|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Star Trek - Original Series The one that started it all... |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Commander
Location: New York State
|
How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?
![]() In other words, should they have traded historicity for impact? The CGi was very restrained throughout the series, and I wonder if they could have done a little more here and there without straying too far from the original feeling. Note that the original was restrained by a combination of budget, technology, and the broadcast standards of the time, so it wasn't necessarily the "intent" of the creators. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?
Not being sarcastic, here. I'd probably still prefer the old dvd's, but once you cosmetically change the Enterprise, a main character, even how she moves, why not change more? Didn't they change Sulu's chronometer? Stuff like that. Or "one to the tenth power" in Court Martial. Why not make a new physical model of the Ent and shoot her under similar lights and film grain, rather than CGI? Just do it with what is currently the best tech. Change rank braids that make no sense. Keep going, once the cows are out of the barn.
__________________
Author of Live Like Louis: Inspirational Stories from the Life of Louis Armstrong, http://livelikelouis.com. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Captain
Location: Pre-Warp Civilization of New England
|
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Admiral
Location: KingDaniel has fallen Into Darkness (in England)
|
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?
I think the latter could have been a lot of fun - I'd love to see Arex on the bridge manning a previously empty station, or Kirk and Spock walk past M'ress in a hallway. Replace the obvious pictures hung around the bridge with animated displays. Re-edit the Klingon fleet scene in "Errand of Mercy" so you see an enourmous fleet made up of a variety of Klingon ship types, one leading ship takes a warning potshot at the Enterprise. Have the M-5 take on an upgraded Phase II-style Connie, a Franz Joseph Dreadnought and a TOS-style Miranda. Add a window or two to the recreation room.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun video mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors. Episode One Episode Two |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Commodore
Location: New Yawk
|
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?
On the other hand, going a little further gave us a sequence at the end of Tomorrow is Yesterday that not only clarified the slingshot effect, it became an exciting sequence as well. Blood spattering? I don't think we need that in Star Trek ever. Her death by explosion was effective enough as is. Where is the line, if you go that far? Do they CGI in a boner every time Kirk sees a hot chick?
__________________
"Tranya is people!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Captain
Location: The Enterprise's Restroom
|
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?
I think production personel on something like Star Trek always did their best with what they had. Sure, they would always have liked to do things differently, if they'd had more time and money. But ultimately, in my view, a product of the sixties is a product of the sixties, and adding extraneous CGI to it certainly does not fulfil "the intent of the creators". All it does do is polish up something old to a more modern standard that will, regardless, never actually 'be' a modern production. IMO if anything, adding CGI (or whatever else) to Star Trek isn't really about realising "the intent of the creators" at all. That's where I think a lot of fans make a mistake. It's more about meeting the expectations of a modern audience.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: None Given
|
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: Georgia, USA
|
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?
Sincerely, Bill
__________________
Tempt the Hand of Fate and it'll give you the "finger"! Freighter Tails: the Misadventures of Mzzkiti |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Commander
|
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?
As Noname remarked, gore would be out of style for TOS. There is also a "zeitgeist" issue. During the '60s Ginger and MaryAnn on GILLIGAN'S ISLAND and Jeannie on I DREAM OF JEANNIE did not show their bellybuttons on TV. The makers of STAR TREK spoke in parables to get their message past the network censors. Add gore to that? Seeing Marta choke in the poisonous atmosphere was enough. No need to Spielberg it up with inyerface FX. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Commander
Location: New York State
|
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Commander
Location: New York State
|
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?
At the end of "Whom Gods Destroy," if Kirk was having his little joke about Spock letting himself get hit on the head-- but Marta's bloody splash was still imprinted on the viewer's mind, it would clash. If the stained window had been in the actual scene behind Kirk and Spock for that moment, it would clash awesomely and almost sabotage our protagonists. But it's interesting to think about. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Commodore
|
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: Berlin, Germany
|
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?
__________________
Time is the fire in which we burn |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Maurice in San Francisco
|
Re: How Far Should TOS-R Have Gone?
__________________
* * *
"Star Trek…at times sparkled with true ingenuity, and pure science fiction approaches, and at other times was more carnival like, and very much more the creature of television than the creature of a legitimate literary form." |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:02 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.


















