RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 135,782
Posts: 5,217,360
Members: 24,217
Currently online: 738
Newest member: davestar057

TrekToday headlines

Q Meets NuTrek Crew
By: T'Bonz on Apr 18

Pine In Talks For Drama
By: T'Bonz on Apr 18

New X-Men: Days of Future Past Trailer
By: T'Bonz on Apr 17

Nimoy to Receive Award
By: T'Bonz on Apr 17

Star Trek Special: Flesh and Stone Comic
By: T'Bonz on Apr 16

These Are The Voyages TOS Season Two Book Review
By: T'Bonz on Apr 16

Kirk’s Well Wishes To Kirk
By: T'Bonz on Apr 15

Quinto In New Starz Series
By: T'Bonz on Apr 15

Star Trek: Horizon Film
By: T'Bonz on Apr 14

Star Trek: Fleet Captains Game Expansion
By: T'Bonz on Apr 14


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 2 2013, 01:06 AM   #286
Balrog
Commodore
 
Balrog's Avatar
 
Location: Balrog
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

"A stack of book with legs."

Hey, wasn't it in the very same episode a tombstone that read, "James R. Kirk"?
__________________
Anybody got some peppermint?
Balrog was Lloyd Dobler
Balrog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 2 2013, 01:10 AM   #287
BillJ
Admiral
 
Location: In the 23rd Century...
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

Kevin W. wrote: View Post
A Very Jewel Christmas wrote: View Post
Is there any other franchise that has to hire historians for their own fictional universe? I know Doctor Who relies on what the writer likes and ignores what they don't like. Dropping that weight is the best thing that ever happened to Trek and frees it to go places we can't even imagine.
They could have rebooted the franchise without falling into the LCD pit Abrams has dropped it into.
I don't even know what this means?

Parts of the movie worked, parts of it didn't. Sounds like much of Trek to me.
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 2 2013, 01:10 AM   #288
Awesome Possum
I've Rebooted Myself
 
Awesome Possum's Avatar
 
Location: Someplace Shiny
View Awesome Possum's Twitter Profile Send a message via ICQ to Awesome Possum Send a message via AIM to Awesome Possum
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

Kevin W. wrote: View Post
A Very Jewel Christmas wrote: View Post
Is there any other franchise that has to hire historians for their own fictional universe? I know Doctor Who relies on what the writer likes and ignores what they don't like. Dropping that weight is the best thing that ever happened to Trek and frees it to go places we can't even imagine.
They could have rebooted the franchise without falling into the LCD pit Abrams has dropped it into.
What did you want them use a CRT monitor? I want the Enterprise to look like the future from now, but the future from the 1960s which we currently have better stuff than.

Although if you means lens flare, who cares? It's an absurd detail to get upset about. It's a minor stylist choice that does not add or subtract from the enjoyment of the story. Anyone who complains about that is missing the forest for the shiny trees.
__________________
"Libertarianism is a good idea on paper, until you look at it."
-Greg Proops, The Smartest Man in the World
Awesome Possum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 2 2013, 01:16 AM   #289
Greg Cox
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Oxford, PA
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

Kevin W. wrote: View Post
And yet a movie that stripped away everything that was good about Star Trek in favor of blatant blockbuster mass appeal designed to appeal to the lowest common denominator was not the answer.

That film was not Star Trek. It was a generic blockbuster with the Star Trek name slapped on it, and it was an abomination.
Well, without rehashing the same old debate for the umpteenth time, let it just be noted that many of us hardcore Trekkies don't feel that away.

Speaking as somebody who has been watching the show since it first aired on NBC, I thought the new movie very much captured the zest and spirit of the original classic series. It felt like TOS to me . . . and is definitely one of the better TREK movies.

You think it's an abomination. I think it's the best thing to happen to STAR TREK in years. But, hey, we're all Trekkies here, even if some of us prefer some iterations over others.
__________________
www.gregcox-author.com
Greg Cox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 2 2013, 01:17 AM   #290
Kevin W.
Commander
 
Kevin W.'s Avatar
 
Location: California
Send a message via AIM to Kevin W.
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

Greg Cox wrote: View Post
Well, without rehashing the same old debate for the umpteenth time, let it just be noted that many of us hardcore Trekkies don't feel that away.
Absolutely. I've never claimed that my opinions are anything more than my own.

