RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 135,769
Posts: 5,216,804
Members: 24,218
Currently online: 746
Newest member: momogila

TrekToday headlines

Q Meets NuTrek Crew
By: T'Bonz on Apr 18

Pine In Talks For Drama
By: T'Bonz on Apr 18

New X-Men: Days of Future Past Trailer
By: T'Bonz on Apr 17

Nimoy to Receive Award
By: T'Bonz on Apr 17

Star Trek Special: Flesh and Stone Comic
By: T'Bonz on Apr 16

These Are The Voyages TOS Season Two Book Review
By: T'Bonz on Apr 16

Kirk’s Well Wishes To Kirk
By: T'Bonz on Apr 15

Quinto In New Starz Series
By: T'Bonz on Apr 15

Star Trek: Horizon Film
By: T'Bonz on Apr 14

Star Trek: Fleet Captains Game Expansion
By: T'Bonz on Apr 14


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies I-X

Star Trek Movies I-X Discuss the first ten big screen outings in this forum!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old March 12 2013, 05:08 PM   #46
Hartzilla2007
Vice Admiral
 
Hartzilla2007's Avatar
 
Location: Star Trekkin Across the universe.
Re: Questions on Insurrection, on the Baku

sonak wrote: View Post
Hartzilla2007 wrote: View Post
BillJ wrote: View Post

But what your proposing isn't what will happen to the Ba'ku, as we've seen in the S'ona. Without treatment they'd simply go back to their normal lifespan and live close to another century.
While people in the federation get to live forever, sounds kind of hypocritical.

er, no, the people in the UFP would get greatly extended lifespans. As would the Baku, if they got access to the same process. It's not hypocrisy if all the parties got the same thing from it.
No they wouldn't get access to it, Doughtery pretty much said the Ba'ku were getting squat out of this with his whole "returning them to their proper course of evolution" stuff.
Hartzilla2007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 12 2013, 05:55 PM   #47
Robert Maxwell
Respect the Beef
 
Robert Maxwell's Avatar
 
Location: Right behind you!
View Robert Maxwell's Twitter Profile Send a message via ICQ to Robert Maxwell Send a message via AIM to Robert Maxwell Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Robert Maxwell Send a message via Yahoo to Robert Maxwell
Re: Questions on Insurrection, on the Baku

Hartzilla2007 wrote: View Post
sonak wrote: View Post
Hartzilla2007 wrote: View Post

While people in the federation get to live forever, sounds kind of hypocritical.

er, no, the people in the UFP would get greatly extended lifespans. As would the Baku, if they got access to the same process. It's not hypocrisy if all the parties got the same thing from it.
No they wouldn't get access to it, Doughtery pretty much said the Ba'ku were getting squat out of this with his whole "returning them to their proper course of evolution" stuff.
Yup. The original plan was to move the Ba'ku without their knowledge. Their home would be stolen from them and they would ideally never even know it had happened.

Not exactly the actions of a "benevolent" galactic power.
__________________
"Holy shit! It's Beef Supreme!"
The Journeyman - Buy it now! Maybe?
My world simulation project!
My blog
Robert Maxwell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 12 2013, 06:27 PM   #48
sonak
Vice Admiral
 
Location: in a figment of a mediocre mind's imagination
Re: Questions on Insurrection, on the Baku

Robert Maxwell wrote: View Post
Hartzilla2007 wrote: View Post
sonak wrote: View Post


er, no, the people in the UFP would get greatly extended lifespans. As would the Baku, if they got access to the same process. It's not hypocrisy if all the parties got the same thing from it.
No they wouldn't get access to it, Doughtery pretty much said the Ba'ku were getting squat out of this with his whole "returning them to their proper course of evolution" stuff.
Yup. The original plan was to move the Ba'ku without their knowledge. Their home would be stolen from them and they would ideally never even know it had happened.

Not exactly the actions of a "benevolent" galactic power.

