RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,570
Posts: 5,514,388
Members: 25,150
Currently online: 518
Newest member: kingkane

TrekToday headlines

Two New Starships Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Dec 26

Captain Kirk’s Boldest Missions
By: T'Bonz on Dec 25

Trek Paper Clips
By: T'Bonz on Dec 24

Sargent Passes
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

QMx Trek Insignia Badges
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

And The New Director Of Star Trek 3 Is…
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

TV Alert: Pine On Tonight Show
By: T'Bonz on Dec 22

Retro Review: The Emperor’s New Cloak
By: Michelle on Dec 20

Star Trek Opera
By: T'Bonz on Dec 19

New Abrams Project
By: T'Bonz on Dec 18


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies I-X

Star Trek Movies I-X Discuss the first ten big screen outings in this forum!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 25 2013, 02:24 AM   #31
Santa Kang
Fleet Admiral
 
Santa Kang's Avatar
 
Location: North Pole,Qo'noS
Re: Starships underwater WTF???

We've had subs that can go into space since the Nineties.

__________________
Nerys Myk
Santa Kang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 26 2013, 12:57 AM   #32
Enterprise is Great
Rear Admiral
 
Enterprise is Great's Avatar
 
Re: Starships underwater WTF???

JarodRussell wrote: View Post
Can submarines they build in the 23rd century go into space as well?
Yes. Happy now?
__________________
JJverse Star Trek...ROCKED on May 17, 2013 and beyond!
Enterprise is Great is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 26 2013, 04:23 AM   #33
Metryq
Captain
 
Metryq's Avatar
 
Re: Starships underwater WTF???

__________________
"No, I better not look. I just might be in there."
—Foghorn Leghorn, Little Boy Boo
Metryq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 26 2013, 10:43 PM   #34
Jackson_Roykirk
Commodore
 
Jackson_Roykirk's Avatar
 
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Re: Starships underwater WTF???

JarodRussell wrote: View Post
Can submarines they build in the 23rd century go into space as well?
I don't know, but Voyager established that in the Star Trek Universe, starships can be relatively easily modified to go miles and miles underwater.
__________________

...With shoes that cut, and eyes that burn like cigarettes
With fingernails that shine like justice and a voice that is dark like tinted glass...
Jackson_Roykirk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 27 2013, 12:17 AM   #35
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Starships underwater WTF???

Jackson_Roykirk wrote: View Post
JarodRussell wrote: View Post
Can submarines they build in the 23rd century go into space as well?
I don't know, but Voyager established that in the Star Trek Universe, starships can be relatively easily modified to go miles and miles underwater.
Which makes sense, since they have to be airtight.
__________________
"...the most elementary and valuable statement in science, the beginning of wisdom, is I do not know." - Lt. Commander Data, "Where Silence Has Lease"
BillJ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 27 2013, 12:41 AM   #36
Pauln6
Rear Admiral
 
Pauln6's Avatar
 
Location: Bristol, United Kingdom
Re: Starships underwater WTF???

I don't have an issue with water - the ship survived the pressure of a black hole without even slightly buckling its pylons, water pressure is nothing by comparison. But actually, now that I think about it, two wrongs don't necessarily make a right... I suppose we have to assume that the structural integrity field holds the ship together at the limits of pressure.

I do however have an issue with a ship of that shape and size being able to take off and land on a planet though. They haven't set down on land - which would look very silly (although even by TMP, the saucer section was designed with the intention that it could detach and land). Surely the energy required to escape planetary gravity for something of that size and density is going to do a lot of damage to marine life? Massacreing plant and animal life for miles around isn't really Starfleet.
__________________
Star Trek/Babylon 5/Alien crossover www.youtube.com/user/pauln6

Other Worlds Role Playing Game
http://rpg.drivethrustuff.com/produc...ducts_id=97631
Pauln6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 27 2013, 12:45 AM   #37
SalvorHardin
Rear Admiral
 
SalvorHardin's Avatar
 
Location: Star's End
Re: Starships underwater WTF???

Pauln6 wrote: View Post
Surely the energy required to escape planetary gravity for something of that size and density is going to do a lot of damage to marine life? Massacreing plant and animal life for miles around isn't really Starfleet.

