RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 137,893
Posts: 5,330,362
Members: 24,555
Currently online: 514
Newest member: berlyn

TrekToday headlines

Retro Review: Inquisition
By: Michelle on Jul 12

Cubify Star Trek 3DMe Mini Figurines
By: T'Bonz on Jul 11

Latest Official Starships Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Jul 10

Seven of Nine Bobble Head
By: T'Bonz on Jul 9

Pegg The Prankster
By: T'Bonz on Jul 9

More Trek Stars Join Unbelievable!!!!!
By: T'Bonz on Jul 8

Star Trek #35 Preview
By: T'Bonz on Jul 8

New ThinkGeek Trek Apparel
By: T'Bonz on Jul 7

Star Trek Movie Prop Auction
By: T'Bonz on Jul 7

Drexler: NX Engineering Room Construction
By: T'Bonz on Jul 7


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek TV Series > Star Trek - Original Series

Star Trek - Original Series The one that started it all...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 21 2013, 05:54 AM   #46
Maurice
Vice Admiral
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Location: Maurice in San Francisco
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?

Honestly TOS-R needed a knowledgeable VFX director on it—someone with a background in or understanding of how optical effects work on FILM—in order to make the effects fit seamlessly into the show. The big problem with the TOS-R effects, beyond the dumb boo boos (e.g. the orange "blue flame" and the Enterprise actually vanishing behind the limb of a planet...which would make said planet about 10 miles across) and crappy models (hel-lo low poly Klingon ship) is that the effects don't feel like they belong next to the footage that surrounds them in terms of LOD (level of detail), grain and lighting style.
__________________
* * *
"If you wanted to get a good meeting... just go in and
say 'darker, grittier, sexier' and whatever."
—Glen Larson, 2010

Last edited by Maurice; February 21 2013 at 06:13 AM.
Maurice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 21 2013, 05:58 AM   #47
CorporalCaptain
Vice Admiral
 
CorporalCaptain's Avatar
 
Location: Kentucky
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?

Maurice wrote: View Post
Honestly TOS-R needed a knowledgeable VFX director on it,—someone with a background or understanding of how optical effects work on FILM—in order to make the effects fit seamlessly into the show. The big problem with the TOS-R effects, beyond the dumb boo boos (e.g. the orange "blue flame" and the Enterprise actually vanishing behind the limb of a planet...which would make said planet about 10 miles across) and crappy models (hel-lo low poly Klingon ship) is that the effects don't feel like they belong next to the footage that surrounds them in terms of LOD (level of detail), grain and lighting style.
I wholehearted agree.
__________________
John
CorporalCaptain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 21 2013, 07:56 AM   #48
ZapBrannigan
Captain
 
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
 
Location: New York State
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?

plynch wrote: View Post
And Ann Mulhall could have a doctorate in an engineering field, right? Or does the script contradict that? I think someone on the bbs postulated that as an explanation for her in her fetching red outfit, nom nom.
Nom nom nom, I quite agree.

But she introduces herself as Dr Ann Mulhall, Astro-biology.

My own double-talk explanation would be that above a certain rank, or in certain back-water departments, officers can choose their own uniform color based on personal preference. This isn't like the flight deck of an aircraft carrier where the shirt colors of guys running around in a life-and-death situation have to be visible from the bridge. It's more like living in the International Space Station, almost casual.

And it just so happens that most women looked best in the red dress. Does the name Yoeman Teresa Ross mean anything to you guys? Nichelle Nichols hated the "plain" command color she wore in "The Corbomite Maneuver" and couldn't get out of it fast enough. She wanted red.
ZapBrannigan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 21 2013, 08:04 AM   #49
ZapBrannigan
Captain
 
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
 
Location: New York State
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?

