RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,854
Posts: 5,474,339
Members: 25,043
Currently online: 461
Newest member: denver23

TrekToday headlines

Retro Review: Covenant
By: Michelle on Nov 22

Two Official Starships Collection Previews
By: T'Bonz on Nov 21

Saldana: Women Issues In Hollywood
By: T'Bonz on Nov 21

Shatner Book Kickstarter
By: T'Bonz on Nov 20

Trek Original Series Slippers
By: T'Bonz on Nov 19

Hemsworth Is Sexiest Man Alive
By: T'Bonz on Nov 19

Trek Business Card Cases
By: T'Bonz on Nov 17

February IDW Publishing Trek Comics
By: T'Bonz on Nov 17

Retro Review: The Siege of AR-558
By: Michelle on Nov 15

Trevco Full Bleed Uniform T-Shirts
By: T'Bonz on Nov 14


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 7 2013, 08:40 PM   #1
TrekToday
Rear Admiral
 
Entertainment Weekly Star Trek Into Darkness Issue

In this week’s issue of Entertainment Weekly, Star Trek into Darkness is featured. Five new photos from the movie are included in the issue, including J.J. Abrams and Alex Kurtzman, Zoe Saldana, Benedict Cumberbatch with redshirts, Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto, and Kirk in danger! “We give you an exclusive first look at the space [...]

More...
TrekToday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 7 2013, 09:27 PM   #2
Joerib
Lieutenant
 
Re: Entertainment Weekly Star Trek Into Darkness Issue

Spoiler??????????????










http://www.blastr.com/2013-2-7/did-c...st-get-spoiled
Joerib is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 7 2013, 09:32 PM   #3
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Entertainment Weekly Star Trek Into Darkness Issue

Was going to grab the issue on my iPad. But I'm not paying five bucks for the digital version.
__________________
"If I hadn't tried, the cost would have been my soul." - Admiral James T. Kirk, Star Trek III: The Search for Spock
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 7 2013, 10:13 PM   #4
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: Entertainment Weekly Star Trek Into Darkness Issue

Yep, EW spoiled it.

Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 7 2013, 10:16 PM   #5
Sindatur
Vice Admiral
 
Sindatur's Avatar
 
Location: Sacramento, CA
Re: Entertainment Weekly Star Trek Into Darkness Issue

I'm not buying it. No one's seen the movie yet, Etertainment Weekly doesn't know this information, someone just put up the most viral rumor.
__________________
One Day I hope to be the Man my Cat thinks I am

Where are we going? And why are we in this Handbasket?
Sindatur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 7 2013, 10:22 PM   #6
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: Entertainment Weekly Star Trek Into Darkness Issue

Of course EW knows it. Lots of people in the business know.
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 7 2013, 10:37 PM   #7
SalvorHardin
Rear Admiral
 
SalvorHardin's Avatar
 
Location: Star's End
View SalvorHardin's Twitter Profile
Re: Entertainment Weekly Star Trek Into Darkness Issue

Here is what is said about Khan in the actual EW cover story written by Geoff Boucher:
Unconfirmed rumors suggest that Harrison also goes by the name of Khan, the genetically upgraded tyrant portrayed by Ricardo Montalban in a February 1967 episode of the original series, as well as in 1982′s big-screen Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan.
http://trekmovie.com/2013/02/07/did-...ty-not-really/
__________________

SalvorHardin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 7 2013, 11:10 PM   #8
DalekJim
Fleet Captain
 
DalekJim's Avatar
 
Location: Great Britain
Re: Entertainment Weekly Star Trek Into Darkness Issue

The "rumour" is so strong now that audiences will be confused if he isn't Khan.


