|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Star Trek Movies I-X Discuss the first ten big screen outings in this forum! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#31 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Nuevo México
|
Re: Star Trek: INS- Son'a/Dominion Question
__________________
Hola! |
|
|
|
|
#32 | |||
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: Star Trek: INS- Son'a/Dominion Question
It has to do with where the particale came from in the first place. They could have formed with the planet itself billions of years in the past. Which means they are billions of years old, and are permanate. Or, they are emitted by the systems sun, some paticales are captured by the planet's magnetic field and formed into a ring. Somewhat like our own Van Allen Radiation Belt. The majority of the particale travel outward into the Brier Patch, where they form a very thin defuse cloud. Or siilar to above, they originate in the Brier Patch, and are again captured. If the particale are permanate, then no problem with the collected particale, the Federation (and others) will have them forever. If the particales in the ring do age out and basically die in time, this means the particale in the ring were being "resupplied" as fast as the existing particale died. So when the Federation's collected particale died, they simply return to the planet and collect the new particles that the plante has captured.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Star Trek: INS- Son'a/Dominion Question
It was a mission of vengeance and destruction, after all, and the Son'a were the only ones who knew how the technology worked. Either they would have slipped in a destructive element or eleven without the technologically less advanced Starfleet noticing - or then they would have slipped in those elements come hell or high water, since destruction of Ba'ku happiness was a non-negotiable mission goal. Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: Star Trek: INS- Son'a/Dominion Question
It would've went smooth as butter until Picard stuck his nose in and pissed off Ru'afo.
__________________
Boobies are evil!!! |
|
|
|
|
#35 | ||
|
Cherry Chassis
|
Re: Star Trek: INS- Son'a/Dominion Question
__________________
Your crash was, like, spectacular! My world simulation project! Also: Women and Men: Self-Image and Rape Culture |
||
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Star Trek: INS- Son'a/Dominion Question
We have little reason to believe that the planet needed to be rendered uninhabitable in the collection process. There might have been some truth to the Son'a needing the collector so that they would get the cure in time, but they could and would have lied about the collateral damage: a harmless collection process would probably have been perfectly possible, too, but that would have been contrary to Son'a interests.
The holographic transport would never have arrived safely anywhere, that much is certain. Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: Star Trek: INS- Son'a/Dominion Question
__________________
Boobies are evil!!! |
|
|
|
|
#38 | ||
|
Admiral
|
Re: Star Trek: INS- Son'a/Dominion Question
The events progressed from lie to lie, until at the very end the truth was revealed. And the truth was that this was all a blood feud.
The case appears airtight. The Son'a were out to kill, and there was no way they could not kill and still expect to survive. Timo Saloniemi |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | ||
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: Star Trek: INS- Son'a/Dominion Question
The planet would've been stripped of the radiation and the S'ona long gone by the time the Ba'ku realized anything happened.
If it was about killing, the S'ona could've simply went in and wiped the Ba'ku out and set up shop in the Briar Patch and Starfleet would've never been any wiser. If you're intent on committing a crime, why complicate it far more than it needs to be?
__________________
Boobies are evil!!! |
||
|
|
|
|
#40 | ||||
|
Admiral
|
Re: Star Trek: INS- Son'a/Dominion Question
The plot necessarily involved making up some scheme for Ba'ku survival. But the plot necessarily could not tolerate the Ba'ku actually surviving. They would know way too much, and they could never be left unaware of the events; it follows that they had to be eliminated.
If the movie indeed takes place after the Dominion War concludes, the Son'a will have to be very, very nice to the Federation to get their permit. Being allied to the losing side of the last war bodes ill for any attempt to pursue one's goals through further war with the victors. Timo Saloniemi |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#41 | |||
|
Cherry Chassis
|
Re: Star Trek: INS- Son'a/Dominion Question
I don't think he necessarily needed the Ba'ku to know he was the one who doomed them, just that they were doomed in the first place, and he would live on. Would he have simply used the collector to kill the Ba'ku if the Federation hadn't been involved? Possibly. But once they were involved and brought the holoship into the picture, I can see him being okay with the Ba'ku just dying "naturally," as long as he gets his Fountain of Youth.
__________________
Your crash was, like, spectacular! My world simulation project! Also: Women and Men: Self-Image and Rape Culture |
|||
|
|
|
|
#42 | |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Star Trek: INS- Son'a/Dominion Question
It could have worked on the primitive folks of "Homeward". But the Ba'ku are seasoned starfarers, and would immediately notice what had happened. The Federation does not realize this, hence the holoship, but Rua'fo would have known this all along. Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | ||
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: Star Trek: INS- Son'a/Dominion Question
![]() EDIT: And let's be clear on one thing, it isn't Ru'afo who breaks the agreement. It's Starfleet by being unable to control one of their starship captains.
__________________
Boobies are evil!!! |
||
|
|
|
|
#44 | |||
|
Rear Admiral
Location: in a figment of a mediocre mind's imagination
|
Re: Star Trek: INS- Son'a/Dominion Question
This post is essentially made-up nonsense. The only reason the plan fell apart in the first place was Data's malfunction, and then Picard's refusal to leave when he was ordered to.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Captain
Location: Michigan
|
Re: Star Trek: INS- Son'a/Dominion Question
The fact of the matter is that Insurrection should've been released in June of 1999 to save any confusion.
__________________
To me, Star Trek's stories are about the depth and complexity of human relationships. It studies us and asks us to look within ourselves, to relate, to ask how would we respond to all that is in their world? |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:55 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.