Maurice wrote: View Post
Honestly TOS-R needed a knowledgeable VFX director on it—someone with a background in or understanding of how optical effects work on FILM—in order to make the effects fit seamlessly into the show. The big problem with the TOS-R effects, beyond the dumb boo boos (e.g. the orange "blue flame" and the Enterprise actually vanishing behind the limb of a planet...which would make said planet about 10 miles across) and crappy models (hel-lo low poly Klingon ship) is that the effects don't feel like they belong next to the footage that surrounds them in terms of LOD (level of detail), grain and lighting style.
Good points!

Your size-of-planet comment reminds me of a shot in the opening credits of STAR TREK VOYAGER, which were done by Disney if I recall correctly. They show Voyager coasting over the rings of a gas giant, but the ship's reflection in the rings is so big, it would make the planet absurdly small.
ZapBrannigan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 21 2013, 08:08 AM   #50
ZapBrannigan
Captain
 
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
 
Location: New York State
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?

Navigator_NCC2120 wrote: View Post
The mistakes are not just restricted to TV series. For example, near the end of TMP, Spock and McCoy are wearing each others field jackets. McCoy's field jacket has the green stripe (for medical division [or science division, medical branch, if you prefer]) and Spock's field jacket has the orange stripe (for science division).

Here is the mistake courtesy of trekcore.

Here is a link to information about the Starfleet Uniforms from TMP courtesy of Memory-Alpha.


Navigator NCC-2120 USS Entente
/\

I never noticed that. Now that you mention it, the jacket is too short on Nimoy and too long on Kelley. That's pretty dumb.

But I could have watched TMP a thousand times and never picked up on the color coding. It was too small on the uniform, and the film itself doesn't inspire me enough to bother studying its details.
ZapBrannigan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 22 2013, 05:08 AM   #51
Maurice
Vice Admiral
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Location: Maurice in San Francisco
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?

ZapBrannigan wrote: View Post
I never noticed that. Now that you mention it, the jacket is too short on Nimoy and too long on Kelley. That's pretty dumb.
It's only in that last shot. I bet they took their jackets off for lunch and put the wrong ones on after.
__________________
* * *
"If you wanted to get a good meeting... just go in and
say 'darker, grittier, sexier' and whatever."
—Glen Larson, 2010
Maurice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 22 2013, 07:52 PM   #52
TREK_GOD_1
Fleet Captain
 
TREK_GOD_1's Avatar
 
Location: Delta Vega
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?

Maurice wrote: View Post
Honestly TOS-R needed a knowledgeable VFX director on it—someone with a background in or understanding of how optical effects work on FILM—in order to make the effects fit seamlessly into the show. The big problem with the TOS-R effects, beyond the dumb boo boos (e.g. the orange "blue flame" and the Enterprise actually vanishing behind the limb of a planet...which would make said planet about 10 miles across) and crappy models (hel-lo low poly Klingon ship) is that the effects don't feel like they belong next to the footage that surrounds them in terms of LOD (level of detail), grain and lighting style.
Agreed 100%

Aside from the video game FX, the biggest mistake of both TOS and TOS-R was the scale of shuttlecrafts in the hangar. How can anyone believe the occupants of a shuttle that large (if we consider the cutaway diagrams or actual footage) would fit into a bridge as small at it is assumed to be on the same cutaway?

All explanations/diagrams have never made sense of that, and one would have thought for all of the unnecessary TOS-R changes, the shuttle size issue would have been a no brainer.
__________________
"...to be like God, you have the power to make the world anything you want it to be."
TREK_GOD_1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 15 2013, 02:37 PM   #53
Rojan
Ensign
 
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?

Does anyone think it possible they may attempt an additional re-master for the 50th anniversary in 2016?

Not starting from scratch of course, but just building on what has already been achieved to date. I’m also thinking about how this would be an opportunity to finally fix certain on-screen faults that weren’t corrected the first time due to time & budget restrictions.
Rojan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 15 2013, 02:40 PM   #54
CorporalCaptain
Vice Admiral
 
CorporalCaptain's Avatar
 
Location: Kentucky
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?

Rojan wrote: View Post
Does anyone think it possible they may attempt an additional re-master for the 50th anniversary in 2016?

