|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Enterprise The final frontier has a new beginning in this forum! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#61 |
|
Lieutenant Commander
|
Re: Braga: "Archer was supposed to be Future Guy"
Needless to say, if I'm wrong about this; I don't want to be right. |
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Starfleet Command, The City that Knows How
|
Re: Braga: "Archer was supposed to be Future Guy"
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Commodore
Location: Unmarked grave, Ekos
|
Re: Braga: "Archer was supposed to be Future Guy"
__________________
"Every time you think, you weaken the nation." --Moe Howard |
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Commodore
|
Re: Braga: "Archer was supposed to be Future Guy"
__________________
Honk if you love silence http://www.jespah.com (includes fanfiction with most ratings). TU Publishing Adult Trek Anthology |
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Captain
Location: New Jersey
|
Re: Braga: "Archer was supposed to be Future Guy"
I doubt he ever wrote anything with a plan for more than the next 5 pages. |
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Starfleet Command, The City that Knows How
|
Re: Braga: "Archer was supposed to be Future Guy"
That's pretty messed up.
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Admiral
Location: KingDaniel has fallen Into Darkness (in England)
|
Re: Braga: "Archer was supposed to be Future Guy"
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun video mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors. Episode One Episode Two |
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Admiral
Location: Militant Janeway True Path Devotees Compound. With Sehlats.
|
Re: Braga: "Archer was supposed to be Future Guy"
__________________
Rider: I can't believe you'd kill me for a field of empty holes. J'onn: It's all I have. ■ ■ ■ Janeway does Melbourne |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Starfleet Command, The City that Knows How
|
Re: Braga: "Archer was supposed to be Future Guy"
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Admiral
Location: Militant Janeway True Path Devotees Compound. With Sehlats.
|
Re: Braga: "Archer was supposed to be Future Guy"
__________________
Rider: I can't believe you'd kill me for a field of empty holes. J'onn: It's all I have. ■ ■ ■ Janeway does Melbourne |
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Commodore
Location: Staten Island, NY
|
Re: Braga: "Archer was supposed to be Future Guy"
Daniels was a network executive spy trying to ensure the shows survival and stayed on the air and that the, Romulan sphere builders from the future succeeded and the future Archer guy was trying to stop him only to be thwarted by the past Archer who was clueless and really wanted the show to be cancelled already. |
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Commander
|
Re: Braga: "Archer was supposed to be Future Guy"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: Braga: "Archer was supposed to be Future Guy"
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Admiral
Location: KingDaniel has fallen Into Darkness (in England)
|
Re: Braga: "Archer was supposed to be Future Guy"
Does anyone know of any pictures of James Horan filming the Future Guy scenes? I'm curious how they dressed him, now! EDIT: I take back the Romulan jacket idea - the sleeves are wrong. It looks more like what this guy was wearing: http://tng.trekcore.com/gallery/albu...ehunted230.jpg
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun video mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors. Episode One Episode Two Last edited by King Daniel into Darkness; February 16 2013 at 11:38 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Lieutenant Commander
Location: Location? What is this?
|
Re: Braga: "Archer was supposed to be Future Guy"
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:52 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.


















