RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 135,770
Posts: 5,216,841
Members: 24,218
Currently online: 661
Newest member: momogila

TrekToday headlines

Q Meets NuTrek Crew
By: T'Bonz on Apr 18

Pine In Talks For Drama
By: T'Bonz on Apr 18

New X-Men: Days of Future Past Trailer
By: T'Bonz on Apr 17

Nimoy to Receive Award
By: T'Bonz on Apr 17

Star Trek Special: Flesh and Stone Comic
By: T'Bonz on Apr 16

These Are The Voyages TOS Season Two Book Review
By: T'Bonz on Apr 16

Kirk’s Well Wishes To Kirk
By: T'Bonz on Apr 15

Quinto In New Starz Series
By: T'Bonz on Apr 15

Star Trek: Horizon Film
By: T'Bonz on Apr 14

Star Trek: Fleet Captains Game Expansion
By: T'Bonz on Apr 14


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Fandom > Fan Productions

Fan Productions Creating our own Trek canon!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 27 2013, 02:32 AM   #946
Admiral Buzzkill
The Legend
 
Re: "Polaris"

It's real.

Starship Polaris design by Vektor and aridas sofia. Optical effects by NEO f/x.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dxyQtCN03Ks
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 27 2013, 04:54 AM   #947
Potemkin_Prod
Commodore
 
Location: Southwest Georgia
Re: "Polaris"

Outstanding!
__________________
Randy
--------------------
Project Potemkin
http://www.projectpotemkin.com
Potemkin_Prod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 27 2013, 06:01 AM   #948
M'Sharak
Definitely Herbert. Maybe.
 
M'Sharak's Avatar
 
Location: Terra Inlandia
Re: "Polaris"

Nice. Now moar, pls.
__________________
"If the man doesn't believe as we do, we say he is a crank and that settles it. I mean it does nowadays, because we can't burn him."
— Mark Twain, from Following the Equator
M'Sharak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 27 2013, 07:07 AM   #949
Vektor
Rear Admiral
 
Vektor's Avatar
 
Location: Spokane, WA, USA
Re: "Polaris"

Looks awesome. Question, though: Did you guys change the engine bells on the booster engines? It's a little hard to tell but they look different.
__________________
www.vektorvisual.com
Vektor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 27 2013, 09:30 AM   #950
CorporalCaptain
Vice Admiral
 
CorporalCaptain's Avatar
 
Location: Kentucky
Re: "Polaris"

M'Sharak wrote: View Post
moar
Word.
__________________
John
CorporalCaptain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 27 2013, 02:11 PM   #951
Admiral Buzzkill
The Legend
 
Re: "Polaris"

No, we haven't changed the mesh in any way.
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 27 2013, 06:31 PM   #952
Duane
Captain
 
Duane's Avatar
 
Re: "Polaris"

Well done!
Duane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 27 2013, 07:44 PM   #953
Vektor
Rear Admiral
 
Vektor's Avatar
 
Location: Spokane, WA, USA
Re: "Polaris"

I think it's just an artifact of the motion blur that makes them look a little different. Never mind.
__________________
www.vektorvisual.com
Vektor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 27 2013, 08:26 PM   #954
Deckerd
Fleet Arse
 
Deckerd's Avatar
 
Location: the Frozen Wastes
Re: "Polaris"

I've watched this whole thread for years in silent fascination and admiration. I can't help but think though that it doesn't matter what orientation you see a ship moving through space. I know in the first days of Star Trek they always showed the Enterprise in a top down orientation and if it was in trouble you would see it slightly askew and not moving. Then, to my surprise, all the other Star Trek offspring did the same thing. But now I think, we've sort of accepted the fact that there is no 'up' in space and that seeing ships always at the same upright position is, I don't know how to say this, a bit tired?
__________________
They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance.
Deckerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 28 2013, 02:34 AM   #955
Admiral Buzzkill
The Legend
 
Re: "Polaris"

Well, J.J. Abrams mixed that up a bit in the last Star Trek movie.

I think you might see Polaris do a couple of different things in the course of our movie. Lacking magical shields it's kind of important that they not get hit by the other guy.

Maurice, one of our producers and a guy who knows a lot more about movies than I do, has pointed out to me that there are also reasons having to do with artful film editing that tend to support having vessels of all kinds move in certain directions and orientations. Returning to TOS as an familiar example, we most often saw the bridge of the Enterprise with Kirk facing screen right - and not by coincidence, the customary orientation of the ship in space was traveling forward from screen left to screen right (and they could vary that if they chose, and occasionally did, despite the now well-known limitations of the filming miniature).
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 28 2013, 05:18 AM   #956
Maurice
Vice Admiral
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Location: Maurice in San Francisco
Re: "Polaris"

^^^That's what's known as "directional continuity". Another film convention is that vehicles traveling west cross the screen in a right-to-left direction and those going east left-to-right, which jibes with how we are trained to view maps with up as north, east as right, etc. A lot of fan films mix up shots of ships so that they don't maintain a directional continuity, with the result that the ship's often appear to have turned around between cuts.
__________________
* * *
“The absence of limitations is the enemy of art.”
― Orson Welles
Maurice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 28 2013, 09:18 AM   #957
Deckerd
Fleet Arse
 
Deckerd's Avatar
 
Location: the Frozen Wastes
Re: "Polaris"

I get directional continuity and agree it's vital to the narrative. However my quibble was about orientation. In order to keep the fiction going about a planet-like environment, artificial gravity was invented. So unless the ship is a spinner like B5 (which I always imagine the first long-distance transport will be) the orientation is immaterial. You're right there were some shots in Star Trek 09 where the orientation was mixed up and IMO it made it much more 'sci fi' and less aeroplanes in space.
__________________
They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance.
Deckerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 28 2013, 10:01 PM   #958
Vektor
Rear Admiral
 
Vektor's Avatar
 
Location: Spokane, WA, USA
Re: "Polaris"

Artificial gravity was invented primarily because it was too big a hassle and too expensive to simulate it on-screen, and because it almost always looked fake when they did.
__________________
www.vektorvisual.com
Vektor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 31 2013, 01:59 AM   #959
Admiral Buzzkill
The Legend
 
Re: "Polaris"

"Another one of them new worlds..."

Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 31 2013, 03:13 AM   #960
Avon
Fleet Captain
 
Avon's Avatar
 
Location: Space Wales
Re: "Polaris"

maybe it should move across the screen a little faster if you're going to emphasize the speedyness

cool looking though
__________________

Hello to Jason Isaacs!
Avon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.