The old "DS9 stole from B5" thing

[Jan]

DeepSpaceWine wrote:

---

How much was in JMS's pitch/package to Paramount? Did he include every single trap door and branching storyline? The series was originally about Sinclair,

who was supposed to end up turning into Valen at the end of the series

. Instead, they just moved that up and crafted a totally new ending for Sheridan IIRC.

Nope. That's a common assumption that's completely wrong.

There was no mention of Valen in the original series treatment at all. Nor in the synopsis of the show & spinoff written between the pilot and first season.

As for what JMS gave to Paramount, it would be the series Treatment, the Pilot script, some concept art by Peter Ledger and probably a dozen or so episode pitches.

As for another poster's comment about a shapeshifter, the early drafts of 'The Gathering' did indeed feature a shape shifter which was changed to the assassin using the changeling net at WBs request. But it would pretty certainly have been in the script accompanying the series treatment.

Jan

[Admiral Buzzkill]

Here's where DS9 came from:

Rick Berman and Michael Piller made it up.

The problem there, of course, is that if you accuse two people by name and publicly of stealing like that it can get pretty sticky.

"Asking questions" about unidentified, shadowy executives, OTOH, avoids those problems while being impossible to refute. Glenn Beck has built a career on it.

[Kestrel]

DalekJim wrote:

---

I think the shapeshifters comment was a worse comparison. It's one instance JMS memorably lost his shit over but it doesn't hold up at all.

DS9 has a shape-shifter as one of the main characters. He physically changes his form (Rarely!) throughout the series and his mysterious past is the key to the threat to the Alpha Quadrant.

B5 has a forgettable henchman use a shape-shifting device in one episode.

Heh, good point

[sidious618]

While there are a lot of similarities between the two shows, I can't see what Paramount would gain from copying a script for a television show that had nothing to do with and, by all predictions, would end up going nowhere.

[Admiral Buzzkill]

There is one significant point of comparison between the two series - only one - and the entirety of "Paramount stole this" originally hung on that premise: they are both set on space stations. This was a departure for Star Trek; Berman and Piller reasoned their way to it in a fashion similar to the way that jms supposedly did.

That only sounds suspicious if you've never been through the process of reading spec scripts, for example, or slush pile manuscripts for an sf magazine. There's a fairly good - if brutal - short essay by John August here that addresses an instance of how ideas parallel one another when working within the same envelope and toward a similar target.

B5 was going to be a show that solved a lot of the budget and logistics problems of doing future-based "space opera" stuff like Star Trek, and key to the solution (at least as far as pitching it was concerned) was that the expense of building an elaborate "home base" would be amortized by making that the primary location - the action comes to us rather than us going to the action.

Berman and Piller had exactly the same problem to solve based on their years of experience actually doing a Star Trek show. If you buy the notion that using a space station was a flash of unreproducable brilliance as opposed to what it actually is - a fairly easily deduced solution to production cost problems - then you might more easily swallow the notion that coincidence is less likely than unnecessary and illogical theft of a simple idea.

But the truth of this situation doesn't hang on what you're willing to believe. Some things actually happened, and other things didn't.

[_C_]

Oh but what I would have given to see Odo and Kosh Naranek in the same room! LOL! Or better yet, Odo linking with a Vorlon ship! (They're both kinda liquid aren't they?!)

[EnsignRicky]

Stealing the idea of the moment is nothing new.

Back To The Future - Bill And Ted

Weird Science - My Science Project

Titanic Movie - Made For TV Titanic Movie

Deep Impact - Armageddon

Gremlins - Ghoulies - Critters - Hobgoblins - Munchies

Volcano - Dante's Peak

Prequelmania - Enterprise

Abraham Lincoln - Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter

Hansel And Gretel Witch Hunters - Hansel And Gretel Get Baked

I'm sure there are and will be many more.

[Admiral Buzzkill]

None of which has anything to do with the DS9/B5 non-thing.

[Nagisa Furukawa]

My Name Is Legion wrote:

---

None of which has anything to do with the DS9/B5 non-thing.

