RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 138,353
Posts: 5,354,972
Members: 24,623
Currently online: 603
Newest member: niko

TrekToday headlines

Borg Cube Fridge
By: T'Bonz on Jul 29

Free Enterprise Kickstarter
By: T'Bonz on Jul 29

Siddig To Join Game Of Thrones
By: T'Bonz on Jul 29

Sci-Fried To Release New Album
By: T'Bonz on Jul 28

Star Trek/Planet of the Apes Crossover
By: T'Bonz on Jul 28

Star Trek into Darkness Soundtrack
By: T'Bonz on Jul 28

Horse 1, Shatner 0
By: T'Bonz on Jul 28

Drexler TV Alert
By: T'Bonz on Jul 26

Retro Review: His Way
By: Michelle on Jul 26

MicroWarriors Releases Next Week
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Sports and Fitness

Sports and Fitness It's football, not soccer.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old March 20 2013, 05:04 PM   #106
Sheep
Vice Admiral
 
Sheep's Avatar
 
Location: Chicago
Re: NFL 2013 Off-Season Discussion

There is a god after all. Hope this means we won't have to see Hester overworking his two brain cells trying to run a route.

PHOENIX — Chicago Bears coach Marc Trestman made it clear Wednesday that Devin Hester is a return specialist only and not a wide receiver.

“Devin is strictly a specialist right now,” Trestman said at a breakfast with the media at the NFL annual meetings.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports...,7513597.story
__________________
Hating the anti-intellectual movement since before it was actually a movement.
Sheep is offline  
Old March 20 2013, 05:16 PM   #107
tighr
Commodore
 
tighr's Avatar
 
Location: California
Re: NFL 2013 Off-Season Discussion

Potential Pro Bowl Changes

It's been reported that the NFL is considering changes to the Pro Bowl (about damn time). One of the ideas is abandoning the traditional AFC/NFC matchup, and instead allowing "team captains" to select their teams (presumably from the pre-determined roster of Pro Bowlers, and not from the entire NFL). I like the idea, and the NFL should too. It allows them to monetize the game, because they can broadcast the draft and get good press all week as the teams pick their team names/mascots/etc, plus it has the possibility for fan involvement.

I've always wanted to see the skills competition return. That to me is what the Pro Bowl is all about, more than the game. It sucks that it's gone. Gives people a reason to pay attention to the Pro Bowl all week rather than just on the day of the game.

I'd like to see flag football, too. Basketball. Softball/baseball. Let's see these guys be the athletes they are. Plus, if you take off the pads you can actually see the player's faces. Many of the non-QB players are unrecognizable to most fans.

Another good idea would be to scrap the Pro Bowl in favor of a 3rd place game between the losers of the Conference Championship Games. This would be a REAL game with hitting and blitzing.
__________________
~Tighr™: Not helping the situation since 1983
tighr is offline  
Old March 20 2013, 08:00 PM   #108
SmoothieX
Vice Admiral
 
SmoothieX's Avatar
 
Location: Massachusetts
Re: NFL 2013 Off-Season Discussion

So long Tuck Rule, you went before your time.

Unless you're a Raiders fan of course.
SmoothieX is offline  
Old March 20 2013, 09:28 PM   #109
Mr. Laser Beam
Fleet Admiral
 
Mr. Laser Beam's Avatar
 
Location: The visitor's bullpen
View Mr. Laser Beam's Twitter Profile
Re: NFL 2013 Off-Season Discussion

chrisspringob wrote: View Post
The Ravens might not get the traditional Super Bowl Champion Thursday night opener to kick off the season, because of a scheduling conflict with the Orioles
Why should the O's be the ones who have to move? Both they and the White Sox play night games, away, the night before. You can't make them move the very next game to the afternoon. (I believe that actually is a regulation, but please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.) Besides both teams will take a financial hit from lost broadcast revenues if they move.
__________________
In labor news: Longshoremen walked off the piers today. Rescue operations are continuing.
Mr. Laser Beam is offline  
Old March 21 2013, 12:01 AM   #110
Sheep
Vice Admiral
 
Sheep's Avatar
 
Location: Chicago
Re: NFL 2013 Off-Season Discussion

Brian Urlacher and the Bears part ways.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...l-not-be-back/

I have to admit I didn't see that one coming. I figured he'd sign for $2.5 or $3m to end his career as a Bear. The guy's lost more than a step or two so I can't see him getting premium money at this point in his career.

