RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,514
Posts: 5,511,641
Members: 25,137
Currently online: 507
Newest member: VonDingle

TrekToday headlines

Captain Kirk’s Boldest Missions
By: T'Bonz on Dec 25

Trek Paper Clips
By: T'Bonz on Dec 24

Sargent Passes
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

QMx Trek Insignia Badges
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

And The New Director Of Star Trek 3 Is…
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

TV Alert: Pine On Tonight Show
By: T'Bonz on Dec 22

Retro Review: The Emperor’s New Cloak
By: Michelle on Dec 20

Star Trek Opera
By: T'Bonz on Dec 19

New Abrams Project
By: T'Bonz on Dec 18

IDW Publishing March 2015 Comics
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 30 2013, 11:08 PM   #841
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

Nagisa Furukawa wrote: View Post
M'Sharak wrote: View Post
and this is not the venue for you to argue.
Thread Title wrote:
Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?
????????????????????????????

What is it a venue of if, not debate?
You completely missed the context, there.
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 31 2013, 02:53 AM   #842
Santa Kang
Fleet Admiral
 
Santa Kang's Avatar
 
Location: North Pole,Qo'noS
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

DalekJim wrote: View Post
Set Harth wrote: View Post
I think it was all one person, and it was a dude.
Nice casual homophobia there .

Nerys Myk wrote: View Post
All of them were French models.
Have you been hacking my account and looking in my PM box?
Watch the video BillJ linked.
__________________
Nerys Myk
Santa Kang is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 31 2013, 03:17 AM   #843
Cookies and Cake
Admiral
 
Location: North America
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

The Overlord wrote: View Post
Star Trek 11 essentially rebooted the franchise, do you think that was the right move?
Yes.
__________________
CorporalCaptain
Cookies and Cake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 31 2013, 03:22 AM   #844
Santa Claus
Believe
 
Santa Claus's Avatar
 
Location: J. Allen's Rooftop
Send a message via ICQ to Santa Claus Send a message via AIM to Santa Claus Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Santa Claus Send a message via Yahoo to Santa Claus
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

I don't remember if I posted in this thread or not, as it's 57 pages, so I'm answering (possibly again).

Yes, the reboot was necessary. Star Trek had become stolid and mired in back breaking canon that left no room for innovation, save to head further into the future, and further away from the relatability that the near future had to offer. By rebooting, a fresh, new lease on the franchise was given, and the end result was a drastic increase in the mainstream popularity of Star Trek. We also got some nice, updated technology, and some updated characters while still making homages to the originals.

All in all, great move.
__________________
---------
"I believe... I believe... It's silly, but I believe." - Susan Walker
---------
❄ A Joyful Holiday Season to You All! ❄

Santa Claus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 31 2013, 03:47 AM   #845
Greg Cox
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Oxford, PA
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

And, even if it wasn't "needed," why not?

Reboots are not the devil. Some people even like them.
__________________
www.gregcox-author.com
Greg Cox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 31 2013, 05:01 AM   #846
Saul
Rear Admiral
 
Saul's Avatar
 
Location: 東京
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

Well I always think that it's the Directors mark and not the fact that it's a reboot that defines the look and feel of the movie. I think we could have got away with updating the sets and having more action even if it was kept within continuity/canon. Since Kirk and Spocks early days are pretty much unexplored there was space to still play around and "update" Star Trek while still saying 'This is what the Star Trek world looked like then'. JJ Abrams is talented enough to do that. Obviously he can since he will be continuing the Star Wars story in the same Universe.

Story-wise it's difficult to blow up Vulcan in continuity without hitting the reset button. So if the story really required it then I guess they needed to reboot. But still, to me (as a Trek fan only) there is some kind of feeling that it's not really our Vulcan since it's in an alternate Universe and the other one is safe and sound.
__________________
"It's not that you can see the strings, it's that 40 years later you're still looking at them." - Steven Moffat
"This movie was big. Imagine how big it could have been with me in it?" William Shatner
Saul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 31 2013, 05:03 AM   #847
The Mirrorball Man
Vice Admiral
 
The Mirrorball Man's Avatar
 
Location: Switzerland
View The Mirrorball Man's Twitter Profile
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

Saul wrote: View Post
But still, to me (as a Trek fan only) there is some kind of feeling that it's not really our Vulcan since it's in an alternate Universe and the other one is safe and sound.
Of course, infinite versions of Vulcan can live on in our imaginations.
__________________
Check out my deviantArt gallery!
The Mirrorball Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 31 2013, 03:22 PM   #848
The Baby Stig
Rear Admiral
 
The Baby Stig's Avatar
 
Location: Dunsfold Aerodrome, Surrey
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

The Mirrorball Man wrote: View Post
Saul wrote: View Post
But still, to me (as a Trek fan only) there is some kind of feeling that it's not really our Vulcan since it's in an alternate Universe and the other one is safe and sound.
Of course, infinite versions of Vulcan can live on in our imaginations.
I'm not sure when it happened, but as I grew older I became far less precious about what 'really happened' in an imaginary continuity and got far more invested in whether or not the story I was watching/reading/playing was about real and relateable people. To see Spock taunted as a youth about his mother and then have him witness her death had a real impact, far more than the destruction of his made-up planet.

That being said, I'll probably raise holy hell when (or if) Bryan Singer's Battlestar Galactica movie gets made. There's only one Adama, and it's Edward James Olmos.
__________________
Some say that his arrival was foretold by a Check Engine light shining over Bethlehem and that he was born in a manger on Christmas Day.

All we know is, he's The Baby Stig.
The Baby Stig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 31 2013, 03:29 PM   #849
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

The Stig wrote: View Post

I'm not sure when it happened, but as I grew older I became far less precious about what 'really happened' in an imaginary continuity and got far more invested in whether or not the story I was watching/reading/playing was about real and relateable people.
This.
__________________
"...the most elementary and valuable statement in science, the beginning of wisdom, is I do not know." - Lt. Commander Data, "Where Silence Has Lease"
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 31 2013, 03:37 PM   #850
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

Yeah, it's called "growing up."

All that matters is whether you're enjoying the show you're watching right now.
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 31 2013, 04:37 PM   #851
Greg Cox
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Oxford, PA
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

The Mirrorball Man wrote: View Post
Saul wrote: View Post
But still, to me (as a Trek fan only) there is some kind of feeling that it's not really our Vulcan since it's in an alternate Universe and the other one is safe and sound.
Of course, infinite versions of Vulcan can live on in our imaginations.
Like the various versions of Oz, Wonderland, Krypton, Mongo, etc.
__________________
www.gregcox-author.com

Last edited by Greg Cox; January 31 2013 at 05:48 PM.
Greg Cox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 1 2013, 01:32 PM   #852
Saul
Rear Admiral
 
Saul's Avatar
 
Location: 東京
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

The Mirrorball Man wrote: View Post
Saul wrote: View Post
But still, to me (as a Trek fan only) there is some kind of feeling that it's not really our Vulcan since it's in an alternate Universe and the other one is safe and sound.
Of course, infinite versions of Vulcan can live on in our imaginations.
Like that version of Vulcan where the deserts are not sand but ice-cream. That's an awesome one.
__________________
"It's not that you can see the strings, it's that 40 years later you're still looking at them." - Steven Moffat
"This movie was big. Imagine how big it could have been with me in it?" William Shatner
Saul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 1 2013, 02:35 PM   #853
Set Harth
Rear Admiral
 
Set Harth's Avatar
 
Location: Distant Thunder
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

But not very logical.
__________________
Do you know what this is? What this means?
Set Harth is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.