RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 135,765
Posts: 5,216,680
Members: 24,218
Currently online: 848
Newest member: momogila

TrekToday headlines

Q Meets NuTrek Crew
By: T'Bonz on Apr 18

Pine In Talks For Drama
By: T'Bonz on Apr 18

New X-Men: Days of Future Past Trailer
By: T'Bonz on Apr 17

Nimoy to Receive Award
By: T'Bonz on Apr 17

Star Trek Special: Flesh and Stone Comic
By: T'Bonz on Apr 16

These Are The Voyages TOS Season Two Book Review
By: T'Bonz on Apr 16

Kirk’s Well Wishes To Kirk
By: T'Bonz on Apr 15

Quinto In New Starz Series
By: T'Bonz on Apr 15

Star Trek: Horizon Film
By: T'Bonz on Apr 14

Star Trek: Fleet Captains Game Expansion
By: T'Bonz on Apr 14


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > TV & Media

TV & Media Non-Trek television, movies, books, music, etc.

View Poll Results: Are you excited for Jack's big screen debut
yes 5 17.24%
no 17 58.62%
maybe so 7 24.14%
Voters: 29. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 5 2013, 01:27 AM   #61
Captaindemotion
Vice Admiral
 
Captaindemotion's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Re: Jack Reacher yes,no, maybe so

To some extent, it doesn't really matter where you start, as they're all pretty much standalone, though there is a bit of an ongoing arc between three of the last four books, namely 61 Hours, Worth Dying for and A Wanted Man. The Affair, the second most recent book, is a prequel, set in 1997 during Reacher's last days in the army (about 6 months before the events in Killing Floor, the first in the series, and thus the arc doesn't apply. Also, the third and fourth books in the series also sort of follow on from each other and if you read the fourth before the third (as I did) it sort of spoils you for the ending of the third. But the fourth doesn't spoil you for the 5th book, if you know what I mean.

The Enemy, the 8th book in the series, is set in 1990, about 7 years before Killing Floor, when Reacher is still in the army and is an alternative starting point to KF. It's also better than The Affair, which I thought was a little disappointing, as was A Wanted Man.

Killing Floor and Die Trying, the second in the series, are both good, but it was around the third novel where Lee Child really hit gold with the formula, IMHO.
__________________
Hodor!!!!!!!
Captaindemotion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 5 2013, 01:48 AM   #62
StolenThunder
Poster
 
StolenThunder's Avatar
 
Location: Scotland
Re: Jack Reacher yes,no, maybe so

I really enjoyed it. I agree with the comment of Captaindemotion above in that it could easily have been made in the 70s, attitude and feeling wise.

And ooft, Rosamund Pike!
StolenThunder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 5 2013, 02:07 AM   #63
Trekker4747
Fleet Admiral
 
Trekker4747's Avatar
 
Location: Kansas City
Re: Jack Reacher yes,no, maybe so

I wasn't too impressed by her in this movie, really. Physically, at least. She has the Spooky Eyes most of the time and the rest of the time eyes like someone was jamming a rod up her ass.

She's certainly an attractive woman, but I didn't much like her or her character in the movie.
__________________
Just because it's futuristic doesn't mean it's practical.
Trekker4747 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 5 2013, 12:55 PM   #64
Captaindemotion
Vice Admiral
 
Captaindemotion's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Re: Jack Reacher yes,no, maybe so

^My view rarely strayed above her chest, truth be told. If we'd been meeting in person, she would continually have been going 'Eyes are up here, Mister!'
__________________
Hodor!!!!!!!
Captaindemotion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 5 2013, 06:19 PM   #65
Captain Craig
Vice Admiral
 
Captain Craig's Avatar
 
Location: Nashville,TN
Re: Jack Reacher yes,no, maybe so

Thanks Captaindemotion, in that case I'll just make sure that the first book I read isn't the 4th book. Probably just try for One Shot or Killing Floor to start with.
__________________
"Picard never hit me." Q-Less(DS9)
"Freedom is the Right of All Sentient Beings" Optimus Prime
Twitter:http://twitter.com/#!/CaptainCraig1
Captain Craig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 15 2013, 03:31 PM   #66
Captaindemotion
Vice Admiral
 
Captaindemotion's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Re: Jack Reacher yes,no, maybe so

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/new...-sequel-412465

So, it seems that there were too many 'No' answers, or at least insufficient 'yes' ones to turn Reacher into a franchise. Aragorn's prediction about the series being rebooted with Tyler Perry may not have been too far off the mark!

Implications here for Tom's star power or was this just the wrong vehicle for him? Might this have Reached (hoho) a wider audience with someone more suited to the character from the book or does the fact that a megastar like Cruise couldn't guarantee success just go to prove that literary success doesn't always mean filmic success (we're looking at you Jack Ryan)? And is there less and less room for old-fashioned mid-range thrillers, that only Denzil seems to make any more?
__________________
Hodor!!!!!!!
Captaindemotion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 15 2013, 03:53 PM   #67
Star Wolf
Rear Admiral
 
Star Wolf's Avatar
 
Location: ciudad de Los Angeles
Re: Jack Reacher yes,no, maybe so

I think they overestimated the reach and popularity of the book franchise. From what was on screen there was nothing new about the character from the silent stranger to playing Martin Riggs in the showdown.. I doubt having The Rock play Jack Reacher would have made any difference
__________________
I'm not crazy! All I Really Need to Know I learned by Watching The Wire
Star Wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 15 2013, 04:10 PM   #68
Captain Craig
Vice Admiral
 
Captain Craig's Avatar
 
Location: Nashville,TN
Re: Jack Reacher yes,no, maybe so

That's too bad, I'd enjoy another installment.

