RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,629
Posts: 5,427,273
Members: 24,810
Currently online: 578
Newest member: Rom

TrekToday headlines

Trek Messenger Bag
By: T'Bonz on Sep 18

Star Trek Live In Concert In Australia
By: T'Bonz on Sep 18

IDW Publishing December Trek Comics
By: T'Bonz on Sep 17

September Loot Crate Features Trek Surprise
By: T'Bonz on Sep 16

USS Enterprise Miniature Out For Refit
By: T'Bonz on Sep 16

Star Trek/Planet of the Apes Comic Crossover
By: T'Bonz on Sep 16

Trek 3 Shooting Next Spring?
By: T'Bonz on Sep 16

Star Trek: Alien Domain Game Announced
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Red Shirt Diaries Episode Three
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Made Out Of Mudd Photonovel
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek TV Series > The Next Generation

The Next Generation All Good Things come to an end...but not here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 8 2013, 11:45 PM   #16
R. Star
Rear Admiral
 
R. Star's Avatar
 
Location: Shangri-La
Re: New Here: Klingon Question

jimbotron wrote: View Post
Mr. Laser Beam wrote: View Post
^ I think it would have been hilarious if, during Trials and Tribble-ations, Worf's trip to the past resulted in him immediately appearing as a TOS style Klingon with no one even noticing.
That would have been great.

Unlike with the Klingons, Trek never bothered to address or explain why TNG-era Romulans had head ridges while TOS-era did not.
Being Spock was able to walk around in public on Romulus without a head ridge, and drew no undue notice, one would just assume some have them and some don't.
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams
R. Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 9 2013, 12:03 AM   #17
A beaker full of death
Vice Admiral
 
A beaker full of death's Avatar
 
Re: New Here: Klingon Question

I-Am-Prepared! wrote: View Post
Unfortunately, the (great) DS9 epsiode "Trials and Tribbleations" ruined that - put Worf together in a room with TOS Klingons, and one of the characters is going to say *something*!!! So they had to come up with a canon explanation for it.
No. The glorious thing about that episode is that they didn't come up with an explanation.
__________________
"shall not be infringed" is naturally open to infringements of all kinds, because shut up and think of the children.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/...#ixzz2ImW0V3GV
A beaker full of death is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 9 2013, 12:04 AM   #18
A beaker full of death
Vice Admiral
 
A beaker full of death's Avatar
 
Re: New Here: Klingon Question

Carcazoid wrote: View Post
Mr. Laser Beam wrote: View Post
^ I think it would have been hilarious if, during Trials and Tribble-ations, Worf's trip to the past resulted in him immediately appearing as a TOS style Klingon with no one even noticing.
This. Emphatically.
Brilliant!

jimbotron wrote: View Post
Unlike with the Klingons, Trek never bothered to address or explain why TNG-era Romulans had head ridges while TOS-era did not.
I honestly think Westmore was so busy congratulating himself over a cheap way to do the eyebrows that he thought no one would notice. How a once great Hollywood family has descended into hackdom. Anyone notice how old McCoy in TOS was so much more convincing than old McCoy in TNG?
__________________
"shall not be infringed" is naturally open to infringements of all kinds, because shut up and think of the children.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/...#ixzz2ImW0V3GV
A beaker full of death is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 9 2013, 12:34 AM   #19
jimbotron
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Bay Area, CA
Re: New Here: Klingon Question

A beaker full of death wrote: View Post
Anyone notice how old McCoy in TOS was so much more convincing than old McCoy in TNG?
Did you see the test footage of McCoy for TNG? I wish they went with that instead.

http://tng.trekcore.com/hd/albums/bo...sited2_211.jpg
jimbotron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 9 2013, 12:55 AM   #20
A beaker full of death
Vice Admiral
 
A beaker full of death's Avatar
 
Re: New Here: Klingon Question

^ooh, that is good!
__________________
"shall not be infringed" is naturally open to infringements of all kinds, because shut up and think of the children.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/...#ixzz2ImW0V3GV
A beaker full of death is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 9 2013, 01:21 AM   #21
Trekker4747
Fleet Admiral
 
