T.B. wrote: View Post
Really? What I always heard was that Maverick's production schedule wasn't up to the demands of being the first weekly full-hour "adult" Western (Cheyenne was the first hour-long, but was only bi-weekly), and when they realized they wouldn't be able to deliver all the episodes in time they came up with the solution of brother Bart and shooting his episodes with a separate crew. Roy Huggins said that the characters were supposed to be interchangeable, since they didn't know in advance which actor would be working on which script. The only times writers were supposed to write Bret or Bart specifically were episodes in which both appeared.
None of what you say is incompatible with what I've said. Garner was the sole star of Maverick for the first half-dozen episodes or so. The strain of which caused Garner to rethink his position and make his frustrations regarding work and reward known. Kelly's addition was inspired for those reasons and their ramifications. Both Huggins and Garner left the series around the third series. They would later work together on the Rockford Files.
__________________
Yours Truly,
Vic Falcone

"Ay plegli ianectu flaggen, tupep like for stahn... " - Cloud William

Last edited by Danger Ace; April 4 2013 at 06:17 PM.
Danger Ace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 4 2013, 02:44 AM   #108
Melakon
Rear Admiral
 
Melakon's Avatar
 
Location: Unmarked grave, Ekos
Re: Why Did Gene drop Christopher Pike?

J.T.B. wrote: View Post
yenny wrote: View Post
Roddenberry wanted Hunter back. But he couldn't get him, cause he became a major movie star when PT.109 came a major hit movie.
Hunter? He wasn't in PT-109.
Hunter became a star after working with John Wayne in The Searchers in 1956. He'd later had his own tv show (Temple Houston) which I remember watching before Star Trek appeared. Yenny may be confusing him with Cliff Robertson, Ty Hardin, or Robert Culp, who were in PT-109.
__________________
Curly: Moe, Larry, the cheese! Moe, Larry, the cheese! (Horses Collars, 1935)

Last edited by Melakon; April 4 2013 at 02:48 AM. Reason: correcting tense
Melakon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 4 2013, 03:44 AM   #109
Christopher
Writer
 
Christopher's Avatar
 
Re: Why Did Gene drop Christopher Pike?

Perhaps yenny was confused because Hunter was one of the runners-up for the role of JFK in PT-109. Robertson was JFK's own choice for the role, beating out Edd Byrnes, Warren Beatty, and Hunter.

But there's also the fact that PT-109 came out the year before "The Cage" was made.
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Site update 1/21/14 including non-spoiler discussion for Rise of the Federation Book 2

Written Worlds -- My blog
Christopher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 4 2013, 04:03 AM   #110
Melakon
Rear Admiral
 
Melakon's Avatar
 
Location: Unmarked grave, Ekos
Re: Why Did Gene drop Christopher Pike?

I hadn't heard of the auditions. I read the Wiki article on the film a few weeks back, so must have missed it.

But Edd Byrnes?!! I admit there might have been a resemblance, but audiences of the day would only have seen Kookie from 77 Sunset Strip. It's like the George Reeves Syndrome.
__________________
Curly: Moe, Larry, the cheese! Moe, Larry, the cheese! (Horses Collars, 1935)
Melakon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 4 2013, 10:42 AM   #111
Tiberius
Commodore
 
Re: Why Did Gene drop Christopher Pike?

Christopher wrote: View Post
After all, the name change to "Christopher Pike" happened very shortly before shooting began. For most of the development process, the captain was named Robert April (which eventually got used as the name of a separate character in the animated series)...
My understanding is that the April character in TAS was intended to be the original captain of the Enterprise, even before Pike. So the 1701 was launched, captained by April, then Pike, then Kirk.

ETA: Just checked the episode "The Counter-Clock Incident" and Kirk's opening log states that April was the first captain of the 1701.
Tiberius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 4 2013, 01:54 PM   #112
TREK_GOD_1
Fleet Captain
 
TREK_GOD_1's Avatar
 
Location: Delta Vega
Re: Why Did Gene drop Christopher Pike?

