RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 138,260
Posts: 5,349,254
Members: 24,614
Currently online: 573
Newest member: robyn

TrekToday headlines

Retro Review: His Way
By: Michelle on Jul 26

MicroWarriors Releases Next Week
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25

Ships Of The Line Design Contest
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25

Next Weekend: Shore Leave 36!
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25

True Trek History To Be Penned
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25

Insight Editions Announces Three Trek Books For 2015
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24

To Be Takei Review by Spencer Blohm
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24

Mulgrew: Playing Red
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24

Hallmark 2015 Trek Ornaments
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24

Funko Mini Spock
By: T'Bonz on Jul 23


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Gaming

Gaming Non-Star Trek Gaming

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 28 2013, 10:37 PM   #1
RoJoHen
Awesome
 
RoJoHen's Avatar
 
Location: QC, IL, USA
Batman: Arkham 3

http://batman-news.com/2013/02/12/ba...-2013-release/

So I guess a couple weeks ago it was confirmed that a new Arkham game would be released later this year. I just got finished playing through a bunch of the downloadable content for Arkham City, and I am more than ready for another installment.

Points of interest: It looks like Rocksteady will not be developing this new sequel, which could end up being a good or bad thing (who knows?).

There were also a rumors of a new Silver Age Batman/Justice League prequel, which may or may not be this new Arkham game. I personally hope that they are different games, as Arkham City's story did certain things that set it up for a continuation.

If they want it to be a multi-character game, I'd rather they do what they did with Arkham City by including Catwoman. You could also throw Robin or Nightwing in there if you want, but I'd prefer the story to be solely in the Batman universe.
__________________
I am the Quintessential Admiral.
RoJoHen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 28 2013, 11:48 PM   #2
AlphaMan
Rear Admiral
 
AlphaMan's Avatar
 
Location: Doom 2099
Re: Batman: Arkham 3

Not developed by Rocksteady? This game just went from "definite buy" to "wait and see."
AlphaMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 1 2013, 01:22 AM   #3
Hartzilla2007
Vice Admiral
 
Hartzilla2007's Avatar
 
Location: Star Trekkin Across the universe.
Re: Batman: Arkham 3

AlphaMan wrote: View Post
Not developed by Rocksteady? This game just went from "definite buy" to "wait and see."
The article makes that sound like thats a rumor and not definate.
Hartzilla2007 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 1 2013, 01:27 AM   #4
Timby
GIVE ME YOUR FACE
 
Timby's Avatar
 
Re: Batman: Arkham 3

AlphaMan wrote: View Post
Not developed by Rocksteady? This game just went from "definite buy" to "wait and see."
We have no concrete information. We know precisely three things: That there is a new Arkham game in development, that Rocksteady has been working on a new project since Arkham City was locked, and Paul Dini is not involved.

We literally know nothing more than that.
Timby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 1 2013, 01:28 AM   #5
RoJoHen
Awesome
 
RoJoHen's Avatar
 
Location: QC, IL, USA
Re: Batman: Arkham 3

Frankly, I'm just happy that a new game has officially been announced.
__________________
I am the Quintessential Admiral.
RoJoHen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 1 2013, 06:11 PM   #6
Reverend
Rear Admiral
 
Reverend's Avatar
 
Location: UK
Re: Batman: Arkham 3

That reminds me, I really ought to finish Arkham City one of these days...

