RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,421
Posts: 5,506,608
Members: 25,129
Currently online: 501
Newest member: Talosian1978

TrekToday headlines

Retro Review: The Emperor’s New Cloak
By: Michelle on Dec 20

Star Trek Opera
By: T'Bonz on Dec 19

New Abrams Project
By: T'Bonz on Dec 18

IDW Publishing March 2015 Comics
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Paramount Star Trek 3 Expectations
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Star Trek #39 Sneak Peek
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Star Trek 3 Potential Director Shortlist
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Official Starships Collection Update
By: T'Bonz on Dec 15

Retro Review: Prodigal Daughter
By: Michelle on Dec 13

Sindicate Lager To Debut In The US Next Week
By: T'Bonz on Dec 12


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Fandom > Fan Productions

Fan Productions Creating our own Trek canon!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old March 4 2013, 02:59 AM   #346
J.C. England
Lieutenant
 
J.C. England's Avatar
 
Location: Bethany/OKC, Oklahoma
Re: Star Ship AJAX Production

Thanks Barbara! Hadn't gotten 'round to it yet.
Just a little thing to help the crew loosen up
(although the effort was not really appreciated
by our set builders/production staff)

@Slipcover:
The gaps you're speaking about (if I'm guessing
the right areas) are present on all Bridge sets,
simply because of the way they are built in sections
like slices of a pizza. Black tape or a black sheet
is supposed to be behind the set piece to block
the lights behind the set.
Some sections are are "portable" to make way for
camera equipments & microphones, and are moved
several times back and forth for particular shots.
In the original TOS episodes, the creators depended
on the poor resolution of the TV screens in the 60s
and 70s to hide those flaws, along with a multitude
of others. If you look close enough to Phase II, Farragut,
and even our production, you will see those flaws
again... there's no way to make these set pieces perfect,
and we really don't want to, to keep them somewhat "authentic".

Thank you for your interest & contact us if you're
ever in the OKC area.

JC England (Capt Boone)
J.C. England is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 6 2013, 12:57 AM   #347
PattyW
Commander
 
Location: New England
Send a message via AIM to PattyW
Re: Star Ship AJAX Production

J.C. England wrote: View Post
@Slipcover:
The gaps you're speaking about (if I'm guessing
the right areas) are present on all Bridge sets,
simply because of the way they are built in sections
like slices of a pizza. Black tape or a black sheet
is supposed to be behind the set piece to block
the lights behind the set.
Some sections are are "portable" to make way for
camera equipments & microphones, and are moved
several times back and forth for particular shots.
In the original TOS episodes, the creators depended
on the poor resolution of the TV screens in the 60s
and 70s to hide those flaws, along with a multitude
of others. If you look close enough to Phase II, Farragut,
and even our production, you will see those flaws
again... there's no way to make these set pieces perfect,
and we really don't want to, to keep them somewhat "authentic".

Thank you for your interest & contact us if you're
ever in the OKC area.

JC England (Capt Boone)
Actually, Phase II doesn't have any of the "portable" sections, so you WON'T see the 'spacer' flaws in our sets. Although built in the "pie wedge sections", each section is bondoed and screwed into the others, so there are no gaps. It definitely limits camera angles.

In the original series, the sections from Spock's station to the viewscreen were usually absent, and a common shot of Spock at his station is from the camera being situated where the next section would be.
__________________
Founder Childhood Warriors. Producer/Promoter/Writer/Costume Designer/Event Coordinator/Fundraiser/website design (formerly for Retro Film Studios, CEC, IP, Mystic Seaport, Dickens Days).
PattyW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 6 2013, 02:59 AM   #348
GSchnitzer
Co-Executive Producer
 
GSchnitzer's Avatar
 
Location: Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA, Terra
Send a message via AIM to GSchnitzer Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to GSchnitzer Send a message via Yahoo to GSchnitzer
Re: Star Ship AJAX Production

J.C. England wrote: View Post
The gaps you're speaking about (if I'm guessing
the right areas) are present on all Bridge sets,
simply because of the way they are built in sections
like slices of a pizza.... If you look close enough to Phase II, Farragut, and even our production, you will see those flaws again... there's no way to make these set pieces perfect, and we really don't want to, to keep them somewhat "authentic".
Actually, after we built our 360 degree bridge set, the seams between each of the bridge stations/sections were bonded over entirely before the set was painted. If you run your hand along the console, say, from Uhura's station, all the way to Spock's station, and over to the Navigation and Weaons Subsystems stations, it's as smooth as glass all the way around with no seams at all.

The advantages are that it looks great--especially since we shoot in high definition. No cracks or seams show because, well, there are none. The disadvantes are that none of the segments are "wild" and they can't be moved. We are locked into one room, for good are bad, and some of the more interesting views used on TOS we just can't get. Also, if we ever need to move the bridge, we need to bust up the bondoing at each station--sort of like busting through a wall. It's a trade-off.
__________________
Greg Schnitzer
Co-Executive Producer
Star Trek Phase II
http://www.startrekphase2.com
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3348883/
GSchnitzer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 6 2013, 05:39 AM   #349
J.C. England
Lieutenant
 
J.C. England's Avatar
 
Location: Bethany/OKC, Oklahoma
Re: Star Ship AJAX Production

I stand corrected then on the other sets, for sure.
Ours are 'wild' to a point, but pretty much fixed in place.
(we can move them if we need, but prefer not to, lol)

Thanks for the input, guys.
J.C. England is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 7 2013, 04:34 PM   #350
Loken
Lieutenant Commander
 
Re: Star Ship AJAX Production

It is amazing to see all the progress on "Ajax". I feel like part of your team since I was there watching John slave away and deal with so many issues early on. His perseverance and the enthusiasm of the new group of people, many of whom I have made friends with, is heart-warming and I cannot wait for the final product!

