RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,540
Posts: 5,513,217
Members: 25,142
Currently online: 487
Newest member: lergondo

TrekToday headlines

Two New Starships Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Dec 26

Captain Kirk’s Boldest Missions
By: T'Bonz on Dec 25

Trek Paper Clips
By: T'Bonz on Dec 24

Sargent Passes
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

QMx Trek Insignia Badges
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

And The New Director Of Star Trek 3 Is…
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

TV Alert: Pine On Tonight Show
By: T'Bonz on Dec 22

Retro Review: The Emperor’s New Cloak
By: Michelle on Dec 20

Star Trek Opera
By: T'Bonz on Dec 19

New Abrams Project
By: T'Bonz on Dec 18


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Science and Technology

Science and Technology "Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known." - Carl Sagan.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old March 12 2013, 06:41 PM   #1
Romulan_spy
Commodore
 
Location: Terre Haute, IN. USA
NASA: Ancient Mars could have supported life!

According to the analysis of rock samples collected by the Mars rover Curiosity, ancient Mars had all the basic ingredients to support living microbes.

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/ms...l20130312.html

Exciting news!
Romulan_spy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 12 2013, 06:52 PM   #2
gturner
Admiral
 
Location: Kentucky
Re: NASA: Ancient Mars could have supported life!

I think we knew this. Dirt + flowing water means the place could have supported pumpkins and vine-ripe tomatoes. Nowdays, not so much.
gturner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 12 2013, 07:05 PM   #3
RoJoHen
Awesome
 
RoJoHen's Avatar
 
Location: QC, IL, USA
Re: NASA: Ancient Mars could have supported life!

Yeah, as soon as they discovered water I thought this was a given. It's cool that they're still continuing to gather more data, though. My least favorite thing about science is that, even if we can prove that life once existed on Mars, we'll never be able to see it.

What I often wonder is this. If life did exist on Mars at one point, how far did it evolve? Microbes? Plants? Did Mars have oceans full of crazy Martian fish? If we ever make it to Mars and establish long-term colonization there, will we one day discover the fossils of an ancient Martian dinosaur?
__________________
I am the Quintessential Admiral.
RoJoHen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 12 2013, 07:44 PM   #4
gturner
Admiral
 
Location: Kentucky
Re: NASA: Ancient Mars could have supported life!

Reading the story, what they found is unoxidized and partially-oxidized elements (iron, sulfur, phosphorus, etc) in Martian sedimentary rocks that could've served as an energy source for bacteria, like what we see in hydrothermal vents in the deep ocean. Of course to me this also indicates that there weren't microbes taking full advantage of the conditions or they'd have oxidized the elements to extract the energy.

Not finding any signs of life does have some major benefits for Mars exploration. If we find any traces of life then there's almost no way we could put a human on the planet in the foreseeable future because of the risk of contaminating the environment with Earth bacteria, forever ruining some of the potential science.
gturner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 13 2013, 03:21 PM   #5
Icemizer
Fleet Captain
 
Icemizer's Avatar
 
Re: NASA: Ancient Mars could have supported life!

Please gt, there is no way science is going to stand in the way of exploitation of Mars.
Icemizer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 13 2013, 03:57 PM   #6
Cookies and Cake
Admiral
 
Location: North America
Re: NASA: Ancient Mars could have supported life!

RoJoHen wrote: View Post
Yeah, as soon as they discovered water I thought this was a given.
Sorry, no.

In science, just because something may be unsurprising given a trend in recent discoveries, it is not the same as being "a given."

In particular, just because it was already known that important necessary chemicals and conditions were present for life as we understand it, it doesn't follow from that alone that there weren't other chemicals or aspects of the environment which might have precluded life. Indeed, the article says:
article wrote:
This ancient wet environment, unlike some others on Mars, was not harshly oxidizing, acidic or extremely salty.
Those are some of the new results.

Also both promising and significant is:

article wrote:
Scientists were surprised to find a mixture of oxidized, less-oxidized, and even non-oxidized chemicals, providing an energy gradient of the sort many microbes on Earth exploit to live. This partial oxidation was first hinted at when the drill cuttings were revealed to be gray rather than red.
This is conformation that Curiosity is in the right spot to be exploring for evidence of life as we understand it.

