RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 135,743
Posts: 5,215,810
Members: 24,215
Currently online: 775
Newest member: rpoe0728

TrekToday headlines

Q Meets NuTrek Crew
By: T'Bonz on Apr 18

Pine In Talks For Drama
By: T'Bonz on Apr 18

New X-Men: Days of Future Past Trailer
By: T'Bonz on Apr 17

Nimoy to Receive Award
By: T'Bonz on Apr 17

Star Trek Special: Flesh and Stone Comic
By: T'Bonz on Apr 16

These Are The Voyages TOS Season Two Book Review
By: T'Bonz on Apr 16

Kirk’s Well Wishes To Kirk
By: T'Bonz on Apr 15

Quinto In New Starz Series
By: T'Bonz on Apr 15

Star Trek: Horizon Film
By: T'Bonz on Apr 14

Star Trek: Fleet Captains Game Expansion
By: T'Bonz on Apr 14


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 12 2013, 10:41 PM   #706
JarodRussell
Vice Admiral
 
JarodRussell's Avatar
 
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

Carcazoid wrote: View Post
Greg Cox wrote: View Post
JarodRussell wrote: View Post
One could have easily avoided all that by not doing a TOS remake at all to begin with.
But where's the fun in that?

If people want more TOS, give it to them. Remakes do not violate the Prime Directive.
Hear, hear.

If the reboot had been a novel it would likely have been lauded as genius.
Or it would have been dissected for how silly the idea and plot was. Ya never know.
__________________
lol
l
/\
JarodRussell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 12 2013, 10:58 PM   #707
BillJ
Admiral
 
Location: In the 23rd Century...
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

I love the people who bitch about more TOS after we've sat through six hundred plus episodes of Modern Trek. It's like the people who bitch about four or five TOS novels in a row after coming off of four or five straight 24th century novels.
__________________
I'm not popular enough to be different! - Homer Simpson
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13 2013, 12:22 AM   #708
M'Sharak
Definitely Herbert. Maybe.
 
M'Sharak's Avatar
 
Location: Terra Inlandia
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

Greg Cox wrote: View Post
Shazam! wrote: View Post
A true prequel would be an absolute minefield continuity wise and would likely have had to span a substantially longer period than Trek IX to facilitate the meetings of all the characters.
And would have left the "new" STAR TREK movies in the middle of the continuity minefield for every movie to come. "Wait? Why isn't Kirk serving on the Reliant now? Why isn't he dating Janice Lester . . . or Carol Marcus . . . or Ruth . . . ? What about the gas monster from 'Obsession'? Where does Kodos the Executioner fit in? Why is Chekov on the bridge already? Where is Dr. Piper? And Robert April?"
And not to forget the classic refrain:

__________________
"If the man doesn't believe as we do, we say he is a crank and that settles it. I mean it does nowadays, because we can't burn him."
— Mark Twain, from Following the Equator
M'Sharak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13 2013, 02:38 AM   #709
TheRoyalFamily
Commodore
 
TheRoyalFamily's Avatar
 
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

Was a reboot necessary?

No.

What Trek needed was to be revitalized. A reboot was not the only way to do it. However, it was the path of least resistance (I don't mean that as a fault, it's just the facts), and it most certainly worked.

Now, was the way they did it good? I'd say no - there was absolutely no need for an origin story. There was no real need for any time travel schenanagans. There was no need to destroy Vulcan. There was no real need to bother with canon, other than have the characters everyone knows - it could just be a self-contained story!

I do think it pretty much needed to be a Kirk-Spock Trek, though. The public knows Kirk, Spock, and the Enterprise. They know TNG better, but the cast is old, and TNG is old. No one outside of the fans knows anything about Voyager or Enterprise, and it was far too late to do anything with DS9 (not that anyone knows about that show, either). But Kirk, Spock, and the Enterprise are cultural icons. Do it right, and it's almost a license to print money, especially by 2009 when geeky retro things were OK to like.

I also think it needed to be an action film. Did it need to be brainless like Trek '09 was? No, but that obviously didn't hurt any. Plus, it's not like TOS isn't familiar with brainlessness.
__________________
You perceive wrongly. I feel unimaginable happiness wasting time talking with women. I'm that type of human.
TheRoyalFamily is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13 2013, 02:44 AM   #710
Nerys Myk
Fleet Admiral
 
Nerys Myk's Avatar
 
Location: House of Kang, now with ridges
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

Oh, there was and is a lot of resistance.

They know TNG better? I don't think so. Nothing on TNG has become as iconic as Kirk and Spock.
__________________
The boring one, the one with Khan, the one where Spock returns, the one with whales, the dumb one, the last one, the one with Kirk, the one with the Borg, the stupid one, the bad one, the new one, the other one with Khan.
Nerys Myk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13 2013, 02:48 AM   #711
YARN
Fleet Captain
 
YARN's Avatar
 
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

Yeah, Trek did need a reboot.

Abrams wasn't quite the reboot I hoped for - nothing is perfect - but it was better than the post-Nemesis "Search for Data" flick which we would have had instead.
YARN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13 2013, 02:54 AM   #712
Greg Cox
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Oxford, PA
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

You know, "need" may be the wrong word here, since it almost seems to imply that a reboot was only justifiable if it was absolutely necessary. As opposed to simply seeing a reboot as a good idea that did the trick.

Were there other options? Possibly. Is there anything wrong with rebooting STAR TREK? Not at all . . .