I agree that the holoship deception plan was a lousy one. I should have clarified that I meant that the Baku could have had access to the particles under the scenario of a negotiation AFTER Picard discovered the true nature of the Baku. At that point deception was no longer necessary, they could have just laid out the situation and offered to share the resources with the Baku.
sonak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 12 2013, 06:29 PM   #49
Robert Maxwell
Respect the Beef
 
Robert Maxwell's Avatar
 
Location: Right behind you!
View Robert Maxwell's Twitter Profile Send a message via ICQ to Robert Maxwell Send a message via AIM to Robert Maxwell Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Robert Maxwell Send a message via Yahoo to Robert Maxwell
Re: Questions on Insurrection, on the Baku

sonak wrote: View Post
Robert Maxwell wrote: View Post
Hartzilla2007 wrote: View Post

No they wouldn't get access to it, Doughtery pretty much said the Ba'ku were getting squat out of this with his whole "returning them to their proper course of evolution" stuff.
Yup. The original plan was to move the Ba'ku without their knowledge. Their home would be stolen from them and they would ideally never even know it had happened.

Not exactly the actions of a "benevolent" galactic power.

I agree that the holoship deception plan was a lousy one. I should have clarified that I meant that the Baku could have had access to the particles under the scenario of a negotiation AFTER Picard discovered the true nature of the Baku. At that point deception was no longer necessary, they could have just laid out the situation and offered to share the resources with the Baku.
How is that at all fair compensation to the Ba'ku having to give up their immortality?

With eminent domain, you actually compensate people for what you take from them. In this case, there is no way to compensate them, because what you are taking away cannot possibly be replaced. It is a galactic power using their size and influence to bully a handful of people. It's wrong.
__________________
"Holy shit! It's Beef Supreme!"
The Journeyman - Buy it now! Maybe?
My world simulation project!
My blog
Robert Maxwell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 12 2013, 07:49 PM   #50
Hartzilla2007
Vice Admiral
 
Hartzilla2007's Avatar
 
Location: Star Trekkin Across the universe.
Re: Questions on Insurrection, on the Baku

Robert Maxwell wrote: View Post
sonak wrote: View Post
Robert Maxwell wrote: View Post

Yup. The original plan was to move the Ba'ku without their knowledge. Their home would be stolen from them and they would ideally never even know it had happened.

Not exactly the actions of a "benevolent" galactic power.

I agree that the holoship deception plan was a lousy one. I should have clarified that I meant that the Baku could have had access to the particles under the scenario of a negotiation AFTER Picard discovered the true nature of the Baku. At that point deception was no longer necessary, they could have just laid out the situation and offered to share the resources with the Baku.
How is that at all fair compensation to the Ba'ku having to give up their immortality?

With eminent domain, you actually compensate people for what you take from them. In this case, there is no way to compensate them, because what you are taking away cannot possibly be replaced. It is a galactic power using their size and influence to bully a handful of people. It's wrong.
Besides I still don't know why the federation couldn't just set up a science station in orbit and study the rings radiation to figure out how to duplicate it.

I mean we're talking about the people who came up with Genesis, how hard is magic youth radiation compared to making freaking planets.
Hartzilla2007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 12 2013, 08:28 PM   #51
BillJ
Admiral
 
Location: In the 23rd Century...
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Questions on Insurrection, on the Baku

Hartzilla2007 wrote: View Post
Besides I still don't know why the federation couldn't just set up a science station in orbit and study the rings radiation to figure out how to duplicate it.

I mean we're talking about the people who came up with Genesis, how hard is magic youth radiation compared to making freaking planets.
Problem was that the S'ona were dying and would seem to have at least some sort of claim on the planet itself.
__________________
I'm not popular enough to be different! - Homer Simpson
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 12 2013, 08:56 PM   #52
Hartzilla2007
Vice Admiral
 
Hartzilla2007's Avatar
 
Location: Star Trekkin Across the universe.
Re: Questions on Insurrection, on the Baku

BillJ wrote: View Post
Problem was that the S'ona were dying
Probably becuase they were using crappy non-federation medical tech, just switch over to federation medical technology. It kept McCoy alive so it should keep them alive long enough to figure out how to make their own magic youth radiation.