Trekker4747's Avatar
 
Location: Kansas City
Re: New Here: Klingon Question

A beaker full of death wrote: View Post
I-Am-Prepared! wrote: View Post
Unfortunately, the (great) DS9 epsiode "Trials and Tribbleations" ruined that - put Worf together in a room with TOS Klingons, and one of the characters is going to say *something*!!! So they had to come up with a canon explanation for it.
No. The glorious thing about that episode is that they didn't come up with an explanation.
But it wasn't glorious because it pretty much said that there WAS a difference rather than just simply not addressing it at all.
__________________
Out of hope.
Trekker4747 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 9 2013, 01:43 AM   #22
R. Star
Rear Admiral
 
R. Star's Avatar
 
Location: Shangri-La
Re: New Here: Klingon Question

jimbotron wrote: View Post
A beaker full of death wrote: View Post
Anyone notice how old McCoy in TOS was so much more convincing than old McCoy in TNG?
Did you see the test footage of McCoy for TNG? I wish they went with that instead.

http://tng.trekcore.com/hd/albums/bo...sited2_211.jpg
Never saw that before, thanks. Yeah, that would've been better than the cross between McCoy and Doc Brown from Back to the Future.
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams
R. Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 9 2013, 02:09 AM   #23
Nerys Myk
Fleet Admiral
 
Nerys Myk's Avatar
 
Location: House of Kang, now with ridges
Re: New Here: Klingon Question

R. Star wrote: View Post
jimbotron wrote: View Post
A beaker full of death wrote: View Post
Anyone notice how old McCoy in TOS was so much more convincing than old McCoy in TNG?
Did you see the test footage of McCoy for TNG? I wish they went with that instead.

http://tng.trekcore.com/hd/albums/bo...sited2_211.jpg
Never saw that before, thanks. Yeah, that would've been better than the cross between McCoy and Doc Brown from Back to the Future.
I recall reading that the makeup in "Encounter at Farpoint" was based on what was used in "The Deadly Years".

That test footage looks like De with gray hair.
__________________
The boring one, the one with Khan, the one where Spock returns, the one with whales, the dumb one, the last one, the one with Kirk, the one with the Borg, the stupid one, the bad one, the new one, the other one with Khan.
Nerys Myk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 9 2013, 02:25 AM   #24
Trekker4747
Fleet Admiral
 
Trekker4747's Avatar
 
Location: Kansas City
Re: New Here: Klingon Question

Nerys Myk wrote: View Post
R. Star wrote: View Post
jimbotron wrote: View Post

Did you see the test footage of McCoy for TNG? I wish they went with that instead.

http://tng.trekcore.com/hd/albums/bo...sited2_211.jpg
Never saw that before, thanks. Yeah, that would've been better than the cross between McCoy and Doc Brown from Back to the Future.
I recall reading that the makeup in "Encounter at Farpoint" was based on what was used in "The Deadly Years".

That test footage looks like De with gray hair.
Sort of, yeah. Remember that the McCoy we see in TNG is supposed to be nearly 80 years older than the McCoy we see in the movies! Some gray hair and a few more wrinkles isn't going to cut it.
__________________
Out of hope.
Trekker4747 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 9 2013, 02:44 AM   #25
R. Star
Rear Admiral
 
R. Star's Avatar
 
Location: Shangri-La
Re: New Here: Klingon Question

Trekker4747 wrote: View Post
Nerys Myk wrote: View Post
R. Star wrote: View Post

Never saw that before, thanks. Yeah, that would've been better than the cross between McCoy and Doc Brown from Back to the Future.
I recall reading that the makeup in "Encounter at Farpoint" was based on what was used in "The Deadly Years".

