RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 126,015
Posts: 4,758,581
Members: 22,648
Currently online: 649
Newest member: Filmigos

TrekToday headlines

Retro Review: Bar Association
By: Michelle on May 18

Quinto Conan Appearance Clip
By: T'Bonz on May 17

Star Trek After Darkness
By: T'Bonz on May 17

Pine Kimmel Video
By: T'Bonz on May 17

Quinto On Conan Tonight
By: T'Bonz on May 17

Facebook Star Trek Slots Game
By: T'Bonz on May 16

Bing Klingon Language Translator
By: T'Bonz on May 16

a+ Magazine App Debuts With Saldana
By: T'Bonz on May 16

Star Trek And NASA Meetup
By: T'Bonz on May 16

Urban: Bone’s Metaphors
By: T'Bonz on May 16


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old December 27 2012, 06:45 AM   #31
Kruezerman
Commander
 
Kruezerman's Avatar
 
Location: South Texas
Re: Would You Be Ok With Khan Being A CGI Ricardo Montalban?

Why not just go the full Facebook Photoshop?

Make those puppies into double-D cups!
__________________
Of course I don't want to eat something called a spittle pod. Go away.
-Montgomery Scott-
Kruezerman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old December 27 2012, 08:52 AM   #32
Devon
Fleet Captain
 
Devon's Avatar
 
Re: Would You Be Ok With Khan Being A CGI Ricardo Montalban?

And what about the chest stunt double?

I can see it now... Star Trek: The Motion Pector.
__________________
"JJ Abrams 'killing' ST is like saying Ringo killed the Beatles because he took over for Pete Best." - A Facebook Fan
Devon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 27 2012, 11:41 AM   #33
King Daniel
Admiral
 
King Daniel's Avatar
 
Location: KingDaniel has fallen Into Darkness (in England)
Re: Would You Be Ok With Khan Being A CGI Ricardo Montalban?

The Mirrorball Man wrote: View Post
I think it would be ridiculous. What's wrong with hiring a flesh and blood actor?
This. If they can recast Kirk and Spock and make the Enterprise look different, Khan can be played by someone else too.

Unless of course you only see him frozen in his pod for two seconds and then it gets blown up or something.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun video mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors.
Episode One
Episode Two
King Daniel is online now   Reply With Quote
Old December 27 2012, 11:50 AM   #34
DalekJim
Fleet Captain
 
DalekJim's Avatar
 
Location: Great Britain
Re: Would You Be Ok With Khan Being A CGI Ricardo Montalban?

I would only be satisfied with a puppet version.
__________________

"Four things cannot be hidden - love, smoke, a pillar of fire and a man striding across the open bled." - Dune Messiah by Frank Herbert
DalekJim is online now   Reply With Quote
Old December 27 2012, 12:47 PM   #35
Blip
Fleet Captain
 
Blip's Avatar
 
Location: Deck 13, section 21-Alpha
Re: Would You Be Ok With Khan Being A CGI Ricardo Montalban?

CGI Arnie's body was actually another, younger bodybuilder -- Roland Kickinger.
__________________
It's not "I could care less", it's "I couldn't care less." If you have failed to grasp this concept you should probably vacate the internet.
Blip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 27 2012, 03:20 PM   #36
Sindatur
Rear Admiral
 
Sindatur's Avatar
 
Location: Sacramento, CA
Re: Would You Be Ok With Khan Being A CGI Ricardo Montalban?

Flake wrote: View Post
Maybe if we can get some of Ricardo Montalbans DNA (off a hair brush?) and some Temporal RNA we can create a clone which will undergo rapid ageing that could be ready in time for a third Trek movie?
Yea, this is a much better idea then the CGI route
__________________
One Day I hope to be the Man my Cat thinks I am

Where are we going? And why are we in this Handbasket?
Sindatur is online now   Reply With Quote
Old December 27 2012, 04:45 PM   #37
EnsignRicky
Commodore
 
EnsignRicky's Avatar
 
Location: Somewhere Far Beyond
Re: Would You Be Ok With Khan Being A CGI Ricardo Montalban?

That sounds like the kind of lame brained idea that could only be cooked up by a Toon.
__________________
Use Only As Directed
EnsignRicky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 27 2012, 05:18 PM   #38
Set Harth
Commodore
 
Set Harth's Avatar
 
Location: Ekkaia
Re: Would You Be Ok With Khan Being A CGI Ricardo Montalban?

Flake wrote: View Post
Maybe if we can get some of Ricardo Montalbans DNA (off a hair brush?) and some Temporal RNA we can create a clone which will undergo rapid ageing that could be ready in time for a third Trek movie?
At the rate it's taking them to get these films out, you probably wouldn't even need the rapid aging.
__________________
Are you casting aspersions on my asparagus?
Set Harth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 28 2012, 06:01 AM   #39
Matt S
Lieutenant
 
Matt S's Avatar
 
Re: Would You Be Ok With Khan Being A CGI Ricardo Montalban?

I'd rather see Kermit the Frog play Khan than a CGI RM
__________________
Balok knows all!!!!!
Matt S is online now   Reply With Quote
Old December 28 2012, 10:12 AM   #40
Donald Draper
Fleet Captain
 
Re: Would You Be Ok With Khan Being A CGI Ricardo Montalban?

Some how this connects with Lucille Ball. I know it must.
Donald Draper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 29 2012, 10:59 PM   #41
Set Harth
Commodore
 
Set Harth's Avatar
 
Location: Ekkaia
Re: Would You Be Ok With Khan Being A CGI Ricardo Montalban?

Orrrrrrr-ci, you got some splainin' to do!!!!!!
__________________
Are you casting aspersions on my asparagus?
Set Harth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 29 2012, 11:45 PM   #42
DEWLine
Captain
 
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Send a message via AIM to DEWLine Send a message via Yahoo to DEWLine
Re: Would You Be Ok With Khan Being A CGI Ricardo Montalban?

Just hire an actor. He doesn't have to look like Montalban.
__________________
Yours,

Dwight Williams
Illustrator/Writer
DEWLine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 29 2012, 11:53 PM   #43
The Keeper
Commodore
 
The Keeper's Avatar
 
Location: Where reality ends and illusion begins
Re: Would You Be Ok With Khan Being A CGI Ricardo Montalban?

Set Harth wrote: View Post
Orrrrrrr-ci, you got some splainin' to do!!!!!!



I suppose it could be thought a CGI Khan might better help general audiences get it but if they don't know the name then they won't understand the face.

New actor. Doesn't really matter though, it's not Khan.
The Keeper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 29 2012, 11:56 PM   #44
Christopher
Writer
 
Christopher's Avatar
 
Re: Would You Be Ok With Khan Being A CGI Ricardo Montalban?

^Yeah, really, I doubt that "general audiences" today would know who Ricardo Montalban was. Even if they did, they probably wouldn't see him as a draw.
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Includes purchasing links for Only Superhuman, on sale now! Updated 12/30/12 with annotations for the novel.

Written Worlds -- My blog
Christopher is online now   Reply With Quote
Old December 30 2012, 02:30 AM   #45
Mr Silver
Rear Admiral
 
Location: UK
Re: Would You Be Ok With Khan Being A CGI Ricardo Montalban?

DEWLine wrote: View Post
Just hire an actor. He doesn't have to look like Montalban.
But he has to look like Khan, in the same way that Montalban fitted the image that Gene L. Coon and Carey Wilber conceived of.

It's the same reason why each of the new actors in the roles of Kirk and co. were chosen as much because of their resemblances and similar features to their predecessors, as their talent.
Mr Silver is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.