|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Science Fiction & Fantasy Farscape, Babylon 5, Star Wars, Firefly, vampires, genre books and film. |
| View Poll Results: Which film did you like best (even with reservations)? | |||
| Star Trek (2009) |
|
60 | 67.42% |
| Prometheus (2012) |
|
6 | 6.74% |
| The Dark Knight Rises (2012) |
|
18 | 20.22% |
| I liked them all equally... |
|
1 | 1.12% |
| I didn't care for any of them... |
|
4 | 4.49% |
| Voters: 89. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Admiral
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
|
A three film comparison/face-off...
Three films, all in genres I generally like, have drawn a lot of polarized opinion. So I'd like to see some other views on them. The Dark Knight Rises (2012) - Lots of us like Batman, but not everyone liked Christopher Nolan's take on him and his world. I liked Nolan's overall take, but while I think there's a fair story in TDR I think it needed to be fleshed out more. A lot is made of serious issues not being well addressed in the film, but this is after all a superhero film and you're not likely to see serious issues addressed there beyond broad strokes. This is essentially entertainment and not a documentary. TDKR also suffers in comparison to The Dark Knight (which, honestly, has a lot of its own issues) and yet that film is considered a near masterpiece. After all is said and done, even with its missteps, it was a decent enough film and entertaining and I think it's the best of the lot. Nolan made an effort to make Batman and his world seem more realistic than other films of the genre, but he still took genre specific liberties so it really can't be compared to truly dramatic films that address issues Prometheus (2012) - The early Alien films (particularly 1 and 2) are considered classics and as such cast a rather large shadow to step into. Prometheus certainly follows in terms of visual impact and cinematography---it's a gorgeous film to look at. I didn't find it a bad film to watch either although I have reservations over how some of the characters behaved. Again, like TDKR, the this film needed to be fleshed out a bit more and have some things made a bit more clear to eliminate confusion. It's fine to raise questions, but not everything should be left ambiguous. Again, like TDKR, this is an ambitious film that needed its creator to step back and give it a critical look before releasing it as is. Prometheus also compares with another ambitious film, Avatar, which I think was a lot more disappointing. I still quite enjoyed Prometheus, but it could have been better with some clarifications and a little smarter thinking. This one comes in second. Star Trek (2009) - This should have been a no-brainer: revisit and reboot TOS, my absolute favourite television series overall. It could have been done...but it wasn't. My issue isn't that it was rebooted---that was practically inevitable. My issue is that everything that I love about the original series and Star Trek in general went missing here. In previous films spun off the original series I can critique every one of them to some extent or other yet they all still managed to resonate with the original subject matter to some degree or other. Rather than criticize every single thing I disliked I think I can summarize by saying that the intent was to remake Star Trek into something else, to effectively make it more like another franchise, Star Wars. The argument has been used that ST09 is similar enough to TOS' lesser episodes and hence it's still faithful. I reject that view because those lesser efforts were in the minority and thus not truly representative of the majority of better work that enthused so many people and made the show popular. Would it not have been better to emulate and evoke the likes of "The Corbomite Maneuver," "Balance Of Terror" and "The Doomsday Machine" rather than the likes of "I, Mudd" and "Spock's Brain?" Hell, it isn't even on the level of "Spock's Brain" which has a legitimate SF story at the heart of it. At any rate I didn't recognize anything of what I love about TOS in ST09---the film and its elements had simply been pushed too far afield into a form that irritated me. I hope I've been specific and civil enough. ![]() Anyone else?
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991 |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Admiral
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
|
Re: A three film comparison/face-off...
It is the same basic issue, though, in regards to which film works most effectively for you and why.
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991 |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Admiral
Location: House of Kang, now with ridges
|
Re: A three film comparison/face-off...
__________________
Nerys Myk's Midnight In Never Land A novel of Dark Fantasy @ Amazon.com |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: A three film comparison/face-off...
The Dark Knight series is so deliberate in its presentation that it veers way to often into downright Dulls-ville. Prometheus, while the most visually stunning of the three, just feels wrong. Every action just seems to be driving us toward people getting eaten by monsters, whether it makes sense or not. While I'm pretty harsh towards Star Trek 2009, it is the most entertaining of the three. And that's why I watch TV/movies to begin with.
__________________
Boobies are evil!!! |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: The PIT, in Utah...
|
Re: A three film comparison/face-off...
Dark Knight Rises: Good but not great, and kinda slow compared to Begins and Dark Knight. Bane reminded me more of the Toxic Avenger than the Bane from the comics, and frankly "The comic Bane wouldn't have worked" doesn't qualify as an explanation for me, because it's always something said by some lame studio exec too afraid to actually try it and find out for sure. That's why we get things like Galactus and Parallax as giant gas clouds in movies. Anne Hathaway's portrayal as Catwoman was better than I expected. Prometheus: My favorite of the three, because unlike a lot of people I had no problem understanding the motivations and agendas of the characters involved and on top of that it really was visually stunning. The only off thing for me was The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo turning herself into The Girl With The Half-Assed Abdominal Scar. And of course, there was Charlize Theron doing the mummy-wrapped pushups.
__________________
"Actually that one scene is quite representative of the film: driving a classic off a cliff and thoroughly trashing it." -Warped9 on ST09 |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Admiral
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
|
Re: A three film comparison/face-off...
None of the concepts were particularly new in Prometheus either, but I liked how they came off better. And I liked the more effective building of tension. Even flawed I could still be engaged by Prometheus. Avatar just made me yawn mostly. Agreed.
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Re: A three film comparison/face-off...
Batman had a lot of dumb plot contrivances that I hated, while Prometheus had as many dumb character contrivances that I hated. I'd give both of those an easy thumbs down (though at least Prometheus was gorgeous to WATCH, but you need a little more than visuals these days. Batman had very little to recommend as far as I'm concerned.) |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Starfleet Command, The City that Knows How
|
Re: A three film comparison/face-off...
Prometheus: silly space horror TDKR: grim crime thriller ... These are very different genres; I find it difficult to make useful comparisons across such distances. But I voted for Trek. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Admiral
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
|
Re: A three film comparison/face-off...
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991 |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: Haifa, Israel
|
Re: A three film comparison/face-off...
Out of the three Nolan's Batman movies, I liked the first one the most. TDKR was just average and way too long. Prometheus is the disappointment of the year for me, one of the worst movies I've ever seen. It was pretty to look at, but the look of it is the only positive thing I can say about the movie.
__________________
Chemistry is physics without a thought Mathematics is physics without a purpose |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: A three film comparison/face-off...
__________________
Boobies are evil!!! |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: A three film comparison/face-off...
__________________
Angelic Hellfire - My novel. Man of Yesterday - My blog, in which I'm writing a superhero story. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: A three film comparison/face-off...
__________________
JJverse Star Trek...is gonna rock again! On May 17, 2013! |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Commodore
Location: Ekkaia
|
Re: A three film comparison/face-off...
__________________
Are you casting aspersions on my asparagus? |
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Captain
|
Re: A three film comparison/face-off...
As for the main question, I haven't seen Prometheus. The dark Knight rises was horrible, but slightly less so than TDK, since it atleast felt like something was happening sometimes and didn't lull you to sleep, even if the plot was still stupid. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:55 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.


