Considering that either they succeed in the mission or the whole planet is dead anyway from what we've seen, some marine life can probably be sacrificed.
__________________

SalvorHardin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 27 2013, 12:46 AM   #38
Santa Kang
Fleet Admiral
 
Santa Kang's Avatar
 
Location: North Pole,Qo'noS
Re: Starships underwater WTF???

There are no marines on the Enterprise!!!!


wait.....what?
__________________
Nerys Myk
Santa Kang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 27 2013, 01:07 PM   #39
Metryq
Captain
 
Metryq's Avatar
 
Re: Starships underwater WTF???

Nerys Myk wrote: View Post
There are no marines on the Enterprise!!!!
Yet there was a Sub Commander Tal in "The Enterprise Incident." Talk about being out of one's element.

"Take us to periscope depth!"

"Sir?"
__________________
"No, I better not look. I just might be in there."
—Foghorn Leghorn, Little Boy Boo
Metryq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 28 2013, 06:03 AM   #40
Cookies and Cake
Admiral
 
Location: North America
Re: Starships underwater WTF???

Metryq wrote: View Post
Nerys Myk wrote: View Post
There are no marines on the Enterprise!!!!
Yet there was a Sub Commander Tal in "The Enterprise Incident." Talk about being out of one's element.

"Take us to periscope depth!"

"Sir?"
__________________
CorporalCaptain
Cookies and Cake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 1 2013, 06:01 AM   #41
Peach Wookiee
Cuddly Mod of Doom
 
Peach Wookiee's Avatar
 
Location: Peach Wookiee
Re: Starships underwater WTF???

Metryq wrote: View Post
"We're off to outer space, to save the human race!"
Peach Wookiee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 1 2013, 12:31 PM   #42
Metryq
Captain
 
Metryq's Avatar
 
Re: Starships underwater WTF???

Peach Wookiee wrote: View Post
"We're off to outer space, to save the human race!"
Have you seen the 2010 live action movie (the source of the above screen cap)? It is remarkably true to the original, yet improves the entire story with subtle changes. For example, in the original the Gamilons were blue-skinned humanoids. Since they were modifying Earth to suit their needs, you'd think there must be billions of other planets to choose from between the LMG and here. Why Earth? The movie answers that question.
__________________
"No, I better not look. I just might be in there."
—Foghorn Leghorn, Little Boy Boo
Metryq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 1 2013, 03:27 PM   #43
DecktheThralls
Rear Admiral
 
DecktheThralls's Avatar
 
Location: Triskelion
Re: Starships underwater WTF???

Space Battleship Yamato 2010

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQoh6AIgNE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iissssJnq4M

God bless Marlon Brando and Ronald D. Moore. S'all I'm saying.

For actors, Marlon, in the words of Jack Nicholson, "Set us free." You don't get it until you see movie cultures that never got that influence; everything is so scripted and spoon-fed. So archetypal and wooden. So corpsed.

With Moore, of course, you get the realism of Battlestar Galactica - not that trite Power Ranger future that was past it half a century ago.

But Japan had Kurosawa and Mifune, so not sure what happened there. Did it not translate to Sci Fi? And please don't say Ghost in the Shell. Almost but not quite.
DecktheThralls is online now   Reply With Quote
Old February 1 2013, 06:02 PM   #44
Metryq
Captain
 
Metryq's Avatar
 
Re: Starships underwater WTF???

^ Huh? Are you commenting on the original SPACE BATTLESHIP YAMATO anime, or the live action movie? "Translate to sci-fi"? Are you suggesting that Western-made "sci-fi" movies are any less "fantastic" or loose with the laws of physics?
__________________
"No, I better not look. I just might be in there."
—Foghorn Leghorn, Little Boy Boo
Metryq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 1 2013, 09:09 PM   #45
DecktheThralls
Rear Admiral
 
DecktheThralls's Avatar
 
Location: Triskelion
Re: Starships underwater WTF???

It's not a contest. Nor are artistic boundaries as black and white as those on maps.

Give me writing and acting over FX any day of the year. Hang a story on people, not costumes with speaking roles.

And I'm sorry but the costuming in that live action movie reminds me of MST3K's Invasion of the Neptune Men.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpVI7_xqZOw

Other people can do whatever they want. If it were me I would stop designing for 1950's children.

Oh, and I have watched enough media from around the world to be able to say "God bless Marlon Brando." But then again I appreciate cultural influences and don't pretend it's the same everywhere.
DecktheThralls is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
canon violation, dumb, starships underwater

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.