|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Science Fiction & Fantasy Farscape, Babylon 5, Star Wars, Firefly, vampires, genre books and film. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#6181 |
|
Admiral
Location: Pennsylvania
|
Re: DC's New 52: Reviews and Discussion (Spoilers welcolme and likely)
|
|
|
|
|
#6182 |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: DC's New 52: Reviews and Discussion (Spoilers welcolme and likely)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6183 |
|
To boldly go...
Location: Kansas City
|
Re: DC's New 52: Reviews and Discussion (Spoilers welcolme and likely)
Today pulled: Superman (end of H'El story line.) World's Finest Smallville Detective
__________________
Just because it's futuristic doesn't mean it's practical. |
|
|
|
|
#6184 | |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: DC's New 52: Reviews and Discussion (Spoilers welcolme and likely)
Children's Crusade and XvsA is more like the conclusion for HoM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6185 | |
|
Captain
|
Re: DC's New 52: Reviews and Discussion (Spoilers welcolme and likely)
As for the WW love, like I said before, there have been worst arcs. Still, compared to the awesome Wonder Woman runs (by people like gail simone and the post COIE run with George Perez) this run sucks. I'll admit the whole "confused about the real world" thing probably came mostly from Justice League, but it was still boring, Wonder Woman is written to be more violent then a rabid klingon, and the art is bad. Not the worst art ever (the guy can't match JRjr, Liefeld, or Frank Miller in the horrible art category) but its very mediocre. I never get why companies give high profile books to bad artists. I literally can't read Captain America right now because JRjr's art makes my eyes bleed, its even worse than his Avengers work (and the guy doing the main Avengers book is also horrible). DC has kind of improved because Liefeld is gone, but while their bad artists aren't quite as bad as marvel's bad artists, DC has more of them (and more just mediocre ones). To be fair, DC has great artists (like the guy drawing Batwoman, although I would love to see the book with a coherent panel structure and not a series of sometimes hard to follow two page spreads, literally my only complaint aboiut that book is that sometimes it gets really hard to read a page) and some good artists, but it also has a lot of not memorable, mediocre and downright bad artists. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6186 |
|
Admiral
Location: Arizona, USA
|
Re: DC's New 52: Reviews and Discussion (Spoilers welcolme and likely)
You don't like the art in the current volume of Avengers? I only read the first issue, but I thought the art was gorgeous. And while I haven't read a whole issue yet, I've skimmed through WW and loved the artwork in it too. But I could see where it might not be for everyone, it is a more unique style. I like it when we see something more than you're standard realistic art.
__________________
Over the course of many encounters and many years, I have successfully developed a standard operating procedure for dealing with big, nasty monsters. Run away. Me and Monty Python. Harry Dresden - Blood Rites (The Dresden Files #6) |
|
|
|
|
#6187 |
|
Captain
|
Re: DC's New 52: Reviews and Discussion (Spoilers welcolme and likely)
Also, I kind of get what you mean, but that only works in some situations. WW is a legitimately bad book, I know that from reading it. Comics, in general, to me can't fit into the "its just not for me" category, atleast with comics I read and don't like. There are comics that aren't for me, and I don't read those. We're talking about WW. Its just a bad comic. |
|
|
|
|
#6188 |
|
Admiral
Location: House of Kang, now with ridges
|
Re: DC's New 52: Reviews and Discussion (Spoilers welcolme and likely)
__________________
Nerys Myk's Midnight In Never Land A novel of Dark Fantasy @ Amazon.com |
|
|
|
|
#6189 |
|
Captain
|
Re: DC's New 52: Reviews and Discussion (Spoilers welcolme and likely)
|
|
|
|
|
#6190 |
|
Fleet Admiral
|
Re: DC's New 52: Reviews and Discussion (Spoilers welcolme and likely)
__________________
Admiral Young Chief of Operations Ignoring the The Last Stand since 2011. |
|
|
|
|
#6191 |
|
Admiral
Location: House of Kang, now with ridges
|
Re: DC's New 52: Reviews and Discussion (Spoilers welcolme and likely)
__________________
Nerys Myk's Midnight In Never Land A novel of Dark Fantasy @ Amazon.com |
|
|
|
|
#6192 |
|
To boldly go...
Location: Kansas City
|
Re: DC's New 52: Reviews and Discussion (Spoilers welcolme and likely)
__________________
Just because it's futuristic doesn't mean it's practical. |
|
|
|
|
#6193 |
|
Shapeshifting Jedi
Location: Gotham City
|
Re: DC's New 52: Reviews and Discussion (Spoilers welcolme and likely)
__________________
I'm Commander Shepard, and this is my favorite thread on the TrekBBS. |
|
|
|
|
#6194 |
|
Admiral
Location: In the lap of squalor I assure you.
|
Re: DC's New 52: Reviews and Discussion (Spoilers welcolme and likely)
Avengers is trying to be too big too early, but Wonder Woman is unreadable... Although I haven't actually read it in maybe 10 months.... Because it's UNREADABLE.
__________________
"Glitter is the herpes of arts and craft." Troy Yingst. My Life as Liz Last edited by Guy Gardener; March 7 2013 at 05:59 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6195 |
|
Admiral
Location: House of Kang, now with ridges
|
Re: DC's New 52: Reviews and Discussion (Spoilers welcolme and likely)
__________________
Nerys Myk's Midnight In Never Land A novel of Dark Fantasy @ Amazon.com |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| batman, comic books, dc comics, dc's new 52, justice league, superman, watchmen, wonder woman |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:46 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.


















