|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#31 |
|
Commander
Location: South Texas
|
Re: Would You Be Ok With Khan Being A CGI Ricardo Montalban?
Make those puppies into double-D cups!
__________________
Of course I don't want to eat something called a spittle pod. Go away.
-Montgomery Scott- |
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: Would You Be Ok With Khan Being A CGI Ricardo Montalban?
I can see it now... Star Trek: The Motion Pector.
__________________
"JJ Abrams 'killing' ST is like saying Ringo killed the Beatles because he took over for Pete Best." - A Facebook Fan |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Admiral
Location: KingDaniel has fallen Into Darkness (in England)
|
Re: Would You Be Ok With Khan Being A CGI Ricardo Montalban?
Unless of course you only see him frozen in his pod for two seconds and then it gets blown up or something.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun video mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors. Episode One Episode Two |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: Great Britain
|
Re: Would You Be Ok With Khan Being A CGI Ricardo Montalban?
__________________
The Paradox Machine - My blog "Four things cannot be hidden - love, smoke, a pillar of fire and a man striding across the open bled." - Dune Messiah by Frank Herbert |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: Deck 13, section 21-Alpha
|
Re: Would You Be Ok With Khan Being A CGI Ricardo Montalban?
__________________
It's not "I could care less", it's "I couldn't care less." If you have failed to grasp this concept you should probably vacate the internet. |
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Sacramento, CA
|
Re: Would You Be Ok With Khan Being A CGI Ricardo Montalban?
__________________
One Day I hope to be the Man my Cat thinks I am Where are we going? And why are we in this Handbasket?
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Commodore
Location: Somewhere Far Beyond
|
Re: Would You Be Ok With Khan Being A CGI Ricardo Montalban?
__________________
Use Only As Directed |
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Commodore
Location: Ekkaia
|
Re: Would You Be Ok With Khan Being A CGI Ricardo Montalban?
__________________
Are you casting aspersions on my asparagus? |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Lieutenant
|
Re: Would You Be Ok With Khan Being A CGI Ricardo Montalban?
__________________
Balok knows all!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: Would You Be Ok With Khan Being A CGI Ricardo Montalban?
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Commodore
Location: Ekkaia
|
Re: Would You Be Ok With Khan Being A CGI Ricardo Montalban?
__________________
Are you casting aspersions on my asparagus? |
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Captain
|
Re: Would You Be Ok With Khan Being A CGI Ricardo Montalban?
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Commodore
Location: Where reality ends and illusion begins
|
Re: Would You Be Ok With Khan Being A CGI Ricardo Montalban?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Writer
|
Re: Would You Be Ok With Khan Being A CGI Ricardo Montalban?
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Includes purchasing links for Only Superhuman, on sale now! Updated 12/30/12 with annotations for the novel. Written Worlds -- My blog |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: UK
|
Re: Would You Be Ok With Khan Being A CGI Ricardo Montalban?
It's the same reason why each of the new actors in the roles of Kirk and co. were chosen as much because of their resemblances and similar features to their predecessors, as their talent. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:51 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.



