That test footage looks like De with gray hair.
Sort of, yeah. Remember that the McCoy we see in TNG is supposed to be nearly 80 years older than the McCoy we see in the movies! Some gray hair and a few more wrinkles isn't going to cut it.
Maybe he took up plastic surgery in his later years of practicing medicine.
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams
R. Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 9 2013, 02:48 AM   #26
Mr. Laser Beam
Fleet Admiral
 
Mr. Laser Beam's Avatar
 
Location: The visitor's bullpen
View Mr. Laser Beam's Twitter Profile
Re: New Here: Klingon Question

jimbotron wrote: View Post
A beaker full of death wrote: View Post
Anyone notice how old McCoy in TOS was so much more convincing than old McCoy in TNG?
Did you see the test footage of McCoy for TNG? I wish they went with that instead.

http://tng.trekcore.com/hd/albums/bo...sited2_211.jpg
That is probably what they'd use today, since what the novelverse would later establish about the human lifespan - 100 is considered prime physical condition - would make 137 years not anywhere near as ancient as McCoy looked on TNG.
__________________
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.
Mr. Laser Beam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 9 2013, 03:22 AM   #27
A beaker full of death
Vice Admiral
 
A beaker full of death's Avatar
 
Re: New Here: Klingon Question

Trekker4747 wrote: View Post

Sort of, yeah. Remember that the McCoy we see in TNG is supposed to be nearly 80 years older than the McCoy we see in the movies! Some gray hair and a few more wrinkles isn't going to cut it.
But a face that looks like a jello mold is?


This is convincing:



This is not:



The original makeup worked with Kelley's face. The Westmore makeup is "generic old man #12".
__________________
"shall not be infringed" is naturally open to infringements of all kinds, because shut up and think of the children.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/...#ixzz2ImW0V3GV

Last edited by A beaker full of death; January 9 2013 at 03:53 AM.
A beaker full of death is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 9 2013, 03:36 AM   #28
Nerys Myk
Fleet Admiral
 
Nerys Myk's Avatar
 
Location: House of Kang, now with ridges
Re: New Here: Klingon Question

The hair from the TOS episode isn't.
__________________
The boring one, the one with Khan, the one where Spock returns, the one with whales, the dumb one, the last one, the one with Kirk, the one with the Borg, the stupid one, the bad one, the new one, the other one with Khan.
Nerys Myk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 9 2013, 03:50 AM   #29
Trekker4747
Fleet Admiral
 
Trekker4747's Avatar
 
Location: Kansas City
Re: New Here: Klingon Question

I'm not going to argue that the makeup used in the episode was great, it wasn't. I don't think it was terrible but it was certainly lacking. (I thought the old-age makeup used in "Too Short a Season" was far worse, however.) Jut that the original old-age look wasn't far enough to depict a 137-year-old man where they essentially took Kelly and added some slightly grayer hair and some wrinkles. The old-age makeup in the TOS episode is very good, and the old-age makeup used on Pulaski in "Unnatural Selection" was decent, but, yeah, the makeup in EaF wasn't great.

Still, that McCoy looks more like a 137-year-old man than the original test makeup.

Look at the pictures, I also sort of think the difference is less about the makeup and more about the lighting used. The corridor scene is way overlit and makes the makeup look poor, the TOS scene seems to have much more natural and subdued levels of lighting, making things look better.
__________________
Out of hope.
Trekker4747 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 9 2013, 06:10 AM   #30
MacLeod
Admiral
 
Location: Great Britain
Re: New Here: Klingon Question

I-Am-Prepared! wrote: View Post
To be honest, I think it's one of those things that most fans would have been happy to accept as a "fact of life" - i.e. we all know Klingons look different in TOS because the budget was smaller, but in our minds we're happy to ignore that. Suspension of disbelief.

Unfortunately, the (great) DS9 epsiode "Trials and Tribbleations" ruined that - put Worf together in a room with TOS Klingons, and one of the characters is going to say *something*!!! So they had to come up with a canon explanation for it.

TBH, I've never watched Enterprise and never will, so I just assume they always had the bumpy foreheads. :P (and just put "Trials" out of my mind)....
No they didn't have to come up with a canon explanation they could have just left it as a mystery.

WORF: We do not discuss it with outsiders

Acknowledge it and move on.
__________________
On the continent of wild endeavour in the mountains of solace and solitude there stood the citadel of the time lords, the oldest and most mighty race in the universe looking down on the galaxies below sworn never to interfere only to watch.
MacLeod is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.