As for the partial claim thing, thats a dispute they need to work out with their parents, since the federation is around they could possibly mediate it. I mean the Ba'ku didn't have a problem taking them back at the end, the Son'a seemed to be the only bitter ones there.
Hartzilla2007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 12 2013, 09:02 PM   #53
Robert Maxwell
Respect the Beef
 
Robert Maxwell's Avatar
 
Location: Right behind you!
View Robert Maxwell's Twitter Profile Send a message via ICQ to Robert Maxwell Send a message via AIM to Robert Maxwell Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Robert Maxwell Send a message via Yahoo to Robert Maxwell
Re: Questions on Insurrection, on the Baku

Hartzilla2007 wrote: View Post
BillJ wrote: View Post
Problem was that the S'ona were dying
Probably becuase they were using crappy non-federation medical tech, just switch over to federation medical technology. It kept McCoy alive so it should keep them alive long enough to figure out how to make their own magic youth radiation.

As for the partial claim thing, thats a dispute they need to work out with their parents, since the federation is around they could possibly mediate it. I mean the Ba'ku didn't have a problem taking them back at the end, the Son'a seemed to be the only bitter ones there.
That part of what the Son'a told Daugherty was probably true: they didn't want to live in the middle of nowhere. They wanted the benefits of the radiation without having be stuck in the Briar Patch. They did, after all, develop the collector with that singular goal in mind. I don't think the Son'a would have come up with such an elaborate bit of kit (which must have taken many years to research and develop) without fully intending to just take the radiation and leave their parents to rot.

If the Son'a were willing to return in peace to their people, I don't see the Ba'ku telling them to get bent. Indeed, as was shown in the film itself, those who wanted to come back were welcomed with open arms.
__________________
"Holy shit! It's Beef Supreme!"
The Journeyman - Buy it now! Maybe?
My world simulation project!
My blog
Robert Maxwell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 12 2013, 09:02 PM   #54
JarodRussell
Vice Admiral
 
JarodRussell's Avatar
 
Re: Questions on Insurrection, on the Baku

Hartzilla2007 wrote: View Post
BillJ wrote: View Post
Problem was that the S'ona were dying
Probably becuase they were using crappy non-federation medical tech, just switch over to federation medical technology. It kept McCoy alive so it should keep them alive long enough to figure out how to make their own magic youth radiation.
Besides that... the Son'a were aging. Big deal.

150 year old McCoy, would he force the Ba'ku of the planet just because he doesn't want to get old like everybody else?
__________________
lol
l
/\
JarodRussell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 13 2013, 01:00 AM   #55
tighr
Commodore
 
tighr's Avatar
 
Location: California
Re: Questions on Insurrection, on the Baku

I still don't understand why the Ba'ku would be seen as unsympathetic to the movie audience just for saying "no" at the beginning of the film. Ignoring the plot necessities of slowly revealing details to the audience, of course (saying "no" at the beginning of the movie would fundamentally make this a different film). The planet is theirs, it was uninhabited, and as far as we are aware there is no claim on the planet by any other organization that predates their settlement (the ENT episode notwithstanding).
__________________
~Tighr™: Not helping the situation since 1983
tighr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 13 2013, 03:02 AM   #56
sonak
Vice Admiral
 
Location: in a figment of a mediocre mind's imagination
Re: Questions on Insurrection, on the Baku

JarodRussell wrote: View Post
Hartzilla2007 wrote: View Post
BillJ wrote: View Post
Problem was that the S'ona were dying
Probably becuase they were using crappy non-federation medical tech, just switch over to federation medical technology. It kept McCoy alive so it should keep them alive long enough to figure out how to make their own magic youth radiation.
Besides that... the Son'a were aging. Big deal.

150 year old McCoy, would he force the Ba'ku of the planet just because he doesn't want to get old like everybody else?

