|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Trek Tech Pass me the quantum flux regulator, will you? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#61 | ||
|
Vice Admiral
Location: In pre-production
|
Re: Earth ship Valiant
__________________
John |
||
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Earth ship Valiant
Still, I agree that "within a sublight journey" is probably way too close... What I still don't find credible is that Earth would have had FTL technology before Cochrane, or that impulse drive in any of its forms would be capable of exceeding lightspeed. Better to explain the about two TOS ambiguities otherwise: "The old impulse engines" on the Valiant as a secondary rather than primary drive system for the old tub, "Her power is simple impulse" on the Romulan cloakship as an understandable error of judgement. Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: In pre-production
|
Re: Earth ship Valiant
__________________
John |
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Earth ship Valiant
Not being able to see purple haze through current telescopes is fairly irrelevant to the argument: the Trek Milky Way is not an exact copy of the real one. But it is roughly as big, for one thing, and has similar spiral arms in certain pieces of onscreen artwork, which keeps most of the estimates of "how far is the edge" relevant even when we use the Milky Way as a yardstick. My original point was just that we don't see any purple haze outside the real Milky Way, either, so it's a wholly fictional feature without placement limitations. ...For all we know, the Barrier defines the edge between the spiral arms and the (yes, yes, far from empty) space in between, hugging the arms tightly like a pantyhose for a starfish. And when we zoom in to the surface of the pantyhose, we see it forms a complex shape resembling the surface of a brain. Some of the folds might actually come pretty close to Earth, then (the Nexus might be a particularly mobile fold). (Also note here that the Barrier apparently isn't a purple surface between here and there. It's something invisible that only manifests as narrow purple shapes when you get really close to it. It wouldn't be much of a barrier if it were the shape of its visually evident part...) Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 | |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: In pre-production
|
Re: Earth ship Valiant
__________________
John |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Earth ship Valiant
When Kirk says what he says, he isn't saying "We are sailing over the edge of the galaxy as I speak". He is saying "I have the intent of leaving the galaxy, and for that reason I command you to punch in Warp 1". Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 | |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: In pre-production
|
Re: Earth ship Valiant
From By Any Other Name [http://www.chakoteya.net/StarTrek/50.htm]:
__________________
John |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Captain
|
Re: Earth ship Valiant
I'm trying to wrap my head around Voyager using it and came to the conclusion that from Voyagers perspective, they wouldn't even have time to sleep. Every hour they would run into some new hard-headed alien of the week. |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 | |||
|
Admiral
|
Re: Earth ship Valiant
This is the reason why we are free to place the purple barrier anywhere we wish: because the writers' intention of having it separate the inside from the outside is contrary to fact, and not really supported by the fiction, either. Standard fare for science fiction where whatever science the writers know, it's either wrong altogether or then at least outdated. And no, this doesn't change the fact that a sublight journey to the edge would still probably be an amazing millennial feat rather than a two-century hop. On that we are fully agreed.
That's another scenario Trek never quite tackled. We have seen tractor beams used for capturing a target at warp (DS9 "Paradise"), but do they work on high sublight targets with lots of "natural", Newtonian-Einsteinian kinetic energy? How does one get a ship to large fractions of c anyway - can it be done with warp drives? (See ST:TMP here...) Also, we never get a clear picture of how fast ships accelerate at impulse. Certain visuals suggest accelerations around a thousand gee, but when two ships maneuver next to each other, accelerations of less than one gee seem to be the norm. Does reaching 0.95 c take a minute, a day, or a year of running at full impulse? Timo Saloniemi |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Commander
|
Re: Earth ship Valiant
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Earth ship Valiant
"Where No Man" was written back in the bad old days when people of reasonable education and good writing skills still thought the galaxy is a cluster of light that borders on darkness. This is a blessing in disguise, as it makes the physical trappings of the events so unreal that they can be assigned any desired characteristics or interpretations afterwards without contradicting current scientific consensus. They are simply far enough outside reality to be immune to it. If Starfleet has found a concrete "edge", it's free to use that to define inside vs. outside, even if the definition will be rather arbitrary. But the reverse is not true: no inside vs. outside setup defines the "edge" we witness in the trio of episodes, and no particular location is established for it, save for "the edge is at the edge", or "it is where it is". Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: On the USS Sovereign
|
Re: Earth ship Valiant
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Commodore
|
Re: Earth ship Valiant
|
|
|
|
|
#74 | |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: In pre-production
|
Re: Earth ship Valiant
One of the reasons why I can still enjoy Star Trek, despite its highly implausible future history, is that I can think of events like the Valiant, and to a lesser extent the Botany Bay, as being more mythological than historical. By that, I mean, I can assume that they happened in some ancient past relative to Kirk's era, a past which doesn't correspond to any version of future history that could fit in with the real world. Screw the dates. I also wonder if that's how the writers want us to look at it, when characters in the franchises refer to contemporary events as happening in "ancient" Earth history.
__________________
John |
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Commodore
|
Re: Earth ship Valiant
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:28 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
















