RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,375
Posts: 5,504,313
Members: 25,126
Currently online: 517
Newest member: Ted Dave

TrekToday headlines

New Abrams Project
By: T'Bonz on Dec 18

IDW Publishing March 2015 Comics
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Paramount Star Trek 3 Expectations
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Star Trek #39 Sneak Peek
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Star Trek 3 Potential Director Shortlist
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Official Starships Collection Update
By: T'Bonz on Dec 15

Retro Review: Prodigal Daughter
By: Michelle on Dec 13

Sindicate Lager To Debut In The US Next Week
By: T'Bonz on Dec 12

Rumor Mill: Saldana Gives Birth
By: T'Bonz on Dec 12

New Line of Anovos Enterprise Uniforms
By: T'Bonz on Dec 11


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 13 2013, 06:28 PM   #721
Greg Cox
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Oxford, PA
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

Jackson_Roykirk wrote: View Post
Urban did the best job of BOTH capturing the essence of the character AND imitating the character.
Agreed. Urban was uncanny.

I thought Pegg's Scotty was the biggest departure from the original, but was entertaining on its own terms.
__________________
www.gregcox-author.com
Greg Cox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13 2013, 06:35 PM   #722
Santa Kang
Fleet Admiral
 
Santa Kang's Avatar
 
Location: North Pole,Qo'noS
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

Well using an actual Scots accent will do that.
__________________
Nerys Myk
Santa Kang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13 2013, 06:43 PM   #723
Shazam!
Rear Admiral
 
Shazam!'s Avatar
 
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

Jackson_Roykirk wrote: View Post
I wasn't that crazy overall with his performance.
He played a decent enough Vulcan but yeah, his performance (and look) fell way short of Nimoy, both superficially and in essence.

If they had waited a few years they could have had Benedict Cumberbatch : (
Shazam! is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 13 2013, 06:52 PM   #724
YARN
Fleet Captain
 
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

Shazam! wrote: View Post
Jackson_Roykirk wrote: View Post
I wasn't that crazy overall with his performance.
He played a decent enough Vulcan but yeah, his performance (and look) fell way short of Nimoy, both superficially and in essence.

If they had waited a few years they could have had Benedict Cumberbatch : (
In fairness, he has been written less Spock-like too. The guy looks the part and sounds OK too. It's what he says and does that is a little off, and that's writing.
YARN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13 2013, 07:22 PM   #725
Santa Kang
Fleet Admiral
 
Santa Kang's Avatar
 
Location: North Pole,Qo'noS
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

YARN wrote: View Post
Shazam! wrote: View Post
Jackson_Roykirk wrote: View Post
I wasn't that crazy overall with his performance.
He played a decent enough Vulcan but yeah, his performance (and look) fell way short of Nimoy, both superficially and in essence.

If they had waited a few years they could have had Benedict Cumberbatch : (
In fairness, he has been written less Spock-like too. The guy looks the part and sounds OK too. It's what he says and does that is a little off, and that's writing.
Spock as written in ST09 seems consistent with what was seen in TOS. ST09 touches on many of the themes that were explored by Spock's character in TOS. If you think Spock is a cold, emotionless automaton ruled by logic, then you don't know Spock.
__________________
Nerys Myk
Santa Kang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13 2013, 07:47 PM   #726
Franklin
Rear Admiral
 
Location: In the bleachers
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

Greg Cox wrote: View Post
Jackson_Roykirk wrote: View Post
Urban did the best job of BOTH capturing the essence of the character AND imitating the character.
Agreed. Urban was uncanny.

I thought Pegg's Scotty was the biggest departure from the original, but was entertaining on its own terms.
Urban admitted that his McCoy was more a tribute to how Kelley played McCoy than his own interpretation of the character. So, he essentially deliberately gave himself the least wiggle room in recreating the character.

Pegg's Scotty was the freshest interpretation of the character of all of them, so it probably will take the longest to get used to. I bet we become more and more comfortable with him as Scotty in the new movie.