I find this argument funny. You can't have it both ways-if aging is "no big deal," then removing the Baku so they resume the normal aging process is no big deal either. If it IS a big deal, then what's happening to the Son'a is a big deal as well.
sonak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 13 2013, 04:23 PM   #57
Robert Maxwell
Respect the Beef
 
Robert Maxwell's Avatar
 
Location: Right behind you!
View Robert Maxwell's Twitter Profile Send a message via ICQ to Robert Maxwell Send a message via AIM to Robert Maxwell Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Robert Maxwell Send a message via Yahoo to Robert Maxwell
Re: Questions on Insurrection, on the Baku

sonak wrote: View Post
JarodRussell wrote: View Post
Hartzilla2007 wrote: View Post

Probably becuase they were using crappy non-federation medical tech, just switch over to federation medical technology. It kept McCoy alive so it should keep them alive long enough to figure out how to make their own magic youth radiation.
Besides that... the Son'a were aging. Big deal.

150 year old McCoy, would he force the Ba'ku of the planet just because he doesn't want to get old like everybody else?

I find this argument funny. You can't have it both ways-if aging is "no big deal," then removing the Baku so they resume the normal aging process is no big deal either. If it IS a big deal, then what's happening to the Son'a is a big deal as well.
Federation citizens are accustomed to way of life in which death is an inevitability.

The Ba'ku have adapted their society over a few centuries to be accustomed to and comfortable with immortality.

You would destroy one culture's way of life in order to change another.
__________________
"Holy shit! It's Beef Supreme!"
The Journeyman - Buy it now! Maybe?
My world simulation project!
My blog
Robert Maxwell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 13 2013, 09:01 PM   #58
T'Girl
Vice Admiral
 
T'Girl's Avatar
 
Re: Questions on Insurrection, on the Baku

Robert Maxwell wrote: View Post
Indeed, as was shown in the film itself, those who wanted to come back were welcomed with open arms.
We only saw a single Sona paying a visit to his mother.

But who knows, maybe after interacting with the Sona elderly, the youthful Baku will themselves push for the particles to be collected so that their very own offspring will benefit from them. Parents will make sacrifices for their children that they wouldn't make for strangers.

The Ba'ku have adapted their society over a few centuries to be accustomed to and comfortable with immortality.
Ahh, so the Baku are capable of adapting their culture and society. That means they could (just as easily) adapt again.

T'Girl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 13 2013, 09:29 PM   #59
Robert Maxwell
Respect the Beef
 
Robert Maxwell's Avatar
 
Location: Right behind you!
View Robert Maxwell's Twitter Profile Send a message via ICQ to Robert Maxwell Send a message via AIM to Robert Maxwell Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Robert Maxwell Send a message via Yahoo to Robert Maxwell
Re: Questions on Insurrection, on the Baku

T'Girl wrote: View Post
The Ba'ku have adapted their society over a few centuries to be accustomed to and comfortable with immortality.
Ahh, so the Baku are capable of adapting their culture and society. That means they could (just as easily) adapt again.
But why should they?
__________________
"Holy shit! It's Beef Supreme!"
The Journeyman - Buy it now! Maybe?
My world simulation project!
My blog
Robert Maxwell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 13 2013, 10:13 PM   #60
tighr
Commodore
 
tighr's Avatar
 
Location: California
Re: Questions on Insurrection, on the Baku

T'Girl wrote: View Post
The Ba'ku have adapted their society over a few centuries to be accustomed to and comfortable with immortality.
Ahh, so the Baku are capable of adapting their culture and society. That means they could (just as easily) adapt again.
If it took centuries to adapt their society to an immortal life, presumably it would take the same amount of time to adapt back to a mortal lifespan of 100 years. Their methods of teaching, their artisans, their very culture requires years of study. Unfortunately, without the planet, they will not have 100 years.

You're asking them to die.
__________________
~Tighr™: Not helping the situation since 1983
tighr is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.