|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Star Trek Movies I-X Discuss the first ten big screen outings in this forum! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#46 | |
|
Commander
|
Re: Starships underwater WTF???
I will grant that American-made movies are very popular elsewhere in the world—which is why multi-standard home video players are so common outside the US, but not in the US. In college I met an Indian graduate student studying television production. I asked what led him to that US university. He asked, "Have you ever watched any Bollywood movies on TV some Sunday morning?"—meaning he didn't like them, either. |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Commodore
Location: Across a sea of suns
|
Re: Starships underwater WTF???
But hey, even bad sci fi is good, right? |
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Commander
|
Re: Starships underwater WTF???
![]() If the score is good, then I will probably like a movie more than I otherwise would. |
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: Starships underwater WTF???
Philip J. Fry: How many atmospheres can the ship withstand? Professor Farnsworth: Well, it was built for space travel, so I'd say anywhere between zero and one. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| canon violation, dumb, starships underwater |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:53 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.


















