RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,448
Posts: 5,508,057
Members: 25,131
Currently online: 553
Newest member: xunixan

TrekToday headlines

TV Alert: Pine On Tonight Show
By: T'Bonz on Dec 22

Retro Review: The Emperor’s New Cloak
By: Michelle on Dec 20

Star Trek Opera
By: T'Bonz on Dec 19

New Abrams Project
By: T'Bonz on Dec 18

IDW Publishing March 2015 Comics
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Paramount Star Trek 3 Expectations
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Star Trek #39 Sneak Peek
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Star Trek 3 Potential Director Shortlist
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Official Starships Collection Update
By: T'Bonz on Dec 15

Retro Review: Prodigal Daughter
By: Michelle on Dec 13


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Misc. Star Trek > Trek Tech

Trek Tech Pass me the quantum flux regulator, will you?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 29 2013, 09:04 PM   #46
Dukhat
Commodore
 
Dukhat's Avatar
 
Location: Baltimore, MD
Re: Uses of the Reliant studio model in Trek

Unicron wrote: View Post
I suppose I might be in the opposite myself, as the Oberth hull seems to be one of the few that looks specifically modular and also cheap to produce. I can easily see where it would have led to a number of different variants that could perform specific missions.
Unfortunately, we never actually saw any such modularity whenever we saw an Oberth on screen

Now I have seen fan-made models of the Oberth with such things as large cargo containers or a medical-based secondary hull in place of the regular secondary hull, so I can see your point. But even when an Oberth was specifically referenced to be a supply ship (the Biko), it had the same hull as it always has.
__________________
“Don’t believe everything you read on the internet.”
– Benjamin Franklin
Dukhat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 29 2013, 10:59 PM   #47
Mantyclause
Rear Admiral
 
Location: Manticore
Re: Uses of the Reliant studio model in Trek

Dukhat wrote: View Post
Unicron wrote: View Post
I suppose I might be in the opposite myself, as the Oberth hull seems to be one of the few that looks specifically modular and also cheap to produce. I can easily see where it would have led to a number of different variants that could perform specific missions.
Unfortunately, we never actually saw any such modularity whenever we saw an Oberth on screen
We didn't with the Nebula after they got the triangular section as well. Probably just too expensive to build a new module of the same quality as the rest of the model every time it appears.

Thank heavens for suspension of disbelief, eh?
__________________
Lord Vorkosigan does not always get what he wants.
Mantyclause is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 29 2013, 11:12 PM   #48
Dukhat
Commodore
 
Dukhat's Avatar
 
Location: Baltimore, MD
Re: Uses of the Reliant studio model in Trek

Manticore wrote: View Post
We didn't with the Nebula after they got the triangular section as well. Probably just too expensive to build a new module of the same quality as the rest of the model every time it appears.
Actually, there was this, but it never got around to being used. Plus, they could have added all kinds of different things to the CGI model if they wanted to, but alas, they didn't.
__________________
“Don’t believe everything you read on the internet.”
– Benjamin Franklin
Dukhat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 30 2013, 09:23 AM   #49
t_smitts
Commander
 
Re: Uses of the Reliant studio model in Trek

Dukhat wrote: View Post
t_smitts wrote: View Post
It's vague when they got up to registries in the 5xxxx range, but regardless, Oberths aren't combat vessels. They're science vessels and maybe some other light duties, like ferrying people between starbases (i.e. the Cochrane in "Emmisary"), or testing new technologies (the Pegasus) etc. There's no reason older ones couldn't have been upgraded with new computer systems and warp drive and there's no reason newer ones couldn't have been built with those upgrades.

The Ford thing's a bit of an exaggeration, but some designs may simply work really well, even after several decades. Starfleet may simply stick with designs when it finds a good one, something that clearly applies to the Excelsior.
Again, I agree that older ships can be upgraded (at least up to a point). And again, that wasn't my point. My original point in the Oberth essay was that the Oberth class is a bad design, and there's absolutely no reason why it should have survived for 80 years of continuous builds when other ships were being designed and built. Why didn't the Constitution class last that long? Why not the Constellation? Why not the Soyuz? They were contemporaries of the Oberth class, and much better designs, yet they were being decommissioned even before the start of the 24th century.
Why do some classes last longer than others? Probably a variety of reasons. Some may not be as adaptable to various mission profiles as others. Some may be more costly to built and/or maintain.