---

It's cool that they're still continuing to gather more data, though.
One reason scientists are still gathering data is because the existence of life at any point in the history of Mars is still not given.
__________________
CorporalCaptain
Cookies and Cake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 13 2013, 04:00 PM   #7
RoJoHen
Awesome
 
RoJoHen's Avatar
 
Location: QC, IL, USA
Re: NASA: Ancient Mars could have supported life!

CorporalCaptain wrote: View Post
RoJoHen wrote: View Post
Yeah, as soon as they discovered water I thought this was a given.
Sorry, no.

In science, just because something may be unsurprising given a trend in recent discoveries, it is not the same as being "a given."

In particular, just because it was already known that important necessary chemicals and conditions were present for life as we understand it, it doesn't follow from that alone that there weren't other chemicals or aspects of the environment which might have precluded life. Indeed, the article says:
article wrote:
This ancient wet environment, unlike some others on Mars, was not harshly oxidizing, acidic or extremely salty.
Those are some of the new results.

Also both promising and significant is:

article wrote:
Scientists were surprised to find a mixture of oxidized, less-oxidized, and even non-oxidized chemicals, providing an energy gradient of the sort many microbes on Earth exploit to live. This partial oxidation was first hinted at when the drill cuttings were revealed to be gray rather than red.
This is conformation that Curiosity is in the right spot to be exploring for evidence of life as we understand it.

---

It's cool that they're still continuing to gather more data, though.
One reason scientists are still gathering data is because the existence of life at any point in the history of Mars is still not given.
Never said the existence of life was a given, just that the possibility of life was a given.
__________________
I am the Quintessential Admiral.
RoJoHen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 13 2013, 04:04 PM   #8
Cookies and Cake
Admiral
 
Location: North America
Re: NASA: Ancient Mars could have supported life!

RoJoHen wrote: View Post
CorporalCaptain wrote: View Post
RoJoHen wrote: View Post
Yeah, as soon as they discovered water I thought this was a given.
Sorry, no.

In science, just because something may be unsurprising given a trend in recent discoveries, it is not the same as being "a given."

In particular, just because it was already known that important necessary chemicals and conditions were present for life as we understand it, it doesn't follow from that alone that there weren't other chemicals or aspects of the environment which might have precluded life. Indeed, the article says:

Those are some of the new results.

Also both promising and significant is:

This is conformation that Curiosity is in the right spot to be exploring for evidence of life as we understand it.

---

It's cool that they're still continuing to gather more data, though.
One reason scientists are still gathering data is because the existence of life at any point in the history of Mars is still not given.
Never said the existence of life was a given, just that the possibility of life was a given.
No. I covered that, too, first.
__________________
CorporalCaptain
Cookies and Cake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 13 2013, 09:06 PM   #9
gturner
Admiral
 
Location: Kentucky
Re: NASA: Ancient Mars could have supported life!

Icemizer wrote: View Post
Please gt, there is no way science is going to stand in the way of exploitation of Mars.
It already has, with the debacle about Curiosities drill that didn't get re-sterilized properly. Under the mission rules they can't allow the rover to get near water for fear of causing a contamination from Earth bacteria.

Finding life won't stop the exploitation of Mars, but it will throw up some major road blocks to human presence as scientists insist on a heck of a lot more remote sampling of the indigenous life before they dare risk contaminating any of it. The number of unmanned missions will go way, way up, as will the requirements of manned-mission sterilization.
gturner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 13 2013, 09:24 PM   #10
T J
Commodore
 
T J's Avatar
 
Location: milky way... there abouts
Re: NASA: Ancient Mars could have supported life!

Weekly scientists breaking news, "Still no life found. That is all."

Check.
__________________
One of the great revelations of space exploration is
the image of the earth, finite and lonely bearing the entire human species through the oceans of space and time. ~ Carl Sagan (1934-1996)
T J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 14 2013, 03:15 PM   #11
Solstice
Sexy Wizard
 
Solstice's Avatar
 
Location: I'm so lost T_T
View Solstice's Twitter Profile Send a message via ICQ to Solstice Send a message via AIM to Solstice Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Solstice Send a message via Yahoo to Solstice
Re: NASA: Ancient Mars could have supported life!

T J wrote: View Post
Weekly scientists breaking news, "Still no life found. That is all."

Check.
Yeah, it's not like we're learning anything at all about Mars here.
__________________
Robert Maxwell
I has a blag.
I put on my robe and wizard hat...
Solstice is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.