I have a problem with JJ Abrams' work that extends beyond Star Trek, though. I don't care for anything he does and I don't believe he deserves the critical acclaim he's gotten.
__________________
Ari Gold: "We're gonna get drunk with Russell Crowe and we're gonna head-butt some goddamn kangaroos."
Kevin W. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 2 2013, 01:19 AM   #291
Awesome Possum
I've Rebooted Myself
 
Awesome Possum's Avatar
 
Location: Someplace Shiny
View Awesome Possum's Twitter Profile Send a message via ICQ to Awesome Possum Send a message via AIM to Awesome Possum
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

My dad grew up watching TOS and I grew up watching TNG, the movies and the reruns. I adored the movie and saw it in theaters a second time with my dad. He loved it too. But I guess we aren't real Trekkies because we don't know the name of Spock's pet or the exact stardate McCoy stubbed his toe on the bridge.
__________________
"Libertarianism is a good idea on paper, until you look at it."
-Greg Proops, The Smartest Man in the World
Awesome Possum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 2 2013, 01:20 AM   #292
Greg Cox
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Oxford, PA
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

A Very Jewel Christmas wrote: View Post
Kevin W. wrote: View Post
A Very Jewel Christmas wrote: View Post
Is there any other franchise that has to hire historians for their own fictional universe? I know Doctor Who relies on what the writer likes and ignores what they don't like. Dropping that weight is the best thing that ever happened to Trek and frees it to go places we can't even imagine.
They could have rebooted the franchise without falling into the LCD pit Abrams has dropped it into.
What did you want them use a CRT monitor? .
I think LCD, in this context, refers to Lowest Common Denominator.

Not that I agree, of course.
__________________
www.gregcox-author.com
Greg Cox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 2 2013, 01:22 AM   #293
BillJ
Admiral
 
Location: In the 23rd Century...
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

Kevin W. wrote: View Post
I have a problem with JJ Abrams' work that extends beyond Star Trek, though. I don't care for anything he does and I don't believe he deserves the critical acclaim he's gotten.
You do realize they're are more people involved in the reboot than just Abrams?
__________________
I'm not popular enough to be different! - Homer Simpson
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 2 2013, 01:27 AM   #294
Awesome Possum
I've Rebooted Myself
 
Awesome Possum's Avatar
 
Location: Someplace Shiny
View Awesome Possum's Twitter Profile Send a message via ICQ to Awesome Possum Send a message via AIM to Awesome Possum
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

Greg Cox wrote: View Post
A Very Jewel Christmas wrote: View Post
Kevin W. wrote: View Post
They could have rebooted the franchise without falling into the LCD pit Abrams has dropped it into.
What did you want them use a CRT monitor? .
I think LCD, in this context, refers to Lowest Common Denominator.

Not that I agree, of course.
I truly wonder what he means by it though. TOS had sex (well it was hinted at), battles and phasers. It just looks like it got new coat of paint. There's nothing in the new movie that TOS didn't have other than Vulcan being destroyed and a level of conflict between characters.
__________________
"Libertarianism is a good idea on paper, until you look at it."
-Greg Proops, The Smartest Man in the World
Awesome Possum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 2 2013, 01:29 AM   #295
Awesome Possum
I've Rebooted Myself
 
Awesome Possum's Avatar
 
Location: Someplace Shiny
View Awesome Possum's Twitter Profile Send a message via ICQ to Awesome Possum Send a message via AIM to Awesome Possum
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

BillJ wrote: View Post
Kevin W. wrote: View Post
I have a problem with JJ Abrams' work that extends beyond Star Trek, though. I don't care for anything he does and I don't believe he deserves the critical acclaim he's gotten.
You do realize they're are more people involved in the reboot than just Abrams?
We can't bring in facts and logic into an absurd personal bias against someone he never met.
__________________
"Libertarianism is a good idea on paper, until you look at it."
-Greg Proops, The Smartest Man in the World
Awesome Possum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 2 2013, 01:31 AM   #296
Kevin W.
Commander
 