Just my two cents, but of all of them, I think Pine had the hardest job and nailed it best. If he haden't been an utterly convincing Kirk, it would've dragged the rest of the movie down.
__________________
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. -- Mark Twain
Franklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13 2013, 08:31 PM   #727
YARN
Fleet Captain
 
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

Nerys Myk wrote: View Post
If you think Spock is a cold, emotionless automaton ruled by logic, then you don't know Spock.
Didn't say that he was emotionless.
YARN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13 2013, 08:36 PM   #728
Santa Kang
Fleet Admiral
 
Santa Kang's Avatar
 
Location: North Pole,Qo'noS
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

YARN wrote: View Post
Nerys Myk wrote: View Post
If you think Spock is a cold, emotionless automaton ruled by logic, then you don't know Spock.
Didn't say that he was emotionless.
So he's a cold automaton ruled by logic then?

I find that many people have a limited perception of Spock, often focusing on the "logic" thing, while missing the complexity of the character.
__________________
Nerys Myk
Santa Kang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13 2013, 08:44 PM   #729
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

I thought that Quinto in fact captured the "essence" of the character while not doing so much of an imitation, whereas Urban's was somewhat more limited to mimicry. His "Good God, man," was almost Ackroydian.
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13 2013, 08:47 PM   #730
Santa Kang
Fleet Admiral
 
Santa Kang's Avatar
 
Location: North Pole,Qo'noS
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

My Name Is Legion wrote: View Post
I thought that Quinto in fact captured the "essence" of the character while not doing so much of an imitation, whereas Urban's was somewhat more limited to mimicry. His "Good God, man," was almost Ackroydian.
__________________
Nerys Myk
Santa Kang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13 2013, 08:54 PM   #731
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

My Name Is Legion wrote: View Post
I thought that Quinto in fact captured the "essence" of the character while not doing so much of an imitation, whereas Urban's was somewhat more limited to mimicry. His "Good God, man," was almost Ackroydian.
The only thing that threw me about Quinto's Spock was the softer voice. Other than that, he nailed the character.
__________________
"...the most elementary and valuable statement in science, the beginning of wisdom, is I do not know." - Lt. Commander Data, "Where Silence Has Lease"
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13 2013, 08:58 PM   #732
Jackson_Roykirk
Commodore
 
Jackson_Roykirk's Avatar
 
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

My Name Is Legion wrote: View Post
I thought that Quinto in fact captured the "essence" of the character while not doing so much of an imitation, whereas Urban's was somewhat more limited to mimicry. His "Good God, man," was almost Ackroydian.
My wife had an uncle who could play some really good polka music on his Ackroydian.
__________________

...With shoes that cut, and eyes that burn like cigarettes
With fingernails that shine like justice and a voice that is dark like tinted glass...
Jackson_Roykirk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13 2013, 09:15 PM   #733
CorporalClegg
Admiral
 
CorporalClegg's Avatar
 
Location: Land of Enchantment
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

This thread is so full of fail that I'm literally slamming my face on my desk. Yes, my nose does hurt, and an eye isn't doing too well either.

Absolutely, Star Trek needed a reboot. The forest was dead; it was time to burn it down and start anew. Any attempt to revitalize it in any other way would have been fruitless and futile. Saplings cannot grow in the infertile soil.

The problem is some seem to cling to the idea that it's their forest like little Gollums frolicking about the bush with their preciouses--their copies of "The Man Trap" on Betamax. (Though I hear laserDisc is also accepted in some circles.) Anything that intrudes on their turf is pelted with pebbles of rancor that have little or no weight. They're just really fucking annoying.

The most common stones are pulled from the quarry and labeled with words like "silly," "plot holes," "unintelligent" "not the real characters," et cetera.

Time to pick up the rocks and throw 'em back.

Silly: This ingenious igneous is probably my favorite. This little guy, which is often tossed about the room by the high-brow pundits who think they're careful, thinks it is primed for window piercing. But it usually just shatters mirrors. As it rolls aimlessly over the shards, we realize it really only as smart as the box it came from.