I sure hope the Bears have a plan to pick up some LBs...
__________________
Hating the anti-intellectual movement since before it was actually a movement.
Sheep is offline  
Old March 21 2013, 12:50 AM   #111
Timby
GIVE ME YOUR FACE
 
Timby's Avatar
 
Re: NFL 2013 Off-Season Discussion

Mr. Laser Beam wrote: View Post
Why should the O's be the ones who have to move? Both they and the White Sox play night games, away, the night before. You can't make them move the very next game to the afternoon. (I believe that actually is a regulation, but please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.) Besides both teams will take a financial hit from lost broadcast revenues if they move.
There is absolutely no regulation whatsoever barring the moving of a night game to an afternoon game, even if they played the night before, especially since this would be in September, when the Orioles are likely to be sucking tailpipe.

This is Peter Angelos being a dick, plain and simple (par for the course with him, really), because he knows it's literally impossible for the games to be played at the same time. Steve Bisciotti, the Ravens' owner, has even promised to cover any revenues lost by moving the baseball game to the afternoon, but he isn't getting any traction because, well, Angelos is being Angelos.

Sheep wrote: View Post
Brian Urlacher and the Bears part ways.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...l-not-be-back/

I have to admit I didn't see that one coming. I figured he'd sign for $2.5 or $3m to end his career as a Bear. The guy's lost more than a step or two so I can't see him getting premium money at this point in his career.
Apparently the Bears' final offer was one year, $2 million, take it or leave it. Urlacher was hoping for at least an option for a second year.
Timby is offline  
Old March 21 2013, 12:53 AM   #112
Mr. Laser Beam
Fleet Admiral
 
Mr. Laser Beam's Avatar
 
Location: The visitor's bullpen
View Mr. Laser Beam's Twitter Profile
Re: NFL 2013 Off-Season Discussion

Timby wrote: View Post
There is absolutely no regulation whatsoever barring the moving of a night game to an afternoon game, even if they played the night before
But both teams are coming off of road trips on that night before. IIRC, there is a regulation which states that a team can't be made to play an afternoon game right after an away evening game, if the distance travelled is above a certain amount (which in this case it would be). Would you expect the O's to be at the top of their game after making that trip? Especially if the previous night's game is delayed?

Timby wrote: View Post
Steve Bisciotti, the Ravens' owner, has even promised to cover any revenues lost
For both the O's and the White Sox? How right neighborly of him.
__________________
In labor news: Longshoremen walked off the piers today. Rescue operations are continuing.
Mr. Laser Beam is offline  
Old March 21 2013, 01:07 AM   #113
Timby
GIVE ME YOUR FACE
 
Timby's Avatar
 
Re: NFL 2013 Off-Season Discussion

Mr. Laser Beam wrote: View Post
Timby wrote: View Post
There is absolutely no regulation whatsoever barring the moving of a night game to an afternoon game, even if they played the night before
But both teams are coming off of road trips on that night before. IIRC, there is a regulation which states that a team can't be made to play an afternoon game right after an away evening game, if the distance travelled is above a certain amount (which in this case it would be). Would you expect the O's to be at the top of their game after making that trip? Especially if the previous night's game is delayed?
That's baseball for you. And, as I said, highly unlikely to matter, given that the O's are likely to fall back to Earth hard next year.

Timby wrote: View Post
Steve Bisciotti, the Ravens' owner, has even promised to cover any revenues lost
For both the O's and the White Sox? How right neighborly of him.
I love how you only wander into the NFL thread if a baseball team is involved.

Let's look at the facts here:

1) It is quite literally impossible for games at M&T Bank Stadium and Camden Yards to be played at the same time.
2) For the past eight seasons, with one exception, it's become tradition for the reigning Super Bowl champions to open the season, at home, on Thursday Night Football. Moving the game to Wednesday or Friday is not an option.
3) The Ravens have offered to step up and cover potential lost revenues. And you really don't quite "get" how broadcast revenues are paid out, in that they're handled on a contractual basis. The teams don't make different amounts of money per individual game.

Given these facts, why are the Ravens the bad guys for wanting to open their championship defense in accordance with tradition, in turn mildly inconveniencing one baseball game out of 162?
Timby is offline  
Old March 21 2013, 01:13 AM   #114
Sheep
Vice Admiral
 
Sheep's Avatar
 
Location: Chicago
Re: NFL 2013 Off-Season Discussion

Timby wrote: View Post
Apparently the Bears' final offer was one year, $2 million, take it or leave it. Urlacher was hoping for at least an option for a second year.
According to the Tribune, his agent's initial offer was $11.5m over two years with the goal of negotiating it down to a number everyone could agree on. Split the difference between $2m and $5.75m and it's plainly obvious that they weren't going to agree to terms. Urlacher's saying he would have stayed for as low as $3m which I find very difficult to swallow given the initial offer.
__________________
Hating the anti-intellectual movement since before it was actually a movement.
Sheep is offline  
Old March 21 2013, 01:13 AM   #115
Scout101
Admiral
 