Alec
Loken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 12 2013, 09:40 PM   #351
x32
Lieutenant
 
x32's Avatar
 
Location: Oklahoma City
Re: Star Ship AJAX Production

J.C. England wrote: View Post
I stand corrected then on the other sets, for sure.
Ours are 'wild' to a point, but pretty much fixed in place.
(we can move them if we need, but prefer not to, lol)

Thanks for the input, guys.
Actually, when we made the move, I rebuilt the set in such a way that it can come completely apart and be moved again easier than it was the first time.

Each station separates, the roof come off and lays in the floor, the x-brace feet come out so the station can be dropped on wheel boards and rolled into the back of a semi truck.

Even though it's easier it would still be a chore to move it, so Charley is correct in that we prefer not to. However if someone wants a bridge for their event and has the money we can bring it.

Many people have pointed out the cracks and offered to fill them in and I stopped them. The original goal John put to me when I first joined the project was to make it as close to possible to the original bridge. Then if someone wants to make another show on the Enterprise they won't have to change anything. Everyone else, including John has abandoned that goal but it's still what I shoot for. If it was on the original bridge I want it to be on our bridge, cracks and everything.
x32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 17 2013, 06:54 PM   #352
MarsWeeps
Captain
 
MarsWeeps's Avatar
 
Location: Outside of Space/Time
Re: Star Ship AJAX Production

x32 wrote: View Post
If it was on the original bridge I want it to be on our bridge, cracks and everything.
But since it's a different ship, isn't it likely that there would be some minor cosmetic changes? For example, you could have blue railings and blue turbolift door just to be a little different.
MarsWeeps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 17 2013, 07:30 PM   #353
MikeH92467
Vice Admiral
 
MikeH92467's Avatar
 
Location: Boise, ID
View MikeH92467's Twitter Profile
Re: Star Ship AJAX Production

This is something that I've suggested as well. In the U.S. Navy, every ship that follows the first of a new line incorporates changes and modifications as feedback comes in from the crews that are actually using them. It seems to me that while two ships might have the same basic template, there are always going to be differences under the hood.
MikeH92467 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 17 2013, 08:10 PM   #354
feek61
Captain
 
feek61's Avatar
 
Location: The Sunshine State
Re: Star Ship AJAX Production

Yes, they changed the graphic at the turbo-lift, the dedication plaque and two of the graphics that originally showed the Constitution class starship. What more do you want, lol.
__________________
feek61 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 18 2013, 04:01 AM   #355
x32
Lieutenant
 
x32's Avatar
 
Location: Oklahoma City
Re: Star Ship AJAX Production

Remember we are building a studio for anyone to use. The plan is to model it after the Enterprise but not everyone will want the Enterprise for their show. So each show is certainly welcome to change whatever they like as long as it is not major construction or damaging to the set.

If someone wants blue rails that is perfectly acceptable as long as they repaint them orange before they leave. The program I've written to display feek61's graphics makes it easy load other graphics if desired. The plaque and most of the other panels are screwed in place and can be changed out if needed. Any changes within reason will be allowed as long as they are changed back.
x32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 18 2013, 04:24 AM   #356
feek61
Captain
 
feek61's Avatar
 
Location: The Sunshine State
Re: Star Ship AJAX Production

. . . and we can certainly change any graphics as needed as well!
__________________
feek61 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 20 2013, 01:57 PM   #357
AjaxSupportCrew
Lieutenant
 
AjaxSupportCrew's Avatar
 
Location: Oklahoma City
Re: Star Ship AJAX Production

Feek, Just wanted to say "Thank You" for ALL the research you have put in replicating the graphics from TOS. These are PERFECT in EVERY sense of the word , , right down to the timing on the different blinking patterns......
Your work Sir is - - PHENOMENAL
__________________
THAT IS ALL.......
http://www.starbasestudios.net

-END OF LINE-
AjaxSupportCrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 20 2013, 05:23 PM   #358
feek61
Captain
 
feek61's Avatar
 
Location: The Sunshine State
Re: Star Ship AJAX Production

Awww, gee thanks, lol. Happy to help out on such a great project!!!

I actually have some updated (read: more accurate) versions I need to send your way.
__________________
feek61 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 20 2013, 05:42 PM   #359
AjaxSupportCrew
Lieutenant
 
AjaxSupportCrew's Avatar
 
Location: Oklahoma City
Re: Star Ship AJAX Production

send them on ......
Richard I'm sure is waiting........
You can send them to me @ - - scott@starshipajax.com also.....

Thanx again!

LLAP
P.S. - plz email me so that I will have a way to respond back to you directly instead of thru the board......

Thanx
__________________
THAT IS ALL.......
http://www.starbasestudios.net

-END OF LINE-

Last edited by AjaxSupportCrew; March 20 2013 at 06:18 PM. Reason: added txt
AjaxSupportCrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 21 2013, 01:48 AM   #360
J.C. England
Lieutenant
 
J.C. England's Avatar
 
Location: Bethany/OKC, Oklahoma
Re: Star Ship AJAX Production

Feek, to echo what Scott said..
Your work sir is... PHENOMENAL!!
The compliments haven't stopped
coming from everyone who has
come onboard the Ajax.

Thank you again!
J.C. England is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.