RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,344
Posts: 5,502,342
Members: 25,118
Currently online: 723
Newest member: Ashanti

TrekToday headlines

IDW Publishing March 2015 Comics
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Paramount Star Trek 3 Expectations
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Star Trek #39 Sneak Peek
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Star Trek 3 Potential Director Shortlist
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Official Starships Collection Update
By: T'Bonz on Dec 15

Retro Review: Prodigal Daughter
By: Michelle on Dec 13

Sindicate Lager To Debut In The US Next Week
By: T'Bonz on Dec 12

Rumor Mill: Saldana Gives Birth
By: T'Bonz on Dec 12

New Line of Anovos Enterprise Uniforms
By: T'Bonz on Dec 11

Frakes: Sign Me Up!
By: T'Bonz on Dec 11


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Science Fiction & Fantasy > Doctor Who

Doctor Who "Bigger on the inside..."

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old March 21 2013, 02:40 AM   #61
Nagisa Furukawa
Commander
 
Nagisa Furukawa's Avatar
 
Re: Was Hartnell first?

DWF wrote: View Post
That wasn't the Doctor in The Impossible Astronaut though and the eighth Doctor did say that he might've been dead too long for the regeneration to take place. The sixth Doctor's behavior after the regeneration was chalked up the suddeness of the regeneration.
Yeah, but the Doctor explicitly says in The End of Time (much as I'd like to write that story out of the canon) that he can die without regenerating. Seems reasonable to me. If you silently walk up behind the Doctor and shoot him in the back of the head, he'd be dead as shit. Makes the drama and tension of the episode thicker if regeneration isn't just a crutch in any fatal situation.
__________________
I am the one who guided you this far.
Nagisa Furukawa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 21 2013, 03:01 AM   #62
Christopher
Writer
 
Christopher's Avatar
 
Re: Was Hartnell first?

Of course we know that wasn't the Doctor in "Astronaut," but the point is that the perception of the Doctor being dead only works if being fatally shot while regenerating actually would kill the Doctor. If regeneration were a guaranteed ticket out of any and every form of death, then his enemies would never have believed they'd succeeded in killing him.

Nagisa, I'm not sure if a bullet to the brain would be a guaranteed kill; we're not talking Sylar here. (Or Claire Bennet, I should say, since Sylar stole that power from her.) Maybe if it were the kind of bullet that tore up the insides of the target with fragmentation and shock waves, that would do it, but if it were a more limited brain injury, it might still allow regeneration. But if he were, say, blown apart in an explosion, or burned up in a fire, or something on a comparable level of bodily dissolution, then yeah, there'd be no coming back from that. (Granted, the Master somehow came back from being vaporized in "Planet of Fire," but I've always taken that to be an aftereffect of the power he stole from the Source of Traken -- which could also explain his ability to survive in gooey snake form in the '96 movie. He wasn't technically in a Gallifreyan body at the time but a Trakenian one, and of course he still had the same face and voice after his, err, recovery, so it doesn't count as a Time Lord regeneration per se.)
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Site update 11/16/14 including annotations for "The Caress of a Butterfly's Wing" and overview for DTI: The Collectors

Written Worlds -- My blog
Christopher is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 21 2013, 03:07 AM   #63
Sindatur
Vice Admiral
 
Sindatur's Avatar
 
Location: Sacramento, CA
Re: Was Hartnell first?

It was the Doctor in Let's Kill Hitler, that River/Mels poisoned beyond his Regenerative ability to heal, hence why River had to give up her Regenerations to heal him. So, yea, from this event, every reason to believe the Spectrox Toxin was a concern for Regeneration.
__________________
One Day I hope to be the Man my Cat thinks I am

Where are we going? And why are we in this Handbasket?
Sindatur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 21 2013, 03:15 AM   #64
DWF
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Re: Was Hartnell first?

Time Lords can be shot and killed we saw that The Deadly Assassin and another one was knifed in the back, Goth also died of his injuries in that story. Regeneration isn't a cure all and even the Doctor needed a push at times to regenerate.
__________________
The greatest science fiction series of all time is
Doctor Who! And I'll take you all on, one-by-one
or all in a bunch to back it up!"
--- Harlan Ellison, from his introduction
to the PINNACLE series of Doctor Who books
DWF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 21 2013, 05:29 AM   #65
diankra
Commodore
 
Location: UK
Re: Was Hartnell first?