The Excelsiors, I suspect, ended up effectively replacing the Constitutions in the late 23rd / early 24th century. Though the transwarp drive clearly didn't pan out, they seem to be a ubiquitous design that could fit a variety of missions that the Connies usually handled (i.e. deep space exploration, diplomatic functions, and, of course, cataloging gaseous anomalies), and maybe a few others that the Connies couldn't. If you're gonna have ships either exploring uncharted space, or patrolling the borders of some of your more dangerous neighbors (Klingons, Romulans), it pays to send out something bigger that can take care of itself. The Excelsior was probably more than a match for a single Klingon battle cruiser. (As for Romulans, we can only speculate what a late 23rd century design wouldn't looked like, though I remember seeing one in a comic that I really liked).

Their frequent appearance in the 24th century indicates Starfleet has a LOT of ships of this class, and those sheer numbers would probably explain why the Ambassador and Galaxy classes didn't completely replace the Excelsior, the way the Excelsior replaced the Connie (By contrast, "Tomorrow is Yesterday" suggested there was only about a dozen of those).

The Soyuz, which was probably an offshoot of the Miranda, may have simply turned out to be an evolutionary dead end in starship design, or was built for some mission profile that was no longer necessary by the 2280's and didn't prove as adaptable as its Miranda cousins. (Though it is interesting that the Bozeman apparently resumed service after emerging in the 24th Century, but you can chalk that up to Braga's desire to give his hometown a shout-out whenever possible ).

Dukhat wrote: View Post
t_smitts wrote: View Post
(Clearly the Klingons have the same attitude, given the lifespan of the BoP and battle cruiser designs, and these are ships that probably see combat far more often than 24th Century Starfleet did pre-Dominion War)
Oh, don't even get me started on Klingon designs that never change...right along with their costumes and weapons that never change either

And again, newer Starfleet vessels could have been re-used just as much as the Ferengi, Warbird, and alien-of-the-week designs. They chose not to build them because they chose to use the movie models instead, just like they reused the BoP and K'T'inga stock footage for Klingon ships, even though they also were quite out-of-date designs for the time period.

If the original CGI VFX are not up to HD standards, then CBS will have to update the effects for a BluRay release. So it's more a question of if they're going to put DS9 on BluRay at all. (Although I'm sure they will; the heavily CGI space scenes were only in the last two seasons.)
You still have to justify the time and expense of building a brand new model. In "Yesterday's Enterprise" and "The Wounded", for example, it was justified. In "Encounter at Farpoint" and "Cause and Effect", apparently, it wasn't.

As for the Klingons, you can hardly be surprised that a culture that still fights with knives and swords might stick with other hardware for long periods.

Dukhat wrote: View Post
t_smitts wrote: View Post
And Starfleet likely sent EVERY ship fit for combat to the front lines, given the scope of the Dominion threat.
So tons of out-of-date Excelsiors and Mirandas were fit for combat, but only a relatively few Galaxies, Nebulas, Akiras, Sabers, and Steamrunners were as well? Not to mention ZERO Ambassadors, New Orleans, Freedoms, Niagaras, Challengers, Cheyennes, and the 20-odd conjectural classes?
And who's to say that the newer ships we saw in those battles weren't proportional to their numbers? Whether or not you buy into Gene Roddenberry's suggestion that there were only six Galaxies at the start of TNG (which is pretty reasonable, given this huge new ship that supposedly took twenty or so to design), it's safe to say they likely weren't a common sight yet in Federation space in the early to mid 2360's. Now clearly several more had been built by the time of the War, but given that Excelsiors and Mirandas clearly number in the dozens, if not more, it'll probably be a few more years before Galaxies are more common.

I do wish we'd seen some Ambassadors, but for whatever reason, they didn't decide to make a CG version. (The model may not have been as detailed as some of the ones built for movies).

As for the conjectural ones, there may simply not be that many of them built, or they may not be designed for combat (most of those classes includes a ship at Wolf 359, which didn't exactly prove the worth of any of the ships involved). We certainly never saw even one Oberth fight the Jem'Hadar.
t_smitts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 2 2013, 09:21 PM   #50
publiusr
Commodore
 
Re: Uses of the Reliant studio model in Trek

Dukhat wrote: View Post

Oh, don't even get me started on Klingon designs that never change...right along with their costumes and weapons that never change either
They just really like Gwar
publiusr is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.