Nor did how well Lord of the Rings did financially vs. Babylon 5 though. Arguably way less, as at least Ensign Ricky is bringing up comparable, almost-around-the-same-time works of art. There seemed to be no reason for you to bring up that Babylon 5 wasn't as successful as LotR (and who would imagine it would be?! B5 was a cheap science-fiction show, Lord of the Rings was one of the best works of the 20th century by one of the best populist writers).

[Demiurge]

DalekJim wrote:

---

Z'ha'dum is the place where the hero falls to his death and is resurrected, only to leave for the distant land with the elder races at the end of his journey.

Oh, wait.

Which come to think of it was also exactly what happened to Sisko in the fire caves at the end of DS9.

[Kestrel]

One critical difference - with Sisko there would have been no "coming back" at all without Avery Brooks specifically saying so. And his reasoning was pretty much as far as possible from "Oh that's what Babylon 5 and Lord of the Rings did."

[Admiral Buzzkill]

Nagisa Furukawa wrote:

---

Ensign Ricky is bringing up comparable, almost-around-the-same-time works of art.

Nope. You following the conversation?

[JoeD80]

DeepSpaceWine wrote:

---

Let me bold this:
There's no association with DS9 or Babylon 5 with UPN or WB!

Well let me bold this. There is an association of Babylon 5 with PTEN! PTEN was owned jointly by Chris-Craft and Warner Bros. Who started UPN? Chris-Craft and Paramount. That's where the connection is; at the station level, not the studio level.

DeepSpaceWine wrote:

---

And B5, despite being produced by Warner Bros, aired on a UPN affiliate in my area.

Yes, because UPN didn't have a full schedule at the time.

My Name Is Legion wrote:

---

There is one significant point of comparison between the two series - only one - and the entirety of "Paramount stole this" originally hung on that premise: they are both set on space stations.

There was not only one. The name Babylon was picked because it means "Gate of God." Why is that? Because there was a jump gate next to the station. What's next to DS9? Why it's a wormhole! Did you know that both Sinclair and Sisko were widowed? Why yes, Sinclair had a dead wife in the original treatment. Does any of this mean anything? I don't know, probably not, but there were more points of comparison than *just the station*.

Also, not directed at you specifically, but I always find it interesting when people talk like Piller and Berman had no idea who jms was. Joe's wife worked for Piller at the time. Piller talked about that in an interview back then (not sure where that one was originally published but you can find it in Joe Nazzaro's writing for Science Fiction book.)

[FPAlpha]

Oh come on.. give it a rest.

There were similarities, that's certain. But they are superficial and the main stories diverge extremely because they have a totally different focus and style to them. The characters are also very different.. yes, Sisko has lost his wife too, so what? It's an age old tool to give a character a chip on his shoulder, a background and some drama (especially if the wife died violently and the character meets the killer at some point). B5 didn't invent that, DS9 didn't and it has been used since boths shows started.. you don't see other people get up in arms when those shows aired crying "But my show's main character also has a dead wife/husband/relative!!!"

I fear however that given the people in fandom that this topic will never be settled because some people can't let stuff go, much less the creator of B5 (for whatever reason.. he created a brilliant story and people talk about his show nearly 20 years after it concluded and that's not bad).

I prefer B5 for its overal story which had me glued to the screen much more than DS9 but then again DS9 had the far more rounded characters and better played by the actors (with the exception of Mollari/G'Kar who are both the coolest duo ever in SF and were played to perfection by Jurasik/Katsulas).

So why don't we enjoy both shows equally for what they were.. flawed at times but providing excellent SF entertainment.

[Admiral Buzzkill]

JoeD80 wrote:

---

Joe's wife worked for Piller at the time. Piller talked about that in an interview back then...

One reason, in fact, that folks at Trek were impatient with the pretense that the B5 people didn't know exactly where DS9 came from.

But then, that bit of info would have screwed up a perfectly good conspiracy theory.

It's hard to say whether the Trek producers were simply incredibly polite in tolerating this whole thing or they simply had better ways to spend their energies than to engage in a stupid pretend controversy on computer bulletin board services. Some of each, I suppose.