RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,895
Posts: 5,476,956
Members: 25,050
Currently online: 495
Newest member: aloraptor

TrekToday headlines

Klingon Bloodwine To Debut
By: T'Bonz on Nov 25

Trek Actors In War Of The Worlds Fundraiser
By: T'Bonz on Nov 25

Star Trek: The Next Generation Gag Reel Tease
By: T'Bonz on Nov 24

Shatner In Haven
By: T'Bonz on Nov 24

Retro Review: Covenant
By: Michelle on Nov 22

Two Official Starships Collection Previews
By: T'Bonz on Nov 21

Saldana: Women Issues In Hollywood
By: T'Bonz on Nov 21

Shatner Book Kickstarter
By: T'Bonz on Nov 20

Trek Original Series Slippers
By: T'Bonz on Nov 19

Hemsworth Is Sexiest Man Alive
By: T'Bonz on Nov 19


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 10 2013, 04:40 AM   #1
Morpheus 02
Commodore
 
Location: Chicago IL
Are we REALLY calling it STiD?

Are we really calling Star Trek Into Darkness STiD as an abbreviation??

It looks too much like STD for me to be comfortable with it...
__________________
Morpheus 02
a.k.a.
JP Paulus jp [at] paulus . com
Morpheus 02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 10 2013, 04:42 AM   #2
Dukhat
Commodore
 
Dukhat's Avatar
 
Location: Baltimore, MD
Re: Are we REALLY calling it STiD?

You're welcome to call it whatever you want. As long as you go see it.
__________________
“Don’t believe everything you read on the internet.”
– Benjamin Franklin
Dukhat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 10 2013, 04:49 AM   #3
M'Sharak
Definitely Herbert. Maybe.
 
M'Sharak's Avatar
 
Location: Terra Inlandia
Re: Are we REALLY calling it STiD?

Morpheus 02 wrote: View Post
Are we really calling Star Trek Into Darkness STiD as an abbreviation??
I'm calling it "the movie" or "the next movie" as often as not, but STID does have the advantage of being an accurate initialism of the movie's title.

Morpheus 02 wrote: View Post
It looks too much like STD for me...
Believe it or not, that similarity has been pointed out a time or two (or forty-two) already.

Morpheus 02 wrote: View Post
... to be comfortable with it...
Would you describe the discomfort as an itch... or more of a burning sensation?
__________________
The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but
that the lightning ain't distributed right.
— Mark Twain
M'Sharak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 10 2013, 04:58 AM   #4
Kruezerman
Fleet Captain
 
Kruezerman's Avatar
 
Location: The corner of San Antonio and a bottle of Fireball
Re: Are we REALLY calling it STiD?

I call it Geoff.

I like Geoff.
__________________
I'm not saying it's cold, but I just keyed two cars with my nipples.
Kruezerman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 10 2013, 05:14 AM   #5
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: Are we REALLY calling it STiD?

No one's calling it "STiD."

People are abbreviating it "STiD" on message boards.

When I actually call it something out loud, it's either "Into Darkness" or "the next Star Trek movie."
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 10 2013, 05:41 AM   #6
Dream
Admiral
 
Dream's Avatar
 
Re: Are we REALLY calling it STiD?

Just call it Khan Returns.
Dream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 10 2013, 06:01 AM   #7
Herkimer Jitty
Rear Admiral
 
Herkimer Jitty's Avatar
 
Location: Dayglow, New California Republic
Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Herkimer Jitty
Re: Are we REALLY calling it STiD?

Star Trek The Second Second One
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1965½, 1966-1969, Jan. 21-23 1972, 1979-2001, 2003-2005, 2009-?
Herkimer Jitty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 10 2013, 12:53 PM   #8
Shazam!
Rear Admiral
 
Shazam!'s Avatar
 
Re: Are we REALLY calling it STiD?

I'm calling it Star Trekin' To Darkness.
Shazam! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 10 2013, 12:55 PM   #9
SalvorHardin
Rear Admiral
 
SalvorHardin's Avatar
 
Location: Star's End
View SalvorHardin's Twitter Profile
Re: Are we REALLY calling it STiD?

I call it Johny when we're alone.
__________________

SalvorHardin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 10 2013, 01:05 PM   #10
starburst
Fleet Captain
 
starburst's Avatar
 
Re: Are we REALLY calling it STiD?

Ive just been calling it "Into Darkness" or the next Star Trek...many people are simply calling it Star Trek 2.
starburst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 10 2013, 01:07 PM   #11
teacake
Fleet Admiral
 
teacake's Avatar
 
Location: Google's ass cave full of the lush, lush asses they have stolen.
Re: Are we REALLY calling it STiD?

At least it isn't "Attack Into Darkness".
__________________

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 10 2013, 01:27 PM   #12
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: King Daniel Into Darkness
Re: Are we REALLY calling it STiD?

Ssstid. It's a word not an anacronym.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 10 2013, 02:05 PM   #13
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Are we REALLY calling it STiD?

I don't care what people call, it as long as its good.
__________________
"If I hadn't tried, the cost would have been my soul." - Admiral James T. Kirk, Star Trek III: The Search for Spock
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 10 2013, 02:39 PM   #14
Tosk
Rear Admiral
 
Tosk's Avatar
 
Location: On the run.
Re: Are we REALLY calling it STiD?

It's Trek 12 to me. I don't care, it's just easier.
Tosk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 10 2013, 02:48 PM   #15
The Mirrorball Man
Vice Admiral
 
The Mirrorball Man's Avatar
 
Location: Switzerland
View The Mirrorball Man's Twitter Profile
Re: Are we REALLY calling it STiD?

I'm calling it DARKNESS. In all caps. That's what I call it. DARKNESS is the sequel to TREK. It works. It works for everything.

Star Wars: MENACE, CLONES, SITH, HOPE, EMPIRE, JEDI.

Star Trek: PICTURE, WRATH, SEARCH, VOYAGE, FRONTIER, COUNTRY, GENERATIONS, CONTACT, BOOBS, NEMESIS, TREK, DARKNESS.
__________________
Check out my deviantArt gallery!
The Mirrorball Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
star trek into darkness, stid

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.