Christopher wrote: View Post
He wasn't technically in a Gallifreyan body at the time but a Trakenian one, and of course he still had the same face and voice after his, err, recovery, so it doesn't count as a Time Lord regeneration per se.)
And, in retconning mode, the fact that he was in a stolen body at the time POSSIBLY explains why the Time Lords can offer him a new regeneration cycle in The Five Doctors, when there's no indication that this can normally be done elsewhere (ie, they can only do it because this body hasn't already regenerated). It clicks in with the theory that regeneration isn't a natural ability, but one that's bestowed on a a newly qualified Time Lord when they graduate - but it can't then be done again.
__________________
"Some days are better than others. They say that where I come from."
"Loudly, I imagine, on the day you left."
(Blake's 7 - Rumours of Death)
diankra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 21 2013, 02:50 PM   #66
Haggis and tatties
Rear Admiral
 
Haggis and tatties's Avatar
 
Location: Glasgow
Re: Was Hartnell first?

^^The timelords are quite a greedy bunch when it comes to life extension, they can regenerate 12 times, bypass the 12 limit rule when needed, steal other beings lifes and bodies, and then go and top up on stuff like the elixer of life from the Sisterhood of Karn. lol

Greedy buggers. lol
__________________

Haggis and tatties is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 21 2013, 02:55 PM   #67
Christopher
Writer
 
Christopher's Avatar
 
Re: Was Hartnell first?

Well, the Master can steal others' bodies, but that doesn't mean all Time Lords can. The Master is an exceptionally evil being, and like the Doctor, he's a renegade who's travelled the universe far more extensively than most Time Lords. As such, he would've sought out techniques and technologies that would increase his power and, if necessary, conquer death. So he could have abilities that other Time Lords don't.
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Site update 11/16/14 including annotations for "The Caress of a Butterfly's Wing" and overview for DTI: The Collectors

Written Worlds -- My blog
Christopher is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 21 2013, 04:41 PM   #68
Photoman15
Fleet Captain
 
Photoman15's Avatar
 
Location: The sunny shores of Trenzalore
Re: Was Hartnell first?

If only Anakin aligned himself with a TimeLord instead of a Sith......
__________________
I refuse to put a signature here!
oh...uh...ummm
Photoman15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 22 2013, 02:15 AM   #69
Chaos Descending
Vice Admiral
 
Chaos Descending's Avatar
 
Location: Grand Canyon State
Re: Was Hartnell first?

Christopher wrote: View Post
Well, the Master can steal others' bodies....
The Master was only able to steal Tremas' body because he still had the residual powers leftover as Keeper of Traken.
__________________
"Romanes eunt domus"
- Brian
Chaos Descending is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 22 2013, 02:17 AM   #70
Davros
Fleet Admiral
 
Davros's Avatar
 
Location: Kaled bunker, Skaro
Re: Was Hartnell first?

Chaos Descending wrote: View Post
Christopher wrote: View Post
Well, the Master can steal others' bodies....
The Master was only able to steal Tremas' body because he still had the residual powers leftover as Keeper of Traken.
But he later stole Eric Roberts body in the 1996 Fox TV movie.
__________________
"Taxes are the price we pay for a civilized society," -Oliver Wendell Holmes
Davros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 22 2013, 02:20 AM   #71
Ru ru, chu
Fleet Admiral
 
Ru ru, chu's Avatar
 
Location: Mr. Laser Beam is in the visitor's bullpen
View Ru ru, chu's Twitter Profile
Re: Was Hartnell first?

^ And it seems clear that most Time Lords can't turn into gooey snakes.
__________________
"A hot dog at the ballpark is better than a steak at the Ritz." - Humphrey Bogart
Ru ru, chu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 22 2013, 02:44 AM   #72
Davros
Fleet Admiral
 
Davros's Avatar
 
Location: Kaled bunker, Skaro
Re: Was Hartnell first?

True, the Master does a lot of things most Time Lords don't.
__________________
"Taxes are the price we pay for a civilized society," -Oliver Wendell Holmes
Davros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 22 2013, 03:09 AM   #73
Christopher
Writer
 
Christopher's Avatar
 
Re: Was Hartnell first?

Davros wrote: View Post
The Master was only able to steal Tremas' body because he still had the residual powers leftover as Keeper of Traken.
But he later stole Eric Roberts body in the 1996 Fox TV movie.
See post #62. I've already posited that both his recovery from being vaporized in "Planet of Fire" and his survival after being disintegrated in the movie may have been the result of the same power that he gained from the Source of Traken. I mean, why assume it was a one-time thing instead of a permanent change? After all, this is fantasy, and it's all just handwaves. In a series where Amy Pond can wish people back into existence after they've been erased from time, it's kind of silly to object that any given explanation for the Master's powers is arbitrary or inconsistent. Using the Source to explain all the anomalous things the Master did between "The Keeper of Traken" and the '96 movie is a nice, simple handwave, and Doctor Who is such a fanciful franchise that we don't really need anything more solid or logical than a handwave.
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Site update 11/16/14 including annotations for "The Caress of a Butterfly's Wing" and overview for DTI: The Collectors

Written Worlds -- My blog
Christopher is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.