My Name Is Legion wrote: View Post
OTOH, there's nothing that Kirk says or does in WNMHGB that would have been "out of character" for Pike because so little character was established for either of them at that point. Roddenberry simply replaced one handsome leading man of a certain apparent age with another.
The only fair comparison is analysing how each was introduced, and in 60s pilots, the tendency to give be clear about who and why a character is "himself" was common to aid in making the sell. On that note, Pike was established in one way, Kirk the opposite. To reiterate, taking the pilot versions of each, it is clear the WNMHGB script was written with Kirk as a very different man than Pike, with different motivations for his life and relationships with shipmates.

Additionally, with 2nd pilot Spock now written as more cold-hearted (the entire "kill Mitchell" dialogue / "all I know is logic" lines) than his 1st pilot self ("the WOMEN!" / smiling, 'nuff said), Kirk had to be a warmer personality than Pike, otherwise, there would be no strong, contrasting dynamic if the captain is a grim and humorless as the resident alien.
__________________
"...to be like God, you have the power to make the world anything you want it to be."
TREK_GOD_1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 4 2013, 02:10 PM   #113
TREK_GOD_1
Fleet Captain
 
TREK_GOD_1's Avatar
 
Location: Delta Vega
Re: Why Did Gene drop Christopher Pike?

Danger Ace wrote: View Post
TREK_GOD_1 wrote: View Post
Incorrect: Larry Linville was offered a two year contract extension at the end of his 5 years, but he declined; it had nothing to do with the producers taking the series in another direction would not suit the Burns character.
True. Linville and Stevenson left to take roles in their own shows.
Yes, the producers knew they had a good thing going with Linville's Burns character, and wanted to hold on to him as long as possible.
__________________
"...to be like God, you have the power to make the world anything you want it to be."
TREK_GOD_1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 4 2013, 02:29 PM   #114
Melakon
Rear Admiral
 
Melakon's Avatar
 
Location: Unmarked grave, Ekos
Re: Why Did Gene drop Christopher Pike?

Linville's explanation involved several factors. Hotlips wasn't his ally and confidante anymore, he felt he had done all he could as the character, and felt that Frank was only being used as a continual butt of the joke. Sounds like he was simply burnt out with Frank.
__________________
Curly: Moe, Larry, the cheese! Moe, Larry, the cheese! (Horses Collars, 1935)
Melakon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 4 2013, 03:15 PM   #115
Christopher
Writer
 
Christopher's Avatar
 
Re: Why Did Gene drop Christopher Pike?

Tiberius wrote: View Post
Christopher wrote: View Post
After all, the name change to "Christopher Pike" happened very shortly before shooting began. For most of the development process, the captain was named Robert April (which eventually got used as the name of a separate character in the animated series)...
My understanding is that the April character in TAS was intended to be the original captain of the Enterprise, even before Pike. So the 1701 was launched, captained by April, then Pike, then Kirk.

ETA: Just checked the episode "The Counter-Clock Incident" and Kirk's opening log states that April was the first captain of the 1701.
But that was a retcon introduced by the writer of "The Counter-Clock Incident." Originally, "Robert April" was just an abandoned name for the character who ended up being named Christopher Pike. If you look at the first-draft outline for "The Cage" in The Making of Star Trek, it was a captain named Robert April who went through all the experiences that Pike went through in the final episode. But when NBC publicist and screenwriter Fred Bronson wrote "The Counter-Clock Incident" (under the pseudonym John Culver), he invented the idea that there had actually been a separate person named Robert April who had been the first captain of the Enterprise. That idea has been widely accepted ever since, but it did not exist before 1974.

I mean, it's not the only time that one of Roddenberry's rejected captain names ended up being used for a different character later on. As I mentioned back in post #32, one of his suggestions, "Captain Christopher," was used for a character in "Tomorrow is Yesterday," and another suggestion, Boone (in honor of Richard Boone, star of Have Gun -- Will Travel, for which Roddenberry was one of the most prolific writers), was used for the lead character in Earth: Final Conflict. (In fact, that character was named William Boone, probably in honor of Shatner as well.)
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Site update 1/21/14 including non-spoiler discussion for Rise of the Federation Book 2

Written Worlds -- My blog
Christopher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 4 2013, 04:07 PM   #116
BillJ
Admiral
 
Location: In the 23rd Century...
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Why Did Gene drop Christopher Pike?