It also goes to show that no matter how many times you hear some internet faceless poster scream that a movie has to make 2.5x budget to get a sequel or be deemed profitable you can laugh it off. It's not even rule of thumb. If that were true you'd think a film that cost $60m to make would be fine then with $150m-$175m worldwide. However that article is citing inside sources saying it needs $250m worldwide to ensure a sequel. That's a little over 4x budget for the film.

It's just over $150m ww now, and as much as Cruise has a following in the Asian markets getting another $100m seems to be, well...an impossible mission.
__________________
"Picard never hit me." Q-Less(DS9)
"Freedom is the Right of All Sentient Beings" Optimus Prime
Twitter:http://twitter.com/#!/CaptainCraig1
Captain Craig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 15 2013, 07:04 PM   #69
Gaith
Rear Admiral
 
Gaith's Avatar
 
Location: Washington, DC
Re: Jack Reacher yes,no, maybe so

Captaindemotion wrote: View Post
Is there less and less room for old-fashioned mid-range thrillers, that only Denzel seems to make any more?
Why spend ~ 4 hours and more than ten bucks on a trip to a 2+ hour movie when the content (brooding crime drama with an emphasis on twisty plots and wisecracks) looks like any of the dozens of cop/quasi-cop dramas airing every night? Why not wait a few months and Redbox it for $1.30 instead?

And does there need to be more than one Jack Reacher movie? Is the character so complex, and his story so nuanced, that a single movie more than half an longer than Casablanca can't do him justice?

... Or was the aging star of Mission: Impossible rather trying to score a similar payout on a much easier, domestic shoot? Did he and Paramount hope they'd found a Twilight-meets-Saw sort of perpetual cash motion machine?

It seems to me that if Cruise wants to keep making M:I-sized checks, he's got to keep making M:I-sized movies.
Gaith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 15 2013, 09:40 PM   #70
Captaindemotion
Vice Admiral
 
Captaindemotion's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Re: Jack Reacher yes,no, maybe so

^I think you're probably right on most, if not all grounds. The likes of HBO offer entertainment on a par with many movies nowadays. And as I said before, this did seem an odd choice for Tom for his new potential franchise.

As for Reacher's character, well, no-one is saying that he needs to be analysed over many movies (indeed, his simplicity is one of his main points of appeal). But I do think that the stories are strong enough for cinematic adaptation (though I'd still prefer a HBO ongoing adaptation.

I'd have liked to see an ongoing series of movies, with or without Cruise, but clearly it wasn't to be. But hey, there's always the books - or the inevitable reboot!
__________________
Hodor!!!!!!!
Captaindemotion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 15 2013, 11:37 PM   #71
Aragorn
Admiral
 
Aragorn's Avatar
 
Re: Jack Reacher yes,no, maybe so

Well it looks like the Alex Cross series will be going forward with Tyler Perry despite horrible reviews, probably because the last movie cost very little for a name brand property.

Mitch Rapp and a Jack Ryan reboot are also coming up.
Aragorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 15 2013, 11:51 PM   #72
Star Wolf
Rear Admiral
 
Star Wolf's Avatar
 
Location: ciudad de Los Angeles
Re: Jack Reacher yes,no, maybe so

I guess that means Tyler Perry is tied up. The Rock is old enough now to play a retired officer and Sheriff Buford Pusser seems to be one and out.
__________________
I'm not crazy! All I Really Need to Know I learned by Watching The Wire
Star Wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 16 2013, 01:21 AM   #73
Enterprise is Great
Rear Admiral
 
Enterprise is Great's Avatar
 
Re: Jack Reacher yes,no, maybe so

Aragorn wrote: View Post
Mitch Rapp and a Jack Ryan reboot are also coming up.
Hopefully they don't cast Cruise as Mitch Rapp. No knock against Cruise. I like a lot of his movies but he's as wrong for Rapp as he was for Reacher.
__________________
JJverse Star Trek...ROCKED on May 17, 2013 and beyond!
Enterprise is Great is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 16 2013, 03:00 AM   #74
Aragorn
Admiral
 
Aragorn's Avatar
 
Re: Jack Reacher yes,no, maybe so

Enterprise is Great wrote: View Post
Aragorn wrote: View Post
Mitch Rapp and a Jack Ryan reboot are also coming up.
Hopefully they don't cast Cruise as Mitch Rapp. No knock against Cruise. I like a lot of his movies but he's as wrong for Rapp as he was for Reacher.
The hot name rumored a while back for Rapp is Chris Hemsworth (supposedly with a $10 million paycheck), but nothing's come of it yet.
Aragorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 16 2013, 03:53 AM   #75
Captain Craig
Vice Admiral
 
Captain Craig's Avatar
 
Location: Nashville,TN
Re: Jack Reacher yes,no, maybe so

Aragorn wrote: View Post
Well it looks like the Alex Cross series will be going forward with Tyler Perry despite horrible reviews, probably because the last movie cost very little for a name brand property.

Mitch Rapp and a Jack Ryan reboot are also coming up.
Really? So there will be a second Perry led Alex Cross film? Link, I've not seen that yet. I enjoyed the first one.

Seems wrong that Reacher isn't likely to get a second film after hearing this. It did so much better at the box office.
__________________
"Picard never hit me." Q-Less(DS9)
"Freedom is the Right of All Sentient Beings" Optimus Prime
Twitter:http://twitter.com/#!/CaptainCraig1
Captain Craig is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.