Also pencil me in for "interested but wait and see." If neither Rocksteady nor Dini are in then I don't see how exceptions could be very high at all.
Reverend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 1 2013, 07:30 PM   #7
Timby
GIVE ME YOUR FACE
 
Timby's Avatar
 
Re: Batman: Arkham 3

Reverend wrote: View Post
If neither Rocksteady nor Dini are in then I don't see how exceptions could be very high at all.
Dini isn't a great loss. Arkham City is a great game, but the writing and plot structure are easily its weakest links (unless you're a fan of relentless misogyny and Jeph Loeb-style "shove everyone into the story regardless of whether it makes sense" plotting).
Timby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 2 2013, 06:44 AM   #8
RoJoHen
Awesome
 
RoJoHen's Avatar
 
Location: QC, IL, USA
Re: Batman: Arkham 3

Timby wrote: View Post
Reverend wrote: View Post
If neither Rocksteady nor Dini are in then I don't see how exceptions could be very high at all.
Dini isn't a great loss. Arkham City is a great game, but the writing and plot structure are easily its weakest links (unless you're a fan of relentless misogyny and Jeph Loeb-style "shove everyone into the story regardless of whether it makes sense" plotting).
For a video game, I don't mind that kind of storytelling. All it means to me is longer game play!
__________________
I am the Quintessential Admiral.
RoJoHen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 2 2013, 07:17 AM   #9
Infern0
Captain
 
Infern0's Avatar
 
Re: Batman: Arkham 3

cool looking forward to this, hopefully rocksteady are doing it
Infern0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 2 2013, 08:29 PM   #10
AlphaMan
Rear Admiral
 
AlphaMan's Avatar
 
Location: Doom 2099
Re: Batman: Arkham 3

RoJoHen wrote: View Post
Timby wrote: View Post
Reverend wrote: View Post
If neither Rocksteady nor Dini are in then I don't see how exceptions could be very high at all.
Dini isn't a great loss. Arkham City is a great game, but the writing and plot structure are easily its weakest links (unless you're a fan of relentless misogyny and Jeph Loeb-style "shove everyone into the story regardless of whether it makes sense" plotting).
For a video game, I don't mind that kind of storytelling. All it means to me is longer game play!
I agree. The rogue's gallery of Arkham City certainly enhanced the game play. Had it been a movie or animated feature, it would've been a disaster. I give kudos to Dini for recognizing the difference.

I'm still on the wait and see list. It's hard for me to get excited about another Arkham Game that might be by an unproven studio and another writer.
AlphaMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 2 2013, 09:43 PM   #11
Timby
GIVE ME YOUR FACE
 
Timby's Avatar
 
Re: Batman: Arkham 3

Isn't it a little premature to say that one is in a "wait and see" mode when we know nothing about the game, only that it exists? It's like saying, "Oh, there's a new Star Trek movie, but we don't know who's directing or starring or writing or what it's about, I'll wait and see."
Timby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 2 2013, 09:56 PM   #12
RoJoHen
Awesome
 
RoJoHen's Avatar
 
Location: QC, IL, USA
Re: Batman: Arkham 3

Premature? No. I'm pretty sure the only option right now is to wait and see.
__________________
I am the Quintessential Admiral.
RoJoHen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 2 2013, 11:00 PM   #13
Timby
GIVE ME YOUR FACE
 
Timby's Avatar
 
Re: Batman: Arkham 3

I'm just saying that it's a meaningless statement. No shit, we'll wait and see, because we don't know a single thing about the game. It's like saying "XYZ could be good, if they do it right." Again, no shit.
Timby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 2 2013, 11:24 PM   #14
RoJoHen
Awesome
 
RoJoHen's Avatar
 
Location: QC, IL, USA
Re: Batman: Arkham 3

No need to get crabby about it.
__________________
I am the Quintessential Admiral.
RoJoHen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 3 2013, 01:37 AM   #15
Reverend
Rear Admiral
 
Reverend's Avatar
 
Location: UK
Re: Batman: Arkham 3

Timby wrote: View Post
I'm just saying that it's a meaningless statement. No shit, we'll wait and see, because we don't know a single thing about the game. It's like saying "XYZ could be good, if they do it right." Again, no shit.
The distinction is one of expectations. If we knew for sure that it'd be the same key players coming back, then expectations would be high. Since all we know is that there's another game in the series that may not include *any* key players, then expectations are of course going to be low to neutral. Premature is probably the last thing this is.
Reverend is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.