Again, reboots are not the devil. Sometimes they can be very interesting variations on a theme.
__________________
www.gregcox-author.com

Last edited by Greg Cox; January 13 2013 at 03:16 AM.
Greg Cox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13 2013, 04:10 AM   #713
Dale Sams
Captain
 
Dale Sams's Avatar
 
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

JarodRussell wrote: View Post
Carcazoid wrote: View Post
Greg Cox wrote: View Post

But where's the fun in that?

If people want more TOS, give it to them. Remakes do not violate the Prime Directive.
Hear, hear.

If the reboot had been a novel it would likely have been lauded as genius.
Or it would have been dissected for how silly the idea and plot was. Ya never know.
IMHO, if , for whatever reason, Trek had gone straight from FC to 2009 Trek, Trek fans would have called it the stupidest thing God ever made and be clamoring for some sort of dual franchise*, ala' Thunderball/Never Say Never.

*In this alternate universe, Trek 2009 still makes bank.
Dale Sams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13 2013, 04:15 AM   #714
BillJ
Admiral
 
Location: In the 23rd Century...
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

Dale Sams wrote: View Post
IMHO, if , for whatever reason, Trek had gone straight from FC to 2009 Trek, Trek fans would have called it the stupidest thing God ever made and be clamoring for some sort of dual franchise*, ala' Thunderball/Never Say Never.
I still think people would've liked the 2009 film, it had an energy that pretty much all the TNG films lacked.
__________________
I'm not popular enough to be different! - Homer Simpson
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13 2013, 04:15 AM   #715
Greg Cox
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Oxford, PA
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

Dale Sams wrote: View Post
JarodRussell wrote: View Post
Carcazoid wrote: View Post
Hear, hear.

If the reboot had been a novel it would likely have been lauded as genius.
Or it would have been dissected for how silly the idea and plot was. Ya never know.
IMHO, if , for whatever reason, Trek had gone straight from FC to 2009 Trek, Trek fans would have called it the stupidest thing God ever made and be clamoring for some sort of dual franchise*, ala' Thunderball/Never Say Never.

*In this alternate universe, Trek 2009 still makes bank.

You know, I always thought Never Say Never Again was underrated. I remember preferring it to Thunderball.
__________________
www.gregcox-author.com
Greg Cox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13 2013, 04:22 AM   #716
Admiral Buzzkill
The Legend
 
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

The notion of a "real crew of the original Enterprise" is preposterous.
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13 2013, 11:33 AM   #717
Nagisa Furukawa
Commander
 
Nagisa Furukawa's Avatar
 
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

BillJ wrote: View Post
I think Pine, Quinto and Urban were clearly recognizable as the characters.
Pine did an okay job as a charismatic young captain, but he didn't look, sound or act much like the Kirk of TOS. Out of all the JJ Trek characters, he's one of the ones that least resembles his counterpart IMO.
__________________
I am the one who guided you this far.
Nagisa Furukawa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13 2013, 11:45 AM   #718
Nagisa Furukawa
Commander
 
Nagisa Furukawa's Avatar
 
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

Carcazoid wrote: View Post
If the reboot had been a novel it would likely have been lauded as genius.
No way. If anything, it'd have been much more harshly reviewed. People accept mindless action and paper-thin plot in big-budget action blockbusters precisely in a way they don't on the printed page (garbage like the Da Vinci Code excepted). Unless the prose was insanely gangbusters or something, if Trek '09 had been released as a novel relaunch of TOS, it would've been heavily criticized in comparison to the really well-written Trek novels of the past; if it has been released as a standalone SF now, it wouldn't have even been a blip in the history of SF literature, much less "genius."
__________________
I am the one who guided you this far.
Nagisa Furukawa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13 2013, 05:53 PM   #719
Nerys Myk
Fleet Admiral
 
Nerys Myk's Avatar
 
Location: House of Kang, now with ridges
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

Nagisa Furukawa wrote: View Post
BillJ wrote: View Post
I think Pine, Quinto and Urban were clearly recognizable as the characters.
Pine did an okay job as a charismatic young captain, but he didn't look, sound or act much like the Kirk of TOS. Out of all the JJ Trek characters, he's one of the ones that least resembles his counterpart IMO.
Other than Quinto and Urban to some degree, none of the actors looked or sounded like the originals. Frankly, that's a good thing, because I'm not interested in seeing a bunch of celebrity impersonators. Pine did a great job of capturing Kirk's swagger and brashness without doing a full on Shatner impression, but did subtly use some of Shatner's body language.
__________________
The boring one, the one with Khan, the one where Spock returns, the one with whales, the dumb one, the last one, the one with Kirk, the one with the Borg, the stupid one, the bad one, the new one, the other one with Khan.
Nerys Myk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13 2013, 06:22 PM   #720
Jackson_Roykirk
Commodore
 
Jackson_Roykirk's Avatar
 
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

^
^^ Yes. Quinto did a good job imitating Spock, although I wasn't that crazy overall with his performance. He was uncannily Spock-like, but I think overall Quinto was just "OK".

Pine didn't "act like Shatner's Kirk", but I think he captured the essence what captain Kirk is supposed to be. People looking for an imitation of TOS Kirk may have been disappointed, but I wasn't.

Urban did the best job of BOTH capturing the essence of the character AND imitating the character.
__________________

...With shoes that cut, and eyes that burn like cigarettes
With fingernails that shine like justice and a voice that is dark like tinted glass...
Jackson_Roykirk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.