Here's the thing: Star Trek is silly! Remember that one time at band camp when the guy in the yellow pajamas was jumping around Styrofoam rocks in the desert judo-chopping the guy in the green rubber-suit?

Then there was that other time the guy in the gray pajamas started ranting about gazelles. But it's best to just forget about that one.

The silliness is what makes Star Trek so awesome. It's why people adore it. Complaining about it is only going to result in a full dose of facepalm.

Plot holes: This dunite of dunces is also a favorite of those in glass houses who selectively forget they live in one.

Star Trek movies have plot holes. All of them. Name a Trek film, and I'll name ten plot holes. Yet some like to selectively ignore the ones running rampant in the films they like and relentlessly attack the ones in the films they don't.

Unintelligent: This pumice of peugh wreaks. It is the defecation of the smug who think that if the pile gets big enough, the rest of us will get sick of the stench and come over to their side. Usually, though, it just stinks up the room and we all leave.

It's the argument that gets cited the most often, and most of us are sick of hearing it.

It's one thing to advocate for a smart Trek film. I do so myself quite often. But I realize both the current artistic environment and economic climate of the industry allow little room for such a film. And I know shitting on those that aren't the brightest bulbs would be utterly pointless because they're are so many of them. I'd have to squeeze out every last kernel only to end up constipated.

Let's face it, Star Trek films aren't exactly Shakespeare. Hell, half of them struggle to be Dr. Seuss. In fact, of the eleven films, only one dared give us a glimpse of its cerebellum, and it was censured for it.

And here, too, some selective memory surfaces. Let's take the holy trinity of Trek films for example:

TWOK: One giant contrivance.
TUC: Also one giant contrivance.
FC: Stricken by Sharks with Freakin' Lasers Syndrome.

When you get right down to it, all three are about as dumb as a box of ... well, you get the idea. And really I don't care because my compassion for something is not limited to my estimate of its intelligence. Instead, I grab my diet coke and popcorn and enjoy the show.

Granted, I do ridicule TWOK relentlessly, but that's only because it drives me bonkers that it seems to get a free pass. Most Trek fans act like it's some great work of intellectual cinema when it's really stupid as shit. But I still love it. I've seen it more than any other Trek film, and that'll probably never change because it's just so much damn fun.

But I think of ST09 as exactly the same in that regard. It too is stupid as shit. And it too is a lot of damn fun. But carrying doggy bags when in comes to TWOK and leaving a mess when with ST09 is hypocritical. And I'm sick of it.

Not the real characters™: The big fat boulder is a non-starter. It's too big for anyone to actually push anywhere. So it just sits there until gravity takes over and rolls down the hill the wrong way.

Characters, in a tangible sense, are nothing more than a few squiggles on paper. This is true for both literary and dramatic characters. Sometimes those boundaries overlap (hence my previous Hamlet example), but that doesn't change how they're perceived whether it be readers, actors, or an audience.

With literary characters, it's readers who interpret and develop the characters in their minds' eyes. However, we would never suggest one's interpretation or vision of a character is more "true" or "accurate" or "real" than another's.

It's the exact same for actors interpretation and vision for dramatic characters. I don't understand why this is such a hard concept to grasp.
CorporalClegg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13 2013, 10:04 PM   #734
BeatleJWOL
Captain
 
BeatleJWOL's Avatar
 
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Send a message via AIM to BeatleJWOL Send a message via Yahoo to BeatleJWOL
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

CorporalClegg wrote: View Post
Time to pick up the rocks and throw 'em back.
Oh, this thread is about to get fun.

"Man, Star Trek is pretty awful, isn't it; but it's still fun, I guess, so y'all just need to relax."
BeatleJWOL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13 2013, 10:08 PM   #735
CorporalClegg
Admiral
 
CorporalClegg's Avatar
 
Location: Land of Enchantment
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

BeatleJWOL wrote: View Post
"Man, Star Trek is pretty awful, isn't it; but it's still fun, I guess, so y'all just need to relax."
You'll have to excuse me, but can you indicate where I said that?
CorporalClegg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.