TREK_GOD_1 wrote: View Post
Additionally, with 2nd pilot Spock now written as more cold-hearted (the entire "kill Mitchell" dialogue / "all I know is logic" lines) than his 1st pilot self ("the WOMEN!" / smiling, 'nuff said)...
Spock was smiling in Where No Man... as well.
__________________
I'm not popular enough to be different! - Homer Simpson
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 4 2013, 06:07 PM   #117
Maurice
Vice Admiral
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Location: Maurice in San Francisco
Re: Why Did Gene drop Christopher Pike?

What some people miss about "morose" Pike is that in the 1st pilot he's smarting from an expedition gone wrong, and in the course of the story, realizes that on the bridge is where he belongs. It's simply a setup for the series character which became Kirk, who early on had his own bouts of self doubt (Balance of Terror). They're effectively the same character as written early on. What some confuse as a difference in the parts is more the way the actor's chose to portray them.
__________________
* * *
“The absence of limitations is the enemy of art.”
― Orson Welles
Maurice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 4 2013, 06:19 PM   #118
trevanian
Rear Admiral
 
trevanian's Avatar
 
Re: Why Did Gene drop Christopher Pike?

Danger Ace wrote: View Post
and why Jack Lord placed such a high-price (50% stake) on his services (knowing full well Desilu couldn't agree to his terms).
That was a price CBS apparently met for Lord with HAWAII 5-0, cuz the guy supposedly wound up owning a hunk of the state by the time the series ended.

A future actor negotiating for a 2150ad trek series who managed a similarly lucrative deal would probably wind up owning the Lagrange-4 and Lagrange-5 points ... talk about THE MAN WHO SOLD THE MOON!
trevanian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 4 2013, 06:33 PM   #119
Danger Ace
Commander
 
Danger Ace's Avatar
 
Location: California
Re: Why Did Gene drop Christopher Pike?

Melakon wrote: View Post
Hunter became a star after working with John Wayne in The Searchers in 1956.
With the apex of his career being the lead (Jesus) in 1961s "King of Kings." And according to Solow and Justman's "Inside Star Trek: The Real Story" he sent his wife down to inform the producers he was no longer interested as he was a movie star. He did TV out of neccessity but disliked it. He definately didn't want the stink of TV sci-fi harshing his karma.
__________________
Yours Truly,
Vic Falcone

"Ay plegli ianectu flaggen, tupep like for stahn... " - Cloud William
Danger Ace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 4 2013, 06:53 PM   #120
Danger Ace
Commander
 
Danger Ace's Avatar
 
Location: California
Re: Why Did Gene drop Christopher Pike?

trevanian wrote: View Post
That was a price CBS apparently met for Lord with HAWAII 5-0, cuz the guy supposedly wound up owning a hunk of the state by the time the series ended.
Desilu wasn't CBS. When Herb Solow was brought in to revitalize Desilu's television production they couldn't afford to deal away that much of any series' they were looking to produce. The reputation of the studio at that time was known in Hollywood and Jack Lord was a shrewd businessman, therefore, it would be much more of a stretch to think he didn't know the studio was incapable of giving such a deal as he was demanding than to assume he did.

CBS, on the other hand, had pioneered helping stars setup their own production companies (and giving them half ownership of their series) as away to help them shelter income from the high tax rates of the day. This was how they were able to raid NBC's talent roster about 10-12 years earlier when they grabbed Jack Benny among others. It was also how they got David Letterman in 1990 (and why, even though Leno is #1 in the ratings, Letterman has the much larger bank account).
__________________
Yours Truly,
Vic Falcone

"Ay plegli ianectu flaggen, tupep like for stahn... " - Cloud William
Danger Ace is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
christopher pike, drop, gene roddenberry, spock

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.