Scout101's Avatar
 
Location: Rhode Island, USA
Re: NFL 2013 Off-Season Discussion

Timby wrote: View Post
Let's look at the facts here:

2) For the past eight seasons, with one exception, it's become tradition for the reigning Super Bowl champions to open the season, at home, on Thursday Night Football. Moving the game to Wednesday or Friday is not an option.
Uh, sure it is? As you yourself said, it's only been 'tradition' for 8 years, and they only even followed through with it on 7 of those 8 years. What's 7 out of 9 going to hurt? Not like people won't watch because it's not Thursday night, their bottom line won't be hurt an iota by doing it Wednesday instead.

It's just NFL trying to flex muscles and bump MLB at this point.

Ravens should just be dicks and tell their fans to get there super early to celebrate, and jam the parking lot so the O's can't park there anyway. Then there will be 5k people in there instead of 10k as they play a suck game in September. If the O's aren't 30 games out by then...
__________________
Perhaps, if I am very lucky, the feeble efforts of my lifetime will someday be noticed and maybe, in some small way, they will be acknowledged as the greatest works of genius ever created by man. ~Jack Handey
STO: @JScout33
Scout101 is offline  
Old March 21 2013, 01:34 AM   #116
Timby
GIVE ME YOUR FACE
 
Timby's Avatar
 
Re: NFL 2013 Off-Season Discussion

Scout101 wrote: View Post
Timby wrote: View Post
Let's look at the facts here:

2) For the past eight seasons, with one exception, it's become tradition for the reigning Super Bowl champions to open the season, at home, on Thursday Night Football. Moving the game to Wednesday or Friday is not an option.
Uh, sure it is? As you yourself said, it's only been 'tradition' for 8 years, and they only even followed through with it on 7 of those 8 years. What's 7 out of 9 going to hurt? Not like people won't watch because it's not Thursday night, their bottom line won't be hurt an iota by doing it Wednesday instead.

It's just NFL trying to flex muscles and bump MLB at this point.

Ravens should just be dicks and tell their fans to get there super early to celebrate, and jam the parking lot so the O's can't park there anyway. Then there will be 5k people in there instead of 10k as they play a suck game in September. If the O's aren't 30 games out by then...
Wednesday isn't an option because it's the first day of Rosh Hashanah, and the Ravens and NFL refuse to open the season on one of the High Holy Days. Friday isn't an option because the NFL's anti-trust exemption forbids professional football from being played on Fridays, to keep the league from dropping a massive "fuck you" on high school football.
Timby is offline  
Old March 21 2013, 02:54 AM   #117
chrisspringob
Commodore
 
Location: North Ryde, NSW
Re: NFL 2013 Off-Season Discussion

I don't see why it's wrong for the NFL to simply *ask* MLB if they're willing to move the game. It's not like they're strong arming them or anything.

But if they can't have the game on Thursday night, then the best alternative would probably be to schedule NE@Balt on Sunday night, and have a different game open the season on Thursday night. I don't know that there's really any particular advantage to having the Thursday night game. (Though I guess you get more time off before the Week 2 game.)
chrisspringob is offline  
Old March 21 2013, 09:49 AM   #118
Yoda
Rear Admiral
 
Yoda's Avatar
 
Location: San Diego
Re: NFL 2013 Off-Season Discussion

The NFL refuses to play on Rosh Hashana? That's silly. They play on Thanksgiving, Christmas, and New Year's. Extra stupid because they're not willing to play on the first day of it but have no issues with the second day?

Holidays and baseball are equally useless excuses to try to not play some football
__________________
Yoda is offline  
Old March 21 2013, 11:07 AM   #119
SmoothieX
Vice Admiral
 
SmoothieX's Avatar
 
Location: Massachusetts
Re: NFL 2013 Off-Season Discussion

For some obvious reasons, I love this.
SmoothieX is offline  
Old March 21 2013, 02:31 PM   #120
Timby
GIVE ME YOUR FACE
 
Timby's Avatar
 
Re: NFL 2013 Off-Season Discussion

Yoda wrote: View Post
The NFL refuses to play on Rosh Hashana? That's silly. They play on Thanksgiving, Christmas, and New Year's. Extra stupid because they're not willing to play on the first day of it but have no issues with the second day?

Holidays and baseball are equally useless excuses to try to not play some football
It's not unheard of. Back in 2009, the Jets successfully petitioned the league to move a game from 4:15 to 1 p.m., because it was the eve of Yom Kippur; as a large portion of the Jets' season ticket holders are Jewish (and even non-observant Jews tend to stay home during Yom Kippur), attendance would have been abysmal.
Timby is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.