RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,444
Posts: 5,507,760
Members: 25,134
Currently online: 484
Newest member: xunixan

TrekToday headlines

Retro Review: The Emperor’s New Cloak
By: Michelle on Dec 20

Star Trek Opera
By: T'Bonz on Dec 19

New Abrams Project
By: T'Bonz on Dec 18

IDW Publishing March 2015 Comics
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Paramount Star Trek 3 Expectations
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Star Trek #39 Sneak Peek
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Star Trek 3 Potential Director Shortlist
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Official Starships Collection Update
By: T'Bonz on Dec 15

Retro Review: Prodigal Daughter
By: Michelle on Dec 13

Sindicate Lager To Debut In The US Next Week
By: T'Bonz on Dec 12


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Welcome to the Trek BBS! > General Trek Discussion

General Trek Discussion Trek TV and cinema subjects not related to any specific series or movie.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old March 30 2013, 05:26 PM   #1
The Overlord
Captain
 
Star Fleet and Genocide

There have been a few times where the Federation was complicated genocide, in I Borg, the Picard was considering using a weapon that would have destroying the Borg Collective, before deciding not to use it and during the Dominion War, Section 31 infected the Founders with a virus, but there is some debate as to whether Section 31 is taking orders from the Federation Council.

So do you think Star Fleet would be capable of genocide? What if the Federation was under attack from aliens that were similar to say the Daleks from Dr. Who, who hate all other forms of life and wish to commit galactic genocide, would the Federation destroy that alien race?
The Overlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 30 2013, 05:36 PM   #2
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: Star Fleet and Genocide

Kirk never had trouble annihilating single-member species such as the Salt Vampire, Vaal, Landru or the Doomsday Machine. And the only thing that stopped him from destroying the entire species of Space Amoebae was that he could only access one individual. Nothing about this appeared to be contrary to his 23rd century Starfleet general orders.

In TNG era, Starfleet specifically wanted Picard to erase the Borg species and chided him for the failure; it also sponsored the plan to erase the Founders (issues of deniability aside) by providing the necessary resources. So that seems to cover the 24th century as well. Sure, Picard prevaricated about killing the Crystalline Entity, but he could have had sound tactical reasons for not killing his captive without interrogating it first; Kirk and Spock really dropped the ball there with the Space Amoeba.

However, the bigger the threat, the less likely that it could simply be destroyed. The Daleks seem to be exceptionally capable of bouncing back (at least in the most recent Who series), so Starfleet would no doubt have to invest massively in researching them and their weaknesses; this might well reveal means to defeat the Daleks without completely removing them from existence, and such means might well be more economical and achievable than outright slaughter.

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 30 2013, 07:19 PM   #3
USS KG5
Vice Admiral
 
USS KG5's Avatar
 
Location: England's green and pleasant land.
Re: Star Fleet and Genocide

In all the shows they tend to veer wildly from a very humanitarian attitude to a variation on "screw us and we will screw you right back" - basically modern US foreign policy.

Starfleet seems to follow the maxim "tread softly and carry a big stick" - especially in the first few seasons of TNG the Enterprise-D seemed like a luxury hotel in space, but Picard was regularly almost conceited about it's tactical capabilities.
__________________
I believe in a better world, so I love Star Trek. I have to live in this one, so I love Battlestar Galactica.
USS KG5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 30 2013, 07:45 PM   #4
Santa Kang
Fleet Admiral
 
Santa Kang's Avatar
 
Location: North Pole,Qo'noS
Re: Star Fleet and Genocide

Timo wrote: View Post
Kirk never had trouble annihilating single-member species such as the Salt Vampire, Vaal, Landru or the Doomsday Machine. And the only thing that stopped him from destroying the entire species of Space Amoebae was that he could only access one individual. Nothing about this appeared to be contrary to his 23rd century Starfleet general orders.
The Salt Vampire and the Space Amoeba were threats to his ship. He really didn't have much of a choice. Vaal and Landru were machines, not people and not representatives of a species.
__________________
Nerys Myk
Santa Kang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 30 2013, 07:53 PM   #5
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: Star Fleet and Genocide

The Salt Vampire and the Space Amoeba were threats to his ship. He really didn't have much of a choice.
How so? There's always the choice of giving up.

