|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| General Trek Discussion Trek TV and cinema subjects not related to any specific series or movie. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#46 |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: Yesterday's Enterprise Episode question
Also, saving those billions of individuals would most likely result in a galaxy ultimately controlled by the Borg. How exactly is that a victory?
__________________
--DonIago It was the best of Trek, it was the worst of Trek... "If I lean over, I leave myself open to wedgies, wet willies, or even the dreaded Rear Admiral!" |
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Yesterday's Enterprise Episode question
The Council apparently is worried about Starfleet captains making excessively independent decisions over life and death. Do they have armed guards placed behind the backs of all DTI workers, with the fingers on the triggers, and the phrase "Please think that over, clear it with the Council, and you may live to see it happen" well memorized? That would sound prudent. Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#48 | ||
|
Captain
Location: At star's end.
|
Re: Yesterday's Enterprise Episode question
I can easily come up with a way to save an arbitrarily high number of people without changing the past in any way. For example: Simply use a temporal transporter (a technology shown in TNG) to teleport all the billions who were about to die from a millisecond before their death to their future (your present). Of course, the reasoning behind the DTI's categorical refusal to save billions was not the impossibility of doing it without undesirable consequences, but the fact that that would constitute changing the past (and not changing the past was shown to be the de fato religion of the DTI agents - the logical justifications of this credo being quite thin). Until one of the DTI's own was to be saved, that is; then the refusal was not even close to categorical. As per the DTI agents' behaviour, all people are equal, but some are more equal than others. As said - elitist a$$holes. The DTI certainly do think they are so.
__________________
"Let truth and falsehood grapple ... Truth is strong" - John Milton Last edited by Edit_XYZ; January 10 2013 at 09:17 PM. |
||
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:59 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.




















