|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Star Trek - Original Series The one that started it all... |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#16 |
|
Commander
Location: New York State
|
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?
In "Obsession," (spoiler alert) Kirk sets off a bomb that rips away half a planet's atmosphere and presumably ends all life there. The remaster adds a cool touch, showing the planet slightly scarred as the ship pulls away at the end. Note that the original fx showed you nothing of the damage done. I found myself wishing CBS had done a little more, like showing a debris cloud erupting from the now-dead planet's pulverized crust. It would clash with the happy ending and upbeat music score as the Enterprise sails away, but maybe that very clash would add a jolt of realism and irony to the episode. The macho, non-hippie '60s ethos (which I love), where the good guys can blow up a whole planet and think nothing of it, and Now it's Miller Time, would be highlighted and recognized better with more vivid planetary devastation in the new fx. It would up the ante a little on the portrait of Kirk as a space cowboy who plays by nobody’s rules but his own. He wasn’t going by the Carol Marcus ethos (“there can’t be so much as a microbe…”), based on the fear that sentient life might evolve billions of years from now if only we don't disrupt things. He would have sputtered at that and said “You’ve got to be kidding me.” |
|
|
|
|
#17 | ||
|
Commander
|
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?
|
||
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Captain
Location: USS Berlin
|
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?
If this was the one time shot attempting TOS-R, I agree.As a purist, the Blu-ray discs gave me the choice to watch the original version instead (except for a technical problem on "The Ultimate Computer" at the first seconds). But other than the beautiful and enhanced new matte paintings, some obvious fixes (Enterprise in darkness zone in "The Immunity Syndrome", after M-5 has switched off the lights on some decks in "The Ultimate Computer") the whole TOS-R excercise lacks passion for TOS in my humble opinion. One might say they got it halfway right but I'd feel TOS deserved a more passionate treatment. Bob
__________________
"The first duty of every Starfleet officer is to the truth, whether it's scientific truth or historical truth or personal truth! It is the guiding principle on which Starfleet is based! Jean-Luc Picard |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Lieutenant Commander
|
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?
If money was no option I'd have loved them to recreate the motion control passes of the Enterprise and other ships in TOS instead of producing not terribly convincing CGI. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Commander
|
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?
Motion controlled miniatures could prove as unsatisfactory if the artists and other creators in the pipeline make the "wrong" choices. |
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: On the USS Sovereign
|
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: West Hollywood, Calif., USA
|
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Lieutenant Commander
|
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?
I'm not a big fan of using the most high-tech modern computer imagery to recreate primitive 60s film-making. Even at the time some of the shots looked dodgy, I've never been a fan of the way the TOS Enterprise seems to list around with her Nacelles tilted forwards as if the Saucer was 50x heavier (and it was feeling that in the atmosphere) and some of the love of that ship's looks is pure Nostalgia and nothing else, it simply doesn't look great from every angle the way later ships were designed to. No, it would've been better to completely remaster it in the same way Doctor Who have done on their DVDs, (though they have the advantage in their episodes are completely lost so it's CGI or nothing in some case which placates the fan-base and even when they add CGI to existing episodes it's never seen as a replacement, just an optional enhancement ) I guess the issue should be just in the marketing. It should've been made clear with the CBS remastering that the originals are still there to be enjoyed, but there are extra FX sequences for those who would like them. The whole attitude of "well I don't like them so they shouldn't do them" is blinkered in the extreme. Tonight on CBS Action here in the UK I watched the episode where Kirk loses his memory and marries a primitive woman while the Enterprise is left to attack an asteroid on course for the planet and the Asteroid part looked great on my HD TV, the final shot from the planet's defences could've been more dynamic though, perhaps even blowed the damn thing up.
__________________
I don't care what anyone thinks, when I hit the iceberg the iceberg sinks! |
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: In pre-production
|
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?
__________________
John |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Captain
Location: USS Berlin
|
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?
I like the comparison and feel it also applies here. Now some may say (and have said) that the original VFX made the ships look like bulky wooden vessels but in comparison the specularity of the new CGI shots (especially the Klingon Battlecruiser) makes the ships in TOS-R look like plastic and rather lightweight.The whole "bomb bay door" concept to unload the orbital satellites in "Operation: Annihilate" made the Enterprise look like a space plane while it's a starship. I prefer wood over plastic. Bob
__________________
"The first duty of every Starfleet officer is to the truth, whether it's scientific truth or historical truth or personal truth! It is the guiding principle on which Starfleet is based! Jean-Luc Picard |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | ||
|
Lieutenant Commander
|
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?
Pushing them away are just Star Trek versions of the somebody else's problem machine "Yeah, we don't need this, lets litter the cosmos that bit more and send this one back out there..."
__________________
I don't care what anyone thinks, when I hit the iceberg the iceberg sinks! |
||
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: In pre-production
|
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?
__________________
John |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Captain
|
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Commander
Location: New York State
|
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?
Yeah, it's probably a bad idea.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Captain
|
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?
__________________
That green blooded son of a bitch !!!! ![]()
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:04 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.












If this was the one time shot attempting TOS-R, I agree.
I like the comparison and feel it also applies here. Now some may say (and have said) that the original VFX made the ships look like bulky wooden vessels but in comparison the specularity of the new CGI shots (especially the Klingon Battlecruiser) makes the ships in TOS-R look like plastic and rather lightweight.