Indeed, several episodes across the shows featured our heroes claiming they had sworn to defend the ideals of the Federation with their lives if necessary. So, when the push comes to the shove, they don't have the guts to die?

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 30 2013, 08:09 PM   #6
TheRoyalFamily
Commodore
 
TheRoyalFamily's Avatar
 
Re: Star Fleet and Genocide

The Federation has more than just Enlightened Humans in it. The Vulcans are a big influence, apparently, for the Prime Directive. The Vulcans, Andorians, Tellarites, etc, would not let an existential threat exist if they could help it. It's only the majority-human bridge crews (which reflect the Western 20th-century liberal attitudes of the writers much of the time) that seem to have problems with any of that. Heck, the Admirals that are often antagonists or foils for Our Heroes tend along the more pragmatic lines of dealing with problems. Did Sisko get any sort of punishment at all for rendering a planet uninhabitable to human life, while there were still humans on said planet? Not that we ever see.
__________________
You perceive wrongly. I feel unimaginable happiness wasting time talking with women. I'm that type of human.
TheRoyalFamily is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 30 2013, 08:15 PM   #7
Santa Kang
Fleet Admiral
 
Santa Kang's Avatar
 
Location: North Pole,Qo'noS
Re: Star Fleet and Genocide

Timo wrote: View Post
The Salt Vampire and the Space Amoeba were threats to his ship. He really didn't have much of a choice.
How so? There's always the choice of giving up.

Indeed, several episodes across the shows featured our heroes claiming they had sworn to defend the ideals of the Federation with their lives if necessary. So, when the push comes to the shove, they don't have the guts to die?

Timo Saloniemi
Give up and be killed? Was the Space Amoeba even sentient? The Salt Vampire was in the process of killing Kirk when it was shot. The Space Amoeba had killed billions.
__________________
Nerys Myk
Santa Kang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 30 2013, 08:24 PM   #8
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: Star Fleet and Genocide

All of which is irrelevant to the question of whether Starfleet could enforce a policy of non-genocide. Yeah, it could, even when its starships come under attack - it would just call for the skippers to have the courage to withdraw or to commit suicide.

The particulars of the policy would be a separate issue. Do only nicely behaving sentients deserve protection? Today, we don't think that way - we allow deadly, senselessly man-eating predators to multiply and take back lands that at one point were tamed by man. We can afford to; it's difficult to see why the Federation could not as well.

Absolutes never make for good policy, though. The Federation has shown that it is willing to erase species if those pose too big a threat to too big or important a part of the UFP. It has also claimed it doesn't want to expand at excess cost to others, although the exact cost varies from case to case. In cases like Vaal or Landru, no Federation interests were in danger, other than the throwaway lives of Kirk and friends, or further trespassers of their ilk. In cases like the Eminians, though, there was a threat or fear thereof that failure to intervene would hurt UFP assets other than trespassing starship crews. And in case of the Space Amoeba, the threat was clear and present and modified by the fact that the enemy was a vile nonhuman beast evoking no sympathies.