Kevin W.'s Avatar
 
Location: California
Send a message via AIM to Kevin W.
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

From my perspective, as I mentioned, it just seemed like a generic summer blockbuster that had a Star Trek veneer applied to it. It didn't have the kinds of things I expect from Trek. It wasn't a smart film. It was just lots of violence and action. I know there is plenty of violence and action in all of Trek but to me, Abrams' film seemed like it was nothing but.

Once again, that's just how I see it. I'm hardly an old curmudgeon who saw TOS firsthand. I was just over 11 years old when Voyager ended so really. The film just doesn't seem right to me.
__________________
Ari Gold: "We're gonna get drunk with Russell Crowe and we're gonna head-butt some goddamn kangaroos."
Kevin W. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 2 2013, 01:38 AM   #297
Awesome Possum
I've Rebooted Myself
 
Awesome Possum's Avatar
 
Location: Someplace Shiny
View Awesome Possum's Twitter Profile Send a message via ICQ to Awesome Possum Send a message via AIM to Awesome Possum
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

Kevin W. wrote: View Post
From my perspective, as I mentioned, it just seemed like a generic summer blockbuster that had a Star Trek veneer applied to it. It didn't have the kinds of things I expect from Trek. It wasn't a smart film. It was just lots of violence and action. I know there is plenty of violence and action in all of Trek but to me, Abrams' film seemed like it was nothing but.

Once again, that's just how I see it. I'm hardly an old curmudgeon who saw TOS firsthand. I was just over 11 years old when Voyager ended so really. The film just doesn't seem right to me.
Did you fall asleep when they explored the dual nature of Spock's human and vulcan sides as well as Kirk going through the hero's journey?
__________________
"Libertarianism is a good idea on paper, until you look at it."
-Greg Proops, The Smartest Man in the World
Awesome Possum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 2 2013, 01:38 AM   #298
DalekJim
Fleet Captain
 
DalekJim's Avatar
 
Location: Great Britain
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

A Very Jewel Christmas wrote: View Post
Is there any other franchise that has to hire historians for their own fictional universe? I know Doctor Who relies on what the writer likes and ignores what they don't like. Dropping that weight is the best thing that ever happened to Trek and frees it to go places we can't even imagine.
I don't understand this attitude. Couldn't they just... write a story for the movie that didn't require knowledge of continuity? Just have a new ship and crew explore the universe and find a new adventure on a new planet.

The way to avoid getting swamped in continuity is to not write a movie that's premise hinges entirely on rewriting continuity.
DalekJim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 2 2013, 01:42 AM   #299
BillJ
Admiral
 
Location: In the 23rd Century...
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

DalekJim wrote: View Post
The way to avoid getting swamped in continuity is to not write a movie that's premise hinges entirely on rewriting continuity.
I know this doesn't mean anything, but they didn't rewrite continuity.
__________________
I'm not popular enough to be different! - Homer Simpson
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 2 2013, 01:45 AM   #300
Greg Cox
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Oxford, PA
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?

Kevin W. wrote: View Post
Once again, that's just how I see it. I'm hardly an old curmudgeon who saw TOS firsthand. I was just over 11 years old when Voyager ended so really. The film just doesn't seem right to me.
Whereas I'm an old coot who grew up watching Kirk fight a giant lizard-man on TOS, and loved the fact that the new movie wasn't afraid to get back in touch with the pulpy space-opera side of STAR TREK. I nearly cheered when that space monster lunged out of the ice; when was the last time TREK indulged in some gratuitous space-monster action just for the sheer fun of it?

To my mind, Trek was in danger of forgetting that it was supposed to be fun as well as idealistic and high-minded. As another reviewer put it, the new movie gave TREK a much-needed dose of Viagra!
__________________
www.gregcox-author.com
Greg Cox is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.