Not starting from scratch of course, but just building on what has already been achieved to date. I’m also thinking about how this would be an opportunity to finally fix certain on-screen faults that weren’t corrected the first time due to time & budget restrictions.
Possible in what sense of the word?

The answer is no.
__________________
John
CorporalCaptain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 15 2013, 03:29 PM   #55
Rojan
Ensign
 
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?

Possible as in it being the important 50th anniversary of the show and therefore wanting to promote it with something like a special anniversary release 10 years after the first Blu-ray release.

Additional revenue being the motive, they would have to consider that many people might be interested in buying such a release on what is a significant anniversary if it contained more enhancements & fixing up all the faults missed last time.
Rojan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 15 2013, 06:07 PM   #56
ssosmcin
Rear Admiral
 
ssosmcin's Avatar
 
Location: ssosmcin
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?

Honestly, why not? Does anyone think that CBS/Paramount would pass up any possible opportunity to squeeze more money out of the series? They practically invented the "double-dip" concept.
__________________
"Tranya is people!"
ssosmcin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 15 2013, 07:16 PM   #57
CorporalCaptain
Vice Admiral
 
CorporalCaptain's Avatar
 
Location: Kentucky
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?

I'll be very shocked if they spend more money on remastering/remixing just for another Blu-ray release. Sure, they could slap together or blow the dust off a special feature or two for a new set, but the TOS-R we got with its second-string CGI was the very model of cheapness to begin with. Why spend a lot more money, for just as much return?
__________________
John
CorporalCaptain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 15 2013, 08:18 PM   #58
gottacook
Commander
 
Location: Maryland
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?

The thing is, I believe they already thought they were going too far at times. Occasionally there are some ship maneuvers that are just fancy for the sake of it, like the rendezvous with the Medusan ship near the end of "Is There in Truth..." (which had no analog in the original and didn't need one; right after Kirk says "Miranda...?" and looks down the empty, fisheye-lensed corridor, the original has a stock shot that went beautifully with the music cue: rear of Enterprise in foreground, the Medusans' planet in distance).

Nonetheless I'm satisfied in general. They knew, for example, what to essentially leave alone although the image was entirely new - such as the first shot of act I of "Metamorphosis," the Companion's planetoid hanging in center screen (with the title and other credits superimposed).
gottacook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 17 2013, 07:24 PM   #59
RAMA
Vice Admiral
 
RAMA's Avatar
 
Location: NJ, USA
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?

I'm doing a same-screen old episode vs remastered TOS for the very first time. I'm really blown away. I've never done a comparison of TOS on this scale before, I plan on looking at about 10-12 complete episodes this way. First up was The Cage...which has some of the very best clarity changes in HD compared to the washed out original. Love the seamless transition of the opening credits to the interior of the bridge. I only wish they had added some video to the bridge's secondary screens. Second was Ultimate Computer. The new space station is one of my favorite changes of the whole series. Third was Doomsday Machine. Oddly enough the HD transfer seems less pronounced on this episode. Obviously this one was the most FX heavy of TOS's run, and they are also quite obviously awful...this episode is a great example of how FX, staging and composition actually help the episode become better in TOS-R. also admire the proper blues seen on the Enterprise bridge as opposed to he purple hue from the original. Next up Tholian Web!!

...and I thought I wouldn't be watching TOS again for years!!

RAMA
__________________
It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. Carl Sagan
RAMA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 17 2013, 08:05 PM   #60
feek61
Captain
 
feek61's Avatar
 
Location: The Sunshine State
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?

I personally think TOS-R "The Doomsday Machine" is one of the worst of the TOS-R episodes. In my opinion at least the original effects looked better than the cartoons that replaced them. The texture on the doomsday machine itself was just pathetic. Don't even get me started on the interior of the machine or the super cartoon looking force beam that it emitted. It really renders one of my favorite TOS episodes unwatchable for me. To me the remastered effects were nothing more than a gimmick but I'm glad to hear that some like them.
__________________
feek61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.