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 30 2013, 08:34 PM   #9
Santa Kang
Fleet Admiral
 
Santa Kang's Avatar
 
Location: North Pole,Qo'noS
Re: Star Fleet and Genocide

All of which is irrelevant to the question of whether Starfleet could enforce a policy of non-genocide. Yeah, it could, even when its starships come under attack - it would just call for the skippers to have the courage to withdraw or to commit suicide.
But it is relevant to the examples you gave of genocide in TOS.
__________________
Nerys Myk
Santa Kang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 30 2013, 08:37 PM   #10
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Star Fleet and Genocide

Timo wrote: View Post
Sure, Picard prevaricated about killing the Crystalline Entity, but he could have had sound tactical reasons for not killing his captive without interrogating it first; Kirk and Spock really dropped the ball there with the Space Amoeba.
I'm not sure how you interrogate a single-cell organism...
__________________
"...the most elementary and valuable statement in science, the beginning of wisdom, is I do not know." - Lt. Commander Data, "Where Silence Has Lease"
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 30 2013, 09:17 PM   #11
sonak
Vice Admiral
 
Location: in a figment of a mediocre mind's imagination
Re: Star Fleet and Genocide

BillJ wrote: View Post
Timo wrote: View Post
Sure, Picard prevaricated about killing the Crystalline Entity, but he could have had sound tactical reasons for not killing his captive without interrogating it first; Kirk and Spock really dropped the ball there with the Space Amoeba.
I'm not sure how you interrogate a single-cell organism...

you can, it's just a very one-sided interrogation.
__________________
"why oh why didn't I take the blue pill?"
sonak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 30 2013, 11:00 PM   #12
Santa Kang
Fleet Admiral
 
Santa Kang's Avatar
 
Location: North Pole,Qo'noS
Re: Star Fleet and Genocide

sonak wrote: View Post
BillJ wrote: View Post
Timo wrote: View Post
Sure, Picard prevaricated about killing the Crystalline Entity, but he could have had sound tactical reasons for not killing his captive without interrogating it first; Kirk and Spock really dropped the ball there with the Space Amoeba.
I'm not sure how you interrogate a single-cell organism...

you can, it's just a very one-sided interrogation.


YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!!!
__________________
Nerys Myk
Santa Kang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 31 2013, 01:38 AM   #13
Olive, the Other Reindeer
Vice Admiral
 
Olive, the Other Reindeer's Avatar
 
Location: scotpens
Re: Star Fleet and Genocide

Timo wrote: View Post
Nerys Myk wrote: View Post
Give up and be killed? Was the Space Amoeba even sentient? The Salt Vampire was in the process of killing Kirk when it was shot. The Space Amoeba had killed billions.
All of which is irrelevant to the question of whether Starfleet could enforce a policy of non-genocide.
It's relevant to the definition of genocide. The near-extinction of the North American bison wasn't genocide. Buffalo are not sapient beings.
__________________
“All the universe or nothingness. Which shall it be, Passworthy? Which shall it be?”
Olive, the Other Reindeer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 31 2013, 03:04 AM   #14
The Wormhole
Admiral
 
The Wormhole's Avatar
 
Re: Star Fleet and Genocide

The Overlord wrote: View Post
Section 31 infected the Founders with a virus, but there is some debate as to whether Section 31 is taking orders from the Federation Council.
No, Section 31 acted on their own to infect the Founders. It was after Dr. Bashir found the cure that the Federation Council decided not to share it with the Dominion. Odo made the comment that seemed like a rather tidy arrangement that while the Federation openly comdemns genocide they're willing to let a race die that they could save.
__________________
"Internet message boards aren't as funny today as they were ten years ago. I've stopped reading new posts." -The Simpsons 20th anniversary special.
The Wormhole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 31 2013, 03:55 AM   #15
sonak
Vice Admiral
 
Location: in a figment of a mediocre mind's imagination
Re: Star Fleet and Genocide

The Wormhole wrote: View Post
The Overlord wrote: View Post
Section 31 infected the Founders with a virus, but there is some debate as to whether Section 31 is taking orders from the Federation Council.
No, Section 31 acted on their own to infect the Founders. It was after Dr. Bashir found the cure that the Federation Council decided not to share it with the Dominion. Odo made the comment that seemed like a rather tidy arrangement that while the Federation openly comdemns genocide they're willing to let a race die that they could save.

hey, Archer established the precedent.
__________________
"why oh why didn't I take the blue pill?"
sonak is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
star fleet

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.