RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,588
Posts: 5,515,376
Members: 25,158
Currently online: 510
Newest member: Giarc1982

TrekToday headlines

Two New Starships Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Dec 26

Captain Kirk’s Boldest Missions
By: T'Bonz on Dec 25

Trek Paper Clips
By: T'Bonz on Dec 24

Sargent Passes
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

QMx Trek Insignia Badges
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

And The New Director Of Star Trek 3 Is…
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

TV Alert: Pine On Tonight Show
By: T'Bonz on Dec 22

Retro Review: The Emperor’s New Cloak
By: Michelle on Dec 20

Star Trek Opera
By: T'Bonz on Dec 19

New Abrams Project
By: T'Bonz on Dec 18


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies I-X

Star Trek Movies I-X Discuss the first ten big screen outings in this forum!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 25 2013, 03:52 AM   #1
The Overlord
Captain
 
What sunk the TNG movie franchise: Insurrection or Nemesis?

What sunk the TNG movie franchise: Insurrection or Nemesis?
The Overlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 25 2013, 03:59 AM   #2
heavy lids
Lieutenant Commander
 
heavy lids's Avatar
 
Location: Denver
Re: What sunk the TNG movie franchise: Insurrection or Nemesis?

Nemesis, but it was already over before it tanked. I could be wrong, but I don't think they planned on making more TNG films. Would have been hard to do without Riker being Picard's first officer.

And I'm one of the few people that actually like Insurrection.
__________________
"Divine intervention is...unlikely" - The Doctor
heavy lids is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 25 2013, 04:04 AM   #3
Dream
Admiral
 
Dream's Avatar
 
Re: What sunk the TNG movie franchise: Insurrection or Nemesis?

The problem with Insurrection was that the story wasn't worth doing as a movie.

It was a big "WHO CARES"?

I don't understand why they just didn't dump it and start over with a more exciting story.
Dream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 25 2013, 04:20 AM   #4
bigdaddy
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Space Massachusetts
Re: What sunk the TNG movie franchise: Insurrection or Nemesis?

heavy lids wrote: View Post
Nemesis, but it was already over before it tanked. I could be wrong, but I don't think they planned on making more TNG films. Would have been hard to do without Riker being Picard's first officer.

And I'm one of the few people that actually like Insurrection.
Insurrection took all the great press of First Contact and threw it down the drain.

And Star Trek 11 would have had Riker as the main character because I rememeber reading Patrick Swewart wanted to return to the stage.
__________________
The powerful play goes on, and you may contribute a verse.
bigdaddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 25 2013, 04:20 AM   #5
The Overlord
Captain
 
Re: What sunk the TNG movie franchise: Insurrection or Nemesis?

Dream wrote: View Post
The problem with Insurrection was that the story wasn't worth doing as a movie.

It was a big "WHO CARES"?

I don't understand why they just didn't dump it and start over with a new story.
Well the problem is the writer was Michael Pillar, who is a TV writer, not a movie writer, that is why the film seems more like an episode. The movie reflected ideas that Pillar was interested at the time.
The Overlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 25 2013, 06:32 AM   #6
Lance
Commodore
 
Lance's Avatar
 
Location: The Enterprise's Restroom
Re: What sunk the TNG movie franchise: Insurrection or Nemesis?

heavy lids wrote: View Post
What sunk the TNG movie franchise?
LOTR: The Two Towers & Star Wars Episode II.

Lance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 25 2013, 06:56 AM   #7
Dream
Admiral
 
Dream's Avatar
 
Re: What sunk the TNG movie franchise: Insurrection or Nemesis?

The Overlord wrote: View Post
Well the problem is the writer was Michael Pillar, who is a TV writer, not a movie writer, that is why the film seems more like an episode. The movie reflected ideas that Pillar was interested at the time.
Pillar's "Best of Both Worlds" two parter is more epic and cinematic than Insurrection ever was.
Dream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 25 2013, 07:39 AM   #8
Saul
Rear Admiral
 
Saul's Avatar
 
Location: 東京
Re: What sunk the TNG movie franchise: Insurrection or Nemesis?

