RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,599
Posts: 5,404,668
Members: 24,870
Currently online: 476
Newest member: The Hooded Man

TrekToday headlines

Star Trek: Gold Key Archives Vol. 2 Comic
By: T'Bonz on Oct 1

Cumberbatch In War Of Roses Miniseries
By: T'Bonz on Oct 1

Trek 3 Filming Location Revealed
By: T'Bonz on Oct 1

October-November 2014 Trek Conventions And Appearances
By: T'Bonz on Sep 30

Cho Selfie TV Alert
By: T'Bonz on Sep 30

TPTB To Shatner: Shhh!
By: T'Bonz on Sep 30

Mystery Mini Vinyl Figure Display Box
By: T'Bonz on Sep 29

The Red Shirt Diaries Episode Five
By: T'Bonz on Sep 29

Shatner In Trek 3? Well Maybe
By: T'Bonz on Sep 28

Retro Review: Shadows and Symbols
By: Michelle on Sep 27


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek TV Series > Deep Space Nine

Deep Space Nine What We Left Behind, we will always have here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old December 29 2012, 09:17 AM   #61
FKnight
Commander
 
FKnight's Avatar
 
Re: Where was Earth's Leader?

Like any member planet, Earth would have to have a planetary government for pretty obvious reasons -- there are simply planetary affairs which need to be handled which have absolutely nothing to do with the Federation.

If the Earth planetary government was to be supplanted because Earth joined the Federation, I'd be the first one in line to sign up for Terra Prime. I don't want to be told how to live my life because of the way a bunch of people from other planets voted in San Francisco.

I doubt the people of Earth would allow themselves to be subject to Federation law without their own planetary government in place any more than Texas would disband its state government and submit only to Federal jurisdiction.
__________________
"You have been examined. Your ship must be destroyed. We make assumption you have a deity, or deities, or some such beliefs which comfort you. We therefore grant you ten Earth time periods known as minutes to make preparations."
FKnight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 29 2012, 12:42 PM   #62
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: Where was Earth's Leader?

there are simply planetary affairs which need to be handled which have absolutely nothing to do with the Federation.
Affairs would always be ideally handed at a specific level of hierarchy tailored for each affair. But all hierarchies in reality consist of only a limited number of levels, forcing people to go higher up or lower down than they would prefer to get their voice heard.

Setting a hierarchy level at "one planet" is awfully arbitrary. Some planets in Trek are self-contained units that only do minimal trade with each other, true - but OTOH we hear of mining worlds or agricultural worlds that apparently do major trade and not much else. The need for a President of Earth might not be particularly pressing, whereas mankind would have a desperate need for a President of Antarctica for the resources inherent in the location, and for a President of Sol, Alpha Centauri and Barneyworld for the economic unit defined by these three key systems.

Whether either of these local levels of government would be relevant to the defense of planet Earth is anybody's guess. Government hierarchy levels in general do not go hand in hand with the way the military defending said government organizes its forces; there's no military equivalent to a Mayor or a Senator, say, no city-level or 1/Xth-state-level defensive unit. Why should the existence of a President of Earth be necessary for the defense of Earth?

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 29 2012, 12:56 PM   #63
Guy Gardener
Fleet Admiral
 
Guy Gardener's Avatar
 
Location: In the lap of squalor I assure you.
Re: Where was Earth's Leader?

Not all worlds in the Federation are member worlds.

150 member worlds, who each bought a few dozen systems in when they joined up.
__________________
"Glitter is the herpes of arts and craft."

Troy Yingst. My Life as Liz

Last edited by Guy Gardener; December 29 2012 at 03:54 PM.
Guy Gardener is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 29 2012, 01:55 PM   #64
R. Star
Rear Admiral
 
R. Star's Avatar
 
Location: Shangri-La
Re: Where was Earth's Leader?

Guy Gardener wrote: View Post
Not all worlds in the Federation are member worlds.

150 member worlds, who each bought a few dozen systems in they joined up.
I would have thought all the colony worlds would have their own representation on the Council too. That's kind of a crappy deal if you're still tethered to a colonial empire that's a member of a federated state.
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams
R. Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 29 2012, 02:44 PM   #65
marksound
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Planet Carcazed
Re: Where was Earth's Leader?

If only someone onscreen would have said it ... "Take me to your leader ... " we'd all know where he was.
marksound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 29 2012, 07:34 PM   #66
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: Where was Earth's Leader?

That's kind of a crappy deal if you're still tethered to a colonial empire that's a member of a federated state.
If your population is 483 (not counting the tastybeests), you're probably thankful that you can outsource all the paperwork to a joint leader of thirteen like colonies...

As said, a planet isn't a particularly natural unit of self-governance, especially not with those DMZ colonies that appear to do a lot of stuff together and wither and die if isolated.

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 29 2012, 08:48 PM   #67
R. Star
Rear Admiral
 
R. Star's Avatar
 
Location: Shangri-La
Re: Where was Earth's Leader?

Timo wrote: View Post
That's kind of a crappy deal if you're still tethered to a colonial empire that's a member of a federated state.
If your population is 483 (not counting the tastybeests), you're probably thankful that you can outsource all the paperwork to a joint leader of thirteen like colonies...