But I totally think he is. Unless he isn't.
DalekJim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 7 2013, 11:49 PM   #9
ManOnTheWave
Rear Admiral
 
ManOnTheWave's Avatar
 
Location: ManOnTheWave
Re: Entertainment Weekly Star Trek Into Darkness Issue

I think Cumberbatch will deliver a compelling performance in a movie I am sure to go see, and I'm not sure if I actually care who he's playing.
__________________
Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth.
ManOnTheWave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 8 2013, 12:45 AM   #10
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Entertainment Weekly Star Trek Into Darkness Issue

Maybe Cumberbatch is playing Jerry Kahn, a delicatessen owner from Milwaukee who got busted selling spoiled meat to school children. He was so ashamed he changed his name and ran off to Starfleet?
__________________
"If I hadn't tried, the cost would have been my soul." - Admiral James T. Kirk, Star Trek III: The Search for Spock
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 8 2013, 01:05 AM   #11
Matt S
Lieutenant
 
Matt S's Avatar
 
Re: Entertainment Weekly Star Trek Into Darkness Issue

Cumberpatch as Khan is fucking stupidly horrible. Great actor, talented mo-fo no question, but he aint fucking Khan. Khan wasn't a British born/looking dude. Is this an alternative timeline or alternative universe? Uhura is black, so why is Khan white? No fucking sense whatsoever.

Honestly, not only am i bummed he's Khan and not an original character, I actually feel betrayed....all this assuming EW is accurate, which I also assume they are
__________________
Balok knows all!!!!!
Matt S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 8 2013, 01:07 AM   #12
Devon
Fleet Captain
 
Devon's Avatar
 
Re: Entertainment Weekly Star Trek Into Darkness Issue

Matt S wrote: View Post
Cumberpatch as Khan is fucking stupidly horrible. Great actor, talented mo-fo no question, but he aint fucking Khan. Khan wasn't a British born/looking dude. Is this an alternative timeline or alternative universe? Uhura is black, so why is Khan white? No fucking sense whatsoever
Yeah!!! Let's go off of second hand information and have a stroke over it!

BTW, E.W. has updated that webpage to say "Kirk & SPOCK"

So simmer down, have a coke and a smile.
__________________
Follow my Star Trek Model builds, music, art and more at Devon's Corner.
Devon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 8 2013, 01:15 AM   #13
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: King Daniel Into Darkness
Re: Entertainment Weekly Star Trek Into Darkness Issue

Matt S wrote: View Post
Cumberpatch as Khan is fucking stupidly horrible. Great actor, talented mo-fo no question, but he aint fucking Khan. Khan wasn't a British born/looking dude. Is this an alternative timeline or alternative universe? Uhura is black, so why is Khan white? No fucking sense whatsoever.

Honestly, not only am i bummed he's Khan and not an original character, I actually feel betrayed....all this assuming EW is accurate, which I also assume they are
But is truKhan Latino or Indian??
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 8 2013, 01:24 AM   #14
SalvorHardin
Rear Admiral
 
SalvorHardin's Avatar
 
Location: Star's End
View SalvorHardin's Twitter Profile
Re: Entertainment Weekly Star Trek Into Darkness Issue

King Daniel wrote: View Post
Matt S wrote: View Post
Cumberpatch as Khan is fucking stupidly horrible. Great actor, talented mo-fo no question, but he aint fucking Khan. Khan wasn't a British born/looking dude. Is this an alternative timeline or alternative universe? Uhura is black, so why is Khan white? No fucking sense whatsoever.

Honestly, not only am i bummed he's Khan and not an original character, I actually feel betrayed....all this assuming EW is accurate, which I also assume they are
But is truKhan Latino or Indian??
Who knows what the scientists put in the mixer when they were experimenting, or who and how many did they have in that big orgy called "selective breeding"
__________________

SalvorHardin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 8 2013, 01:27 AM   #15
Matt S
Lieutenant
 
Matt S's Avatar
 
Re: Entertainment Weekly Star Trek Into Darkness Issue

SalvorHardin wrote: View Post
King Daniel wrote: View Post
Matt S wrote: View Post
Cumberpatch as Khan is fucking stupidly horrible. Great actor, talented mo-fo no question, but he aint fucking Khan. Khan wasn't a British born/looking dude. Is this an alternative timeline or alternative universe? Uhura is black, so why is Khan white? No fucking sense whatsoever.

Honestly, not only am i bummed he's Khan and not an original character, I actually feel betrayed....all this assuming EW is accurate, which I also assume they are
But is truKhan Latino or Indian??
Who knows what the scientists put in the mixer when they were experimenting, or who and how many did they have in that big orgy called "selective breeding"

Weak....and my nerd rage is 'assuming' EW isn't full of NUTS
__________________
Balok knows all!!!!!
Matt S is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.