Both films. They went big with First Contact, the story felt smaller with Insurrection, but then again there were a lot of changes to the script. Nemesis was their last shot to get it right again. There was a 4 year gap to get fans hungry for a new movie and a story that was supposed to be TNG's TWOK was envisaged. I think if it had been a success we might have gotten at least one more movie from the TNG crew.
__________________
"It's not that you can see the strings, it's that 40 years later you're still looking at them." - Steven Moffat
"This movie was big. Imagine how big it could have been with me in it?" William Shatner
Saul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 25 2013, 01:32 PM   #9
Lance
Commodore
 
Lance's Avatar
 
Location: The Enterprise's Restroom
Re: What sunk the TNG movie franchise: Insurrection or Nemesis?

The irony is that Insurrection feels smaller than First Contact, even though FC was actually much cheaper to produce, and was confined to sets and a limited amount of location shooting (whereas Insurrection had quite extensive location shooting). I still can't work out why it is that FC just feels so much more epic. It's gotta be the script. Something in that story just helps to pull the audience along for the ride more. Insurrection always loses me early on and never quite manages to get me back on side again.

I know I've said it on here before, but I still believe that there's nothing fundamentally wrong with the conception of Nemesis. It all really went south in the directing/editing, imo. Some of the best bits were left on the cutting room floor.
Lance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 25 2013, 01:35 PM   #10
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: What sunk the TNG movie franchise: Insurrection or Nemesis?

For me it was Insurrection. I lost quite of bit of interest in the franchise after that debacle.

The Overlord wrote: View Post
Dream wrote: View Post
The problem with Insurrection was that the story wasn't worth doing as a movie.

It was a big "WHO CARES"?

I don't understand why they just didn't dump it and start over with a new story.
Well the problem is the writer was Michael Pillar, who is a TV writer, not a movie writer, that is why the film seems more like an episode. The movie reflected ideas that Pillar was interested at the time.
Well, there were two things that were completely out of Piller's control:

1) Stewart and Spiner had creative input.

2) Paramount had locked in a release date before Piller was ever hired to write the movie.

Star Trek: Insurrection was a total team failure as far as I'm concerned.
__________________
"...the most elementary and valuable statement in science, the beginning of wisdom, is I do not know." - Lt. Commander Data, "Where Silence Has Lease"
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 25 2013, 02:43 PM   #11
Hound of UIster
Rear Admiral
 
Re: What sunk the TNG movie franchise: Insurrection or Nemesis?

Both.
Hound of UIster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 25 2013, 03:01 PM   #12
Tosk
Rear Admiral
 
Tosk's Avatar
 
Location: On the run.
Re: What sunk the TNG movie franchise: Insurrection or Nemesis?

First Contact sunk TNG's cinematic journey...because nothing was ever good enough for some fans after that.
Tosk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 25 2013, 04:03 PM   #13
sonak
Vice Admiral
 
Location: in a figment of a mediocre mind's imagination
Re: What sunk the TNG movie franchise: Insurrection or Nemesis?

Insurrection did, because the movie series was doing well up until that point. INS made more than $20 million less than FC. It practically disappeared from theaters after a few weeks, and didn't make an impact in fandom. Its performance was why there was a four-year gap before the next movie, at that time the longest such gap.

By the time Nemesis came out, the movie series had been sunk by INS.
sonak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 25 2013, 04:11 PM   #14
F. King Daniel
Admiral
 
F. King Daniel's Avatar
 
Location: King Daniel Into Darkness
Re: What sunk the TNG movie franchise: Insurrection or Nemesis?

I really liked Nemesis. Insurrection, not so much.

How about Enterprise? It was in the middle of a wave of fan negativity and plummeting ratings. Now, from the people who made this crap - the sequel to that other crap!
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
F. King Daniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 25 2013, 04:59 PM   #15
Trajet
Lieutenant Commander
 
Location: Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
Re: What sunk the TNG movie franchise: Insurrection or Nemesis?

I didn't mind Insurrection in the slightest, but it did feel like an enormous anti-climax after the relative high of First Contact. I think the rather "meh" feel of Insurrection, combined with it's limited impact on Trek fandom, and complete lack of impact on the general public doomed Nemesis before the terrible script had even been written.

The biggest thing that sunk the TNG movies, in my opinion, was growing creative and studio indifference to the franchise. It had become a cash cow to be milked for $70-90 million every few years, and Paramount never really cared about or invested in the production.

The blueprint for profitable, mass-appeal Star Trek was established successfully when First Contact grossed $146 million worldwide, but Paramount never saw fit to capitalise on it in any meaningful way. Insurrection and Nemesis were both products of creative burnout and studio indifference.
Trajet is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
insurrection, nemesis

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.