As said, a planet isn't a particularly natural unit of self-governance, especially not with those DMZ colonies that appear to do a lot of stuff together and wither and die if isolated.

Timo Saloniemi
If that's the only example you're using, sure. But if you have a few million people, you're not going to be wanting folks literally light years away making the calls for you.

It would remind me of 19th century western US, a set requirement for statehood and until then you're a territory.
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams
R. Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 29 2012, 10:25 PM   #68
Guy Gardener
Fleet Admiral
 
Guy Gardener's Avatar
 
Location: In the lap of squalor I assure you.
Re: Where was Earth's Leader?

But it goes both ways.

All of earths colony worlds would have equal rights and responsibilities as any citizen of Earth.

All a colony is, is more Earth.

"Federation Governor"

We know about these people.
__________________
"Glitter is the herpes of arts and craft."

Troy Yingst. My Life as Liz
Guy Gardener is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 30 2012, 12:32 AM   #69
Phily B
Fleet Captain
 
Phily B's Avatar
 
Location: United Kingdom
View Phily B's Twitter Profile
Re: Where was Earth's Leader?

I always thought Earth at that point might've been a bit of an anarchist society which meant there wasn't a leader in the traditional sense.
Phily B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 30 2012, 01:17 AM   #70
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: Where was Earth's Leader?

Or, since it was the capital world, it would be split up more or less evenly between the 150 or so members. Between them, there'd be more governing than anybody could ever have use for...

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 30 2012, 06:10 AM   #71
Sci
Admiral
 
Sci's Avatar
 
Location: "We hold these truths to be self-evident..."
Re: Where was Earth's Leader?

I think a casual look at the history of the District of Columbia's fight for self-governance more than demonstrates the necessity of making sure your capital polity has both its own government, and equal representation in the legislature.
__________________
"Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic Socialism, as I understand it." - George Orwell, 1946
Sci is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 30 2012, 06:46 AM   #72
Guy Gardener
Fleet Admiral
 
Guy Gardener's Avatar
 
Location: In the lap of squalor I assure you.
Re: Where was Earth's Leader?

Humans don't have money.

How they determine ownership is probably questionable too.

Remember how whitey treated the Inidans?

Maybe the Humans of the 22nd century when all this was being set up got some glass beads and lost their homeworld?
__________________
"Glitter is the herpes of arts and craft."

Troy Yingst. My Life as Liz
Guy Gardener is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 30 2012, 09:36 PM   #73
T'Girl
Vice Admiral
 
T'Girl's Avatar
 
Location: t'girl
Re: Where was Earth's Leader?

Guy Gardener wrote: View Post
Maybe the Humans of the 22nd century when all this was being set up got some glass beads and lost their homeworld?
Remember what happen to the Ferengi home world's moon?

Guy Gardener wrote: View Post
150 member worlds, who each bought a few dozen systems in when they joined up.
LILY: How many planets are in this Federation?
PICARD: Over one hundred and fifty ...

I do kind of assume that means 150+ species home ("birth") planets. Let's say that Starfleet encounters a small interstellar republic, 10 species home worlds and each home world has 9 colonies. 100 planets total. They are convinced to join the Federation, I think that would mean only 10 additional seats on the council, not 100.

It would depend on what the Federation membership considers a "unit" for a seat.

Sci wrote: View Post
... the necessity of making sure your capital polity has both its own government, and equal representation in the legislature.
Residents of the Brazilian federal district elect eight representatives and three senators, but the federal district isn't a state. It isn't necessary for Washington DC to be a state, for it's resident to have representation in the federal legislature.

Moving the current Maryland state boundaries to enclose all the residential areas would be better. The areas wouldn't even have to be continuous, there could be "islands" of Maryland in the new, smaller District of Columbia. I believe the term is "pene-exclave."

To drive to one part of Washington State, you briefly have to enter Canada.











.
T'Girl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 30 2012, 09:53 PM   #74
George Steinbrenner
Fleet Admiral
 
George Steinbrenner's Avatar
 
Location: Mr. Laser Beam is in the visitor's bullpen
View George Steinbrenner's Twitter Profile
Re: Where was Earth's Leader?

^ It most definitely is necessary for DC to be a state. Its representative in Congress can't vote in it, therefore the representation means nothing. So 'taxation without representation' is very real for them.
__________________
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.
George Steinbrenner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 30 2012, 10:11 PM   #75
T'Girl
Vice Admiral
 
T'Girl's Avatar
 
Location: t'girl
Re: Where was Earth's Leader?

Mr. Laser Beam wrote: View Post
^ It most definitely is necessary for DC to be a state.
Again, if another nation can have a federal district that isn't a state, and the residents of that district can have elected representation in both houses of the federal government, (and vote for president), why does DC have to be a state to have the same arrangement in this nation?

The laws were changed to give DC a city council, change the laws again. I think there are better options (which I outlined), but DC doesn't have be a state.

Because that would put the federal government physically inside of one of the states.

T'Girl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.