|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Voyager There's coffee in this forum! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Lieutenant Commander
Location: UK
|
Latent Image
....how is it possible for the doctor to have all memories of Jetal removed without there being a massive consequence to the memories of countless other experiences for example....lets say the doctor is chatting with Jetal and Paris about a piece of music he likes..........then (after the memories of Jetal are removed) he brings it up again with Paris and Paris is like....yeah, you already told me that doc"....Would Paris really make an effort to keep every conversation he had with the doctor in the presence of Jetal at the front of his mind should such an incident occur.....and everyone else on the ship would be expected to do this too Not only must the crew be wary of any conversation they've ever had with the doctor when Jetal was present but also they have to constantly be conscious of not mentioning Jetal whenever the doc is around Just seems that removing every single memory related to Jetal would have a serious knock on effect that would create problems.....there's a line where the doc says he hasn't seen Jetal for a while and how are things on deck 11...i think this was intended to show us that the doc and Jetal didn't socialise very often....but even so, it's a bit hard to accept that you can remove an entire person from his memory without it effecting other things In fact, we see this almost immediately when Seven tells the doctor that he asked her to meet him in an hour and he has no memory of it.....aside from proving the point that, removing so many of the docs memories involving Jetal would cause problems, it also makes one wonder why Janeway didn't discuss the whole thing with Seven to ensure Seven didn't keep having further conversations with the doctor that he had no memory of (she presumably did this with all the other crew otherwise they'd have to delete his memory every week) any other thoughts on this episode
__________________
Kryton - Is this the human quality you call....friendship Lister - Don't give me any of that Star Trek crap, its too early in the morning |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Admiral
Location: KingDaniel has fallen Into Darkness (in England)
|
Re: Latent Image
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun video mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors. Episode One Episode Two |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Fleet Admiral
|
Re: Latent Image
__________________
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Lieutenant Commander
Location: Denver
|
Re: Latent Image
__________________
"Divine intervention is...unlikely" - The Doctor |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Captain
|
Re: Latent Image
If I were in a situation where I had two people whose life I could save and I could only pick one, I would probably go with the one I'm closer to also, and I'd feel totally shitty about it afterward. But the Doctor was programmed with the edict never to take a life, and he was put in a situation where life and death was strictly his arbitrary judgment call. I totally understand a feedback loop being created between his expanded personality and his base ethical programming. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Fleet Admiral
|
Re: Latent Image
- The Doctor acts to save one life, and another dies. OR - The Doctor waits too long to make a decision, and both die. Therefore, logically speaking, anything - ANYTHING - that helps the Doctor make a decision as to whose life to save, must (by definition) be a good thing. Better to have only one person die than two die, right?
__________________
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: North America
|
Re: Latent Image
Tell that to Janeway in "Mosaic".
__________________
"But life is a battle: may we all be enabled to fight it well!" Charlotte Bronte |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Fleet Admiral
|
Re: Latent Image
![]() Here's another thought: This alien race reproduces by reanimating the bodies of the dead and turning them into living aliens. What happens when there aren't enough bodies? Do these aliens kill people so that they can reanimate them as their own? Think about it.
__________________
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: in a figment of a mediocre mind's imagination
|
Re: Latent Image
agreed. I don't really understand the Doctor's issue here-there were two patients, which as he said, both had an equal chance to live. It was a no-win scenario, there was no reason to feel guilty about it. I suppose he could have flipped a coin though(or an equivalent thing) if he wanted to take his personal "feelings" about it out of the equation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Fleet Admiral
|
Re: Latent Image
It sounds harsh, yes, but as I said, something had to help the Doctor make a decision.
__________________
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:09 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.


















